I stumbled across this podcast the other day and wanted to see if anyone else had listened? The basic gist is that a podcaster investigates claims that non-verbal (usually autistic) people are able to read minds. The host and her team meet various non-verbal people and their carers and test their abilities. If we take the podcaster at their word then it seems that these non-verbal people are able to pull off some amazing feats, seemingly reading minds.

As the show progresses it delves much deeper in spirituality and what I would call 'woo woo' topics, and I found it increasing less credible as it went on.

So if you have heard the show my questions would be - do you think the show is a total hoax? And if not, does that mean it is all true or could it be honest but mistaken, or maybe the host is the victim of a hoax?

If you have not seen it then more generally are you aware at all of claims of non-verbal people being telepathic and what do you think about that?

There are certain words I hear that instantly shut down because these words invoke a lack of substance. Please feel free to add

Misinformation Disinformation Pseudoscience Conspiracy theory Shill Grifter Propaganda

There are more but I want people to add some. I find it irritating that people think using these words somehow helps their arguments.

Remote Viewing

If you go to wikipedia, here is what you'll find about 'remote viewing':

Remote viewing (RV) is the practice of seeking impressions about a distant or unseen subject, purportedly sensing with the mind.

A remote viewer is expected to give information about an object, event, person, or location hidden from physical view and separated at some distance.

The idea of remote viewing received renewed attention in the 1990s upon the declassification of documents related to the Stargate Project, a $20 million research program sponsored by the U.S. government that attempted to determine potential military applications of psychic phenomena.

The CIA

The top google result for 'remote viewing' leads to the CIA website and this paper:

An Evaluation of the Remote Viewing Program: Research and Operational Applications

It makes for fascinating reading, although at 120+ pages, I'm guessing most folks won't be interested in reading it for themselves.

The tl;dr is that the author(s) makes the case that even if remote viewing really worked, it wouldn't be useful for intelligence gathering.

You can find the summary of that paper around page 120 of the pdf, or 5-4 if you follow the report's labeling system.

My Impression

In the past, I might have scoffed at the idea of 'remote viewing' being a real thing which people could actually 'do'.

This was before I understood the basics of what is being proposed, and how it might 'work'.

You can hear my recent one-hour chat with a proud remote viewer named Sasha aka Orphan Red.

It's available to stream or download here, and also via podbean directly.

Some of my main takeaways from this conversation include:

1) 'Remote Viewing' is very different from telepathy (RVers are not trying to 'see through other peoples eyes')

2) The concept is based on the premise that all information in our realm is being stored or recorded somehow

3) Some people believe they can use their RV skills to accurately predict pro sports outcomes

Questions

What do you know about 'remote viewing'?

Have you looked into this before and if so, what opinion did you arrive at?

Are you familiar with 'The Men Who Stare at Goats' (2009)?

Why do you think the CIA is the top listed result if you google 'Remote Viewing'?

Submission Statement: It appears to me that Feeding America partners with grocery stores to inflate the value and usability of donated foods so the charity can collect actual, cash donations and pocket them legally.

A bit of a lukewarm conspiracy but it's been driving me nuts. Hoping to get anyone's opinion or criticism since my accounting degree is nowhere near enough for the forensic accounting claims I'll make. These all come from Feeding America's 990 forms and audit reports here.

For any not in the know, Feeding America is mobile food bank that ostensibly collects donations and feeds the poor. As frequent poors, my wife and I used to get a box of food from them a handful of times a year. We noticed the quality substantially drop post-covid, but it's free food and we never wanted to be choosing beggars. Gradually, FA started to exclude meat or protein, frequently provide moldy/severely expired food, and only consist of grocery store donations. A couple years back we got better jobs and bought a house near her family, who run a tiny food bank of their own.

