Really goes to show how ass feminists are treating everyone.

Additionally, I've noticed r/feminism insta bans anyone who dares to make a point against they're petty arguments, while r/mensrights acc listens to people's controversial opinions.

And finally one more fact for the road, when you try to search up r/feminism, it shows other subreddits before it that are the complete opposite of what feminists want, I won't list them because they're nsfw subreddits, but it's so funny imagining an angry single middle aged woman raging when she finds out r/feministsneedcock is a thing

2 years ago i (M) stared linkin with this girl that I knew for a decade or sm, she started catching hela feelings but i had told her before we do anything that I didn’t want nothing serious with her we did out thing for some months and we stopped talking … Any ways we hadn’t talked since that summer 2 years ago , and am talking with this girl ( she from the same city w us ) and she told me that 2 years ago that other girl had saw her and to another girl , one pic of me and her in bed doing stuf. I got shocked because I didn’t expect it , and these 2 girls are not even close with her , so am thinking if she leaked that pic to those randoms , how many people have seen my tingi…?? ( the girl that told the that the other girl showed our pictures, explained the pic with 100% accuracy) I don’t know if it sounds funny but it’s not , I called her 2 days ago and confronted her , she claimed she hadn’t leak non and that this girl was making things from her mind. hanged up 40 minutes after fighting and then she blocked me EVERYWHERE ( she also has moved to another country ) . Now tell me wtf am I supposed to do , I can’t do non . IMAGINE what if this had happened but I would be the one that was showing pics around. And the thing that scares me is that we have videos…

A male victim of sexual assault feels suicidal after reaching out for help in an online service and being blocked for being male. He is likely not in the United States.

Here is my reply in the hopes that it serves the interests of justice, and because some victims of such discriminatory behavior can be chidlren, helps to protect children from child abuse.

I'm not an attorney and this is not legal advice.

You wrote:

(Above and anonymized)

Please stay alive.

988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline

We can all help prevent suicide. The 988 Lifeline provides 24/7, free and confidential support for people in distress, prevention and crisis resources for you or your loved ones, and best practices for professionals in the United States.

https://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/

Were these users of a particular service? Did you feel they misrepresentated their services e.g. by claiming inclusivity or that they supported survivors?

If a US based service is engagaged in deceptive or discrimiantory practices, it is possible to make a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission. The complaintant does not have to be a US resident.

To file a complaint with the FTC:

Visit https://reportfraud.ftc.gov/

Provide details about the incident

Answer the questions on the online form

The FTC uses these complaints to investigate and take action against companies engaging in unfair practice

For US based services, that may be:

Fraud

Fraud is both a civil tort and criminal wrong.

In civil litigation, allegations of fraud might be based on a misrepresentation of fact that was either intentional or negligent. For a statement to be an intentional misrepresentation, the person who made it must either have known the statement was false or been as to its truth. The speaker must have also intended that the person to whom the statement was made would rely on it. The hearer must then have reasonably relied on the promise and also been harmed because of that reliance.

https://www.law.cornell.efdu/wex/fraud

You may have experienced discriminatory behavior censoring your interactions which is not in good faith. As such, the service may have violated their requirements to moderate in good faith and may have lost their protection from civil liability for censoring such content.

Section 230(c)(2) further provides "Good Samaritan" protection from civil liability for operators of interactive computer services in the good faith removal or moderation of third-party material they deem "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_230

These actions may be the basis of a breach of contract lawsuit. This may either be in a state court, or especially if many users are involved from different jurisdictions in a class action lawsuit, it may be in federal court.

Other nations have similar laws protecting consumers.

Please keep us updated.

I wish you the best of luck in your search for justice.

I think we all know that gyms nowadays are a hot place for false accusations and creeps right? But God from up there blessed this mess with a person that took this matter in his own hands.

Joey Swoll, if you didn’t hear about him, is a gym bodybuilder influencer who is called the “CEO of Gym Positivity” after he started to call out women and men creeps and accusers in gyms. On Instagram he called out a female swimmer athlete who made fun of a kid and filmed him in a gym cause he was doing an exercise wrong. And the hot topic is with a Twitch influencer called Jessica Fernandez, who made a stream in a gym and later on falsely accused a guy there who she assumed started at her like a creep.

