/r/hardware
/r/hardware is a place for quality computer hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion.
The goal of /r/hardware is a place for quality hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion.
/r/hardware IS NOT the place to come for help of any kind.
Techsupport and PC building questions should be posted to /r/techsupport or /r/buildapc instead.
The goal of /r/hardware is a place for quality hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion.
/r/hardware is not the place to come for help of any kind. This includes tech support and PC building questions.
Rules:
Rule Description Follow the Reddit Content Policy You can find it here. TL;DR: If you can't say something respectfully, don't say it at all. Insults and personal attacks aren't welcome here. Post should be about hardware Posts should be about hardware news, reviews, technical discussion or how-tos and buyers guides. No editorializing titles Please use the "suggest title" button for link submissions, or copy the title of the original link. Do NOT editorialize the title of the submission; (minor) changes for clarity may be acceptable if the original title is clickbait, or failed to summarize its actual content. Original Source Policy Content submitted should be of original source, or at least contain partially original reporting on top of existing information. Exceptions can be made for content in foreign language or any other exceptional cases. Fully paywalled articles are not allowed. Please contact the moderators through modmail if you have questions. No memes, jokes, or direct links to images Memes, direct image links, and low effort content will be removed. This includes both posts and comments. Images submitted as self posts must include an informative description for context. Top level comments must be substantive and contain more than 20 characters. No tech support or PC building questions These belong in /r/techsupport, /r/buildapc or any relevant tech subreddits. If your post asks a question about a specific product or need, it probably belongs elsewhere. This includes 'What should I buy?', 'Does a ____ do what I need?', 'How much is _____ worth?' and 'How long until (something obvious) happens?' type questions. Serious and intelligent discussion We allow discussion posts on relevant topics to hardware; there should however be at least background information and relevancy to demonstrate such a discussion is worthwhile. Low effort posts such as "What is ______ and what does it do?" is not acceptable. Rumor Policy No unsubstantiated rumors - Rumors or other claims/information not directly from official sources must have evidence to support them. Any rumor or claim that is just a statement from an unknown source containing no supporting evidence will be removed. Misc. Rules No content behind paywalls. No submissions to streaming sites outside of event megathreads. No submissions to crowdfunding sites or ongoing campaigns. No bots.