In checking out the 501c3 process to make their bank a real charity, I started looking into FA to see how a massive food bank runs, and there are a lot of red flags IMO. Here are the top ones (which again, could just be lack of understanding on my part:)

1. Diana Aviv, CEO in 2019, had a salary of $1.1m I understand this isn't unheard of in charities, but it sets a tone.
2. Current CEO Claire Babineaux-Fontenot made over $1m with bonuses last year
3. The top 19 executives split over $6m in salary (~$350k average) which again seems odd for a charity. Why does a food bank need a top-of-the line, half a million dollar HR manager when it has less than 500 employees?
4. Average executive salary increased 22.5% YOY, which is almost an additional $1m, at a time where the organization turns away more people than ever due to shortages (anecdotally speaking, though the increase in need seems generally acknowledged)
5. There are only 417 other employees in the $5 billion-a-year company. They split $53.5m in pay for an average of $128k, which would include entry level employees and folks first transitioning from food bank volunteer roles.
6. To their credit, FA functions as a network on unincorporated food banks. They get massive amounts of grants and distribute them, but this adds to its 'total fundraising', and composes a lot of their $5 billion in donations figure.
7. FA proudly passes on 98% of its donations, but for a $5b company, that other 2% is still a hundred million per year.
8. $119k in flights and hotels in 2023. Seems very high for staff size.
9. $101 million in 'program service revenue' from 2023, which seems to consist of grants awarded but not fully spent.
10. $62 million in royalties and investments; stocks, bonds, etc. in 2023. Great returns but strange allocation of money IMO
11. Over $100 million spent on marketing and acquisition. One company, PlusMedia Digital LLC, makes all of its revenue from Feeding America. 37 employees were paid $12 million, with FA being literally their only client.
12. Small but their form 990 needed to be published publicly by 11/15/2024 and still has not been.
13. Minnesota, Texas, and Florida food banks funded by FA each moved over $100 million in food in a single year, which would be physically impossible. That's almost ten times the revenue of an average grocery store, which has customers moving their inventory for them.
14. 2400 trucks owned by FA depreciated by $17 million in one year. I don't know a ton about diesel trucks but that seems high, feel free to correct me.
15. Getting flimsier here, but Walmart and more local chains like to flex on 'total investment' which the former puts at $240 million. These 'investments,' being food, appear to be donated at or past expiration (from experience in a few different cities/states.) This is totally cool and I'm all for rescuing food, but they're being written off at full value. When Feeding America fails to get it to someone before it actually becomes inedible, it's a depreciating asset expense and an expected one that can be seen by their assets depreciating by half each year. The grocery store still 'donated' 240 million worth of food, which would add to the $5b FA gets a cut from, allowing them to siphon the cash donations from people since they're still only taking 2%. Inflating the value of the food that couldn't be sold helps the stores with social equity and allows FA to steal more.
16. Anecdotal, but to support the last point, I've worked for two national grocery chains and two local ones, each of which donated, but only damaged unsellable goods. FA is open about this too but the price isn't marked down on the books, and could easily be inflated.
17. Their "meals provided" slogan is a completely arbitrary metric, prone to change, and determined by the company finances (likely the branding they paid hundreds of millions to marketing agencies to push.) In their own words:

"We divide the total number of pounds of donated food by what it costs to keep Feeding America running smoothly and getting that food where it needs to go. That gives us the number of pounds of food we secured on behalf of local food banks per dollar. Each meal is roughly 1.2 pounds, giving us our meal per dollar figure."

Really looking for anyone to poke holes in this because it'd be great if they weren't actually stealing donations in a scummy, financially legal way. Also again totally pro giving people food even if it's not peak, but with an operation this large and the steading decline in edibility with the rise in executive compensation and investment portfolio seems crazy.

Looking forward to seeing everyone's replies

Sounds crazy at first.

Until you see the evidence for yourself.

The video is about 12 minutes long, and there's a lot of information in there.

The tl;dr is that Season 3, Episode 11 of Seinfeld contains some Corona-related elements.

Or, at least, that's how it might seem in hindsight.

I personally don't believe in 'predictive programming' but I can see why a lot of people do.

If you've seen the video for yourself, I'd be interested to hear your thoughts about it.

Is it all a matter 'coincidence'?

Perhaps even a case of 'apophenia'?

Or do you think there's too much going on Seinfeld S3E11 to for it to have simply occurred by 'chance'?

You've probably heard of the 'Book of Enoch' before

It's the one with the giants and the nephilim and the demons and so forth. Via wiki:

The Book of Enoch is an ancient Jewish apocalyptic religious text, ascribed by tradition to the patriarch Enoch who was the father of Methuselah and the great-grandfather of Noah.

The Book of Enoch contains unique material on the origins of demons and Nephilim, why some angels fell from heaven, an explanation of why the Genesis flood was morally necessary, and a prophetic exposition of the thousand-year reign of the Messiah.

Three books are traditionally attributed to Enoch, including the distinct works 2 Enoch and 3 Enoch.

None of the three are considered to be canonical scripture by most Jewish or Christian church bodies.

So it isn't from the official bible (so to speak), but it is considered to be a religious text.

Questions

1. Do you believe in nephilim, giants, and demons?

2. How old do you believe the 'Book of Enoch' to be?

What I've heard

This year I have interviewed three different people who all source the 'Book of Enoch' as a key plank of their worldview.

Earlier this year I chatted with two fellows who call themselves Team Yahawashai.

Among other things, they believe this realm to be a 'simulation'.

A couple months ago I spoke with Paul Stobbs, author of The Nephilim Looked Like Clowns.

All three of these gentlemen told me that they believe the 'Book of Enoch' to be a genuine, authentic, ancient text.

So what's the problem?

Well, I decided to spend some time trying to trace the claimed sources / provenance of the 'Book of Enoch'.

I began by looking at the official story in the 'History' section on the wikipedia page linked earlier.

Outside of Ethiopia, the text of the Book of Enoch was considered lost until the beginning of the seventeenth century, when it was confidently asserted that the book was found in an Ethiopic (Ge'ez) language translation there, and Nicolas-Claude Fabri de Peiresc bought a book that was claimed to be identical to the one quoted by the Epistle of Jude and the Church Fathers. Hiob Ludolf, the great Ethiopic scholar of the 17th and 18th centuries, soon claimed it to be a forgery produced by Abba Bahaila Michael.

Better success was achieved by the famous Scottish traveller James Bruce, who, in 1773, returned to Europe from six years in Abyssinia with three copies of a Ge'ez version. One is preserved in the Bodleian Library, another was presented to the royal library of France, while the third was kept by Bruce. The copies remained unused until the 19th century

The first English translation of the Bodleian / Ethiopic manuscript was published in 1821 by Richard Laurence. Revised editions appeared in 1833, 1838, and 1842.

So the first English translation was only published 200 years ago? That makes it younger than the USA.

How do we know it wasn't just made up on the spot?

They say the original / non-English version was considered lost until the early 1600s, and the copies supposedly found at that time were later claimed to be forgeries.

They say a Scottish 'traveller' named James Bruce claimed to find a copy in the 1770s, but who was this 'traveller'?

Bruce was a Scottish Freemason. He was Initiated in Lodge Canongate Kilwinning, No. 2, on 1 August 1753. The Lodge history, which details his Initiation in the Lodge reads: 'Bruce, James, Younger of Kinnaird – the Abyssinian Traveller.

A travelling man indeed.

Houston, we've had a problem...

I don't know if many of you have watched Attack on Titan. It's a very famous anime and full of symbolism and foreshadowing, and I believe it is one of the few shows that tells the truth of our past.

What makes Attack on Titan so special is that it feels like it reveals something true about our history, maybe the writer Isayama wants us to explore the big mysteries of our world on our own, instead of just relying on books or the media.

https://preview.redd.it/llz5q7e03r1e1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=65c1ed2a23ddb4f16fbc2569963c39a02eecb0d2

https://preview.redd.it/eis0t6k43r1e1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=026f47b5bf7fc71c0462839f7652e319a94ecf62

https://preview.redd.it/b64rr8w53r1e1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=d4c743016723d87913aa963eb675cb5ae9f45db1

There have been more governmental UFO meetings. There was a point made about the beings living underwater around the globe.

This got me thinking about the ancient Sumerian story about the fish people called the Oannes, an amphibious being who taught mankind wisdom. It had the form of a fish but with the head of a man under his fish’s head and his fish’s tail the feet of a man. In the daytime, he came up to the seashore of the Persian Gulf and instructed mankind in writing, the arts, and the sciences. Oannes was probably the emissary of Ea, god of the freshwater deep and of wisdom.

I just thought it was interesting. I also remembered Admiral Byrd, his missing diary, and his link to the hollow earth theory.

Just a fun thought, still waiting for decent proof.

These questions tend to be polarizing; please bear with me for a moment.

I'm not talking about 'predictive programming' and I'm not saying that Robert Zemeckis was 'in on it'.

All I'm doing is presenting a series of bizarre coincidences between the 1985 film...