Spoiler alert, the guy was only doing the daily basis that 100% of people do, and that’s simply looking at people around, not starring. Joey called out the influencer and the video gained huge attention, over 8 million views, and this made the influencer apologize for her actions. Oh man if it was only this, then it would had been a wonderful day, but of course not.

After that video, Joey continued to call out horrible people from gyms, women and men alike, so he is not targeting only women. But I saw an article some time ago that women on the internet are uniting to call out Joey for MISOGYNY! Woaaaaaah that far we reached?

I thought this was a joke but unfortunately it’s true. Women saying, and I quote “Joey Swoll basically made a safe space for misogynistic men to invalidate women’s experiences of being uncomfortable at the gym” or “OMG I can’t stand Joey Swoll that man has done irreparable damage to the reality and plight of women facing misogyny in public spaces”. I think they are upset they can’t get away with their false claims now huh?

And as last idea, the article was written byyyyyy A WOMAN. Who could have guessed. Well I tell you how. Besides her name and profile picture, in the article of course that she needed to add statistics of women being afraid of doing workouts cause of harassment and how many are killed, like murder during workouts and exercises are women only. What do you think about this one mates?

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/fitness-influencers-gym-creep-battle-divides-men-and-women/news-story/dbc38708e5d5e61a25bc439ba84147df

The injustice and unfair treatment men always get makes this subreddit a relief and burden imo. On one hand, you know that everyone here understands and is going through the same pain you are, but on the other hand, hearing other people list out all this injustice out loud hurts. Hearing how you've been being beaten up wby society without even knowing it before just feels like a slap to a face. Life just seemed so much more bearable and happier when I didn't know about how women got away with everything and men are seen are emotionless machines. I feel like I'm stuck in a limbo of whether I should just give up and go back to imagining that men have it good in society, or fight for our rights even when there's practically no chance we'll have as good a life as women

Feminists don't really go through this because the injustices they face are so small, they have the energy to complain about them, but men have it worse in almost every aspect of our lives, from being drafted, to emotional to support, to standards and expectations. It hurts to know you're going to be kicked on and seen as a monster just for being born the way you are. I feel like if I just ignored the injustices and put on the rose colored glasses again, I'll see the world in a happier pov.

Don't get me wrong, I love how we're standing up for ourselves finally, but I just hate that we're constantly reminded of how often we're spat on

I know this post doesn't really say anything or go anywhere, but I'm just curious if any of y'all think the same about this, sorry for the rant, thanks for listening

Women have literally so many advantages in life. They literally have to not be fat and not be a shitty person and they are virtually assured of a middle class lifestyle. There are plenty of suckers willing to date and marry them. Still they are complaining about discrimination at work, wage gap, blah, blah. Universities and companies are bending over backwards to hire them and cater to them. The university system is designed to female learning style. The mental health system is based on female needs.

I saw million girls moonshot encouraging girls in STEM fields. What about poor boys ? Who will encourage them ? Did they make a mistake being born male in poor family?

https://www.milliongirlsmoonshot.org/

Am I biased ? Am I unaware about advantages offered to men ?

This is probably a dumb post. I'm tired, it's late, and this is definitely a rant. But I've read the "neither party cares about men" thing far too many times. Yes, neither party cares about men. But guess what folks, neither party cares about anyone!! Neither party cares about Blacks, women or anyone else. Oh, they pretend to care about lots of people to get their votes (called pandering), but genuine caring? Give me a break.

Actually this is like those who think men can get women to change by just explaining how men are treated unfairly. Sorry, but women don't really care about men either.

The only way to get the results you want in either case is to rock the boat. With the parties, you have to make them pay in elections. Show them if they ignore you, they lose. Men need to vote men's issues like women vote for women's issues. With women, you have to deny them what they want. Our resources, sex, relationships, etc. This is why I preach MGTOW.

