https://archive.is/Vu4Ep

It is therefore obvious why America is in decline and Russia is on the ascendancy in the matter of human rights. America has largely turned her back on God, reorganized her government and culture on a statist model, and is plummeting in a death spiral of moral and ethical degeneracy. As our collective former (Bible-based) values of self-restraint and personal responsibility steadily decline, external controls and surveillance by the new police state increase. The rule of law becomes the rule of man, and equal justice under law becomes special rights for favored groups.

Conversely, Russia has begun embracing Christian values regarding family issues, albeit imperfectly, in stark contrast to its aggressively godless Soviet past. Repression in Russia is decreasing as rapidly as it is increasing in the U.S..

The crux of the human rights debate is what it means to be human. Russia appears to be returning to it’s pre-Soviet understanding that humans are made in the image of God, and that our “rights,” are really duties of respect and care for each other which are imposed on us by Him. This is why the first principle of both the Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights is the protection of the Christian church, from which the very concept of modern human rights emerged. And this is why the greatest point of conflict between the U.S. and Russia is the question of homosexuality. (I believe even the conflict in Ukraine is being driven to a large extent by this issue, at least on the part of the Obama State Department and the homosexualist leaders of the E.U.)

There is no human right to sodomy to be found in nearly 4000 years of human rights jurisprudence. It is an invention of Cultural Marxists in the late 20th century, and rests on their dangerous premise that the state, not God, grants us our rights. In fact, the “right” to sodomy is really an anti-right, because it can only be granted at the expense of the true human rights of religious freedom and family values. Thus, the first principle of the Magna Carta stood unbreakable in Britain for almost 800 years until the recent introduction of “sexual orientation regulations” (SORs) and the first principle of the First Amendment stood for over 200 years until SORs were passed here in the United States.

What about free association, freedom of religion, the establishment clause, right to privacy ect...? The Church is given priority here which the founding fathers didn't want!

https://web.archive.org/web/20170116180553/https://medium.com/@robertstacymccain/gender-sexuality-and-psychological-maladjustment-91593a656b8e

What is happening here? The rise of transgender mania — for which Bruce “Caitlin” Jenner is the celebrity poster boy/girl — can best be understood as a belated consequence of culture shifts that occurred 40 or 50 years ago, especially in the field of psychology. Whereas once heterosexuality was officially understood as normal, and homosexuality defined as deviant, this understanding was cast aside by the American Psychiatric Association in 1973. If there was no such thing as normal sexual behavior, then it was no longer possible to describe any sexual behavior as abnormal. Pandora’s Box had been opened, and the potential results of this were difficult to predict.

Ah yes this is a slippery slope fallacy while conflating attraction with behavior. He doesn't explain why homosexuality is not "normal" (itself another example of fallacious thinking

Parents who have more or less traditional expectations for our children find ourselves compelled to protect our children against a culture which increasingly condemns “normal” as a synonym for oppressive. Progressive intellectuals consider you a very bad parent if you expect your boys to be masculine and your girls to be feminine, and you are simply hateful if you expect your children to be heterosexual. Advocates of “gender-neutral parenting” denounce parents who encourage their sons to play sports or who permit their daughters to watch Disney princess movies (which are full of “heteronormative” messages, Women’s Studies professors warn us)

And it works: https://www.dailyscandinavian.com/gender-neutral-swedish-preschools-produce-successful-children/ https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/02/upshot/how-to-raise-a-feminist-son.html

They are against "encouragement" of gender conformity, not "allowing" it i.e., letting the kids choose and giving them options.

Amid this confusion, it has become apparent that, in many cases, the transgender cult is exploiting the vulnerability of young people with serious mental illnesses. Many young people buy into a prevailing attitude that “transition” is a cure for problems of identity and social maladjustment. Many of the harshest critics of the transgender movement are those who are “destransitioned,” having quit the process of sex-change “treatment.” One mentally ill 21-year-old lesbian who abandoned this process described herself as “angry as hell” about her experience with “transition-happy therapists and doctors” who “decided to try to medically correct” her, based on their belief that she would “stand a better chance at being a more normal man than a normal woman.” But what is “normal”? And who is qualified to decide?

Turns out they are liars, and frauds

Magister colin leslie dean points out

The avoidance of meaninglessness by SCIENTISTS:Mathematicians DoubleThink

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublethink

Doublethink is a process of indoctrination whereby the subject is expected to simultaneously accept two mutually contradictory beliefs as correct, often in contravention to one's own memories or sense of reality.

EXAMPLE

you know 0.9999... is a infinite decimal thus non-integer by notation

you know 1 is an integer

yet you also believe

you say

1=0.9999...

without contradiction

because now you say

0.999... is now an integer

here is the double think

1 integer = 0.9999... non-integer infinite decimal

ie

an integer is /=a non-integer

which is a contradiction in terms -which your double thinks does not see

thus

maths ends in contradiction

Magister colin leslie dean the only modern Renaissance man with 9 degrees including 4 masters: B,Sc, BA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, B.Litt(Hons), MA, MA (Psychoanalytic studies), Master of Psychoanalytic studies, Grad Cert (Literary studies)

the vulva pictured as a flower

He is Australia's leading erotic poet: poetry is for free in pdf

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/book-genre/poetry/

proven 1+1=1

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/A-Theory-of-Everything.pdf

or

https://www.scribd.com/document/455372682/A-Theory-of-Everything

IT’S EVEN MORE OFFICIAL: Leftist Virtue-Signalers Are Nuts—Display “Dark Triad” Personality Traits

This is a fertile environment for “victim-signalers,” who openly and intentionally express how oppressed, disadvantaged and otherwise limited they are to showcase the extent to which they are “victims” and so elicit guilt-ridden resource transfers in their direction. This would seem to be a particular motive in the case of wealthy blacks, who insist they are “victims” because they are black.

Except the persecution is real

As this points out however:

Pretty much anybody expressing an opinion on either the conservative or liberal ends of the political spectrum has likely been accused at some point of virtue signaling. In fact, simply defining it can be difficult, since it’s used so often as an insult.

Virtuous victims cry out that they need protection from The Big Bad Enemy That Hates Them Super-Lots Because of Their Virtuous and Proper Membership in the In-Group (TBBE).

To make this manipulation work, the signalers falsely paint themselves as hard-done-by victims of TBBE. At the same time, they send signals communicating their virtuous and proper in-group affiliation to the rest of their group. They call upon the group to provide them resources and attention for protection from the danger the out-group represents, or aid to make up the resources the out-group has denied or taken from them. Or perhaps the virtuous victim simply desires a huge hit of sympathy for their supposed suffering.

And conservatives are very guilty of that. Why elese are they called out as being part of the Dark Triad in other studies like this?

Or you know lie about being victims?

I received a fun email today. I would post this to r/badmathematics but the only actual mathematical mistake I found by skimming through the email is a rounding error in the numerology (see last quote). So I decided to post here instead. I haven't read even half of the email because it is quite long, but as far as I understand it attempts to link famous politicians from USA with subdermal RFID microchips through numerology.

EDIT: Here's the full email, headers included - https://pastebin.pl/view/db5587af .

Pastebin's automated scanner refused to publish the email and I don't want to upload it to my website because some similar automated scanner may decide that I'm distributing such content through my website and report it. I will try to put the full email (with the headers intact) in a comment.

I would assume that the author is mentally ill but their flow of thoughts is better than most of what I have seen from mentally ill people so I would rather assume that they are a recruiter for a religious sect. Plus, the email was sent through an email marketing tool and even has a List-Unsubscribe header.