Spam and Self Promotion:
Spam and self promotion are not allowed. Users who want to post links to their website should be aware of the reddit definition of spam and read this article concerning self promotion on reddit. The 10% rule is enforced on /r/hardware; repeat offenders and/or your website or channel may be banned.
Related Reddits:
filters
/r/hardware
4,288,890 Subscribers
0
Why Buying GPUs Is a Disaster
2 Comments
2025/02/05
02:10 UTC
02:10 UTC
263
nVidia GeForce RTX 5080 Meta Review
- compilation of 18 launch reviews with ~8520 gaming benchmarks at 1080p, 1440p, 2160p
- only benchmarks at real games compiled, not included any 3DMark & Unigine benchmarks
- geometric mean in all cases
- standard raster performance without ray-tracing and/or DLSS/FSR/XeSS
- extra ray-tracing benchmarks (mostly without upscaler) after the standard raster benchmarks
- stock performance on (usually) reference/FE boards, no overclocking
- factory overclocked cards were normalized to reference clocks/performance, but just for the overall performance average (so the listings show the original performance result, just the performance index has been normalized)
- missing results were interpolated (for a more accurate average) based on the available & former results
- performance average is (some) weighted in favor of reviews with more benchmarks
- all reviews should have used newer drivers for all cards
- power draw numbers based on a couple of reviews, always for the graphics card only
- performance/price ratio (higher is better) for 2160p raster performance and 2160p ray-tracing performance
- for the full results and some more explanations check 3DCenter's launch analysis
| Raster 2160p | 3080 | 3090 | 309Ti | 79XT | 79XTX | 407TiS | 4080 | 4080S | 4090 | 5080 | 5090 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ampere 10GB | Ampere 24GB | Ampere 24GB | RDNA3 20GB | RDNA3 24GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 24GB | Blackw. 16GB | Blackw. 32GB | |
| CBase | - | - | - | 74.2% | 87.0% | 78.0% | - | 89.3% | 120.5% | 100% | 149.2% |
| Cowcotl | - | - | - | 74.6% | 89.0% | 78.0% | 84.7% | 86.4% | 112.7% | 100% | 144.9% |
| Eurog | 64.1% | 66.6% | 73.7% | 76.0% | 88.0% | - | 84.3% | 85.8% | 114.1% | 100% | 149.4% |
| GamersN | 59.9% | 64.7% | 75.9% | 74.4% | 93.5% | - | 86.8% | 87.8% | 118.8% | 100% | 155.3% |
| HW & Co | 51.5% | 68.4% | - | 74.2% | 86.7% | - | - | 89.5% | 117.3% | 100% | 149.8% |
| HWLuxx | 58.1% | 65.0% | 73.7% | 73.4% | 84.6% | 73.8% | 85.8% | 87.8% | 113.4% | 100% | 147.5% |
| Igor's | - | - | - | 76.1% | 92.5% | 77.7% | - | 91.2% | 121.2% | 100% | 152.5% |
| KitGuru | - | - | - | 79.1% | 92.6% | 75.6% | - | 88.9% | 117.9% | 100% | 151.8% |
| Linus | 57.5% | 67.5% | 72.5% | 76.3% | 88.8% | 75.0% | - | 85.0% | 115.0% | 100% | 147.5% |
| Overcl | - | - | - | 79.9% | 94.3% | - | 88.4% | 89.7% | 115.6% | 100% | 148.4% |
| PCGH | 52.8% | - | - | 76.9% | 91.6% | 73.8% | - | 87.7% | 118.7% | 100% | 152.2% |