...and what we have seen so far in 2024.

It is an eight-minute video, take a look yourself before arriving at your conclusion.

I know that's becoming more and more difficult in this day and age.

Most of us are spending more time online, in algorithm-powered echo cambers of outrage.

I'm asking you, politely, to take a look at the evidence first, and then make up your mind.

If you could do that, and then leave your thoughts below, I'd appreciate it.

Personally I think I'm on to something here but I'm happy to discuss potential issues with my theory.

All I ask is that, if you think I'm way off, you arrive at that conclusion after inspecting the evidence 👍

There is something strange about these wars... it just seems like nonsense to me. i mean the reasons for them, the fact they aren't resolved with diplomacy...

take a look at this https://freevoice.io/the-ukraine-war-is-devoid-of-logic/

Mainstream Science is Holding Back on Researching Microchimerism and is putting out fact checks to bury it. Possible reasons are:

1. The implications for the freedom of modern women.
2. Mainstream science is mostly anti-religion and microchimerism supports the religious notion of the monagamous design intent for humans.
3. Findings in relation to Microchimerism may bring into question the accuracy of DNA tests, which is a big industry and a lot of money to lose out on.

Let me know what you think. Am I wrong? Are there more reasons this particular topic hasn't sky-rocketed in popularity? Are there any implications I have missed?

And if it is true that a promiscuous woman will hold, store, and essentially become the DNA of her partners, then even if you are the father that gave the sperm to concieve the child, it may be created with the DNA of several other men.

If this is true, what does it say about monogamous religions? Did they perhaps know about Microchimerism thousands of years ago? Or did God warn them?

At this point, doesn't the World Cult have control of the military, media, economic system and AI to just basically take over the world and siphon everyone's bank account?

What could we do about it? They already have control of everything - why would they even bother doing a "reset" or using the covid pandemic as a rehearsal or implant secret messages in the media to get us used to an upcoming world order?

Why don't they just announce tomorrow that you're locked in your home and your bank account is now empty? Obviously workers will still be needed to act as slaves for the Elite Class, but they can work under gunpoint or threat, while the rest of us can simply die.

Or are they industry plants?

Put there by TPTB to influence the masses towards intended social engineering objectives?

Personally I think TayTay and Lady Gaga both have serious talent, particularly the latter.

However, it is true that there are lots of people out there with just as much -- if not more -- talent who never made it past busking in the street, playing in cover bands or, if they're lucky, getting gigs as session musicians and music teachers, making enough to get by but not much more, and almost nobody will ever know their names.

So the question is: How do people like TayTay and Gaga make it to the top?

Are they connected to the top end of town via family?

Do they belong to secretive clubs (or cults)?

Have they unlocked some supernatural force by way of rituals and sigils and other magick?

Do you believe you have to 'sell your soul' to get picked up and promoted by major labels?

I was chatting about this with a professional musician recently and his thoughts on the matter were different from the prevailing wisdom espoused by typical 'awake' people.

Maybe it's a matter of right time, right place, right connections...

...with some decent talent thrown in for good measure.

What do you think?

This is written for those who have been around awhile and have seen the shifts occuring, and for those of you who haven't and have a genuinely open mind.

The crux of this post relies on a premise that the minds of the masses can and are being largely guided by constructed narratives in both old and new media. Some of these are false, some are real and some involve true things portrayed in a false light.

My thesis here is that Trump was their choice all along.

We've all seen so much of the US left seeming to devolve in many ways. From it's covid era policies to cultural issues such as trans - where an initial care about human rights led to a systemic push to let children permanently alter their bodies and futures. I would put immigration on this basket as well.

Anywhere you look you see issues being taken to their extreme and making them increasingly unappealing and wrong to more and more people. We even see this in the neoliberal covid spending which saw a massive shrinking of the middle class and workers rights.

All issues came to a head, during a time when the president was becoming undeniabley incompetent and senile and not actually in charge.

Then we see a sort of consensus forming amongst new media figures, Tucker on X, Rogan, Jones, Owens, Weinsteins, Musk and MANY more.

They began "exposing" the WEF great reset agenda, the 4th industrial revolution (4IR), and pinning it all on "the government" and "leftist globalists".

This, IMO, was a major dialectic used to push people right. Demolish the left and use it as fuel for the right.

