I had this idea in my head for a while, this is not the typical big Germany, or forever Kaiserreich. Here the German empire doesn't collapse but just declines like the British empire towards the end of the 20th century. We can see here that they have given up on France, Denmark and Poland, and probably Germany has given up on monarchy, and have them like private citizens, they government will still have strong figure as a leader, effectively still being authoritarian.

Outside of Germany, Austria Hungry doesn't explode, but rather just split up, nevertheless, they aren't relevant in the wield world stage anymore. And Poland united with Lithuania to access the Baltic sea.

Excuse me for my poor quality map, but I just really wanted to share this with yall. I could think how different the rest of the world would be, I'm open for suggestions.

Will Francoist Spain and Fascist Italy fight the newfound Protestant threat, or will they ally with it and form one unified far-right axis?

If there is a split between Fascist Catholic and Fascist Protestant countries much like the Sino-Soviet split, Will there be a 3-way war?

With pressure from Zionist parties in the British Empire, will the Holocaust never happen? Will a soverign State of Israel, or atleast a British Mandate Israel form?

Does Japan still get involved with the Anglo-German axis?

I would imagine the powers would be : The US, resistance movements in France, the USSR, Israel? Ireland, the numerous Baltic states, Ethiopia, Australia, Brazil, India, China, Indonesia, numerous African independence movements throughout Africa fighting two independent wars against

The British Empire, Third Reich, Rhodesia, Japan? the pro-British colonial governments, a partitioned and controlled Western and most of central Europe and Finland

And Fascist Italy, Portugal, and Spain

Who wins this war? Who are the powers? And how much of Africa and South Asia becomes independent?

Does Iran or the Arab states get involves? On which side?

How this would have affected the results of the election of 1912/16, and WW1.

In this timeline (partly inspired by Alternate History Hub), Britain’s forces do not escape at the port of Dunkirk and are captured or killed by the Wermacht. With an outright defeat, British politicians force Churchill’s hand to negotiate an armistice with Germany. In exiting the war, UK soldiers return home, but at the marginally small cost of African colonies and Malta. British exit of the war ends the western theatre. Vichy France is fully established in old French borders, Spain and Portugal sign a treaty with the Axis powers. Stressed and now in a tighter race, FDR has a near-death heart attack, forcing him out of the 1940 presidential race. His unpopular VP is the bane of Democratic establishment, resulting in a tumoultuous primary. Wendell Willikie becomes President of the United States in 1940, leading to isolationism, no lend lease, no draft, and no oil embargo.

Nazi Germany then turns their full power and in-tact luftwaffe (no battle of Britain to decimate it) towards the USSR in mid May of 1941. Stalin, blissfully ignorant as in OTL, gets steamrolled. The front comes to a pause in late 1941. Reopening in spring, Hitler reaches Moscow and the A-A line, effectively dissolving the USSR in late 1942. Hitler’s atrocities and genocide is ramped up to an unthinkable level of terror. Reports from the eastern front work their way into the West, prompting the public to be outraged. President Willikie in late 1942 starts sending minimal aid to Russia and China, too little too late. Japanese war crimes in Indochina and Indonesia also prompt an oil embargo. Pearl Harbor and Phillipines invasion then occurs in February of 1943. The total destruction of Pearl Harbor in this TL, and lack of mobilization, cripple the US Navy. Signifcant troop numbers won’t be ready until November of 1943. Japan then begins besieging Australia and British colonies, prompting Britain to involve herself once again in war.

In the wake of the USSR’s dissolution, Hitler begins deporting jews to Africa for labor, and moving large numbers of Germans to rebuild Eastern Europe, displacing and disadvancing the Slavs. When this Jewish deportation fails, Hitler and his frustrated cabinet begin the Final Solution. Germany is dystopic and always in a sense of unease. Germany, France, Spain, and Italy, declare war on the United States. The European theatre is wack, with a full Germany, the Mediterranean campaigns are slow grogs. Willikie and Churchill do not get along like FDR and Churchill, with bickering and disagreements. Africa, Sicily, Italy, Spain all see slow and bloody battles which end at the mountains (for the latter two areas). Finally, in June of 1945, plans are formulated for an invasion of Northern France. However one of the beach heads becomes a failure and American disaster, witth the other four surging ahead, creating a chaotic mess in France and forcing Eisenhower to resign.