| PurePC | 56.8% | - | 73.9% | 72.7% | 85.2% | - | 87.5% | - | 117.0% | 100% | 151.7% |
| QuasarZ | - | 65.1% | 71.9% | - | 84.8% | - | 84.5% | 87.2% | 116.1% | 100% | 148.1% |
| SweCl | 59.9% | - | - | - | 90.1% | - | 88.4% | - | 121.3% | 100% | 152.1% |
| TPU | 57% | 66% | 74% | 73% | 87% | 74% | 87% | 88% | 113% | 100% | 152% |
| TechSpot | 60.4% | 70.3% | - | 76.9% | 92.3% | 76.9% | 87.9% | 90.1% | 120.9% | 100% | 150.5% |
| Tom's | - | - | - | - | 90.2% | - | - | 91.6% | 120.4% | 100% | 150.9% |
| Tweakers | 58.9% | 65.2% | - | 77.0% | 88.9% | 73.7% | 88.1% | 88.9% | 114.6% | 100% | 151.1% |
| avg | 57.2% | 66.9% | 74.3% | 75.2% | 89.0% | 75.2% | 86.8% | 88.5% | 117.2% | 100% | 150.3% |
| Raster 1440p | 3080 | 3090 | 309Ti | 79XT | 79XTX | 407TiS | 4080 | 4080S | 4090 | 5080 | 5090 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ampere 10GB | Ampere 24GB | Ampere 24GB | RDNA3 20GB | RDNA3 24GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 24GB | Blackw. 16GB | Blackw. 32GB | |
| CBase | 60.6% | - | - | 78.6% | 88.8% | 81.2% | - | 92.0% | 116.5% | 100% | 135.0% |
| Cowcotl | - | - | - | 83.0% | 92.9% | 80.4% | 89.3% | 91.1% | 109.8% | 100% | 127.7% |
| Eurog | 64.0% | 67.0% | 73.8% | 76.5% | 89.0% | - | 86.4% | 87.2% | 110.7% | 100% | 136.8% |
| GamersN | 60.5% | 64.9% | 75.2% | 79.2% | 94.2% | - | 91.9% | 92.1% | 118.3% | 100% | 142.4% |
| HW & Co | 60.1% | 69.6% | - | 79.1% | 89.8% | - | - | 92.3% | 114.9% | 100% | 136.1% |
| HWLuxx | 60.1% | 70.7% | 79.0% | 83.2% | 95.0% | 81.5% | 95.4% | 97.2% | 118.5% | 100% | 144.2% |
| Igor's | - | - | - | 78.5% | 92.2% | 79.1% | - | 92.3% | 114.0% | 100% | 135.2% |
| KitGuru | - | - | - | 82.2% | 93.6% | 78.9% | - | 91.6% | 117.4% | 100% | 143.8% |
| Linus | 60.9% | 69.2% | 73.7% | 82.0% | 93.2% | 80.5% | - | 89.5% | 115.0% | 100% | 136.1% |
| PCGH | 58.5% | - | - | 80.3% | 94.1% | 77.2% | - | 91.2% | 118.5% | 100% | 143.5% |
| PurePC | 59.2% | - | 74.0% | 75.1% | 87.0% | - | 90.5% | - | 115.4% | 100% | 141.4% |
| QuasarZ | - | 65.6% | 70.9% | - | 86.5% | - | 87.6% | 90.4% | 113.8% | 100% | 136.7% |
| SweCl | 61.8% | - | - | - | 92.4% | - | 92.0% | - | 117.7% | 100% | 142.5% |
| TPU | 60% | 67% | 74% | 77% | 89% | 79% | 90% | 91% | 112% | 100% | 137% |
| TechSpot | 63.7% | 73.3% | - | 82.2% | 95.2% | 83.6% | 93.8% | 95.9% | 119.2% | 100% | 131.5% |
| Tom's | - | - | - | - | 91.1% | - | - | 93.5% | 113.3% | 100% | 128.2% |
| Tweakers | 59.9% | 65.7% | - | 80.8% | 89.8% | 77.3% | 91.4% | 91.8% | 111.6% | 100% | 135.1% |
| avg | 60.4% | 68.3% | 75.0% | 79.3% | 91.2% | 79.3% | 90.5% | 92.0% | 115.3% | 100% | 137.3% |
| Raster 1080p | 3080 | 3090 | 309Ti | 79XT | 79XTX | 407TiS | 4080 | 4080S | 4090 | 5080 | 5090 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ampere 10GB | Ampere 24GB | Ampere 24GB | RDNA3 20GB | RDNA3 24GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 24GB | Blackw. 16GB | Blackw. 32GB | |