Some highlights:

Some generic conspiracy theory sentences:

Carl Sanders sat in 17 New World Order meetings with heads-of-state officials such as Henry Kissinger and Bob Gates of the CIA to talk about plans on how to bring about this one-world system. The government commissioned Carl Sanders to engineer a microchip for identifying and controlling the peoples of the world-a microchip that would be inserted below the skin with a hypodermic needle (a quick, convenient process that would be progressively accepted by the world).

"Not even wrong" type of argument:

What does it mean to count? It means to add up. So how could we add up 666? Remember my previous point about God confirming in threes is key to unlocking the number 666. So logically, what would be the best way to count the number 666? To count it equally by using the rule of three based off the number.

We cannot count it equally as 600+60+6, this would also bring us back to the start.

We cannot count it as 600+600+600, or 60+60+60 because there are no zeroes in between or at the end of 666.

The only logical option is 6+6+6=18.

"The numbers are everywhere" type of argument:

In Hebrew, the word "Barack" means "lighting", and the use of "Bama" (Strongs Hebrew word 1116) is used to mean the "heights" of heaven.

The following day after the election of Barack Obama (11/04/08), the prevailing select 3 lotto numbers in Illinois (Obama’s domestic state) for 11/5/08 were 666.

Same fallacy but it has an actual mistake - the first sentence barely makes any mathematical sense but even after inferring what he means, 2020 / 666 is equal to 3.(033), which is quite off from being "30330 repeated":

If you take the current year 2020 and divide it by the number 666 (known for its satanic implications) you will get the number 30330 (repeated). This number 30330 happens to be the number used to vote for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. Freaky? Supernatural? Odd for sure. Whatever this means, it doesn’t seem good to me.

Yes, I'm talking about Digibro. He usually does this type of stuff without minding to actually do even the most cursory of research about what he's talking about. This time he started trying to make his own version of "psychological typology" "since the Myers-Briggs is too dumb". And, as he does it, he is butchering every other discipline imaginable (who knows when he'll stop). It's all fun and games until he starts spreading some massive misinformation to weebs (see latest video).

Examples:

How it all started: https://youtu.be/R1ndTCR4aKg

Latest stuff: https://youtu.be/Z4JLEhseTNU

https://www.zdnet.com/article/a-samsung-galaxy-s7-user-explains-why-she-doesnt-want-the-s20/

http://archive.is/gXrYy

The hearing was attempting to make case law to support the notion that if a Christian calls homosexuality a sin then he or she is vilifying homosexual persons. In effect, they are trying to develop complex case-law to make certain Christian biblical teachings unlawful.

No, he was under arrest for trying to connect homosexuality with pedophila: http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/nsw/NSWCATAD/2017/66.html?context=1;query=McKee%20Burns%20;mask_path= https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decision/54a63b1f3004de94513db271

Which is wrong: https://medium.com/@juliussky/gays-arent-more-likely-to-be-pedophiles-611a48469655

He also claims that anyone involved with surrogacy must be gay without evidence: https://archive.is/lPHyz

Despite higher numbers of heterosexuals doing it: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6408321/

If anything gay men are recruited by shady businesses: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280596/

https://donotlink.it/VqNbN

Conflates transgender people with drag: http://theconversation.com/explainer-the-difference-between-being-transgender-and-doing-drag-100521

Thinks gender noncomformity is evil: https://www.reddit.com/r/BestOfOutrageCulture/comments/dz9eq6/neonazi_thinks_safe_spaces_for_gender/

Promotes a fraud: https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2011/08/16/lgbt-rights-group-tells-frc-cease-distribution-false-video

And misunderstands a fetish festival: https://holybulliesandheadlessmonsters.blogspot.com/2009/07/peter-labarberas-pictures-contradict.html

Oh and says this:

They love showing off their new chests by walking around shirtless, yet are totally disgusting when you know the real deal. One big side effect of expensive monthly hormone injections (driving up insurance rates for all of us), turns them into odd, doughy looking girl-boys — just so they can grow a little whispy hair on their “manly” chests. You’re paying for this shit.

Wrong! https://www.google.com/search?q=transgender+men+chest+hair&client=tablet-android-verizon&prmd=inv&sxsrf=ACYBGNSfm2eYau72NdGF-BdtXFN_-mILhw:1578457979007&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiVrYaZlvPmAhXCSt8KHXTeDnYQ_AUoAXoECA0QAQ&biw=962&bih=601

you have seen this weird post on r/BadSubHub

https://www.reddit.com/r/BadSubHub/comments/cijpbc/v/

You may not have seen weird threat on r/BadRhetoric

https://www.reddit.com/r/badrhetoric/comments/cwgf4q/horseshoe_theory/

​

Some trolls have been trying to roll on our mates. We must deal with them in the proper mobter, I mean matter. (Get your bats ready).

link to post here https://www.reddit.com/r/BadSubHub/comments/dm96ir/list_of_bad_subs_for_redesign_usersthe_unofficial/

​

I noticed that allot of posts were not being responded to, and also that the side bar got lost in the redesign. Will keep the list updated as new requests come in.

Here is a copy of the full list for those that hate risky clicks

r/BadAdaptations

r/BadAnarchists

r/BadAnthropology

r/BadArmour

r/BadArtHistory

r/BadAtheism

r/BadCatholuicisim

r/BadCGI

r/BadCivics

r/BadComputerScience

r/BadEasternPhilosophy

r/BadEconomics

r/BadEverything

r/BadFallacy

r/BadFictionalHistory

r/BadGeography

r/BadHaircuts

r/BadHistory

r/BadHistory2

r/BadHistoryRebooted

r/BadIRC

r/BadIslam

r/BadLegalAdvice

r/BadLinguistics

r/BadLiterature

r/BadLiteraryStudies

r/BadLogic

r/BadMathematics

r/BadMartialArts

r/BadMedicine

r/BadMilitaryScience

r/BadMusicology

r/BadNeuroscience

r/BadPerson

r/BadPhysics

r/BadPhilosophy

r/BadPolitics

r/BadPsychology

r/BadRhetoric

r/Bad_Religion

r/BadScience

r/BadSciFi

r/BadSocialScience

r/BadSodomy

r/BadVoiceActing

r/BadWomensAnatomy

and lets not forget

r/shittydesign

r/shittyflutecovers

r/zenjerk

https://www.quora.com/Is-Sanskrit-really-useless

• Linguistics is covered here

• Physics has its own thread, too. All the claims about quantum mechanics in the highly upvoted reply are just nonsense.

• Bad physics and computer science with the quantum computers and AI (which have nothing to do with Sanskrit).

• Bad medicine:

Medical sciences: Ayurveda is written in Sanskrit and world has accepted this fact that Ayurveda is so special.

Nah, it's just one quackery among many.

As Sanskrit is an ancient language with unknown origin it is also being used by experts in medicine and neurosciences to study the evolution of Human brain.

Yeah... no.

• Bad engineering?

in space when there was a message sent it used to be appeared like ~you are how ? if the real message was how are you. so they started sending messages in sanskrit wheather we read it from left to right or right to left it same

https://donotlink.it/eg7l9

I believe that this video will do even further damage to the glbt community by swaying the undecided. Men pretending to be women get very masculine when offended.

Look how this man threatens to unleash his manliness if he isn't referred to as a woman! How unintentionally comical this delusional man is!!

Yes because women never do this yes? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jhWSXDTmgUo https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5Qzz6m5HIwI https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Lg0BSP9XeGE

Are these women unleashing "maleness?"

This...just speaks for itself. Bad linguistics and bad history:

https://ianjamesparsley.wordpress.com/2015/01/30/ancient-romans-couldnt-read-and-what-that-means-for-language/

https://donotlink.it/ApyJ

On the gridiron, Michael Sam, who has not taken a single snap in the NFL, has turned the NFL, ESPN, and all sports media outlets into his personal circus since his coming-out announcement. LGBT activists are overjoyed at the announcement, thinking he will be a symbol of courage, as an inspiration to the future’s gay in-the-closet athletes who fear being judged in the harsh confines of the locker room by their fellow, pussy-juggling teammates.

In reality, Michael Sam is simply the first drop of poison in entering the NFL system, and it will continue to spread. What people are failing to realize is that locker rooms are not at all politically correct. Players do not censor themselves like we are forced to do in the corporate world. While homosexuality has been gaining acceptance momentum in society as a whole, the locker room is a vastly different animal.

You see, locker rooms are one of the last true places that contain only, or close to only men. It is a place where men are free to make all of the crude jokes they want; where they are free to bond together as males without fear of outside judgment. Of course, Sam claims the people making these jokes are simply uneducated:

So homosexuality is not masculine, thus crude jokes at their expense are ok? Also can you explain the apparent link of asserting masculinity by hazing and abusing percieved homo homosexuals in the locker room?

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5fe8/fa844a64fa0f45427acf8cef8a85e05b7bd3.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiA8YK51p7jAhUrmeAKHQEpCcgQFjABegQIBRAB&usg=AOvVaw16G-3Bh5vJ2Jmag-dpqiCB

https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/the-masculinity-motivation/

Or how male victims of assult fear being called less then manly i.e. "not straight" i.e. "gay", so they do not come forward?

https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/the-masculinity-motivation/

Gay rights activists want homosexuality to be viewed not only as acceptable, but natural. They want to push gay propaganda on to children, and they will throw fits if they are not allowed to do so. They are supporting athletes like Collins and Sam simply because of the publicity it brings to their movement.

How about the fact they have to keep quiet while everyone else asserts their heterosexuality and can possiblly be harassed for even mentioning that they are different.

When Super Bowl winning quarterback for the Green Bay Packers, Aaron Rodgers, was rumored to be gay last year, he put an end to those rumors. However, even if he had been gay, then up to that point, he had been living his life as a model homosexual. His respect from his NFL peers would have remained intact, for keeping his personal life and exploits under wraps, and focusing on the task at hand, playing football.

But you said that the locker room was a place to assert your masculinity, and I expect that involves talking about 'female conauests'. See the double standard?

No longer is it enough for homosexuals to be given equal opportunity and not be hated. No, now they want to poison the entire nation, and that starts by hitting the sectors of culture that have been dominated by the masculine up to this point.

How does homosexuality hurt masculinity?

So when one gay athlete couldn't bring himself to admit he was gay to a woman he most likly didn't love...

I’d be the first to tell you that if you break up with a girl, you don’t owe her any closure. However, if she is going to have the mainstream media knocking down her door, and she never really wronged you (and from all accounts, it doesn’t seem she did), then some explanation is in order. The fact that he didnot taken the time to make a phone call to her and give her some answers shows he was too busy relishing in his new fame.

Except he did call her you lying bastard, You even link to it! http://www.cosmopolitan.com/celebrity/exclusive/jason-collins-is-my-ex-fiance

Jason told me he’s gay over the phone on a Monday morning in April, the same day the magazine hit newsstands. However, he didn’t mention the article—that came as a surprise when I heard about it from a friend. In his essay, Jason wrote that he’d once been engaged to a woman. Reporters zoomed in on me, thrusting my name into the news. My in-box exploded with e-mails from women saying the same thing had happened to them. I’m sharing what I’ve learned from my experience in hopes that it might help others.

So how is he still a coward if by your definition he should've told her?

The selfish, diva-like actions of Sam and Collins have flung open the closet doors for all current and future American sports athletes. Soon, the Vegas bookies will cease to bet about covering the spread, and instead ask people to place bets on the over and under about whether a player likes to take it up the ass. Rather than beer being sold at sporting events, you will pay $20 for an appletini.

Say goodbye to the blood, sweat, and tears of the American sporting world. They might as well dub it Project Runway. You can blame the homosexual athletes like Collins and Sam for ruining sports, as they have injected the culture with poison, killing off one of the final forms of pure masculinity supported by the American public.

As of now, there is no antidote.

You are relying on untrue steryotypes to jusify paranoia.

https://donotlink.it/r2LY

The new Russian law:

1. Proscribes fines for propaganda promoting homosexual sex to minors;

2. Bans homosexual rallies; and
3. Bans the distribution of homosexual propaganda to minors

First off, homosexuality is attraction, not sex acts: http://homoresponse.blogspot.com/2011/05/countering-heterosexist-arguments.html#08

The ensuing uproar over the new Russian law in the cultural marxist outlets of the Western media was immediate and predictably overwrought and hysterical. According to them, the Russian’s are not qualified to determine what laws are best for Russia. Instead, only homosexual activists and their cultural Marxist cheerleaders in the West are qualified to determine Russia’s laws. And the homosexual activists, unsurprisingly, were against leaving the Russian kiddies alone.

Of course, the open contempt that the cultural Marxists exhibit towards the will of the Russian people is not surprising. It is, in fact, their standard operating procedure. They exhibit the exact same contempt towards the American people whenever their will conflicts with whatever socially destructive and morally abhorrent policies of the moment the cultural Marxists wish to inflict upon the United States.

Because homosexuals aren't allowed to even exist or have a voice to fight back:

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DQ8fWwXNXZq4&ved=2ahUKEwjl4Z3J8Z7jAhWOmeAKHQfuAMQQjjgwCHoECAQQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1BzmdKmBXTqphbjUl90OSz&cshid=1562367906994

http://gay.americablog.com/2014/08/russian-anti-gay-neo-nazi-leader-sentenced-5-years-anti-gay-work.html

https://www.theverge.com/2013/8/7/4595246/russia-anti-gay-neo-nazis-bully-teens-on-social-media-occupy-pedofilyay

https://www.hrw.org/report/2018/12/11/no-support/russias-gay-propaganda-law-imperils-lgbt-youth

All this is under the assumption gays are pedophiles and thus after children, which is stupid: http://homoresponse.blogspot.com/2011/05/countering-heterosexist-arguments.html#11

If anything, this law causes more issues! https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/29/stigma-means-russia-risks-hiv-epidemic-as-cases-rise

Anything about homosexuality that doesn't say it's a perversion is banned, allowing fear and false information to be peddiled arount by tge state controlled media!

https://donotlink.it/poQQ

Years ago, I found myself discussing affirmative action with a long-time critic of such policies who explained why racial quotas are always a source of friction. When white people think of “equality,” my acquaintance informed me, they think in terms of equality of opportunity — everybody judged by the same standard — whereas many black people believe any standard is unfair if it does not produce “equality” in terms of outcomes. Furthermore, even if this were possible, the fact that black people are 14% of the U.S. population means that even in such a regime of “equality,” they would still be a minority in the student body of a “diverse” college, and yet some black activist types believe that “equality” should entitle them to a 50% share of everything. It is this 50-50 attitude toward “equality,” my acquaintance said, that is the real root of racial resentment among black college students.

So why should we assume that this person existed, let alone said this inncorrect assertion? https://www.theroot.com/the-merit-myth-the-white-lies-about-race-conscious-col-1828231903

We see a similar pattern has been replicated in other situations where the rhetoric of “diversity” fuels identity-politics demands. What percentage of Mount Holyoke students are “non-binary” or transgender? Even in such a “prestigious” hotbed of Third Wave craziness, the numbers are probably quite small, but whenever this vocal minority expresses their “concerns,” everyone is expected to genuflect in obeisance to their every whim. So the tail always wags the dog and, drunk on their own power, the transgender minority develop the attitude of a conquering army, accustomed to dictating the terms of their antagonists’ surrender.