The Jews are essentially wiped out of existence, Central Asia and Siberia are warring states with Russian refugees, China had seen wayyy more casualties with an extra year of oil. Nukes are ready in late 1946, with Germany being the target. The Western Axis and Italy had begun to collapse, but Hitler reinforced a HARD front with rockets and advanced tech. Uprisings in Eastern Europe, and starving Germans didn’t help Germany either. In January of 1947, the first nuke falls on Hamburg. Subsequent bombs then fall along the Rhine and German lines to open up the front, creating a hellish fallout zone. Japan has been pushed back to the Ryuku Island chain, with deep fighting occuring in the summer of 1947. In Europe a breakthrough occurs, but the war will not end until spring of 1948. Japan is nuked into submission, with even Tokyo getting the bomb. I guess we can say Hitler kills himself again.

Japan is destroyed. China leaves the war communist, but too poor and depopulated to spread the ideology. Germany is dissolved into multiple states, with a lost identity. France is reestablished, Eastern Europe is in abject poverty and destruction, the blue banana belt of Europe is impoverished. India had faced famine and greater poverty, being granted independence like in OTL. Central Asia is a mess, Slavic refugees returning to Europe fight German settlers with a nasty backlash. Franco and Mussolini were overthrown, but Southern Europe is broke. Axis crimes in Africa are revealed. But the biggest horror of all is the uncovering of the Holocaust, which did wipe out Jews in Europe. The US reverts to isolationism, with vets traumatized and poisoned from radiation. Essentially, no commies, no Marshall Plan. Britain analyzes the desire for empire with conquest ambitions being shown on full display. The globalist society is never built. Hundreds of millions die as a result of WW2 spanning the 1930’s-1940’s. Famine and disease also accelerate the brutality.

Austria and Russia agree to split the Balkans between them, with the annexation of Bosnia and the Romanian Principalities by Austria, granting complete control of the Danube. The creation of a Bulgarian state, expanded Serbia (Russian puppet), and Russian control of the straits are also planned.

The Greek uprising occurs, but in this timeline, British and French consider an alternative option : Creating a long term intractable conflict between the Greeks and the Slavs, permanently splitting Greece from Russia diplomatically, and ending the Eastern Question.

They achieve this by providing Greece with a massively expanded territory, including the straits (although those are permanently occupied by the French/British), inclusive of much of the territory intended for Bulgaria/Russia by the Russians/Austrians, and with a significant Slavic/Albanian/Turkish population. There is essentially a race to collapse the Ottoman empire, and the French/British succeed.

As a result, the Greek state is now in a precarious situation: It can no longer rely upon the idea of Russian support, and becomes entirely dependant on the British/French, both to defend itself against Serb/Bulgarian attempts to unite their populations, as well as from the Ottomans, of whom their citizens remain approximately half of Eastern Thrace / Constantinople.

Russia makes limited gains in the east, incorporating areas with significant Armenian and Pontic Greek populations. Britain and France, having concluded that Ottoman control of the Straits is no longer a viable strategy, and will in the future simply partition what remains of the Ottoman Empire between themselves. Greece is heavily controlled by the Anglo/French, who retain a permanent strategic position in the straits.

Russia is angered by the betrayal of the Greeks, and gain comparatively little. They are still trapped in the Black sea, and have now lost their rationalisation for being able to legitimately conquer the straits or Constantinople as both are now (at least De Jure) owned by Orthodox Greeks. The Austrians gain everything they could have wanted, with Danubian control, Bosnia, and an Authoritarian Russia as their neighbour to assist with keeping the south Slavs in line, and avoid directly engaging in a war against France / Britain. The British gain a permanently controllable puppet, and the French anticipate significant colonial gain in Ottoman territories.

The Ottomans are pretty cooked, and are forced to relocate their capital to their interior. Greece faces significant internal issues, but if it can reconcile its new ethnic groups, may succeed in formalising a broader Hellenic identity.

https://preview.redd.it/0xdxxnxrp54e1.png?width=600&format=png&auto=webp&s=5e220bce79d00d06550be338a919111e8e35a75b

Continuation of: https://www.reddit.com/r/imaginarymapscj/s/ljf44RCV3S

Lore(i wrote this in a rush I may make a timeline): lore: by 2027, russia had declared a full invasion of ukraine and sent the literal entire millitary and conscripted millions, and with the disbandanment of nato by 2030, declared war on the baltics, finland and poland. at the summer of 2031, finland fell due to no support comming, and estonia followed suit. poland then declared Greater poland, revealing that poland was buying much more us equipment then they let on and produced much more. they turned on czechia, latvie, slovenia, lithuania and ukrain and blitzed all those countries, marching into belarus. russia formally annexed occupied territories and what was left of belarus and poland and russia went into a stalemate, though poland is being steadily pushed back by sheer numbers, only holding on due to support from various european nations desiring a buffer from russia and the christian autocracy.