| Cowcotl | - | - | - | 88.1% | 94.5% | 85.3% | 91.7% | 92.7% | 106.4% | 100% | 113.8% |
| Eurog | 65.6% | 70.2% | 79.9% | 83.8% | 92.4% | - | 89.4% | 90.2% | 108.1% | 100% | 126.5% |
| GamersN | 62.5% | 66.8% | 75.9% | 81.7% | 95.8% | - | 95.6% | 95.7% | 115.9% | 100% | 131.7% |
| HWLuxx | 67.1% | 70.9% | 78.3% | 83.2% | 93.6% | 83.8% | 92.6% | 94.5% | 114.8% | 100% | 130.4% |
| Igor's | - | - | - | 79.5% | 91.2% | 82.7% | - | 94.8% | 111.6% | 100% | 124.0% |
| KitGuru | - | - | - | 83.6% | 93.7% | 81.2% | - | 93.1% | 115.4% | 100% | 136.0% |
| PCGH | 60.1% | - | - | 82.0% | 93.7% | 79.8% | - | 92.3% | 115.8% | 100% | 133.2% |
| PurePC | 61.0% | - | 74.4% | 87.8% | 87.8% | - | 92.1% | - | 115.9% | 100% | 137.2% |
| QuasarZ | - | 67.1% | 71.7% | - | 86.6% | - | 89.9% | 92.6% | 110.9% | 100% | 125.9% |
| SweCl | 63.3% | - | - | - | 93.2% | - | 93.5% | - | 114.8% | 100% | 131.1% |
| TPU | 63% | 69% | 76% | 80% | 90% | 82% | 93% | 94% | 111% | 100% | 124% |
| TechSpot | 71.0% | 79.5% | - | 86.9% | 96.6% | 90.3% | 99.4% | 100.6% | 117.0% | 100% | 115.9% |
| Tom's | - | - | - | - | 92.5% | - | - | 96.5% | 111.4% | 100% | 115.1% |
| Tweakers | 61.4% | 67.0% | - | 81.8% | 89.3% | 79.5% | 93.8% | 93.6% | 106.2% | 100% | 122.4% |
| avg | 63.5% | 70.1% | 76.6% | 82.7% | 92.0% | 82.5% | 93.0% | 94.2% | 112.8% | 100% | 128.1% |
| RayTr. 2160p | 3080 | 3090 | 309Ti | 79XT | 79XTX | 407TiS | 4080 | 4080S | 4090 | 5080 | 5090 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ampere 10GB | Ampere 24GB | Ampere 24GB | RDNA3 20GB | RDNA3 24GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 24GB | Blackw. 16GB | Blackw. 32GB | |
| CBase | - | - | - | 67.3% | 77.8% | 80.1% | - | 92.1% | 121.0% | 100% | 147.2% |
| Cowcotl | - | - | - | 59.0% | 68.9% | 73.8% | 82.0% | 84.4% | 116.4% | 100% | 150.8% |
| Eurog | 63.6% | 65.9% | 75.6% | 62.5% | 72.4% | - | 87.9% | 89.5% | 124.6% | 100% | 162.0% |
| GamersN | 54.8% | 59.0% | 69.4% | 54.4% | 68.8% | - | 86.2% | 87.1% | 116.3% | 100% | 156.3% |
| HWLuxx | 45.8% | 58.7% | 67.2% | 44.7% | 50.1% | 82.1% | 92.9% | 94.4% | 125.3% | 100% | 154.0% |
| KitGuru | - | - | - | 55.1% | 63.7% | 75.0% | - | 89.3% | 123.8% | 100% | 159.8% |
| Linus | 28.2% | 59.0% | 64.1% | 43.6% | 48.7% | 74.4% | - | 87.2% | 123.1% | 100% | 161.5% |
| Overcl | - | - | - | 59.9% | 72.1% | - | 89.8% | 91.6% | 116.3% | 100% | 148.6% |
| PCGH | 46.3% | - | - | 58.2% | 68.8% | 75.9% | - | 89.4% | 119.3% | 100% | 150.8% |
| PurePC | 50.0% | - | 67.5% | 47.0% | 56.0% | - | 86.5% | - | 122.0% | 100% | 160.0% |
| QuasarZ | - | 60.5% | 65.3% | - | - | - | 85.7% | 88.4% | 116.9% | 100% | 148.6% |
| SweCl | - | - | - | - | 56.0% | - | 90.7% | - | 131.2% | 100% | 165.6% |
| TPU | 44% | 64% | 71% | 53% | 62% | 77% | 89% | 90% | 119% | 100% | 156% |
| TechSpot | - | - | - | 41.0% | 49.2% | 73.8% | 88.5% | 91.8% | 118.0% | 100% | 149.2% |
| Tom's | - | - | - | - | 68.9% | - | - | 93.9% | 128.8% | 100% | 163.1% |
