/r/EnergyPolitics
Energy politics, business, and policy: the key to understanding global affairs in the 21st century.
A discursive community for Energy Politics. The key to understanding global affairs in the 21st century.
About /r/EP
/r/EP has:
» Strict moderation.
» A narrower focus than other subreddits.
» Regular weekly content.
Interested in helping out? PM /u/callumgg
Link flair explained
» Discussion - ask the community
» News Review - a summary of opinion/analysis in energy, usually behind a paywall.
» PDF Report - a report on the energy industry (gov't factsheets, company reports, consultancy analysis)
» Primer - a useful intro to a topic
» Opinion/Analysis - an opinion piece on energy (e.g. the Guardian's 'Comment is Free' or analysis from an energy expert)
Related subreddits
» The general /r/energy & in-depth /r/europeans
» The political /r/geopolitics, /r/foreignpolicyanalysis
» The soft path of /r/environment, /r/solar, /r/green, /r/biomass, /r/wind
» The hard path of /r/oil, /r/hardenergy, /r/coal, /r/nuclear, /r/NuclearPower
- Why here and not in the above subreddits? (hover)
- Doesn't hijack a general subreddit
- Provides a focus
- Stricter moderation
- News Review for general access to paywalled articles
- Regular weekly content can be stickied and resources made available in the sidebar/wiki
/r/EnergyPolitics
1,659 Subscribers
What Chris Wright's nomination means for nuclear energy in general (and fusion specifically)
I've been writing about the business of fusion energy for couple weeks now.
I don’t typically cover political developments, but I found Chris Wright's testimony before Congress during his confirmation hearing fascinating. I tried to keep my coverage as unbiased and grounded in the facts as possible.
Check it out: https://commercial-fusion.beehiiv.com/p/what-might-chris-wright-s-nomination-mean-for-fusion-energy
02:15 UTC
DOE Sec Granholm on how Biden energy legacy will survive Trump admin
04:47 UTC
Back To Top