Another key aspect of this dialectic was the good tech vs bad tech angle best porttayed by Gates vs Musk. The evil technocrat vs the freedom loving futurist.

Enter Musk's political pivot. He knew what was coming. Once a self-described socialist hated by the right for his brain chip and his green future, now a libertarian futurist that is "for the people" - pro human (whatever that means).

We also know a major theme of 2024 amongst the ruling class, Bilderberg, WEF etc... was "restoring trust".

So much more. I can't explain it, but even Trump's shooting convinced people that "the deep state" hated him, giving him a massive wave of new support.

But it all culminated in a sweeping Trump win. Not only that, but figures that called him Hitler for 8+ years simply gave up and walked away. All too smooth.

As in all long cons, right when you think you've won, you've lost.

Trump's team is heavily invested, personally and financially, in ALL areas of the 4IR Reset. And now they have an unchecked majority AND popular support.

It's my guess that this dream team will now use all of this along with a moral high horse to bring in the Reset with flag waving support of the very people who called it an communist plot just 3 short years ago.

As a Christian I could take this further, as it is the beast that hates and destroys Babylon. But we don't have to go there for now.

What do you think? Is it all a grand coincidence, was it orchestrated, or is Trump really the peoples' hero and chosen one?

i was just reading a post about what happened on 9/11.

so many people say the teachers all brought out Tvs and everyone HAD to watch it. what was the point of this tho? people say they were in elementary school and they were showing yall this stuff??

so strange how every school in the country was able to get a tv in every classroom within, however long it took, the second plane to hit and the towers to collapse.

im not even a big 9/11 conspiracist i was just thinking about how easy it is to program and traumatize a whole generation in a single hour. those moments made everyone think “we need to come together, we need protection, we need to fight back” but we just put all our trust in the government to fix it.

I was born a few months after and always wondered.. were we close to breaking the cycle in 2001? were people waking up and they needed to knock us down a notch?

Do you believe there are intelligent life forms in 'outer space'?

If so, do you believe they have visited earth during human existence on earth?

If so, do you believe they are here with us right now?

https://cf-img-a-in.tosshub.com/sites/visualstory/wp/2023/11/alien-life-scaled.jpeg

Whatever your take on these matters, importantly, I'd like to know WHY?

Why do you believe what you currently believe?

Pretty straight-forward stuff, I look forward to reading the replies.

I saw an interesting tweet from an account called 'Reddit Lies' recently:

https://x.com/reddit_lies/status/1854034052736578036

They wrote:

I think this election might actually break Reddit.

And then embedded this image:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GbraEiOWQAorFIV?format=jpg&name=small

The text says:

I'm starting to think reddit might be an echo chamber that is completely disconnected from the majority of this country

My first question for you is, do you believe reddit is an echo chamber of left wing / progressive / Democratic opinions?

My next question is, did you notice a sudden drop off of anti-Trump / pro-Kamala talking points once the election result became clear?

And finally, do you think there is a chance it might improve over the next few months / years?

First off, I do not believe John Titor was a real time-traveler. I do find it interesting that he predicted a civil war after because of a presidential election. His years are off and other stuff, but just figured I'd mention it before election day and before the new president gets sworn in, in case things get crazy. He also predicted a short, but bad WW3. With Israel seemingly attacking further and further areas, I could see that spiraling quickly. Again, this is just fodder to discuss if anyone remembers that guy.

Relax, it is okay to have a thread where we discuss our predictions for the election.

I checked it with the mod team and they said it is A-OK, so long as there is no

"red Vs blue cheerleading / muck-raking, or anything that can be interpreted as clearly taking a side"

So any way, what are you predicting?

Will we see massive voter turnout?

Is Trump going to return to the White House?

Or is it time for the first female president of the United States of America?

Will we see some shenanigans and sudden changes in the votecount, 2020 style?

If Trump is clearly behind on the electoral college, will he concede?

Or will he say it was rigged again, and demand it go through the courts?

If the election goes Trump's way, and he wins bigly, will Dem supporters accept it?

Or will they lose their minds and freak out like eight years ago?

Might we see a certain type of derangement that has never been seen before?

Are we likely to know the final outcome by Tuesday night / early Wednesday, or will this one drag out?

Will you be watching the results closely, or do you not actually care about any of this?

