/r/GoldandBlack
Join us in Discord: https://discord.gg/vNT2H5DeyP
Once you have access post your Reddit handle in #general-discusion with @Properal in the message to get less chance to get stuck in spam filter.
Civil, On-topic Discussion of Anarcho-Capitalism and other Libertarian Topics.
MEMBERS ONLY - Civil, on-topic discussion of anarcho-capitalism and other libertarian topics.
Libertarianism is a philosophy that holds that one should not initiate aggression on person or property. Anarcho-capitalism is a political philosophy that advocates for the elimination of the state in favor of individual sovereignty, private property, and free market production of law and justice. Anarcho-capitalists believe that in the absence of a state or ruler, society would improve itself through empowering individual choice and the discipline of the free market, or what its proponents describe as a voluntary society.
Racism and Social Justice are considered off-topic here; libertarianism does not have a racial component. All posts related to racism and social justice must have some obvious link to libertarianism and may be removed at moderator discretion.
Learn the basics of ancap philosophy: /r/AnCap101
David Friedman on How to Privatize Everything from AnCap Primer playlist
The Gold and Black Starter Pack for those new to Anarcho-capitalism.
This subreddit is night mode compatible
Well-Kept Gardens Die By Pacifism - why we chose to keep this sub an on-topic sub and remove participants who do not talk about things of interest to ancaps.
Libertarian Websites
https://bleedingheartlibertarians.com
https://economicpolicyjournal.com
https://marginalrevolution.com
If you're looking for the subreddit related to images and artwork involving the colors Gold and Black, that's over at /r/blackandgold
/r/GoldandBlack
I don’t care if this has already been posted. Watching the MSM have an absolute meltdown over their ‘realization’ of Biden’s mental capacity has been so enjoyable.
Birth control is party of the patriarchy. I’ve never met a woman who was forced to take birth control. Required readings. Bunch of Marxist shit thrown in too.
The Thought → The Act → The End
We cannot separate the outcome entirely. This is because the Individual values some outcome and each Individual is different.
The private Individual earns. He also owes debts. He interacts with others reciprocally, which means he trades or disassociates. If others do the same, the end result is autonomy of the Individuals. Exchanges or trade result in unity. Failed exchanges result in disassociation. The ability to disassociate results in progress as non-beneficial exchanges do not occur.
In both cases of exchange or disassociation, autonomy is the result.
The Conformist does not earn but takes. Usually the Conformist takes via entitlement, or demands that the Group takes on his behalf. The end is Uniformity as the self interests of the Individual are absorbed into the interests of the group. Uniformity is the minimizing of differential outcome, in ownership and in contract.
One cannot be known to be conforming in private.
Entitlement cannot exist in reciprocity, and vice versa.
Uniformity is not unity.
The Servile (or dominant) does not earn but takes. More specifically, the Servile takes via theft, or hopes his master will take for his benefit. The end is Hierarchy as self interests of the servile are dominated by the powerful. Hierarchy is maximizing differential outcome, in ownership and in contract.
One cannot be known to be servile in private.
Theft cannot exist in reciprocity, and vice versa.
Hierarchy is not merit.
The extent to which an Individual can change in thought (privacy vs conformity vs servility) is up to the Individual. A person can claim to not being conforming, yet if that person appeals to Democratic processes, majority claims, and other appeals of legitimacy via Group, then that person is conforming. A person can claim to not be servile, yet if that person appeals to Representative processes, Experts, or specific State officials, and other appeals of legitimacy via Dominance, then that person is servile.
The extent to which an Individual acts is the extent to which he/she is that act. A person can claim to not being entitled, yet if that person demands that the Top or the Successful be taken from, then that person is entitled. A person can claim to not believe in theft, yet if that person supports or submits to masters that rob, then that person believes in theft.
The Individual chooses to be a private, conforming, or servile Individual.
The Individual chooses the means of reciprocity, entitlement, or theft
the essay:
https://kellychaseoffield.substack.com/p/thought-act-outcome
Let's talk about the bottled water industry from a market perspective. We've got a product that's essentially identical (H2O), yet there's a huge variety of brands at wildly different price points.
Is this a triumph of marketing over substance? A demonstration of the power of branding? Or perhaps a market inefficiency waiting to be corrected?
Curious to hear some points of view.... Is there a libertarian take on the economics of water?
Trying to think of a good drinking game for the debates, since there is no way you can watch sober. Who has any good rules?
I'll start with some I've been thinking of: