It there some law that separates it? Is there some moral level? Is it just bullshit?

U.S. military contractor & data analytics firm, 'Palantir' assures that their clients “maintain ownership of all of the data now and at every point in the future.” But this has been revealed to not be entirely true according to a 2017 dispute with the NYPD. Palantir declined to hand over a readable version of NYPD data back to the department after they terminated their contract, claiming it “retains all rights” to any documentation from the products that they licensed to the department. The company claimed that returning any “technical data” would threaten its “intellectual property;” explicitly prohibiting the department from transferring, transmitting, and exporting this data throughout the duration of their contract as well.

While the specifics of the NYPD contract are still unknown, the NYPD was licensing Palantir software to produce analysis from data collected by the police, such as arrest records, license-plate reads, and parking tickets.This revelation came after years of public record requests, a lawsuit and the New York City city council denying they ever worked with Palantir. While the data may have been returned, the analysis of this data was not, according to the dispute.

'What Is The Government Doing With Your Data?' discusses this litigation from 2017 & also touches on other data privacy concerns of this industry once data has been analyzed and assimilated in to a companies "intellectual property." It wraps up by explaining the most dangerous & ethically concerning things that can be done with data analytics.

I just wanted to bring something to your attention that I was concerned about. From some other users I've talked to it seemed like Proton was tracking the services/sites you sign up, at least when it comes to their alias. So, I decided to do a test. I signed up for Steam about 5 times with 5 different Proton Pass Alias'. Then, when I tried to sign up yet again I got an email from SimpleLogin saying I am not allowed to sign up for Steam multiple times and that they would ban my account. They then started blocking all emails to me from Steam. I believe this is clear evidence they are tracking/scanning Alias emails to check for this behaviour.

I am very concerned at this behaviour and seems out of line with how they present themselves. I would like to hear an explanation from Proton.

As the state here in Estonia is growing more and more repressive by sacrificing basic human rights of its citizens in the name of "speed and efficiency" (I vaguely remember hearing about regimes like that from the past, it never ends well), breaking privacy laws set by its own courts (and by the EU) through surveilling, storing and possibly modifying all online communications while having zero oversight on who has access collected data or how all of it is being used, then I thought I would give my best on how to alleviate the pain its causing and will keep causing unless something is being done against it. Hence, I've spent the past month on developing a poor-mans VPN (read: SSH tunnel proxy) to make interception as well tampering of communications as hard as possible for any malicious party.

It works by renewing exit nodes (and thus your external IPs) almost as often as you would like (with the minimum of interval of 2 minutes) by creating a new VPS for every connection. Technically, it's a DIY TOR, but with decent internet speeds. It's currently in a very basic state, no UI, no comforts, uses Digital Ocean API under the hood to create VPS's, but works well enough to already yield comments such as "a three letter agency would like to have a word".

My next steps involve extending the provider set and eventually creating a non-profit organization (as to minimize the risks of greed taking over) for managing it. If you think you would like to either contribute or support it, then try it out, give feedback and/or create pull requests with improvements. I could probably also use some legal advice as the time progresses.

If you need to contact me, PM me here on reddit or add me on Signal (username: andrus.42).

Oh, and last, but not least, the link.

I'm a student. When commuting to my university by bus I encounter many CCTV security cameras in public. Would it be possible for me to do my regular commute, and when I get home ask relevant authorities to provide the CCTV footage of me that they have (coming out of home, walking in street, waiting at bus stop, on the bus, out of the bus, going into university)?

I would like to do this because I'm learning about data protection laws and it could be a weird/fun/interesting sort of art/educational project.

Would this be possible in the EU and/or the UK?

So there's an organization with heavy presence and well-known reputation across the world in the EU engaging in systemic privacy violations and the other day I've asked NOYB about it where they replied back that while those instances do indeed constitute GDPR violations, they can only help file less-effective tip-offs to the DPAs unless any victims in the EU decide to become a complainant/plaintiff against the organization, in which it can be upgraded to a formal complaint.

So, with the absence of willing plaintiffs in the EU at the moment, would a tip-off to the DPAs made by influential figures such as government officials or MEPs be far more effective than those made by everyday Joes such as myself?

The EU Council was supposed to vote about the Chat Control law on September 23rd. I cannot find any information on the results. Did it pass this time or not?

Every time I add dns0.eu as a DNS resolver, I see a lot of google cloud DNS servers directly from the US. And every time I disable dns0.eu, they disappear too. WTF, why is this even happening?

I recently tried to open a bank account, and they asked me to provide my phone number, email, and ID through an app, which I was fine with. But then, they wanted a selfie, and I agreed. The app then opened the camera and asked me to move my head left and right, which made me uncomfortable, as it felt like I was being treated as a criminal. I ended up canceling the process because I felt uneasy.

I understand that banks need to verify identities, but why do they require this kind of biometric data? How can I be sure that my data will be stored securely and won't be sold or misused in the future? Are there any laws or regulations that prevent banks from asking for such invasive information? And what happens if a hacker or even a future government gains access to this data?
And i found that,this identity verification was handled by a third-party company, not the bank itself.
This company isn't even well-known, which means my biometric data would be stored both by the bank and this third-party. What happens to my data if this company gets sold in the future?

It feels like banks use these third-party services because they are cheaper, but that raises more questions. What does "cheaper" actually mean in this context? Are they cutting costs at the expense of data security? And how do they manage to offer their services at a lower price? Could they be manipulating or misusing the data to maintain their profit margins?

Wouldn't it be safer if banks were required to delete this data instead of just anonymizing it after a certain period? Is there a way to guarantee that my data is truly safe?

I'm worried about the potential risks here, and I’m curious to know if others have had similar experiences or concerns.
Are there any regulations to protect us in this situation, or is this just the new reality of dealing with banks in the digital age?

I'm interested in hearing your thoughts and experiences on this!

A few days ago Meta announced it has decided to go ahead using the data of UK users from Facebook and Instagram to train their generative AI.

Only a few months ago, back in June, Meta had originally stopped those plans for both the UK and European Union. Now the UK is back on the menu, but not the EU. Why?

https://wolfhf.medium.com/all-your-post-belong-to-us-b827b81dccb3

Unfortunately, more and more companies are preventing the purchase of a program or service indefinitely.

Instead, they make it available by subscription.

We actually do not own the product or any rights to it.

We lose the product as we stop paying, or simply as it is removed.

We do not own the games on steam, and they are only VOLUNTARILY made available to us.

Many of these programs also require constant internet access even when theoretically not needed.

We don't know what happens to our data in the cloud.

An example of a change in the law:

Movies from streaming platforms should be downloadable in a format that allows its normal playback without additional special programs.

Games belong to buyers, not just given to them.

After deleting a game, the user can download the game to disk within two years from the date of deletion should be able to play offline, and transfer the game to other devices.

Computer programs must also be available for lifetime purchase at a cost not to exceed 24 monthly subscription rates.

Click on the link of your country here (the blue link, not the "+" button):
https://op.europa.eu/en/web/who-is-who/organization/-/organization/REPRES_PERM/REPRES_PERM

And grab the email address there.

--

Then, enter here:
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/home

Select your country in the dropdown, and then it will present you with a number of people. Click on each one, and then there's an envelope icon for the email address. Collect all of them, separated by ";".

--

With the full list, send a bulk email to all of them.

Be polite. Just say that this goes against our rights to privacy, and may even be unconstitutional, and ask them to please vote against this law.

Points I suggest including in the email:

• I agree with the need to prevent and combat child sexual abuse.
• I am concerned that the proposed rules imply constant surveillance of personal communications, such as messages and emails, using Artificial Intelligence directly on the device.
• I believe that this mass monitoring constitutes a violation of the right to privacy, which is guaranteed by the Constitution.
• The mandatory identification through ID cards may increase users' vulnerability to cyberattacks and data breaches.
• The use of AI to monitor communications could result in false positives, unjustly exposing private conversations of innocent people.
• I fear that real criminals will find ways to circumvent the surveillance, making these measures ineffective against those who should truly be caught. Meanwhile, innocent people, who do not try to evade these measures, may be unjustly exposed due to false positives.
• I urge the need to find a balance between protecting children and preserving citizens' fundamental rights.

--

Remember... politicians will be exempt from this control. It's easy to create laws for the common people, but as long as they don't affect those who make the laws, everything's fine, right?... "We are all equal, but some have more rights than others."

--

The law, if you want to read:
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52022PC0209

By Wednesday, politicians will resume work on it (https://digitalcourage.social/@echo\_pbreyer/113055345076289453)

Please help fight that thing back.

Here's the step by step:

https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/take-action-to-stop-chat-control-now/

Hi! Maybe a naïve question but you surely have seen the recent EU laws about driver monitoring: the new mandatory driver-facing camera to track attention for example, or the fact that the car will constantly track tour speed and match it against GPS data.

I get really worried about all the privacy issues that these news mandatory devices and components could create. As far as I know, the privacy aspect of these laws have been hugely tuned down because "it's for safety".

So, what is your opinion on that and do you have ideas or solutions to keep our privacy in our vehicles?

Hello All,

As a lawyer I am hired in a company as a DPO. I would like to hear your advices, courses, recources from which I could learn more and prepare for this.

I would also like to hear your experience if someone worked or is working as a DPO.

Any help advice would be much appriciated.

Thank you all and cheers!