by 2050, the nations of the uk, germany and france had much more increasing support of far right nationalism and communist uprisings, and the french were the first to fall when the french people in paris stormed the streets and executed the entire government. france fell into anarchy only held together by the millitary, though they dont have much control or organization. the people of paris declared the paris commune. the uk, after another dissastorous election and the assasination of the royal family by terrorists, with only prince archie of sussex being the only survivor. the labors and facists in the uk formally split of, and prince archie had rallied the rest of the uk to fight for the monarchy. some liberals managed to turn most of the royalists due to them commiting increasingly horrible war crimes. Germany held on for a while but the AFD managed to rouse enough support to incite a rebellion. around june of 2054, a string of events known as the Second rise of Nationalism took place. the nations of portugal, spain, italy, ireland, hungary, bulgaria and turkey had been couped by right leaders into increasingly millitaristic states. the spanish had went ahead and invaded france, portugal seems to be preparing the navy, ireland reformed into a celtic union and invaded the british isles, the facists in britain landed in normady, citing that normady was always english land since the norman invasion, and finally bulgaria and hungary started the 3rd Balkan war

the third balkan war started when bulgaria and hungary invaded romania. bulgaria also quickly annexed macedonia and invaded greece. hungary also went north and took some polish land. serbia, supported by russia, annexed sprska and montenegro and invaded croatia, bosnia and slovenia with italy joining in, annexing them, then proclaiming Jugoslavia. the governments of Greece and albania quickly mobilized and started a counter offensive, with them annexing kosovo before jugo could react. turkey tried to join but their government was in chaos and shitty as hell, and greece managed to land in istanbul, with mass support of the turks due to the shitty unpopular government, with the greek promise of equally representing turks and reforming into a confederation.

the nations of the benelux, remianing nordic countries, albania and greece, romania and austria, seeing the chaos, had met in utrecht and executed the Utrecht protocol, in which the nations of the benelux and the nations of scandinavia would unite, every goverment would reform and democratise, and above all, uphold liberty. the League of Free nations was formed. they started 2 operations as of 2060, operation lille and operation Skjope.

Operation skjope is an invasion of the Balkans, Operation lille is the invasion of france

This may not cover everything so if I missed something just llike ask

Full quality image because reddit is a bitch:

The Idea described above is related to my project- FAPU, the free Artic People's Union.

A Map of FAPU

Where FAPU is on the world map.

Early FAPU: I would imagine territory of FAPU was barren wasteland with a population of around 10 people but then in 1750s Some Russian expedition discovered iron, coal and oil there and people started to settle. There was a colossal population boom as people flock to the island looking for a good job opportunities in Iron works.

FAPU is semi-communist. As they were rich in resources and had big ironworks they most likely had very rich few and extremely poor population. during ww1 they "ate the rich" and go with their own semi-communist revolution that's the time they split from Russian oppression. As FAPU is a semi-communist nation it might be that it was part of Bolshevik Russia but split due to the disagreement with Lenin about what a Communist nation should look like.

Due to the cold of FAPU, very little grows there so the ironworks were used to export and then they could import food.

Russia was always really bad at keeping it in it's empire so it was practically entirely self-dependent by the time of the split. In 1921 they allied with Poland and during the persecution of the Polish jews and during rebellions by Polish people FAPU secretly sent several Micro-subs over to aid the Polish rebels and jews.

-Only a select few actively know about this project

The Eurasian Confederation is a country that also comprises of many different smaller countries that have almost full autonomy and has a weak central government. This is due to the 1970s where the Soviet Union entered a massive reform for a more Libertarian Socialist ideology that is coined as "Eurasian Confederalism". This country seeks to create a horizontal leadership style, direct democracy, local autonomy, and also solidarity rather than forced collectivism. This is rather out of an idea for an alternate nation that would outperform the United States ideologically. They are also isolationist and are slightly more technologically advanced than the Soviet Union in our timeline.

Getting tired of the countless pressure thus im rebranding TNB to "a place under the sun" where no one won ww2 i mean NO ONE not even the germans nor the axis nor the japanese nor the united nations (or allies but the call themselves the united nations in 1942 until it became an international "peaceful" organisation by the time the war ended) i needed help on how the war could ended in a stalemate But not earlier as i planned for this ww2 to go one much longer until both sides said "FUCK IT IM OUT"

I am desperate

I kind of messed up many things in the previous scenario, so this scenario has changes.

