If you mirror a circular fractal and push the mirror together towards a Vesica Piscis it’s extraordinary that the morphology of a beautiful human just appears….

So my question to you all is why is that? I would love to know the answer!

Isn’t Geometry timeless like way before humans turned up!

So why is our likeness embedded in Geometry?

Discuss!

Earth is at the “node” of an extremely intricate, cymatic-like structure. Earth sits near the barycentre of a binary system: the Sun and Mars. Because of relativity, all reference points are “valid”—it is not “incorrect” to model a geocentric system; the leading heliocentric model is not any more “correct”. Modelling as this binary system has revealed other orbital resonances between pairs of bodies to be multiples of our own Moon’s synodic period, revealing a very harmonious, rythmic, fractal-like resonance.

I find it very interesting that high-level human consciousness has developed at the “node” of this complex resonant system. Through meditative practices, you realize within yourself that you are the “still-point”—the present moment, Here & Now, is the only still-point within a changing universe.

More information here, with a really fun simulator that you can play with yourself: www.tychos.space/

Rethinking Geometry: From Static Shapes to Dynamic Patterns

When most of us think about geometry, we tend to imagine static shapes - even if they're three-dimensional, we visualize them as fixed, solid objects existing in space. However, I've come to realize this simplistic view of geometry isn't just naive - it actually hinders our intuitive understanding of nature.

Here's the key insight: there is no such thing as 'physical' geometry in the Universe. Even crystal lattices, which appear to be perfect examples of geometric forms, are made of atoms - which themselves are made of energetic events within fields. What we perceive as geometry is actually the interaction of energetic patterns. Geometry, in its truest sense, is describing information - relationships of position, distance, and organization.

From Lines to Events

To understand cosmic geometric patterns - whether in the geometry of space or atoms - we need to realize that every vertex, every corner of a shape, is centered on an energetic event. Take a simple example: three energetic events in two dimensions. What we see here is the blueprint for a triangle - but the triangle doesn't exist as a physical object. Rather, it exists as an intrinsic relationship between three circles/events.

But why does this triangular geometry arise? To understand this, we need to define what we mean by 'event'. Imagine each event as a vorticular flow process with both push and pull dynamics - a radiative and compressive dynamic creating a encapsulated toroidal flow. This perspective helps us understand how certain geometries naturally arise as systems seek equilibrium - similar to how repelling magnets in a confined space will crystallize into geometric patterns based on their relationships and the distances between their centerpoints.

The Fundamental Forms

The three-circle triangle represents an inherently stable form - it's the most primary 2-dimensional shape, encoding the smallest area per given perimeter. Its 3-dimensional analogue is the tetrahedron, which similarly represents the smallest encoding of 3D volume per unit perimeter. Again, the tetrahedron isn't a solid object but rather lines connecting centerpoints of toroidal vortices, something like this.

However, when we think of these spheres as energetic events, we realize we've introduced polarity - a directional vector of force that creates unbalance depending on your frame of reference. How do we balance this most basic 3-dimensional energetic form? Through polarization! This brings us to one of the most 'sacred' geometries - the merkaba or star tetrahedron, which can be inscribed in a larger sphere (and then again...and again...)

Buckminster Fuller's Insights

Buckminster Fuller pioneered much of this thinking through his work on Synergetics. He recognized the triangle as the basic unit of structure and the tetrahedron as the basic unit of energetic form. Crucially, he understood the need to redefine geometry in terms of energetic events rather than static shapes.

He predicted that gravity would emerge naturally from geometry in this way.

Fuller proposed that space itself might be structured as a fractal tetrahedron - what he called the isotropic vector matrix (IVM). Like this. One of the most fascinating properties of this IVM lattice is that it contains an even more important geometry for spatial dynamics - the cube-octahedron, which Fuller termed the 'vector equilibrium'. Here it is in the polarized IVM.

The Vector Equilibrium and Dynamic Systems

The cube-octahedron or 'vector equilibrium' represents a perfectly balanced 3D polygon. When we apply our sphere-packing energetic event dynamic, its significance becomes clear - every vector is equal length, including both edge and center vectors. When surrounded by other spherical energetic events, this shape essentially creates a false vacuum - all forces cancel out to equilibrium.

This is how we should imagine the 'false vacuum' of space. Apparently empty, but actually completely full. The energy is just (in most cases) at equilibrium.

