Links

https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/grounding?lang=python

Personally, I'd say that it needs to be like Jarvis. Whenever Tony Stark would do something Jarvis is always there to correct, support or help at any given moment. So now, going back to reality, say I'm working on my computer and get stuck with my project and some sort of an assistant keeping constant track of my actions, like an extra pair of eyes, could really help. However, here comes the privacy concern... This kind of technology might even be available in 2025, who knows! However, it might take us 50 years to truly embed AI in our lifes like this.

I hope my text is clear and easy to understand since English is not my native language. Thank you for reading!

Leadership at Conjecture and ControlAI have released a 110 page document detailing their views on the current Ai race and it's extinction risks. They cover the technical alignment arguments, as well as discussing the social and political dynamics driving the race.

https://www.thecompendium.ai/

I stopped checking things out on agents roughly 6 months ago, can you guys recommend me resources like podcasts or interviews that can help me get up to date?

Technology is exponential. It took 10,0000 years from the invention of civilisation to reach the Industrial Revolution. Just 100 years later we had steam ships, large steal mills, trains, global empire, libraries, Victorian England.

And then just in the 50 years from 1890-1940. Radio, Airplanes, Peniciclin, Telivisin , cars everywhere, ACs; Penicilin, Nuclear bombs!

And then just 30 years later, 1970 we landed on the moon and invented, microchips, colour tv, the Internet.

And then just 50 years later we have the smartphone, a unified theory of physics, a picture of a black hole! and AI chatbots that give anyone access to the sum of all human knowledge!

Imagine where will be 10 years from now!

Did I mention the picture of the black hole? That's very important in the grand picture of things.

It's hard to wrap your head around exponential growth, if you're not smart like me!

4060ti 16gb vs 4070 12gb is my big debacle on a new build.

I've been searching all over for this comparison to no avail or getting very contradicting responses (same with asking gpt the same question in much more detail even)

I want to use: Midjourney, Stable diffusion, Runway, Synthesia, Topaz, Sora, Dalle and pretty much anything coming out in the next 2 years in the image-video generation and editing categories.

Maybe even very automated game development (if an IT illiterate will be able to do it)

So which one to go for? The better gpu or the extra vram? Appreciate any answer, especially if its explained!

On one had you have a hand sophsiticated google search, and you can cheat on your homework instead of using chegg.

On the other hand, all the scams involving AI and all the ugly AI images flooding social media and polluting our retinas, all the teenagers getting in parasocial relationships with fictional characters.

What you say?

I've discovered the pre-RNA world, along with it's self-replicating entity but it took me a lot of time and I had to "play ChatGPT and Copilot (in parallel) off each other" when they conflicted (too frequently, say I).

It seems that they both correct themselves when you either deny their reply or simply enter "Objection !" - true ...

I was able to present my paper to Academia.org, finally.

If we could create one or even networks of AGI or perhaps even ASI agents, we would create machines to solve virtually every problem (just imagine we have quantum computing all worked out). Yes yes. This could means big things. But how do these machines define what a problem is, what problems to solve, how to formulate new problems, which questions to ask and so on? Surely, this would be automated.

I'd say that the creators would have some say what initial problems to work on would be. That is my stance, if you will, on the implications of such technology across society and the planet of such technology. The creators have some control. My political perspective (different from my stance on the extent of control over superintelligent machines) is that everyone should get a say in what problems should be solved. We should all get control over life and world-changing technology.

Anyway, my main question to you is, if you could solve every problem that could ever be come up with, what problems would you focus on? Which problems do you think that society, on different levels, should prioritise? What projects to be worked on.

I'm very interested in hearing your answers, as well as what questions to ask (or even what questions AI should ask or how AI can go about formulating new questions).

I also want to know if anyone is working on or has read about projects with similar ideas outlined above (and below too).

That was the main part of the post, but I also have one last thing to think about. Control.

To go back to my stance on the extent of control, I said that 'creators would have some say'. But not how much say, how much control. Control is a tricky ethical and political issue, if not and important ontological one. How should we handle that? Agency requires a certain amount of control over one's surroundings. How much agency and control are we willing to give these machines?