| Tweakers | 51.6% | 60.7% | - | 58.4% | 66.8% | 75.2% | 90.5% | 91.4% | 124.3% | 100% | 164.1% |
| avg | 47.1% | 61.3% | 68.7% | 53.8% | 63.0% | 76.2% | 88.2% | 90.0% | 121.1% | 100% | 155.4% |
| RayTr. 1440p | 3080 | 3090 | 309Ti | 79XT | 79XTX | 407TiS | 4080 | 4080S | 4090 | 5080 | 5090 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ampere 10GB | Ampere 24GB | Ampere 24GB | RDNA3 20GB | RDNA3 24GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 24GB | Blackw. 16GB | Blackw. 32GB | |
| CBase | 46.4% | - | - | 72.4% | 80.5% | 82.9% | - | 93.4% | 115.2% | 100% | 125.9% |
| Cowcotl | - | - | - | 64.1% | 70.1% | 71.8% | 85.5% | 87.2% | 112.0% | 100% | 139.3% |
| Eurog | 63.2% | 66.8% | 75.3% | 65.1% | 73.7% | - | 89.6% | 91.1% | 121.2% | 100% | 150.4% |
| HW & Co | 52.8% | 62.5% | - | 46.2% | 52.8% | - | - | 92.0% | 121.4% | 100% | 153.3% |
| HWLuxx | 57.3% | 60.5% | 67.6% | 49.4% | 54.5% | 84.2% | 94.4% | 96.1% | 119.6% | 100% | 139.5% |
| KitGuru | - | - | - | 56.8% | 64.7% | 76.8% | - | 90.3% | 119.1% | 100% | 149.2% |
| Linus | 52.0% | 60.0% | 64.0% | 44.0% | 50.7% | 78.7% | - | 88.0% | 117.3% | 100% | 148.0% |
| PCGH | 56.2% | - | - | 63.2% | 72.8% | 79.1% | - | 92.1% | 117.6% | 100% | 139.5% |
| PurePC | 52.9% | - | 68.3% | 48.7% | 57.1% | - | 87.3% | - | 118.5% | 100% | 150.3% |
| SweCl | - | - | - | - | 57.3% | - | 92.8% | - | 125.0% | 100% | 151.3% |
| TPU | 59% | 66% | 72% | 57% | 66% | 80% | 92% | 93% | 117% | 100% | 146% |
| TechSpot | - | - | - | 47.5% | 54.5% | 80.8% | 93.9% | 94.9% | 117.2% | 100% | 139.4% |
| Tweakers | 56.0% | 62.3% | - | 59.5% | 67.2% | 78.2% | 93.6% | 93.9% | 121.9% | 100% | 151.9% |
| avg | 55.6% | 63.4% | 70.0% | 55.5% | 63.3% | 78.9% | 90.5% | 92.0% | 118.6% | 100% | 144.7% |
| RayTr. 1080p | 3080 | 3090 | 309Ti | 79XT | 79XTX | 407TiS | 4080 | 4080S | 4090 | 5080 | 5090 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ampere 10GB | Ampere 24GB | Ampere 24GB | RDNA3 20GB | RDNA3 24GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 24GB | Blackw. 16GB | Blackw. 32GB | |
| Cowcotl | - | - | - | 63.2% | 70.1% | 78.6% | 85.5% | 87.2% | 103.4% | 100% | 114.5% |
| Eurog | 62.8% | 68.2% | 74.8% | 66.6% | 74.3% | - | 90.7% | 92.4% | 117.9% | 100% | 138.5% |
| HWLuxx | 60.2% | 62.5% | 68.6% | 52.3% | 57.3% | 83.4% | 90.5% | 91.7% | 112.4% | 100% | 126.3% |
| KitGuru | - | - | - | 58.3% | 65.2% | 78.6% | - | 90.4% | 115.3% | 100% | 140.4% |
| PCGH | 59.3% | - | - | 66.6% | 75.3% | 81.5% | - | 93.3% | 114.5% | 100% | 130.5% |
| PurePC | 55.2% | - | 68.5% | 51.4% | 58.6% | - | 90.1% | - | 117.1% | 100% | 142.0% |
| SweCl | 56.8% | - | - | - | 59.3% | - | 93.9% | - | 118.6% | 100% | 134.3% |
| TPU | 61% | 68% | 74% | 60% | 68% | 83% | 94% | 95% | 115% | 100% | 136% |
| TechSpot | - | - | - | 49.2% | 56.2% | 84.6% | 96.2% | 97.7% | 113.8% | 100% | 130.8% |
| Tweakers | 57.1% | 62.9% | - | 59.7% | 66.3% | 78.9% | 93.6% | 94.8% | 116.0% | 100% | 140.7% |
| avg | 59.2% | 65.3% | 71.6% | 59.2% | 66.5% | 81.3% | 91.7% | 93.1% | 114.4% | 100% | 133.0% |