Summing up - stop waiting for people to give you what you want because they "care". Reagan said it pretty well. "If they won't see the light, then make them feel the heat".

All of the men in the ad, after first touting their hyper-macho proclivities (for weight-lifting, steak, Bourbon, motorcycles, trucks, hay bales), then assure us that as manly men (“I’m a man, man,” says one), they are more than willing to emote, cry, and—above all—give support to “women who take charge.” I’m surprised we weren’t also told how happy they are to vacuum, and to take submissive postures during sex.

Being pro-woman, according to the ad, means supporting every choice a woman could make, including killing her unborn baby. The ad even comes with an accusatory warning near the end: real men like these are “sick of so-called men domineering, belittling, and controlling women just so they can feel more powerful.”

Statements from the ad’s main creator, Jacob Reed, a comic who has worked for Jimmy Kimmel Live and other productions, proclaimed the ad a genuine attempt to appeal to men, a humorous yet sincere invitation for them to embrace pro-feminist masculinity. Reed mentioned in interview that earlier versions of the ad, which had actually been even more preachy and censorious, with lines like “I’m not afraid of a woman having rights because what kind of creep would I be then?” had been toned down out of respect for male viewers.

“Reed realized the last thing he wanted to do was condescend to his potential audience,” wrote Fast Company author Joe Berkowitz approvingly. “Ultimately, he decided viewers would be savvy enough to intuit the negative implications of the opposing viewpoint without having it spelled out.” How broad-minded of Reed not to spell out the loathsomeness of non-feminist men!

Far from offering a parody of feminist dogma, then, the ad was a straight-up celebration of it.

I don’t want to make too much of it: the ad was not endorsed by the Harris campaign and is merely one, perhaps hastily produced and certainly ill-conceived, male-feminist representation. I realize that there are plenty of non-feminist men planning to vote for Harris for their own reasons. Yet in its ham-fisted buffoonery, the ad is a useful reminder of how thoroughly the ruling class (including significant portions of the Republican machine) misunderstand and have contempt for the concerns and perspectives of many American men. Here I want to respond seriously to the ad’s suggestion that only knuckle-draggers want to “control women.”

What struck me most powerfully about the ad is how little idea Jacob Reed seems to have of what most men actually do, and how crucial their work is. That’s why the ad’s presentation of traditional masculinity (the Bourbon, the horse) is such a belittling pastiche.

I am reminded of an interview by YouTuber Chris Williamson of evolutionary biologist Joyce Benenson in which both agreed that the technological advances of modern society had made it possible for women to outperform men just about everywhere (see 26:30), leaving a large swath of men playing videogames and, in Williamson’s words, “basically sedated […] out of their usefulness in the real world” (1:03:00). At one point in the conversation, Williamson asked Benenson (27:00) to explain whether men have any use left now that their former roles in war and big-game hunting were no longer relevant.

Benenson, expressing compassion for men and boys, thought it unfortunate that society had not “come up with more community-based ventures for men” (28:20) such as tree-planting or recycling to keep them productively occupied. One can only shudder at the thought of university-educated women directing such ventures.

Like Williamson and Benenson, Reed seems never to have encountered the millions of American men who use their strength and skills to build and maintain the vastly complex transportation, construction, energy, automation, manufacturing, food, and sanitation networks that make modern life possible. He seems genuinely to believe that qualities such as physical toughness, stoicism, and interest in technology are relics of the past with no connection to modern manhood.

If women aren’t flooding in to firefighting and road paving, sewer repair and long-haul trucking, according to this vision, it isn’t because men are more inclined for such essential physical work. In the progressive view, men’s relation to machines and physical competence can only be ironic and postmodern. Not just the lack of respect but the utter incomprehension are staggering.   

Reed similarly seems to have no idea what many men today think about female leadership and female power, which is why the ad is fixated on the notion that only a paranoid fantasy in the fragile male psyche—a pathetic, atavistic belligerence—has caused men to turn in fear from the prospect of womanly competence. The possibility that men have looked for such competence and not found it could never, of course, occur.