This denies their existence: http://transascity.org/the-transgender-brain/

Prepare for bad Law and news: https://www.deviantart.com/bulldozerivan/journal/Deal-didn-t-have-to-give-the-mouse-the-cookie-600061854

A poorly-kept secret, it is, that, as documented in the book The Naked Communist way way back, a large part of the Globalists' agenda to turn the whole planet into a the new Tower of Babel, and avenge Nimrod's insanity, revolved around getting rid of the elephant in the room - the United States.

"The Naked Communist" was a piece of propoganda: https://www.shreveporttimes.com/story/opinion/2017/11/13/author/857992001/

The author of it, is a known loon: https://sites.google.com/site/ernie124102/skousen https://bycommonconsent.com/2010/12/11/god-does-not-particularly-care-about-your-civil-liberties/#comment-208312 https://bycommonconsent.com/2010/12/11/god-does-not-particularly-care-about-your-civil-liberties/#comment-208962

Nice try

The history goes on and on, but none has been more fanatical, successful, rabid, hypocritical in its violence and intolerance, et. al., than...drum roll...the Kinsey philosophy. Laughed at hysterically by real scientists of today, Kinsey's junk science is still the core of sexuality teaching in America today. Nothing gets taught to children about sexuality, unless it passes through the filters of the long-dead sexual psychopath's agenda.

Really? https://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/Simon_review_excerpt.html https://web.archive.org/web/20041209091937/http://www.jesus21.com/content/sex/index.php?s=kinsey

After the vile and disproportionate retribution that was visited upon Sweet Cakes by Melissa in Oregon (which included gratuitous gag orders and arson threats, in addition to robbing them of their entire life savings, and a burglary into their van), private business owners in Georgia were rightfully terrified.

No it wasn't disproportionate: https://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2015/07/sweet-cakes-by-melissa-didnt-just-deny-a-lesbian-couple-service-they-also-doxxed-them-and-their-kids.html https://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/2015/03/same_sex_couple_in_sweet_cakes_by_melissa_case_received_death_threats/ https://www.oregonlive.com/business/2015/02/what_led_to_the_sexual_orienta.html

Rumors flew to Georgia of private chapels in Idaho being threatened; that they either let these outside agressor mice have the cookie, or face jail time. These levels of macro aggression by a tiny sexual proclivity minority had not been seen since the Sturmabteilung slithered the city streets in Berlin. Is the fear still "irrational", at this point??? At what point do the connotations behind the term "phobia" become inaccurate/inadequate in context???

Not this: https://www.goodasyou.org/good_as_you/2014/10/caught-ya-far-rights-latest-marriage-victim-edited-website-to-make-more-solid-legal-case.html https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/coercion-d39alene/

It isn't. Plain and simple. Businesses not only have 1st amendment association rights if privately-run; they have 13th amendment rights. You should be able to deny service, without giving a reason. When someone orders a service, they're hiring you, not the other way around. So it's not "employment discrimination."

Wrong: https://home.ubalt.edu/shapiro/rights_course/Chapter8text.htm

To zap a business is a form of blackmail

Then Christains should stop doing so: https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2011/09/01/hypocrisy-unlimited-anti-gay-groups-denounce-boycott

So now, the Crooked Rainbow has seized control by the carotid artery of General Mills, General Electric, Disney, Marvel, and a LOT of other companies that do business in Georgia.

And this isn't freedom of association how?

They push for pro-pedo and pro-bestiality smut literature like The Bluest Eye to be read by elementary school children.

Um there isn't any of that in the book. There is a child raped in the book, but that ins't in service towards promoting pedophila.

Gov. Nathan Deal caved. The DDOS attack threats of government servers was too great. Government and the economy would shut down, and he feared he'd be vilified, if he didn't pander and give the mouse the cookie. So he did. And they immediately swooped in and began threatening ma and pa stores and church sanctuaries anew, demanding the glass of milk, with all the blind rage of the men of Sodom.

So they attack denial of service?

This led to direct conflict, and the need for a bill that would explicitly state that any company or lobby trying to force its will on a church or private business in a way that violated the Hobbes Act or RICO statutes, would be prosecuted under such statutes. That churches and private businesses have rights too. That once the rights game became zero-sum, it needed to end.

Churches already had First Amendment Rights. http://www.protectthyneighbor.org/why-shouldnt-states-just-adopt-the-federal-rfra

Remember the part where I mentioned that these lobbies and companies attempting to zap the governor were violating the Hobbes Act and RICO??? Georgia has its own state-level investigations bureau. If figureheads of Disney are threatening to pull business from the state unless the governor knowingly endanger children by forcing them to intermingle with the sexually degenerate, then that could be construed as an act of aggression on the citizenry of Georgia.

Deal would have been within his rights to send the GBI after Kevin Feige, Bob Iger, Ken Powell, etc. Or after whomever handled those letters for those companies at the Georgia state level. And the GBI could work with the FBI to handle the out-of-state accomplices in this act of aggression.

After getting a prosecution team after these companies and LGBT lobbies for RICO and Hobbes violations, he could have then named names of the aggressors via televised speech.

"We will expose these human cockroaches committing acts of aggression against the free and moral people of this tate, and we will see them brought to justice! A rainbow flag does not excuse zapping and extortion! We do not negotiate with sexual terrorists!!!"

These are violations of the right to boycott! The freedom of privacy, and association for non political entities! This is the stuff Nazis did again Jewish boycotts!

https://donotlink.it/k0QQ

https://donotlink.it/k0bJ

​

> If the atheist must add to his model events that arise for no cause, or an endless string or cycle of universes, they he add epicycle to epicycle.

​

What about god? Wouldn't he be an epicycle?

> Positing the creation to come from one supreme and unconditional, eternal being obviates all these objections nicely.

​

If the universe can't be just so, then why god? This is special pleading.

​

> The question “Since God created the universe, who created God?” attempts to impose the same shortcoming as the atheist model with its infinite regression of causes, or its uncaused first cause, but the attempt falls short: the material universe is filled with change and decay and entropy. It is made of matter, and material things cannot do things by themselves. They must be set in motion. God is a spirit, having the power to set things in motion, and is not a material thing set in motion by another. He is an unmoved mover and an uncaused first cause. If that seems a paradox, reflect that a train engine, a car that is not pulled by a prior car, must seem a paradox to someone who has only seen train cars filing by, and never seen an engine.

​

This is all post hoc assumptions however. Besides the quantum vacuum can explain our universe. https://medium.com/the-physics-arxiv-blog/a-mathematical-proof-that-the-universe-could-have-formed-spontaneously-from-nothing-ed7ed0f304a3

​

> The presence of universal concepts and universal truths is baffling to the atheist because, if his theory is correct, there is no supernatural mind or creator-god to establish any universal ideas

​

Truths can be subjective, and while it takes a mind to establish a law, that comes from observation of the physical universe.

​

> In sum, absent God, logic is a human invention, or a byproduct of irrational natural forces designing brain machinery to function so as to deceive men into thinking logic is logical. But the relation of formal logic to the real world then become unintelligible. Just because “A is A” in our ape-brains, why should “A is A” be true in reality? (Indeed, some modern physicists hold that the law of noncontradiction breaks down when describing subatomic particles, which indeed shows that physicists should not attempt amateur metaphysics, lest they look like fools.)