| FG/MFG 2160p | 4090 | 4090 FG | 5080 | 5080 FG | 5080 MFGx3 | 5080 MFGx4 | 5090 | 5090 FG | 5090 MFGx3 | 5090 MFGx4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ComputerB | 123.2% | 216.2% | 100% | 175.0% | 251.2% | 322.0% | 150.0% | 274.3% | 394.9% | 499.8% |
| HWLuxx | 129.5% | 228.4% | 100% | 183.6% | 254.8% | 323.4% | 172.0% | 303.9% | 435.0% | 547.0% |
| TechPowerUp | 114.3% | 139.2% | 100% | - | - | 274.5% | 148.8% | - | - | 460.9% |
| avg pure FG/MFG gain | +74% vs4090 | +73% vs5080 | +141% vs5080 | +206% vs5080 | +78% vs5090 | +154% vs5090 | +220% vs5090 |
| At a glance | 3080 | 3090 | 309Ti | 79XT | 79XTX | 407TiS | 4080 | 4080S | 4090 | 5080 | 5090 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ampere 10GB | Ampere 24GB | Ampere 24GB | RDNA3 20GB | RDNA3 24GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 16GB | Ada 24GB | Blackw. 16GB | Blackw. 32GB | |
| 2160p Raster | 57.2% | 66.9% | 74.3% | 75.2% | 89.0% | 75.2% | 86.8% | 88.5% | 117.2% | 100% | 150.3% |
| 1440p Raster | 60.4% | 68.3% | 75.0% | 79.3% | 91.2% | 79.3% | 90.5% | 92.0% | 115.3% | 100% | 137.3% |
| 1080p Raster | 63.5% | 70.1% | 76.6% | 82.7% | 92.0% | 82.5% | 93.0% | 94.2% | 112.8% | 100% | 128.1% |
| 2160p RayTr | 47.1% | 61.3% | 68.7% | 53.8% | 63.0% | 76.2% | 88.2% | 90.0% | 121.1% | 100% | 155.4% |
| 1440p RayTr | 55.6% | 63.4% | 70.0% | 55.5% | 63.3% | 78.9% | 90.5% | 92.0% | 118.6% | 100% | 144.7% |
| 1080p RayTr | 59.2% | 65.3% | 71.6% | 59.2% | 66.5% | 81.3% | 91.7% | 93.1% | 114.4% | 100% | 133.0% |
| TDP | 320W | 350W | 450W | 315W | 355W | 285W | 320W | 320W | 450W | 360W | 575W |
| Real Power Draw | 325W | 359W | 462W | 309W | 351W | 277W | 297W | 302W | 418W | 311W | 509W |
| EE RA 2160p | 55% | 58% | 50% | 76% | 79% | 84% | 91% | 91% | 87% | 100% | 92% |
| MSRP | $799 | $1499 | $1999 | $899 | $999 | $799 | $1199 | $999 | $1599 | $999 | $1999 |
| Retail GER | 800€ | 1700€ | 2100€ | 679€ | 889€ | 831€ | 1150€ | 1000€ | 1750€ | 1300€ | 2600€ |
| P/P GER 2160p RA | 93% | 51% | 46% | 144% | 130% | 118% | 98% | 115% | 87% | 100% | 75% |
| P/P GER 2160p RT | 77% | 47% | 43% | 103% | 92% | 119% | 100% | 117% | 90% | 100% | 78% |
| Retail US | $700 | $1500 | $2000 | $650 | $870 | $900 | $1200 | $1000 | $1600 | $1150 | $2300 |
| P/P US 2160p RA | 94% | 51% | 43% | 133% | 118% | 96% | 83% | 102% | 84% | 100% | 75% |
| P/P US 2160p RT | 77% | 47% | 39% | 95% | 83% | 97% | 85% | 103% | 87% | 100% | 78% |
Note: RA = Raster, RT = Ray-Tracing, EE = Energy Efficiency, P/P = Performance/Price Ratio
Note: For the graphics cards that have already been discontinued, a retail price was assumed at the time of their sale. The same applies to the 7900XT, 7900XTX and 4080S, which are currently on the retreat from the market. Retail prices were estimated for 5080 & 5090 when availability is reached. These estimates are of course not perfect, as nobody knows how the price situation will develop.