Things we have to change in the USSR:

In this timeline, the Bolsheviks allowed the Czechoslovak Legion to use the Trans-Siberian Railway, which meant that White Russia would be at a greater disadvantage. The Bolsheviks would have retained control over Eastern Russia in 1919 and could have consolidated it faster than in our timeline. After consolidating Eastern Siberia and Central Asia, the Bolsheviks would have gone on to conquer the Caucasus and properly militarize, recapturing Ukraine, Belarus, and the Baltics. They would have also won the Soviet-Polish War but would have lost the Brest territory to Poland. However, they would still have failed to capture all of Poland. The Russian Civil War would have ended after the Soviet-Polish War, and there would have been no further attempts by White forces and their allies to conquer Eastern Siberia. Japan would have retreated earlier too.

Things would have gone pretty similar with the USSR, Lenin dies early, Stalin turns a socialist country into a nightmarish autocracy but Tukhachevsky Conspiracy (also known as the Case of the Trotskyist Anti-Soviet Military Organization) never happened and He makes less crackdowns on military generals although NKVD would still have a sight on them. Meaning that many Experienced Soviet generals would have survived and Soviet military would have had better morale.

However, the USSR would still have signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

In this timeline, Finland would have agreed to cede territory to the USSR in exchange for military support.

In November 1940, Stalin took Sorge's warnings of a German invasion seriously and began evacuating citizens from the German border areas while preparing for a surprise attack. Germany would still have attacked, but with the less effects of the Purge and with early preparations, the German invasion would have failed almost immediately as they would have struggled to advance beyond Brest-Litovsk. In the winter of 1941, the USSR would have launched a devastating counteroffensive, pushing the Germans back, even reaching Kaliningrad. Germany would have made one final push by attacking Ukraine, but it would have been only a moderate success. Due to the superior Red Army, this attempt would have failed, and German supplies would have been completely exhausted, leading to another Soviet counteroffensive. The Soviets would have been much more difficult to defeat by this point.

By the winter of 1942, the Soviets would have recaptured most of Ukraine and Belarus, and by 1943, the USSR would have gone all out against the Nazis, occupying their eastern territories and allied states like Romania, Bulgaria, and Hungary. Due to the USSR’s devastating offensives, D-Day would have occurred earlier, but harsh weather would have caused its failure. The Soviets would have managed to conquer everything up to the River Rhine.

USSR would have also managed to liberate Nations like Denmark, Yugoslavia, Northern Italy and Greece and would have installed a Stalinist dictator in power in these countries.

American translators never made mistranslations which means that Truman would have gone for Operation Downfall, but after a few months of war, the U.S. would have nuked Japan, which would have led to the USSR taking the entire Korean Peninsula instead of just the northern half.

Stalin still dies in 1953 but Malenkov had managed to consolidate his position more successfully and Malenkov had managed to get rid of Beria before Khrushchev's intervention. Malenkov also managed to maintain alliance with the key figures in the party meaning and maintained balance on focus on both Consumer goods and Heavy industry meaning that Khrushchev would have stayed as an opposition figure to Malenkov.

Malenkov would have implemented plans like Turkmen Canal, Improvement of the Agriculture of Union and would have tried to expand CMEA.

There would have been no Khrushchev's disastrous reforms, which caused diplomatic fallout with China and Albania, economic failure, agricultural collapse, and mass unemployment. The USSR would have remained more stable under Malenkov. However, Kosygin’s reforms would still have occurred due to economic stagnation.

Under Malenkov, the USSR would have won the space race because, during Operation Paperclip, most of the German scientists would have come to the USSR.

In the 1970s, Alexander Shelepin would have succeeded Malenkov and reformed the KGB into an anti-corruption institution, leading to more progress in the union and reduced corruption.

In the 1990s, Gregory Romanov would have succeeded Shelepin, continuing the Cold War. The future remains uncertain.

Things we have to change in the world:

In 1930s, USSR had managed to influence Chinese Communist party in exchange of Military support which would have led to Wang Ming gaining much greater influence but this would have not stopped him to defeat Nationalist in South China and would have become Leader of China in 1949 . This means that there would be no Sino Soviet Split.

Muhammad Ali Jinnah died of tuberculosis in the early 1940s, leading to the fall of religious dogmatism in Indian independence. This would have kept India united, and without a divided India and Wang Ming's leadership there are less to chances of 1962 war. India would have remained close to the Eastern Bloc.

In Afghanistan, Noor Muhammad Taraki received intelligence about a coup being staged by Hafizullah Amin and assassinated Amin before he could act. With Taraki surviving, he would have received massive Soviet support to defeat the Mujahideen. This would have taken several months, or up to a year, but Communist Afghanistan would have defeated the Mujahideen without the Soviet invasion, avoiding the Soviet-Afghan War.

Shelepin managed to fund the Tudeh Party in Iran significantly, leading to the Tudeh Party overthrowing the Shah in 1979 instead of Khomeini.