​

It's called cause and effect, and consistency.

​

> Fourth, if there is no God, on what grounds does morality have any moral authority? Why should I obey a moral rule if I encounter a case where I stand no danger of retaliation, and obeying the rule neither pleases me nor seem a practical way to get some good for myself?

​

The golden rule is a good way to establish consequences and duty. No god required.

​

> Fifth, the atheist has to explain modern history. The laws of Christian nations are noticeably superior in fairness and justice to those of pagan nations, and so have been throughout history. One need only mention the abolition of the gladiatorial games and the slave trade. Slavery is universal. Torture is universal. Even the Red Indians kept slaves and tortured captives. Christians have also done these things. But only Christians, and no one but Christians, has ever in the history of man outlawed them. The game of moral equivalence and tu-quoque is both illogical and ahistorical.

​

Athiests were involved in the abolitionist movement against other Christians.

​

> On the other hand, all nations, races, philosophies and peoples have had mass killings. And yet the genocides of the modern age all came from atheists and secular powers. The ghosts of the 150,000,000 killed by atheists in the Twentieth Century alone should give pause to anyone, anywhere, willing to claim that the atheist society has just a firm a claim on the ability to comprehend and enforce a moral standard as a Christian.

​

Does this include Hitler? https://www.nobeliefs.com/Hitler1.htm

http://markhumphrys.com/christianity.killings.html

https://web.archive.org/web/20171109222758/http://ropeculture.org/2016/03/01/the-fag-agenda Reposted here: https://donotlink.it/XWq45

We’ll start with biological faggotry. Fags will have you believe that they are “born that way” 100% of the time. Well, I will contest that only a minority of the modern fags are actually that – fags from birth. Yes, certainly some faggots are born that way, but these are a minority in the sea of faggots that arise from the other sources which I mentioned prior. The thing is that “born that way” is not an argument. Some people are born deformed. We don’t treat that as normal – that’s why we call it a deformity. In this same sense, the origins of “born gays” would have to be attributed to genetics, but not as a “gay gene” being a variation of the norm,as fags would have you believe, but as a deformity, a genetic imperfection and disorder. This can be proved even on a purely rhetorical level, in the sense that it is an evolutionary dead end (can’t reproduce).

Fallacy! Normality in the case of homosexuality can also relate to how common it is: https://www.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/24kqoe/is_the_appeal_to_normality_fallacious_in_ethics/

What he is doing is equivation: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivocation

It is then fallacious to argue that something is not the case or is the case based on a set of ideological, ethical, moral, political, or other normative commitments: https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2009/04/22/the-normative-fallacy/

Likewise a species survival is dependent on more that reproduction:

Besides explain the genetic variations that keep coming up: http://theconversation.com/stop-calling-it-a-choice-biological-factors-drive-homosexuality-122764

https://theconversation.com/how-genes-and-evolution-shape-gender-and-transgender-identity-108911

We randomly inherit half our genes from each parent. Each person’s genetic makeup is unique, so it would be highly unlikely to find two people with exactly the same set of genes influencing their sexuality.

Thus, variation is expected, and individuals fall along a spectrum ranging from a majority who are straight, to a minority who identify as gay.

Think of it this way, instead of asking how gay sex and attraction evolved, the question should be: how did human sexuality evolve in all its forms?

In doing do, we acknowledge homosexuality does not present a paradox needing a special explanation. It is simply a result of our species’ recent sociosexual evolution.

Please continue though.

Some have actually argued with me that this is a natural development in response to human overpopulation.

Who?

Fags tried to justify the evolutionary argument from a different angle, namely utilizing the concept of “fraternal birth order and male sexual orientation“, yet they only use this argument in the context of the positive “being born that way” argument (positive in the sense of ‘I am what I am, accept me that way, love is love’) rather than the negative “curb overpopulation” argument because the first one sounds “nicer. However, if this concept is true, then it may indeed be the proof that biological faggotry (which is, again, the minority of cases) is an evolutionary safeguard against overpopulation. Only thing that puts this concept into question is how traditional aryan families of the past had many children, whereas modern families struggle to have even one child, let alone two. Not to mention, once again, how non-whites keep having many children – so on a purely statistical basis, they ought to have more faggots than there are in the West. Yet, this does not happen.

This makes it a recessive trait moron: https://web.archive.org/web/20171008101130/https://evolequals.com/2014/05/13/dispelling-the-myth-about-the-gay-gene/

https://www.lehmiller.com/blog/2017/8/9/does-everybody-have-a-gay-gene?rq=Sex%20myths

Also very few people use this overpopulation argument anymore, leaving this a strawman.

However the point of this concept is still that fags can’t reproduce and must die, which again brings about the hilarity of “faggotry is good because it is death“. All evolutionary arguments on biological faggotry lead to it being a dead end. You can only try to spin what that means in a societal context, which is what faggots have grown to be excessively good at.

Ever hear of kin selection? Alloparenting? https://www.quora.com/If-homosexuality-is-innate-genetic-how-has-it-survived-evolutionary-selection-given-that-a-homosexual-couple-produces-no-offspring-Wouldnt-an-evolution-based-standpoint-argue-that-homosexuality-is-developmental https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-017-0105-9 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/147470491301100202 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44152219_Genetic_factors_predisposing_to_homosexuality_may_increase_mating_success_in_heterosexuals

http://theconversation.com/homosexuality-may-have-evolved-for-social-not-sexual-reasons-128123

However by that point whatever was imparted and the reaction to said information will have already stuck for life (after that, the majority of people are prone to confirmation bias, i.e. only seek out materials and information that already supports their established views). Developmental psychologists, for the most part, agree that kids remain sponges roughly until they grow to be 14, which is when they become critical of information (important to note: critical, not reactionary but actually critical of information, that is to say that they develop an inquisitive nature as opposed to simply reacting to it one way or another, as was expressed in my examples earlier).

These examples are simplified ideal situations to illustrate my point, which is that psychology can develop any which way depending on certain events (hence Freud’s notion that parents are essentially the ones to fuck up their kids first, even if we don’t go into the sexual motifs he explores behind parent-child relations). This explains the psychological origin of homosexuality for a good deal of faggots, since events that can impose psychological faggotry of course statistically occur more often than a genetic disorder. In women lesbianism can be a result of being raped by a man, while in cases of man on man rape, the results can be various: overcompensating, emphasized heterosexual behavior, or to the contrary – varying types of faggotry, from homosexuality to transsexualism.

Wrong: https://www.brainblogger.com/2016/11/21/homosexuality-link-to-child-sex-abuse-confirmed-gender-nonconformity/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3289524/

Gender noncomformity is not a sign of abuse but a risk factor for it: https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037/sgd0000279

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0886260515569063

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/sex-sexuality-and-romance/201912/does-abusing-children-have-consequences-sexuality

The more gender noncomforming you are, the more you get abused. https://www.patheos.com/blogs/tippling/2019/08/01/link-between-lgbt-religion-homelessness-suicide/

And this causes the "degeneracy" you see. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6695950/

Likewise gay parents don't raise kids to be gay: http://www.lehmiller.com/blog/2012/9/28/5-myths-about-homosexuality-debunked-by-science.html

One doesn’t really have to go into too much detail to understand the basic premise. What must be realized however is that there is also the additional issue of imparted information taking hold of people in their childhood. Kids are essentially informational sponges and as such they simply take everything in, until a certain age when they grow to be critical. However by that point whatever was imparted and the reaction to said information will have already stuck for life (after that, the majority of people are prone to confirmation bias, i.e. only seek out materials and information that already supports their established views). Developmental psychologists, for the most part, agree that kids remain sponges roughly until they grow to be 14, which is when they become critical of information (important to note: critical, not reactionary but actually critical of information, that is to say that they develop an inquisitive nature as opposed to simply reacting to it one way or another, as was expressed in my examples earlier).