| Perf. Gain of 5080 | Raster 2160p | Raster 1440p | Raster 1080p | RayTr. 2160p | RayTr. 1440p | RayTr. 1080p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE | +131% | +119% | +102% | +176% | +156% | +135% |
| GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | +75% | +66% | +58% | +112% | +80% | +69% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 | +50% | +46% | +43% | +63% | +58% | +53% |
| GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | +35% | +33% | +31% | +46% | +43% | +40% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XT | +33% | +26% | +21% | +86% | +80% | +69% |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | +12% | +10% | +9% | +59% | +58% | +50% |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | +33% | +26% | +21% | +31% | +27% | +23% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | +15% | +11% | +8% | +13% | +10% | +9% |
| GeForce RTX 4080 Super | +13% | +9% | +6% | +11% | +9% | +7% |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | –15% | –13% | –11% | –17% | –16% | –13% |
| GeForce RTX 5090 | –33% | –27% | –22% | –36% | –31% | –25% |
Note: Performance improvement of the GeForce RTX 5080 compared to the other cards. The respective other card is then 100%.
| nVidia FE | Asus Astral OC | Colorful Vulcan OC | Gainward Phoenix GS | Galax/KFA2 1-Click OC | Gigabyte Gaming OC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooling | Air, 2 Fans | Air, 4 Fans | Air, 3 Fans | Air, 3 Fans | Air, 3 Fans | Air, 3 Fans |
| Dimensions | DualSl, 30x13.5cm | TripleSl, 35x15cm | TripleSl, 36x15cm | TripleSl, 33x13cm | TripleSl, 30x13.5cm | TripleSl, 34x14cm |
| Weight | 1635g | 2900g | 2796g | 1595g | 1308g | 1823g |
| Clocks | 2295/2617 MHz | 2295/2760 MHz | 2295/2685 MHz | 2295/2700 MHz | 2295/2625 MHz | 2295/2730 MHz |
| Real Clock (avg/median) | 2640 MHz / 2662 MHz | 2882 MHz / 2925 MHz | 2822 MHz / 2865 MHz | 2821 MHz / 2865 MHz | 2745 MHz / 2790 MHz | 2815 MHz / 2857 MHz |
| TDP | 360W (max: 390W) | 400W (max: 400W) | 375W (max: 400W) | 360W (max: 380W) | 360W (max: 450W) | 360W (max: 450W) |
| Raster Perf. (2160/1440/1080) | 100% | +6% / +6% / +5% | +5% / +4% / +4% | +5% / +5% / +4% | +3% / +3% / +2% | +4% / +4% / +3% |
| RayTr. Perf. (2160/1440/1080) | 100% | +6% / +6% / +6% | +4% / +5% / +5% | +4% / +5% / +4% | +2% / +3% / +4% | +4% / +4% / +5% |
| Temperatures (GPU/Memory) | 67°C / 74°C | 62°C / 66°C | 61°C / 66°C | 68°C / 76°C | 69°C / 76°C | 64°C / 66°C |
| Loundness | 36.8 dBA | 36.3 dBA | 34.4 dBA | 37.4 dBA | 35.6 dBA | 38.4 dBA |
| Real Power Draw (Idle/Gaming) | 20W / 325W | 17W / 388W | 30W / 367W | 22W / 361W | 17W / 350W | 18W / 358W |
| Price | $999 | $1500 | $1300 | $1150 | $1000 | $1200 |
| Source: | TPU | TPU | TPU | TPU | TPU | TPU |