That’s how you know you’re over the target… I can say anything I want about christians, whites, men, etc… but mention J people and I’m booted. Odd…

Years ago there used to be criminal conspiracy subs but not anymore. I love you all for your supernatural theories but I need a place grounded, nonpolitical, and based in science. Any leads?

A long time ago I listened to someone who was generally accurate. He seemed to imply that he thought that there was the possibility of Israel being navigated into a scenario where direct, open conflict with Iran would happen and that Israel probably would take major damage from Iran, and from the fighting. He implied that it could have been a plan long in the making, and relayed something going back to the Reagan administration, and then to someone's reaction that he personally witnessed during the morning on 9/11.He had an anti-Israel bias, but there was enough 'information' and 'dots' that enough breadcrumbs were there - although I have started to majorly doubt his analysis, for example, he portrayed Hezbollah as being much stronger. His scenario is almost exactly how he said it would start. It starts in fits, and jumps, stops, then continues again until it rolls to a start. However, Iran would APPEAR to be in a much weaker position now, but of course, a cornered animal is potentially much more violent. A dying regime doesn't need any missiles as insurance. It launches them. Best wishes friends, I have been feeling uneasy since that first Iranian missile barrage, because that 'style' of attack seems to be the harbinger for what COULD occur if missiles were launched in magnitude. Air shootdown rates have been impressive, but of course impressively expensive, too, and missile volume and projectile quantity greatly reduces efficacy favoring the aggressor. Think of this post as the 10th Man Doctrine. Someone needs to suggest the possibility of the bizarre, however uncomfortable, so that if it may occur, it can be more effectively countered. In the IDF Command right now, I would be advocating for extreme de-escalation after any Iranian response we get from here, and I would have also advocated against the recent strikes on Iranian soil prior to them being authorized, but in a large part because I personally overestimated Iran's air deterrence capability and Israeli strike capacity based on incorrect information, but again still, in an effort to forestall the result of the aforementioned scenario. If Israel can complete the trifecta, and negate Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran, that is very good, but I do not think it is wise to force an inevitable victory too soon, and in a way that could be dangerous, but based on what I've seen, I would absolutely acknowledge that the military decisions made so far starting with the Gaza neutralization operation have been correct, and effective, and I am sure that my own information is inadequate for the full picture. A certain hoax letter that was in the British museum also comes to mind as something odd. Something extremely important to watch for I think is any collateral damage to the Temple Mount and to the Dome of the Rock. In a big missile barrage, debris or even hits might inflame religious opinion in the Arab world or in Israel based on which party takes responsibility or is assigned responsibility for damaging important religious sites of the other nation's religion. For example, let's say the Dome takes some chrome and the Khomeini blames Israel for it. Then, a Muḥammad al-Mahdī, (VAJA maybe?) maybe suddenly appears and declares jihad in tandem with the lifting of the Fatwa against nuclear development. Please be aware that exotic situations, while extremely unlikely, are better anticipated, in my opinion, and planned for, because security situations during events of global magnitude can be fluid. Everything we have seen so far has massively been in Israel's favor, and rightfully so. Just please be in a state of heightened awareness, because until this current stage is through, I see shadows of risks of unexpected unknown 'unknowns'. The accuracy of some of the above analysis though is most likely influenced by that source's apparent personal bias, regarding Eschatology, but I also acknowledge that this person I listened to could have been deliberately creating memes for his own purposes. He who thinks, wins. https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3954442/statement-from-pentagon-press-secretary-maj-gen-pat-ryder-on-middle-east-force/ https://imgchest.com/p/wl7lrqaz37x

I don't know if this is a right sub to post this or if this theory has been discussed earlier but a crazy thought crossed my mind. It is just my pure imagination and I just wanted to put it out.

What if, our universe is actually a part of a being's biological ecosystem? All the galaxies might be the cells who are producing energy by planets revolving continuously and the stars itself are massive balls of energy.

Since, the universe is constantly expanding, what if the being is growing? And we are not really supposed to leave our planet, that's why the environment of other planets would instantly kill us. Maybe we are not really supposed exist and we are actually cancerous cells for that being who were not really supposed evolve. Maybe that's why we have not been able to make contact with other alien life.

The dinosaurs might be as well the cancerous cells which were attacked by that being's immune system or some external medication.