The vector equilibrium has another remarkable property - it "jitterbugs." It has a built-in pumping mechanism that causes torque, collapse, and expansion. Notice how it passes through dodecahedral and icosahedral geometries as it pumps. This jitterbug motion creates a torquing flow of the original spheres in and out of singularity.

The VE collapse actually traces a double torus. Remember - it's not the geometry making this motion, but rather energetic spheres. The geometry simply provides the intrinsic model.

As Fuller noted: "The vector equilibrium is the true zero reference of the energetic mathematics... the zerophase of conceptual integrity inherent in the positive and negative asymmetries that propagate the differentials of consciousness."

This vision parallels John Wheeler's geometrodynamics, developed in the 1950s and 60s. While Fuller approached geometry from a design and energetic perspective, Wheeler was attempting to describe quantum mechanics and gravity as manifestations of geometric patterns in the structure of spacetime itself. Both men, from different directions, arrived at similar insights about the fundamental nature of space being dynamic rather than static.

The Fractal Nature of Space

What happens when we fractalize the star tetrahedron? We get this pattern, continuing infinitely. This is Nassim's 64 tetrahedron matrix, containing two octaves of vector equilibrium that double in size. The structure is rich with phi ratios - found in the icosahedron, dodecahedron, in the binary doubling of its size, and in the VE collapse.

Instead of visualizing spacetime as a 2d plane in which objects create gravity wells, think of space like this - nested fractal toroidal boundaries.

Imagining this shape scaling from cosmological to Planck scales reveals jitterbugging geometries made of jitterbugging geometries, leading to a fractal toroidal boundarized spin model. Toroidal systems made of toroidal systems made of toroidal systems. Electrons toroidally flowing in atoms toroidally flowing in planets toroidally flowing in solar systems toroidally flowing in galaxies toroidally flowing in superclusters toroidally flowing in the Universe.

A crucial realization about these scaling boundarized toroidal flows: the smaller the scale (or higher the fractalization), the higher the pumping rate of the cube-octahedron. This is simply because it has a shorter distance to travel. The Planck scale represents the 'fastest pumping' - the highest energy and frequency. This perfectly aligns with what we observe in the cosmos - smaller quantum oscillations carry higher energy. This density gradient across scales powers everything.

Ancient Knowledge and Modern Physics

The 64 tetrahedron, when viewed in 2D, creates the flower of life pattern found on the wall of the Osirion Temple in Egypt.

Remarkably, you can almost construct a descriptive model of reality using only the geometries inherent in the 2-dimensional flower of life and an understanding of synergetics - knowledge that has been preserved on temple walls for millennia.

As Fuller predicted: "Omnitriangulated geodesic spheres consisting exclusively of three-way interacting great circles are realizations of gravitational field patterns. The gravitational field will ultimately be disclosed as ultra high-frequency tensegrity geodesic spheres. Nothing else."

Sound’s vibrations effecting a physical object. Could these vibrations actually affect consciousness and perspective? It is known in psychology that certain chord progressions can evoke certain emotions. Could specific frequencies make our brains work in specific ways or would our brain work only based on past experience and its current understanding? If there is already info on this let me know. What do y’all think?! There’s more to this that I feel ancient civilizations figured out… possible levitation. Possible spiritual connections. Dimensional relationships? Fascinating.

I hope the brain cell havers inside of my brain cells are having a good time(and that the brain cell havers within themselves are having a good time, ad infinitum), I hope the brain cell haver we exist within is having a good time(and that the brain cell haver they exist in is having a good time, ad infinitum), and I hope the brain cell havers that exist on the level of “is” that I exist on are having a good time.

I just want the concept of “is” to have a good time on all levels.