In Iraq, Saddam Hussein was killed in 1959, meaning the Ba'athists would have remained allies of the USSR.

Due to a larger Communist Germany, Communist North Italy, and a Soviet-friendly China, the USA would have sent even more troops to Vietnam, which would have led to widespread discontent within the U.S. They also made a mistake by diplomatically supporting Britain and France during the Suez Crisis, which meant that Ba'athists and Arabs would have been more closely aligned with the USSR. Additionally, the USA supported Argentina due to decolonization instead of Britain during the Falklands War, leading to strained relations with the UK.

The assassination attempt on Ronald Reagan was successful, meaning that his "Star Wars" program and neoliberalism would never have come to existence, leading to a weaker U.S. economy.

The USSR has kind of emerged victorious in cold war due to weaker NATO and USA.

The future of the world, however, remains uncertain.

Let’s explores the hypothetical scenario where Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) did not act alone to assassinate president Kennedy, but instead was part of a conspiracy.

1. The co-conspirators

The first thing is to determine what type of conspiracy LHO could realistically have been part of, and who his co-conspirators would have been.

If we study historical precedents, only one U.S. presidential assassinations has been done by a group of conspirators—the assassination of Abraham Lincoln in 1865. All other assassinations have been done by lone individuals. The most serious attempts to kill a president (Reagan), president-elect (FDR) or former president (Jackson, T. Roosevelt, Trump) were also carried out by lone actors. These individuals were either mentally unstable or politically motivated.

The Lincoln conspiracy was a small one (only 8 people were convicted), and was also politically motivated.

LHO, for his part, was a 29-year-old secretive, violent and arrogant man. He was broke, couldn’t keep a job, and his marriage was in shambles. In short, he was a loser no serious organisation would have trusted with an operation as important as assassinating a U.S. president.

Therefore, the only realistic scenario is that, in this alternate timeline, LHO encountered one or two individuals similar to himself: losers, far-left extremists, and willing to resort to political violence. He could have met them as part of his communist activities. (Of course, for the sake of this hypothetical scenario, we will set aside the "butterfly effect" implications of inventing these characters.)

2. The point of divergence

To avoid significantly altering the timeline of events, let us assume that Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) befriended these individuals after his attempted assassination of Edwin Walker on April 10, 1963. Had he met them earlier, they might have planned Walker’s assassination together, potentially changing the timeline even further. For instance, their involvement could have led to different outcomes—perhaps their arrest, or even a successful assassination of Walker, which might have eliminated their motive to target President Kennedy later.

By placing their meeting around April 1963, this timeline allows seven months for them to become acquainted, bond over their extremist views, and deliberate on committing an act of political violence together.

3. The decision

In our timeline, the JFK’s assassination was opportunistic. The motorcade route happened to pass in front of the Texas School Book Depository, where Lee Harvey Oswald had recently started working.

In this alternate timeline, if Oswald still secures the same job at the Book Depository (a position he obtained by random chance, and one that could easily be altered by the butterfly effect), the events might unfold differently. Once the motorcade route is announced to the public, Oswald could inform his associates, and together they plan the assassination.

4. The preparation: what would change?

In this alternate timeline, Lee Harvey Oswald (LHO) would likely have a better rifle. In our timeline, he was broke and could only afford a cheap rifle. With the support of accomplices, they could pool resources to acquire a higher-quality firearm.

LHO also wouldn’t need to ask a coworker for a ride to transport “curtain rods.” If his rifle were still at home, one of his co-conspirators would likely give him a ride instead.

However, since the Texas School Book Depository was Oswald’s workplace, it is unlikely he could have smuggled his accomplices to the sixth floor. Therefore, LHO would likely still shoot Kennedy alone from the sixth floor.

Where would his co-conspirators be? One might position himself in a car at the rear of the building to facilitate LHO’s escape. Another could be stationed at Dealey Plaza to monitor the situation, create a diversion, or even attempt to shoot Kennedy himself if LHO missed.

5. The assassination

In our timeline, LHO had enough time to fire three shots, hitting the target twice and killing the president. Multiple reenactments by the FBI, television networks, and others have shown that the shots were achievable, with many performers achieving better accuracy than LHO.

With a better rifle in this alternate timeline, it’s highly likely that LHO would still succeed in assassinating Kennedy.

6. The aftermath

In our timeline, LHO managed to escape the Book Depository and fled the area by bus. In this alternate version, he would escape out the back of the building and be picked up in a car by one of his co-conspirators.

LHO’s escape plan in our timeline was haphazard—he went to his rooming house briefly before leaving again. Meanwhile, the police quickly identified him as a suspect. When confronted by a patrolman, LHO killed him, fled to a theater, and was eventually arrested there after attempting to shoot an arresting officer.