These same psychologists say that children are aware of their gender identity at a young age: https://theconversation.com/when-do-children-develop-their-gender-identity-56480 https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cdev.12758

This means that kids up to 14 years of age are particularly vulnerable to the information imparted on them, and very sensitive to events that can have psychological consequences, i.e. “become scarred for life”. This means that events having to do with sexual intercourse can have devastating effect, with consequences that also range far and wide (including all manner of faggotry), and will stay with them for life. We will come back to some of these points further down as we counter gay adoption and gay propaganda.

Nope: http://www.lehmiller.com/blog/2015/4/24/is-same-sex-attraction-contagious-within-adolescent-social-networks

If anything abuse and sex are reduced. https://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/eknsi9/christains_demand_tolerance_for_their/

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.advocatesforyouth.org/wp-content/uploads/storage/advfy/documents/cse-myths-and-facts.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi3r_7Ao7HnAhXzlnIEHQ8pB-QQFjAHegQICRAB&usg=AOvVaw3t17jbU8ynLlb_5R5hIQct

However, in the United States the American Psychiatric Association had to cave in to faggot pressure, as it experienced constant harassment and protests from the faggot movement for 3 years from 1970 to 1973 until the matter was put to a vote, with 58% voting for declassifying homosexuality as a mental disorder. Thus, the only reason homosexuality was declassified as a mental illness was because faggots strongarmed the APA into that decision. It wasn’t declassified due to a new valid study proving it to be a variation of the norm. No, it was declassified because barely more than half of the members of the Board of Trustees voted to do so, meaning they were more concerned about stopping the protests and harassment than in sticking to scientific research. But science is never a matter of voting – we don’t vote if gravity exists or not, and neither can one vote on something being a mental disorder or not. But a group can vote if it is in their interests to appease faggots so that they would go the fuck away.

Except this never happened: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.scribd.com/document/165076223/APA-Science-vs-Obscurantists&ved=2ahUKEwiG2fqP5KriAhWOUt8KHWuTAhcQjjgwAHoECAMQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1_quZRDZus1wOHG4iOGl3t

http://homoresponse.blogspot.com/2011/05/countering-heterosexist-arguments.html

Furthermore, most if not all supposed scientific research that attempts to prove homosexuality to be a norm, genetic or psychological, is mostly conducted by “gay researchers” and their “allies“, i.e. people with a vested interest in a specific outcome in any research they conduct on the matter. This makes said research completely invalid, by virtue of the “scientists” involved not being impartial (ergo why it specifically “attempts to prove it to be a norm” – that is the goal and evidence to the contrary be damned). Naturally, faggots will try to counter this argument by spinning it around against normal (read: real) scientists, who would prove homosexuality not to be a variation of the norm, by claiming that they are evil bigots and so on trying to oppress faggots. However, since when does one trust a patient’s ramblings over the educated opinion of his doctor?

This is a massive appeal to bias, begging the question (gays are mentally ill by default) and no true Scotsman rolled into one!

If anything, homophobes are the dishonest faggots! http://holybulliesandheadlessmonsters.blogspot.com/2009/08/christian-medical-dental-associations.html http://holybulliesandheadlessmonsters.blogspot.com/2009/07/american-college-of-pediatricians-and.html http://holybulliesandheadlessmonsters.blogspot.com/2010/12/porno-pete-labarbera-accuses-splc-of.html http://holybulliesandheadlessmonsters.blogspot.com/2010/10/top-12-lies-of-tony-perkins-and-family.html http://holybulliesandheadlessmonsters.blogspot.com/2010/02/maggie-gallagher-commits-sin-of.html http://www.goodasyou.org/good_as_you/2010/04/tinyu-r-gay-nomupdates-limits-gay-lives-to-less-than-140-characters.html

The greatest accomplishment of faggots pushing their agenda in society is that they managed to convince people that it is about love, and that all faggots are born that way 100% of the time. Thus, no one even considers the possibility of alternative sources to faggotry – such as the psychological one, which account for a bigger proportion of faggots than biology. But perversion would account for a bigger proportion still. Faggotry as perversion has nothing to do with love or attraction to this or that sex. Rather, it is about seeking pleasure and amplifying it with psychological stimuli. And it is faggotry as perversion that accounts not only for homosexuals but also for transfags, genderqueers and any other nonsense they can come up.

Even though heterosexual are just as perverted: http://homoresponse.blogspot.com/2011/05/countering-heterosexist-arguments.html#08 http://homoresponse.blogspot.com/2011/05/countering-heterosexist-arguments.html#23 http://www.lehmiller.com/blog/2012/9/12/do-gay-mens-sex-lives-match-up-with-the-stereotypes.html http://www.lehmiller.com/blog/2013/3/13/how-many-straight-people-are-having-gay-sex.html

And yes sexuality is about attraction: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/hormones-and-the-brain/201706/how-the-brain-determines-sexuality

This is despite all the evidence being available to prove that this is indeed the majority of the fag movement, and explains the rampant promiscuity faggots engage in, the inability to be loyal to a single partner at a time and all of the most degenerate cases you may have heard of from watching Common Filth’s channel.

https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2018/03/20/millennials-love-monogamy-say-researchers/

https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/06/gay-couples-aren-t-monogamous-people-saying-this-have-no-idea-what-they-are-talking-about.html

http://holybulliesandheadlessmonsters.blogspot.com/2009/05/another-flawed-piece-of-work-courtesy.html#.UorOpuLy2i0

Indeed, despite the minority stress experienced by LGB individuals, this study discovered that same-sex married couples are at least as stable as, if not more stable than, different-sex married couples.

So what if you are “born that way“? Either get treatment or simply overcome it by sheer will-power. Psychological disorder? Same thing. Perversion? Fucking stop it. This ultimately comes down to the subject of one’s inherent inferiority and the test of Free Will

Feels like a no true scotsman to ignore the faults of gay conversion therapy: https://whatweknow.inequality.cornell.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-whether-conversion-therapy-can-alter-sexual-orientation-without-causing-harm/

https://exgaywatch.com/2007/02/an-ex-gay-watch-original-video-the-spitzer-study-methodological-flaws-and-abuse-in-anti-gay-politics/

https://truthwinsout.org/pressrelease/2009/06/3112/

https://thinkprogress.org/pat-robertsons-regent-university-ex-gays-can-act-the-part-but-orientation-doesn-t-change-bb0717828c01/

http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_exod2.htm

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/political-minds/201811/gay-conversion-therapy-associated-suicide-risk

http://www.lehmiller.com/blog/2014/3/31/are-religiously-motivated-people-able-to-change-their-sexual-orientation

https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/06/22/science-journal-retracts-paper-that-said-gay-conversion-therapy-works/

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/political-minds/201811/gay-conversion-therapy-associated-suicide-risk

https://www.newsweek.com/gender-identity-conversion-therapy-suicide-transgender-discrimination-hate-1458488

If the choice was out of their hands (forced labor, slavery, forced exercising) the material change would follow, because all of that is merely material and subject to changeability

No: https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/07/06/science-proves-it-fat-shaming-doesnt-work/ https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/fat-shaming-makes-things-worse

The exact same situation applies to faggotry. If you are actually of strong will you can overcome that vice no matter its origins, and prove that this is not who you are, that you are above it. Yet if you are inferior and of weakwill you will succumb to it or even embrace it, and let it define you as much as you let your body define you. That is the case with the fag movement that tries to impose itself onto society by any means through identity politics. If you are fine with being a faggot or embrace it, then you are a degenerate through and through, regardless of how you justify it.