See: `Consciousness is Every(where)ness, Expressed Locally: Bashar and Seth´ in: IPI Letters, Feb. 2024, downloadable at https://ipipublishing.org/index.php/ipil/article/view/53  Combine it with Tom Campbell and Jim Elvidge. Tom Campbell is a physicist who has been acting as head experimentor at the Monroe Institute. He wrote the book `My Big Toe`. Toe standing for Theory of Everything. It is HIS Theory of Everything which implies that everybody else can have or develop a deviating Theory of Everything. That would be fine with him. According to Tom Campbell, reality is virtual, not `real´ in the sense we understand it. To us this does not matter. If we have a cup of coffee, the taste does not change if we understand that the coffee, i.e. the liquid is composed of smaller parts, like little `balls´, the molecules and the atoms. In the same way the taste of the coffee would not change if we are now introduced to the Virtual Reality Theory. According to him reality is reproduced at the rate of Planck time (10 to the power of 43 times per second). Thus, what we perceive as so-called outer reality is constantly reproduced. It vanishes before it is then reproduced again. And again and again and again. Similar to a picture on a computer screen. And this is basically what Bashar is describing as well. Everything collapses to a zero point. Constantly. And it is reproduced one unit of Planck time later. Just to collapse again and to be again reproduced. And you are constantly in a new universe/multiverse. And all the others as well. There is an excellent video on youtube (Tom Campbell and Jim Elvidge). The book `My Big ToE´ is downloadable as well. I recommend starting with the video. Each universe is static, but when you move across some of them in a specific order (e.g. nos 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, etc.) you get the impression of movement and experience. Similar to a movie screen. If you change (the vibration of) your belief systems, you have access to frames nos 6, 11, 16, 21, 26 etc. You would then be another person in another universe, having different experiences. And there would be still `a version of you´ having experiences in a reality that is composed of frames nos. 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 etc. But you are not the other you, and the other you is not you. You are in a different reality and by changing your belief systems consciously you can navigate across realities less randomly and in a more targeted way. That is basically everything the Bashar teachings are about.

The premise of this post is that the proton represents a holographic encoding of cosmic parameters, characterized by geometric relationships at the Planck scale. This framework enables the derivation of multiple cosmic parameters through purely geometric considerations.

Mathematical Relationships

Required values:

Proton charge radius (r_p) = 8.414 × 10^-14 cm
Planck length (l_p) = 1.616 × 10^-33 cm
Planck mass (m_p) = 2.176 × 10^-5 g        

Postulate 1:

The proton contains the virtual mass energy of all protons (i.e. holographic):

Proton volume (V_p) = (4/3)π(r_p)³ 
                    = 2.495 × 10^-39 cm³

Planck sphere volume (V_ps) = (4/3)π(l_p/2)³ 
                            = 1.947 × 10^-99 cm³

Number of Planck spheres (N_ps) = V_p / V_ps 
                                = 1.28 × 10^60

Total mass equivalent (M_total) = N_ps × m_p 
                                = 2.78 × 10^55 g

This derived mass aligns with current astronomical estimates of the observable universe's mass, using the estimated number of protons in the Universe - suggesting a potential scale-invariant relationship between quantum and cosmic structures.

Postulate 2:

Hypothesizing that the planck spheres that tile on the surface of the proton are wormhole connections to all other protons, allowing us to roughly calculate the number of protons in the Universe, if each proton is connected to another that is connected to 10^40:

Proton surface area (A_p) = 4π(r_p)² 
                          = 8.902 × 10^-26 cm²

Planck circle area (A_pc) = π(l_p/2)² 
                          = 1.889 × 10^-66 cm²

Surface Planck spheres (N_sp) = A_p / A_pc 
                              = 4.71 × 10^40

Total connections (N_connections) = N_sp² 
                                 = 2.21 × 10^81

Postulate 3:

Adding up the total number of planck sphere surfaces on all protons should correlate with the number of planck spheres that fit on a sphere the size of the Universe, demonstrating a scale invariant holographic relationship

Total surface units = N_connections × N_sp = 1.04 × 10^122

Universe radius (R_u) = √((1.04 × 10^122 × A_pc) / 4π) ≈ 4.4 × 10^28 cm

Astute readers will note that 10^122 is the ratio by which our vacuum energy density measurements differ from QFT predictions

Quantum Field Theory Prediction (ρ_QFT):
ρ_QFT = (Planck Energy)⁴/(ħc)³ ≈ 10^93 g/cm³

Observed Vacuum Energy Density [dark energy] (ρ_obs):
ρ_obs ≈ 10^-29 g/cm³

Ratio:
ρ_QFT/ρ_obs ≈ 10^122

Postulate 4:

If you blow up a proton to the size of the Universe's radius, the holographic mass turns into the known energy density of the Universe

Universe volume (V_u) = (4/3)πR_u³ = 1.09 × 10^85 cm³
Energy density (ρ) = M_total / V_u = 2.55 × 10^-30 g/cm³