The men I know don’t spend a lot of time contemplating women’s place and status in the world other than to be taken aback by the decades-long hissy fit in which so many women have indulged. Most men are happy to work with talented and committed women but have not so far found such talent or commitment in enough abundance to justify having women “take charge.”

Some men, indeed, have had run-ins with women—a feminist teacher who made their son’s life a misery, a feminist judge unconcerned with reason or evidence—that have left a bad impression. Still, most men don’t vote based on sex: they assess policies and results that matter to them. Emotions and self-perception—especially about their masculinity—play almost no role.

Yet while the vast majority of men don’t have a problem with women in positions of leadership, men are noticing that at least some of those women (and a goodly number of feminist men) have a problem with them. The casual, unapologetic misandry embodied in the ad and in so much else that feminism proclaims speaks for itself. Even when the misandry isn’t overt, it’s clear that boys’ and men’s lives simply don’t matter much to the majority of feminist pundits and leaders, who seem to think of men mainly in relation to the more they can be got to do to improve women’s lives. If that seems exaggerated, take a look at the White House National Strategy on Gender Equity and Equality, which has nothing to say about male disadvantage in its 42-page discussion of a “whole-of-government” approach to providing services and increased representation for girls and women.

Men have seen their standard of living decline in relation to women’s in all the areas that economists measure. Over the past four decades, their earnings have stagnated, especially for the least educated and the youngest males, their employment rates and occupational stature have declined, and their numbers at institutions of higher education have fallen dramatically. As researchers David Autor and Melanie Wasserman demonstrate, the prospects are particularly poor for male children raised in single-mother households.

Proponents of gender equality do not concern themselves with these gender inequalities; instead, such ideologues participate in giggly debates over whether men are obsolete. Some even write books with triumphant titles like The End of Men: And the Rise of Women (Hanna Rosin), Are Men Necessary? (Maureen Dowd); or even I Hate Men (Pauline Harmange). They bathe in male tears, and so on. Anyone trying to address the problems of men and boys, whether suicide, substance abuse, employment discrimination, homelessness, or incarceration, will be met with indignant claims that women suffer more and must always be the first and the main priority (on this score, see Kamala Harris’s speech to the UN).

What the ad never broaches is any actual reason why a society governed by feminists and run according to women’s preferences should be appealing to men. It’s well known that women have a strong in-group preference that leads to biased outcomes (men, too, are biased—in favor of women): punitive sexual harassment legislation; dubious accusations of misconduct that destroy men’s careers and reputations; the fantasy of rape culture; affirmative consent legislation at the college and state levels; diversity initiatives that have made anti-male discrimination a common, lauded practice; the trumpeting of female superiority in business, government, academia, law, and medicine; and statements of anti-male hatred, even of the desire for a world without men at all, tolerated in a manner impossible to credit if made by men about women.

Though reluctant to see women as their enemies, some men can no longer shrug off the evidence of anti-male indifference or contempt. They’re talking to one another about the family court system. They’re concerned about diversity policies that ignore merit. They’re shocked by the feminization of the military. They don’t want to see their forefathers dishonored or their sons and nephews sidelined.

The tone-deaf Man Enough ad was an attempt to paper over men’s growing discontent by pretending that the most masculine men in America love the idea of even more feminism.

https://substack.com/@fiamengofile/p-150528812

Hi all,

I’m a 21 guy from Northwest, England.

I’m thinking about starting a an actual support group for men, in the area, in the coming months.

A place for guys to talk~ but also to come up with actual solutions and preventions to very real problems the men in the group are experiencing.

Together we can chat, help each other combat our problems; as well as just keeping each other company and even having a laugh along with the way.

I want to make some actual progress in bringing together the brotherhood; even if it is just for my area.

Plus, I’m hoping this way, it might encourage others to do the same for their community; as there’s only so far one person can reach.

I’ll get in touch with a few venues and such in Manchester, and see what I can arrange. I will create a follow up post, once I have more details…

If you’re interested to discuss more, feel free to DM me.

Stay strong brothers!