In the alternate timeline, the aftermath would likely be better coordinated. LHO might hide at the home of one of his co-conspirators, or they could attempt to flee the area together. Nevertheless, the police would still likely identify LHO as a suspect and potentially uncover his accomplices.

This alternate scenario would probably end in a shootout where LHO and his accomplices are killed.

7. Conspiracy theories

In our timeline, conspiracy theories surrounding JFK’s assassination have proliferated over the years, with many Americans still refusing to believe he was killed by a lone assassin. Would these theories remain as prevalent in this alternate timeline?

Of course, in this scenario, there really is a conspiracy. However, the presence of an actual conspiracy does not inherently prevent alternate theories from emerging—consider the persistent theories surrounding 9/11, for example.

So, what would have happened?

On one hand, the involvement of accomplices could provide the public with a clearer understanding of the motivations behind the assassination and the details of the plot. A group leaves more evidence than a lone individual, offering a more complete picture of the event. This clarity might reduce the appeal of speculative or exotic theories.

Additionally, if Oswald and his accomplices were killed in a shootout, it would seem less suspicious than Oswald’s death in custody in our timeline. And of course, at least one of the accomplices could have survived and confessed the whole thing.

On the other hand, several factors would still encourage conspiracy theories. Chief among them is the pervasive distrust of the government, which only grew during the Vietnam War (and was exacerbated by subsequent scandals like Watergate). – there is a reason many conspiracy theorists claim JFK intended to withdraw U.S. forces from Vietnam.

Sure, other high-profile killings, such as those of Martin Luther King Jr. or Robert Kennedy, have generated less conspiracy theories. But JFK was the sitting president, a young and charismatic leader, and a symbol of the optimism of the early 1960s—a time before the Vietnam escalation, countercultural unrest, and disillusionment with government set in.

It’s also worth noting that even in our timeline, where the evidence against Oswald is overwhelming (fingerprints, ballistic analyses, eyewitness accounts, etc.), a majority of Americans still prefer alternative explanations.

Conclusion: In this alternate timeline, conspiracy theories would still emerge, though they might not be as widespread or deeply ingrained as in our timeline. The extent of their popularity would depend on several factors, in particular: whether any conspirators survived to provide full confessions, and how much evidence clarified the plot.

It was caused by Thailand joining Japan and the axis powers Seni pramoj Minister of foreign affairs while many generals against Thailand joining the axis powers mutiny and take there soldiers into the anti-Japanese faction while the Navy fledge loyalty to the rebellion after 3 days Plaek Phibunsongkhram is forced to resign exicuted 20 December 1941 Seni pramoj becomes prime minister a new constitution is drafted and enacted in may 1942 in March 1942 the national trials of 9 December Begins more known as the Bangkok trials

Alright so pretty self explanatory so I'm gonna say my take on the matter (my theory is inspired by others on YouTube and such)

So after the second world war and the defeat of Hitler the scene of Germany would split into three different nations 1.west Germany 2.east Germany 3.Prussia the Prussians would obviously be a Soviet puppet and a member of the Warsaw Pact and for majority of the Cold War it remained non important, the only relevance it had to the Soviets was the warmer naval bases (Leningrad froze over in the winter) and a perfect deportation site for the Volga Germans who settled Russia during the reign of cathrine the great, anyway the Volga Germans would mix with the local Prussians after a while it would blend with the Prussian culture, that would create a unique and patriotic Prussian identity, drastically different yet similar to their Germanic brothers west, so any unification with the other Germans would be unpopular by the common Prussians, during the Soviet era the prussian economy would suffer reliant on the Warsaw Pact Prussia would be so poor it would be poorer then the Baltic SSRs, after the Cold War the Prussians would declare independence, and because of their extreme Prussian patriotism (and mix of the Volga German culture) they wouldn't reunite with the other Germanys instead becoming a constitutional monarchy. On the modern world stage Prussia would be just as vital as the baltics majority of its economy would be a strong and self sufficient, with a popular tourism industry mainly to konnisberg, the Prussians would identify as different from the other Germans claiming that the Prussians and Germans were different and how Germany was birthed from Prussia. In summery Prussia would be just a naval base and dumping site of the Volga Germans, and in modern days have a strong industry, influence across its neighbors, and a strong independent Prussian culture.

Response to this post, but the post was old enough that I decided to make a new post instead of replying.

Timeline doesn't really look at the Southern Hemisphere because I don't know enough about its history (sorry).

Shortly after they form, the Haudenosaunee Confederacy becomes more powerful than they do in OTL. Their trade relationships with their neighbours deepen, and various mutual assistance pacts and land-use treaties are formed. Within a century, the result is an alliance similar to the Holy Roman Empire: A chaotic amalgamation of individually negotiated treaties, with the Confederacy at its core.

