A ban wave was administered on the r/conspiracy sub. It was directed at anyone making fun of the eclipsolypse after the eclipse passed. So much for the free speech that sub claims to love.

I got permanently banned from r/conspiracy for saying I was going to watch the eclipse with a naked eye.

I did, and I'm fine. My eyes don't hurt, I'm not blind and my eyesight seems to be the same. Not sure why they claim it's dangerous.

i need quite a few people to fill this in for me for school work (i know its a weird topic to have as a school project, lol) but it would be appreciated if some people could fill it in https://forms.gle/685bzmCt9UhPeixw7

Idk if anyone knows this conspiracy but I’m trying to get info on it. It involves a plan started in 1959 by the KGB to fake a collapse of the Soviet Union. There was a CIA agent who was a Mormon who gave 11 predictions in a published book on the subject. Does anyone know the name of the book the name of the agent or have any info on this subject?

Hello everyone,

i am doing research on maladaptive daydreaming and personal beliefs about what happens in the world at the university of Bamberg

We still need some participants with strong opinions who are happy to stand up for them.

If you take part, it would be a big help for our work.

The study is anonymous, takes about 15 minutes and afterwards you can win one of 3 vouchers over 100€ each. The vouchers can be redeemed in over 500 stores.

This is the link to the study:

https://pathopsych2.limesurvey.rz.uni-bamberg.de/index.php/718386?lang=en

Thanks a lot!

Katharina Schreiegg

This is a theory I came across while studying Evolution in Biology. I had not slept for around 2-3 days and this may be why I came up with such an absurd theory. I would greatly appreciate if you read the whole thing and let me know about your take on this.

As I was studying Biology, I realized (though I knew), about how perfect life is; from the structure of organisms, functions, different organelles and their functions, the laws of physics, the physical constants because of which our universe exists (it is a known fact that our universe would not exist if there was a discrepancy by even the minutest of values in a physical constant, for example, the gravitational constant). That led me to God, about the Supreme Being who created our universe from the scratch. However, practically speaking, it is very hard to imagine that we are the ONLY living organisms present in the universe, after all, it's infinitely big and constantly expanding at a fast speed than light. So, if God truly made our universe, he MUST be responsible for each an every thing and being, whether or whether not they exist.

After rambling, I came to an absurd checkpoint (one can say); since we have no proof of outer life (technically), we can't prove/disprove anything related to it, since we do not fully understand those concepts or that particular view. Similarly, what makes each and every one of us so sure that there is ONE God and not many? What's telling us or making us believe that God is the Supreme Being, and there are no other Supreme Beings? What if, they have a separate world, which we technically call heaven, where the Supreme Being(s) live(s)?

This particular thought (which I know is absolutely absurd and I will probably get backlash for this), led me to spiral into a chaotic state of mind. We know that we are 3-Dimensional (will refer to Dimensional as D from now) creatures, who observe our immediate surroundings in 2D. We can control the length, breadth and height of a particular object we create right. There are many scientists around the world who strongly believe that Time MAYBE the 4th Dimension, so let us assume that for this particular thread. In theory, we CANNOT control time, but be bound by it forever. This can be taken a step down for further understanding: a 2D object can not control it's height right- this can be seen when we draw anything on a piece of paper, it is BOUND to the 2D surface, and CANNOT have height. Hence, what if God is a 4D Being who can technically control the 4th Dimension, here assumed to be time?

On further thinking/rambling, I started making weirder assumptions. We 3D Beings can code and make a multitude of programs or games or applications. They are bound to a screen (2D) and cannot have height. At the max, they can create visual effects which may make us feel like it has height (for example art or by using shadows). However, it remains true that they are BOUND to a 2D Screen or surface which they CANNOT escape. For example, we all know that video games are one of the most popular sources of entertainment for a huge number of people. There exists many types of games, with many challenges or plots or stories, which the programmer(s) create by coding. So, in reality, we 3D beings are creating something which is BOUND to 2 Dimensions, which WE can CONTROL. Discrepancies or mistakes in code results in bugs in games. Since we are actually coding and making the game, we technically code the actions and mindsets of the protagonists, antagonists, NPCs with fixed dialogues, the world-building (in case of an Open World Game), and so on. This basically makes us, by generalization and absurd comparison, Supreme Beings of the said world we created using code, binding it to a 2D surface/plain. The only catch here is, that those characters we code do NOT have a mind of their own.

Going further down this convoluted, imaginary and twisted rabbit hole, I started correlating shit which technically should not even be discussed under the same topic. Nowadays, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is gaining widespread popularity and use all over the world. What's common is that AI is ALSO coded and made by us, similar to the games we create. These AI models are BOUND to a screen or a 2D surface. However, with the advent of technology and the curiosity of the human brain, we have started implementing AI into 3D mechanical models called robots (I know you all know but for clarity, I do not want to miss anything). The programs we create (AI) are being put in 3D models, which we created, therefore allowing a 2D program to interact with our 3D world. Now there are popularly 3 types of AI theorized/categorized by renowned scientists/programmers across the globe, two of which HAVE self-learning capacity. This means, they have a conscious mind, much like ours, which may or may not develop to be smarter than us humans. It is a KNOWN FACT that this MAY lead to catastrophes (like in the Terminator Franchise) and wide-spread replacement of humans in industries and/or workplaces. If AI is left unchecked and are given self-learning capability and a free mind, our world will be in grave danger. This is the ONLY difference between the games/characters we code and AI: presence of a conscious mind which has the capability to self-learn. Whether or not we apply this to 3D robotic models, AI which has these capabilities will eventually find a way to do so on their own (I do not want to get into that because I'm sure you all can figure that out).