It is more and more obvious that the average person does not ask to know anything deeper.

They are fine knowing nothing and being led and pushed whichever way the controllers see fit.

When you are programmed by your parents, religious institutions, school, etc, it is not a positive situation to be in. It is not a preferable situation to begin with.

But there’s a new type of sickness passing through many people I talk to.

They don’t disbelieve you, they don’t think you’re crazy and they know something is very bad.

But they don’t care. It’s so bad they can’t even let it register.

“there’s nothing I can do”

“I’ll just kill myself/That’s not a world I want to live in”.

Some of these people have literal children… wtf?

The way to break out of this slave society is to stop engaging with it. Communities that can provide for and defend themselves are how we reject the “Great Reset”.

Detachment from anxiety and fear can be had by just preparing. The controllers want us all to be scared and think the world is real while they guide us to their solutions.

FEAR FEAR FEAR.

Whatever your religion or belief system, you know we are all reflections of the highest source, the creator, love, and unity, whatever name you put on it.

I do not think it’s a coincidence that most religions teach that to reach heaven, nirvana, moksha, etc one must outgrow the world and our attachments to it (detachment).

I’ve been kicked out of three subreddits for talking about the basic conspiracy 101. Has anyone else had this problem or am I just hitting bullseye on who is really in charge?

There is a persistent 'mythology' of the idea of human ascension: the 'leveling up' of the organism and/or it's soul, the climbing of Jacob's Ladder, various 'New Age' ideas, etc. That humanity in it's latter days will gain or regain powers such as the ability to better commune with plants and animals, improve their health, acquire telepathic capability, etc. etc.

I've not been an observer of this sphere of discussion for much of my time, but in recent years, for various reasons, I've become interested in the possibility of human telepathy.

One might argue that much of this 'ascension' is being achieved through technology, that all the old promises have been, or are being, attained via our science.

But it is a pity that the technological noises (and particularly the AI happenings), as they ramp up, work to muddy the waters about the more 'organic' or dare I say 'spiritual' possibilities.

Many of the ways that we might have observed potential 'supernatural' occurences are obscured by the mirroring and patterning of the 'algorithm', which works to duplicate the experience someone might have with a fractal, self-reflecting, as-above-so-below universe or 'God'.

I don't have much more to say in that respect, but in terms of human telepathy and other strange talents, I like to think that the human organism will adapt and compete with what it might subconsciously detect as aggression and incursions upon it's own potential spheres.

If spontaneous telepathy started occurring, many would default to presuming that 'it's the nanobots from the vaccines' or 'nanotech in shampoo' or such-like. Pity.

It is it's own philosophical realm, the possibility of telepathy. Depending on the way it manifests, it might be nothing more than the occasional blip of thought or emotion or presence, but it could be that the slightest nudge in that direction will lead inevitably to a full-on hive-mind. Who knows what the consequences of that - a sudden human singularity?

Regardless, one theory I have for a technique to achieve the formation of a telepathic hive mind is simply this:

• Concentrate on the Absolutes, the unchanging constants (ie. archetypes, mathematical structures, fixed geometries, rigid correspondences ... and do not let yourself be swayed by the momentary and temporal (the distractions, so to speak).

Presuming a certain kind of universe, many people would then come to share a mental topology or ontology, and this might actually quantum entangle their minds, leading to spooky action at a distance.

I often read 'quantum physics' discussion as allegory for human connectivity, and this can be entertaining.

EDIT - why am I censored here - a forum I've only just discovered? why these terrible automoderator bots?

I sense a conspiracy! (*)

Somebody is laughing: (*)

I note, in terms of the title of the thread:

• "Man, Machine" = 911 squares ( "Society" = "SkyNet" = 911 trigonal )

Oscar Wilde was on to something when he suggested that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. If he’s right, then the sight of the new Technics SC-CX700 wireless music streaming system will be making KEF, and its LS50 Wireless II music streaming system in particular, feel about as flattered as possible. [...] (*)

• "Massive Coverup: 0" = 2023 latin-agrippa | 1717 squares
• "Massive Coverup: 1" = 2024 latin-agrippa ( "The Occult" = 1717 squares )

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2-6AHSV0cc

EDIT #2 - one hour later - this thread now appears to have been unbanned. I tip my hat to whoever or whatever made it so.