|nVidia FE|MSI Vanguard OC|MSI Suprim SOC|Palit GameRock OC|Zotac AMP Extreme Infinity |:--|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:|:--:| Cooling|Air, 2 Fans|Air, 3 Fans|Air, 3 Fans|Air, 3 Fans|Air, 3 Fans Dimensions|DualSl, 30x13.5cm|TripleSl, 36x15cm|TripleSl, 36x15cm|TripleSl, 33x14.5cm|TripleSl, 33x14cm Weight|1635g|1954g|2639g|2200g|2161g Clocks|2295/2617 MHz|2295/2730 MHz|2295/2745 MHz|2295/2730 MHz|2295/2670 MHz Real Clock (avg/median)|2640 MHz / 2662 MHz|2791 MHz / 2835 MHz|2726 MHz / 2752 MHz|2803 MHz / 2857 MHz|2830 MHz / 2872 MHz TDP|360W (max: 390W)|360W (max: 400W)|360W (max: 400W)|360W (max: 400W)|360W (max: 400W) Raster Perf. (2160/1440/1080)|100%|+4% / +3% / +3%|+2% / +2% / +2%|+5% / +5% / +4%|+5% / +5% / +4% RayTr. Perf. (2160/1440/1080)|100%|+4% / +4% / +4%|+2% / +1% / +3%|+4% / +5% / +5%|+5% / +5% / +5% Temperatures (GPU/Memory)|67°C / 74°C|60°C / 62°C|60°C / 62°C|64°C / 68°C|66°C / 66°C Loundness|36.8 dBA|35.0 dBA|25.5 dBA|37.3 dBA|38.6 dBA Real Power Draw (Idle/Gaming)|20W / 325W|15W / 352W|18W / 318W|30W / 346W|24W / 371W Price|$999|$1230|$1250|$1200|$1250 Source:|TPU|TPU|TPU|TPU|TPU
Note: Just the values of the default BIOS were noted throughout, as complete information including performance values are only available for that BIOS.
List of GeForce RTX 5080 reviews evaluated for this performance analysis:
- ComputerBase
- Cowcotland
- Eurogamer
- Gamers Nexus
- Hardware & Co
- Hardwareluxx
- Igor's Lab
- KitGuru
- Linus Tech Tips
- Overclocking
- PC Games Hardware
- PurePC
- Quasarzone
- SweClockers
- TechPowerUp
- TechSpot
- Tom's Hardware
- Tweakers
Source: 3DCenter.org
115 Comments
2025/02/03
20:37 UTC
20:37 UTC
2
AndrewMarcDavid - Lenovo ThinkPad X9 (2025) REVIEW
27 Comments
2025/02/03
14:44 UTC
14:44 UTC
43
Techtesters - GeForce RTX 5080 Roundup - 5 Models Tested & Compared
19 Comments
2025/02/03
14:37 UTC
14:37 UTC
214
Asus ROG Astral RTX 5080 Review: Stupid Big, Stupid Expensive!
81 Comments
2025/02/03
10:06 UTC
10:06 UTC
2
HW News - RTX 50 Continues to Not Exist, Strange Intel CPU, AMD Vulnerability, NVIDIA Stock Drop
58 Comments
2025/02/03
00:46 UTC
00:46 UTC
175
The DisplayPort 2.1 Cable Problem is Solved
41 Comments
2025/02/02
11:19 UTC
11:19 UTC
51
is there any benchmark being done on alan wake 2 rtx mega geometry in terms of performance compare to before and does having mega geometry having any benefit for those with rtx 5000 series gpu?
I'm aware that german computerbase claim to have did the benchmark test for rtx mega geometry but I would like to see more people testing rather than from 1 source. I'm interested to know if having rtx geometry having any performance improvement to rtx 5000 series since Nvidia many times emphasize that 5000 series gpu build for neural rendering
5 Comments
2025/02/02
08:30 UTC
08:30 UTC
205
"Fake Frames" Tested | DLSS 4.0, MFG 4X, & NVIDIA's Misleading Review Guide
323 Comments
2025/02/02
04:03 UTC
04:03 UTC
Back To Top