This presumes it is a vice, which I show isn't the case!

As any other sociopolitical movement, the faggot movement relies on propaganda, it’s just that they don’t like the word propaganda. But that is a general modern ailment rather than a fag-specific one, and to keep up with the narrative of liberal/degenerate bullshit, they will have you believe that what they fight for is “progress”. As such what they do isn’t propaganda (how the hell does portraying a normal family as poor, dirty and dysfunctional, as opposed to the well off, clean and “loving” fag wanna-be parents not constitute propaganda?)...

Where do they do so? Your link doesn't show this at all! It says "What they want you to think" they don't even have a broken heterosexual family to show.

However it’s not just exacerbating the traumatic psychological sensitivity. It’s also indoctrination – another “bad” word that they also cover by calling what they do “education”. Faggots attempt to deny that they are indoctrinating kids into homosexuality, and yet they produce “educational” books for kids on sexual orientation. Kids are just not allowed to be kids anymore. No, they must know about sex and sexual orientation as early as possible, lest the “evil patriarchy” teaches them to be bigots. But again, kids up to around 14 years are like sponges and intake information without any sort of filter. They can have a basic reaction to the information, but they are not truly critical of it.

Tell me why does promiscuity go down then? https://www.abc.net.au/health/talkinghealth/factbuster/stories/2013/04/18/3739632.htm

https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2019/06/promiscuity-propaganda-access-information-and-services-does-not-lead-increases-sexual

I already mentioned the Freudian theory that the first sexual intercourse can play an important role.

Freud was a hack! https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/freud-was-a-fraud-a-triumph-of-pseudoscience/

This is why gay adoption cannot be allowed under any circumstances. We already established that even normal parents can fuck up their kids in any number of ways. Now the degenerates want to take a swing at parenting? I already read and heard enough stories of the sort of results this shit has, and I’ll forgo such cases as when faggots adopt children only to sexually abuse them, as other faggots will just dismiss these as isolated incidents, so its pointless to use them as an argument.

Good since I can loint to wards heterosexuals who do the same: https://www.newsobserver.com/news/state/north-carolina/article229618929.html https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.knoxnews.com/story/news/crime/2019/02/11/former-pastor-foster-care-worker-guilty-adopted-daughters-rape/2830559002/&ved=0ahUKEwiugriA7KriAhWHo1kKHRoaADk4HhDF9AEIOjAE&usg=AOvVaw0S4T_UPZZllmDLVeil5Wnh https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/San-Jose-man-serially-abused-by-adoptive-parents-14291899.php https://myfox8.com/2019/03/20/arizona-woman-behind-comedy-youtube-channel-charged-with-abusing-7-adopted-children/ https://whnt.com/2019/07/29/man-pleads-guilty-to-charges-of-aggravated-abuse-rape-and-sexual-torture-of-foster-and-adopted-children/ https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona-child-welfare/2019/05/21/mesa-man-charged-abusing-pre-teen-teenage-relatives-mathew-legrand-arrington-foster-care/3761510002/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/in-alabama--where-lawmakers-banned-abortion-for-rape-victims--rapists-parental-rights-are-protected/2019/06/09/6d2aa5de-831b-11e9-933d-7501070ee669_story.html

In just the last year alone we have seen multiple churches who claim to protect children use their position to rape instead...far more often than any gay parent. https://foxsanantonio.com/news/local/man-accused-of-molesting-several-children-he-met-through-church https://www.reddit.com/r/askgaybros/comments/dbu2kr/why_do_homophobes_defend_pedophiles/ https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/08/24/pastor-charged-with-sexually-abusing-child-in-his-unregulated-home-church/ https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/09/18/pa-gop-lawmaker-who-opposed-child-sex-abuse-bill-arrested-for-child-sex-abuse/ https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/09/25/southern-baptists-promote-book-by-pastor-who-mishandled-girls-sexual-abuse-case/ https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/09/28/pastor-charged-with-sexually-abusing-13-year-old-says-she-initiates-most-of-it/ https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/10/29/pastor-who-faced-life-in-prison-for-alleged-child-sex-abuse-kills-himself/ https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/08/01/a-popular-pastor-involved-in-an-abuse-scandal-is-being-protected-by-his-church/ https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/06/17/a-pastor-who-wanted-women-executed-for-abortions-was-arrested-for-raping-a-child/ https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/06/17/a-pastor-who-wanted-women-executed-for-abortions-was-arrested-for-raping-a-child/ https://www.patheos.com/blogs/nosacredcows/2019/09/help-stop-preacher-who-encourages-child-sex-abuse-and-works-with-kids/ https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/09/25/pastor-accused-of-attempted-rape-of-child-says-victims-demons-provoked-him/ https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/08/20/guams-catholic-church-sued-over-priest-who-admitted-sexually-abusing-20-kids/ https://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2019/08/pastor-recites-cleansing-bible-verses-while-sexually-assaulting-underage-girl/ https://www.patheos.com/blogs/thefreethinker/2019/08/priest-who-joked-about-the-sexual-abuse-of-deaf-kids-is-put-on-trial/ https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/10/26/pastor-andy-savage-who-assaulted-a-teen-girl-is-starting-a-new-church/ https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2017/06/26/victim-of-homosexual-demons-church-beating-begged-for-investigation-for-years/ https://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2014/07/kidnapped-for-christ-torture-and-abuse-at-christian-boarding-schools/ https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/08/22/christian-couple-that-ran-gay-conversion-camps-arrested-for-child-trafficking/ https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/09/01/former-gay-conversion-therapy-leader-we-have-harmed-generations-of-people/ https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/01/21/notorious-mormon-gay-conversion-therapist-now-says-he-just-wants-to-date-men/ https://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2019/08/book-banning-anti-gay-kentucky-principal-busted-for-child-pornography/ https://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2019/07/anti-gay-alabama-pastor-arrested-after-admitting-he-molested-underage-boys/ https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2018/03/31/anti-gay-pastor-charged-with-molesting-8-kids-telling-them-to-sit-on-his-face/ https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2019/06/12/pastor-who-works-for-tn-police-dept-says-gays-should-be-executed-by-police/ https://www.reddit.com/r/askgaybros/comments/dbu2kr/why_do_homophobes_defend_pedophiles/ https://www.heraldbulletin.com/news/state_news/elwood-man-who-sparked-gay-adoption-debate-admits-to-molesting/article_a3c30e76-920a-533e-8b5c-32c79d78147a.html

No, I’m talking about how some children raised by faggots imagine such behavior to be the norm, and don’t even know that heterosexual relations even exist up to a certain point. This means that they base their own future relations on the model of their adoptive faggot parents, meaning they have more chances of growing up as faggots than a child in a normal family. Especially so if the parents are very adamant about their views and about “educating” the child into such thinking. What a “happy coincidence” that the lesbian cunts just happened to adopt a boy who always “knew” he was a girl. And then they proceed to mutilate the child by giving him hormone blockers.

Even though 1) There are plent of Trans child with heterosexuals parents 2) It isn't mutilation: https://web.archive.org/web/20180902070724/https://genderanalysis.net/2018/01/evidence-of-health-benefits-of-medical-transition-gender-dysphoria-body-image-sexual-functioning-and-quality-of-life/

https://web.archive.org/web/20180902070913/https://genderanalysis.net/2017/06/anatomy-of-disinformation-blaire-white-lies-about-puberty-blockers-and-vaginoplasty/

Puberty blockers are safe: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1153424052712890368.html

Ergo, they will inevitably try to indoctrinate (oh, sorry, “EDUCATE“) the kids into this kind of thinking: “Some dudes fuck dudes up the ass Timmy, maybe you’re one of them, unless you prefer to be the one fucked up the ass, like your daddy here.”