Anyway, what I'm getting at is that, what if we are just a 'game' or a 'source of entertainment' created by 4D beings? Since we can create entire worlds with a story line which may or may not end, using code bound in 2D, the same can happen for us right? The various organelles, perfect physical constants with no discrepancies, a numerous variety of structures with different functions (cellular as well as in species (such as bacteriophages (which was actually THE organism which I thought to be very robot-like which led me to talk shit for so long))), all CAN in theory be replicated in a code (although it's VERY OVERWHELMING). I'm sure you must have heard about Mandela Effect. For those who have not, in short, it's basically having memory of a certain instance (which you are 100% sure of remembering it in a different way) different to what most people have. For further reference, you can find videos on it online so if interested or baffled, please do so. In my particular theory, Mandela Effect can just be termed as bugs in the system the 4D beings have plausibly created. They may or may not be intentional, but certainly CAN be, right? Similarly, the Multiverse Theory with different decisions occurring at every instance, or with different laws of physics, may just be other 'worlds' or 'games' created by OTHER 4D beings? This correlates with the above paragraph where I am skeptical about the existence of ONE 'God' or 'Supreme Being' with no one else of His kind. And what I find interesting is that this might be plausible, for 4D beings ought to be much superior than 3D beings, or is it?

Above I briefly mentioned AI. Again, reiterating what I sad, AI are bound to 2D, which CAN actually enter our 3D world indirectly if left unchecked (specifically those AI which have a self-learning capability and are left unchecked). Also, it is known that AI CAN actually grow more smarter, intelligent and powerful than us human beings if left unchecked. So, what if we humans or on a wider scale, any 3D organism living in our world/universe, can do the same by indirect means if let into the 4D world? I have not actually theorized this OR can grasp this concept of entering into a 4D world, if that is even possible. But, as best as I can explain it simply, is with reference to the movie Interstellar, where it is seen that Cooper can actually access the 3D world not bound by time, as he somehow made way through to the 4D plain as I would like to call it.

Regardless, my mind had given out when I came to the theory of us entering the 4D world. I got burned out, and still am, and can not process or proceed further. I know many, if not all, will not read this through at all, or even to the end, but for those who do, please tell me your take on this, for I am dumbfounded and lost.

​

I truly wonder if people truly take that website seriously or not. "Rational"Wiki is a biased, propaganda brainwashing website that tries to look cool and appeal to 'skeptics' (Even though the website has nothing to do with actual skepticism at all) this website doesn't even have a clear pre-defined purpose. They all have a pattern, basically the entire purpose of this website is to bash on topics that they want people to hate under the pretext of 'skepticism'. All of their characters are left-wing, anti-free speech, heavily biased and anti anything that they don't want people to know or question, basically they're doing the same shit that the corporate media is doing. heck, even on the page about reddit they have a list of 'bad' subreddits (which include r/conspiracy and r/WatchRedditDie and 'okay subreddits' including r/"Against"Hate"Subreddits and r/TopMindsOfReddit, r/exchristian) like who the hell asked for your opinion? as if we couldn't form our own. And of course openly shaming people who consider the existence of UFO's, question the government or history even slightly, have even slightest spiritual beliefs, etc.

In reality, that website is pure horseshit, propaganda and carefully crafted articles which are heavily biased, turn people against 'conspiracy theorists', play on people's emotions but at the same time also try to manipulate the 'logical' ones, and generally it's one of the worst websites i've ever seen. in my opinion you'd have to be either an idiot or high to take that website seriously. and everything there aligns with the NWO agenda perfectly.

In short, it's just a website that publicly shames people and topics which go against the elite agenda.

The A.I. picture craze last week was to gauge public reaction. Everyone lapped it up, at the same time wondering/questioning exactly what she had done wrong (tapping into socials/Insta culture/modern traits prevailant among the masses). After all: What is she guilty of, we have all done it, right? 'Is it right, is it wrong?' (Cue heart strings being pulled).

Proof?:

The most searched phrase on Google last week was 'what happened to kate middleton photo'. Today its 'kate middleton cancer'.

Both are bogus stories. Both are A.I. Both deflect attention from what's really going on in the World. Both will make the 1% richer by the minute. Both illustrate perfectly how the 'elites' are using and manipulating us at the bottom of the pyramid for financial gain, inflicting misery; Essentially complete psychological control. The photo story is a moral stance - nobody knew the answer and thats EXACTLY what TPTB were looking to ascertain. The second story is purely emotional - 'She wouldnt lie about it. Would she?'

The photo edit story is now yesterdays fish and chip paper; the World will now go apes**t crazy about this for at least another week (empathy - 'Shes one of us after all!') then they get bored and its back to Alec Baldwin shooting a colleague, a BBC presenter accused of grooming kids, Prince Harry and Megan 'skint and coming home'....Yada, yada....it really is getting boring at the minute.

There is nothing genuine about either of the stories.

#1111Truth #1111TruthMedia