With the Haudenosaunee Confederacy exerting more regional power than they did in OTL, and being constantly in negotiations with themselves in order to get anything done, their leaders become a lot more cynical and inclined to realpolitik. When Europe makes contact, they quickly learn all they can about the European cultures.

When Britain begins claiming land under the Doctrine of Discovery, the Haudenosaunee leadership recognizes European colonization as an existential threat. They lack the military to contest the claim by force, but they send out delegations to as many North American nations as they can, seeking to adopt a unified foreign policy. The overtures are not completely successful, but most nations at least become wary of the Europeans.

The fur trade still happens, but the federation does their best to maintain control over as much of the logistics as possible. The Hudson's Bay Company is actually limited to the Hudson's Bay, and doesn't expand into most of the continent.

At this time delegations from different North American nations travel to London and Paris, meeting with European leaders. They speak excellent English and French, and their primary goal is to get Europe to treat them as fellow sovereign states instead of savages with no claim to statehood. France is more convinced than Britain.

In 1776 (or thereabouts) Britain is trying to get more resources out of their empire, and decides to expand the Thirteen Colonies into "unused" territory. The Haudenosaunee object, and this time they have enough of a military to do so with force. War breaks out. Always eager for a chance to hurt the British, France sends military support. Some people in the Thirteen Colonies also want independence from Britain, and many fight on the Haudenosaunee side. In the final peace deal, Britain promises not to take any more land in North America without the permission of its inhabitants. The Thirteen Colonies remain a British possession but also sign treaties with the Haudenosaunee, and end up with non-voting membership in the federation.

When the French Revolution rolls around, the rebelling French soldiers are less republican, since they didn't pick that up from the American Revolution. The Revolution is more liberal and moderate. Louis XVI survives. The government adopted is a form of constitutional monarchy, with some American influences, like a bigger focus on consensus-building. The church and nobility have their power curtailed, but maintain some power and most of their social status. There is no Reign of Terror, and Napoleon never gets the chance to stage a coup.

France comes out the other end of the Revolution as a stable liberal democracy with a figurehead King. The monarchies of Europe are concerned, but without the radicalism we see in OTL, they don't muster the political will to actually declare war on France.

There are no Napoleonic Wars, and Europe manages to avoid any other great power conflicts. The Congress of Vienna never happens either, but a lot of the institutions it spawned evolve eventually.

Without the horrors of the French Revolution, Europe is a lot less skeptical of liberalism. When Germany unifies, it ends up more liberal, and Italy does the same. With physical and ideological proximity, France, Germany, and Italy hold various trilateral trade summits.

The success of German and Italian unification inspires an American unification movement. Within a few years, the continent has reorganized into the United American Federation, a superstate stretching from the Arctic Circle to the Mexican border. (A few smaller nations choose to maintain limited independence, becoming associates instead of joining outright.) The UAF has sizable populations with European ancestry, and its government is a fusion of European democracy and the traditional Haudenosaunee structure, with some influences from other American nations. Although uninterested in expansionism, the UAF has a great deal of soft power which it uses to achieve foreign policy objectives (its primary objectives are a stable, peaceful, non-threatening Europe, an aligned Mexico, and improving relations with China.)

The French-German-Italian trade agreement grows, and basically becomes the EU. They improve the rights of workers enough that Communism never takes off. With Europe much more friendly with itself, WWI doesn't happen, and the chaos required for the Russian Revolution also never happens. I think this results in a cold war between the democracies and the totalitarian states, but I'm not sure. It's not a war that's likely to go hot, though, because the democracies aren't very interested in conquering Russia, and anyone stupid enough to mess with UAF allies will be brutally smacked down by a nation-state the size of a continent.

This was pretty fun to write! It's also my first attempt at an alternate history, so feedback is very much encouraged.