To be clear, father is equally Responsible for children but, today the right to abortion / no abortion remain solely with the woman. If a woman made a mistake by sleeping with a man she can erase it by aborting the baby but, the male has to carry the brunt of it even if he doesn't wishes to keep the baby. While I totally agree women should have the right to abort as it's thier body, men should have the right to not be responsible for babies that come into the world only because of the mother's will. If u are sure u want the baby without the approval of the father then u should not expect monetary compensation for raising the baby. Am I wrong with this idea.

From what I've read on the internet, the official death toll is over 43,000. Slightly over half (50%) of those killed were women and children. This is very sad that this is happening, but media outlets and news reporters often ignore the tens of thousands of men who have also been murdered. It boils by blood how the lives of men are seen as less valuable in the eyes of society. This is a prime example of male disposability.

Have there been any notable activism or protests for men's rights? For women we obviously have the feminist movement, but is there anything for men? The closest to "activism" I've seen is men's mental health month.

There exists a report published by the "Panamerican Health Organisation" back in 2012, indicating that domestic violence against women is widespread in the region and that in some cases it leads to a decrease in GDP of as much as 2% in countries such as Nicaragua and Cuba:

https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/3471

However, we are already aware that women are as likely to perpetrate domestic violence against men as men are to perpetrate domestic violence against women and that Latin America has, generally speaking, substantially higher crime and violence rates than many parts of the world.

Obviously, judging from the above assumptions, the rates and consequences of domestic violence between the genders should be absolutely equivalent as well.

Thoughts?

Looking forward to everyone's responses.

Wikipedia says MRM started in the 1970s, so it's been almost 54 years since we got going.

My question is: what have we accomplished since then, and what do we still need to achieve?

I was talking with a fellow dad at a Halloween gathering yesterday. I asked him to tell me something about himself. "Tell me something about yourself," I told him.

He proceeded to tell me where he worked, how many kids he had, where he and his wife met, and how long they've lived in the area. Ok, that is definitely information, but it doesn't tell me much about this person. What are his hobbies, what are his interests, etc...

And it got me thinking, and led me to post here. Is this the way we introduce ourselves to others? Are we merely identified by our familial relationships and employment status?

Wouldn't it be interesting to hear "married with two kids and yeah I work but on the side I enjoy carpentry (or playing piano, or whatever)"

Something to think about - are we enabling this gross overgeneralization of men by society by conforming to some hidden expectation that we stay shallow in our interactions with others? It seems that it would be harder to do this if people saw a little more of the rich lives that all men live, or want to live.

Next time someone asks me about myself, I may go off the rails a little bit. Talk about the piano I'm trying to learn with my kid or the games I've been playing lately. Something....different.

Anyway, take care of yourselves, and don't be afraid to be the real you in your interactions with others. At least you won't just be "dude with two kids and works in finance."

Le processus naturel de fabrication des bébés va devenir obsolète.

https://www.innovant.fr/2024/10/24/ce-ventre-de-maman-artificiel-chinois-controle-par-ia-va-bouleverser-la-fabrication-des-bebes/

So I have been surfing the net about what women and society as a whole thought about male forced draft in military service. And then I found out that Norway, one of the most equal countries in the world, made a law some years ago that makes women attend drafting as well.

Pretty equal right? I mean, the Norwegian army is since 1600s, so men have been drafted by force in combat for over 400 years while women only started now. But don’t think this was taken good by feminists.

They started arguing that it’s a decision that doesn’t promote equality and strips away the right of freedom. Well well well, ain’t that something Fritz. So you are telling me that men being drafted to war since 1600s is not against freedom, but when women get drafted since 2010s, that offensive.

Instead of complaining about that women now are equal to men in terms of military, they should make efforts in the name of real feminism definition, and that being equality between BOTH genders, not women only, but I doubt them ever doing that. What do you think mates?

https://womenalliance.org/no-to-female-conscription/#:~:text=The%20Norwegian%20Association%20for%20Women's%20Rights%20(NKF)%20considers%20female%20conscription,human%20rights%20and%20fundamental%20freedoms.