Its the year 1960 and the world has changed, ever since the end of the second world war germany dominates europe while britain watches the germans becoming stronger and stronger all thanks to hermann goerings reforms after hitlers death in 1955. The soviet union manages to survive but at what cost? Bukharin after overthrowing stalin in 1934 after the disaster, of the holodomor had caused the entire party to overthrow him electing bukharin into power, the golden boy tried to save what was left of the damage caused by both trotsky and stalin but by the time, 1940 came the UK sued for peace thus alerting the soviets june 22nd 1941 the germans launched operation barbarrossa but unlike our own it simply, frozes like what the first world war or great war is italy dominates the african continent after successfully invading egypt while japan struggles to fight against the americans (and still losed in 1945 but apologies for the war crimes) the war in the east by 43-45 ended in an utter stalemate, The post war years was disasterous The soviets, still coping their defeat against the axis while the Nationalists in china are gradually winning against the communists despite, funding from the soviets they ended up losing anyway with the establishment of the Republic of China in 1950, The US and canada and britain all formed the UNITED NATIONS, not an international organisation but a western alliance, as a way to protect the "free world" and even invited the soviets. 1955 hitler died by natural causes the supposed successor was joseph geobbles, martin borman got in the way and tried to take over but only for the wehrmact to step right in to stop all of it, herman goering is the new fuhrer noticing the post war struggles of germany and, has a deep feeling that this power, struggle may have caused every piece of hitlers work to all fall down causing a civil war getting help from the wehrmact, launches a supposed "coup de'tat" and restoring normalcy in germany at the same time the german-italo split came with the formation of both the mediteranian league and the Einheitspakt. Its 1960 and the world has never been colder than before

(NOTE: MODS PLS DONT DELETE THIS I WORKED HARD ON THIS ITS A PASSION PROJECT OF MINE!) (Is this tno??? No its not its more like twr but yes it has bits of tno but unlike tno russia is fine and strong but a bit weak from the war)

After the defeat of the American rebellion the British realize that the current political situation in North America is untenable and decide to grant more political autonomy to their American colonies. The Dominion of North America is formed out of 13 rebellious new world colonies. The Dominion is also granted all territory west of the Mississippi and South of the Great lakes for future settlement, however they are required to sign treaties with indigenous nations in order to seize the territory. This satisfies the Americans’ desire to expand while ensuring territory is seized legally under British law. After the French revolution fighting breaks out between British North America and French troops in Louisiana. The Dominion emerges victorious and incorporates Louisiana into the Dominion.

Member Provinces:

Province of Nova Scotia: Joined in after being separated from the majority French New Brunswick which joined the Dominion of Canada. Scottish Gaelic is widely spoken along with English.

Province of Prince Edward Island: Joined at the same time as Nova Scotia. Scottish Gaelic is widely spoken along with English.

Province of New Ireland: Formed from Massachusetts’ northern territory.

Province of New Hampshire: Founding member.

Province of Vermont: Formed from the territory of the Vermont Republic. Briefly joined Quebec before join the Dominion.

Commonwealth of Massachusetts: Founding member.

Province of Rhode Island: Founding member.

Province of Connecticut: Founding member.

Province of New York: Founding member.

Province of New Jersey: Founding member.

Province of Delaware: Founding member.

Province of Westmoreland: Formed from Connecticut’s western territory.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: Founding member.

Province of Maryland: Founding member.

Commonwealth of Virginia: Founding member.

Province of North Carolina: Founding member.

Province of South Carolina: Founding member.

Province of Georgia: Founding member.

Province of Red River: The furthest inland settlement at the time of joining. Joined hoping to attract more settlers to the region and secure help in fighting local Native tribes.

Commonwealth of Kentucky: Formed from Virginia’s western territory.

Province of Tennessee: Formed from North Carolina’s western territory.

Commonwealth of Sequoyah: Formed from Georgia’s western territory. Created after a treaty with the Cherokee, Muskogee, Choctaw, and Chickasaw as a Native American state. The government is is modelled after the British Westminster system with an Upper House consisting of hereditary chiefs from the various native tribes and a Lower House consisting of representatives elected by the citizens of Sequoyah. Citizenship of Sequoyah works differently from all other provinces. In most provinces anyone can move there and become a resident equal to anyone else. Sequoyah however is allowed to impose additional restrictions on voting rights in order to maintain its status as a native commonwealth. After a native rebellion funded by the French during the war for Louisiana, many native tribes east of the Mississippi were deported to Sequoyah. The tribes were given full citizenship and representation in the Upper House, however they have far fewer Upper House chiefs per capita than the four founding tribes. As the British North Americans settled further west of the Mississippi, some native tribes would willingly move to Sequoyah as part of their treaties, gaining Upper House seats for their chiefs.

Province of West Florida: Originally a British colony separate from the Dominion, the British let the Dominion annex it for European settlement in exchange for creating the Commonwealth of Sequoyah.

Province of Louisiana: French is widely spoken here, formed after annexation of the Louisiana territory.

Province of Ohio: Formed after signing treaties with natives in the Indian Territory.

Province of Indiana: Formed after signing treaties with natives in the Indian Territory.

Province of Illinois: Formed after signing treaties with natives in the Indian Territory.

Michigan Territory: A territory south of the Great Lakes.

Arkansas Territory: A territory north of Louisiana.

Missouri Territory: A Territory on the Great Plains.