First off, don't conflate sexual orientation with behavior: https://www.glamour.com/story/sexual-orientation-sexual-behavior https://holybulliesandheadlessmonsters.blogspot.com/2009/09/anti-gays-are-encouraged-to-get-more.html

Second: https://qz.com/1320434/new-research-debunks-old-science-about-the-negative-effects-of-same-sex-parenting/

Finally: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/08/170815095159.htm https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/adult-children-lesbian-parents-less-likely-identify-straight-study-finds-n989976

Despite the title of the second link:

FREE TO EXPLORE WHO THEY ARE’ Of the 76 children of lesbian parents, 70 percent of females and 90 percent of males identified as “heterosexual or straight,” compared to 88 percent of females and 98 percent of males in the demographically matched NSFG group.

“They were raised by parents who were nonjudgmental and may be more attuned to their own feelings because of the environments in which they were raised,” Gartrell said. “Perhaps we should be celebrating that the culture has evolved enough that these young people feel free to explore who they are.”

This is more likely. See above for how gender noncomformity is a risk factor for abuse, not a result.

Yet they will criticize traditional family and the foster care system to promote gay adoption as the better alternative. Why not instead fight for improving the foster care system?

Um, no. They just want the same right to adopt as heterosexuals. Where did you get this from?

We oppose gay adoption not “just because we’re bigots” – the “No H8 Campaign” and the like should stop wasting their time. Our hatred doesn’t come from some irrationality or because we fear faggots. Practically all hate is born from love. One can’t exist without the other. We hate that which threatens what we love, so our hatred for this degeneracy is the purest expression of our love for that which we are defending – including the kids this scum tries to adopt and fuck up if not just fuck.

Ok first of, homophobia is not just fear: https://www.fallacyfiles.org/etymolog.html

And attempts to show they would hurt kids kept failing: https://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/2014/04/opinion_nom_shill_mark_regnerus_long_history_of_using_religion_to_attack_gays/

https://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/2014/04/regnerus_scandal_ripped_wide_open_as_ut_confesses_to_major_systemic_ethics_failures/

https://skeptic-ink.tumblr.com/post/48764066985/david-quinn-now-cites-discredited-fraudster-loren

Also you do know Christain charities steal kids tho give then to heterosexual parents? https://newrepublic.com/article/127311/trouble-christian-adoption-movement

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2018/07/devos-linked-to-christian-adoption-agency-implicated-in-state-sponsored-kidnapping/

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2009/03/meet-parents-dark-side-overseas-adoption/

https://theintercept.com/2018/07/01/separated-children-adoption-immigration/

https://psmag.com/news/they-steal-babies-dont-they-international-adoption-schuster-institute-95027

For all you care for kids, it doesn't seem to matter much huh?

But hey, some faggots know all about promoting diseases and having an entire subculture based around that – Bug Chasing. These particular faggots are in fact happy to be plague-bearing vermin. In fact, they love it! The whole scene, besides being one of the most degenerate things imaginable, is 100% native to faggotry. There is no heterosexual subculture of looking to spread HIV. There might be some degenerates like that, but there is no subculture dedicated to this pursuit, which serves as further evidence of how HIV is so intrinsically tied to faggotry.

Really? http://homoresponse.blogspot.com/2011/05/countering-heterosexist-arguments.html#27

https://www.metrotimes.com/detroit/debunking-the-drudge-report/Content?oid=2175395

Heterosexuals are there too: http://test.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread748962/pg1#pid12245735

HIV is not the same as homosexuality.

Finally, we have the economic consequences. Faggots will tell you all about the powers that be trying to keep them down, when in reality, as we saw just above, they are using the faggotry movement to advance themselves in politics.

....https://www.reddit.com/r/BestOfOutrageCulture/comments/dpxabr/homophobes_think_they_are_compassionate_when/ https://www.reddit.com/r/askgaybros/comments/dxk3dy/why_do_homophobes_think_that_they_do_no_harm/ https://www.reddit.com/r/skeptic/comments/byhd2l/homophobes_dont_belive_in_sourcing_their_claims/

You think this is all imaginary slippery slope ramblings? We don’t have to imagine shit. We just have to look to history, namely the Weimar Republic, one of the most degenerate states that ever existed. Berlin of that time manifested the kind of society towards which decay and such faggotry leads to.

You mean the Nazis? https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/bq5k5e/on_a_post_engaging_in_genocide_olympics_user/ https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/2q7fy8/the_hitler_was_popularly_elected_myth_or_how_to/

Just check out these pictures from an event called “Up your alley fest” – wow, so progress, so slippery slope, wow. Wait a minute, where were the kids during all this?

There were no kids there! Let's look at your link.

Up Your Alley -- which until recently was called the Dore Alley Fair -- is very similar to the larger and more well-known Folsom Street Fair, in that they are both held to celebrate the leather and fetish scene in the gay community.

But that’s from 2008, check out the 2015 report. Yet when this exact same behavior is combined with drug use, it suddenly gets called the “dark side of the gay scene” as this VICE “documentary“ will attest.

Again:

Every year the city of San Francisco hosts a free, open-to-the-public street festival called Up Your Alley for the gay BDSM (bondage, discipline and sadomasochism) sexual subculture.

So it is a subculture inside the gay community and not representative as a whole! Hell there were heterosexuals there too: https://holybulliesandheadlessmonsters.blogspot.com/2009/07/peter-labarberas-pictures-contradict.html

As for that Vice Documentary on chemsex: https://www.inpud.net/en/chemsex-case-study-drug-userphobia

It is a nicely explained take on why gay marriage is dangerous from a purely sociological viewpoint. It argues it would lead to the destruction of marriage and the traditional family at large, by virtue of opening up the way to the marriage of more than two people, until marriage becomes obsolete. The author describes it as marital chaos, but what it is in effect is promiscuity. This argument was only further proven to be right by Masha Gessen, who openly stated that gay marriage is a sham to destroy marriage at large. Ergo she also means that gay marriage is a window to promiscuity.

Bad slippery slope argument! https://www.mic.com/articles/38737/gay-marriage-the-blaze-wants-you-to-know-the-goal-is-to-destroy-traditional-marriage

And don't confuse promisxuity with polyamory: https://www.livescience.com/27128-polyamory-myths-debunked.html

Or other family structures: http://beyondmarriage2006.blogspot.com/

However, if we look back to the argument of a natural occurrence of homosexual behavior in animals, then in most cases animal homosexual interactions are not done for pleasure, save for some species (most prominent yet again being the Bonobos). In most cases, such acts are done as a show of dominance – meaning that those homosexual acts are instances of rape. Also there is next to no instances of lesbianism in the animal world, save for those few species that practice homosexuality for pleasure. But even then a lot of the supposed studies in this field are highly suspect, like the guy who claimed that lezhogs exist – you think that video is funny shit? This is where the gay argument that homosexuality exists in over 450 species COMES FROM – some crackpot idiot who drew shit. Actually the reality makes more sense, no, he’s not a crackpot – he’s gay. So allow me to restate my previous point: “research” conducted by “scientists” with a vested interest in its results is invalid. And the wiki on him is suspiciously small. Also, I don’t think he actually wrote any other “research” but this one.

Ok 1) The lezhogs thing was from a comedian making a joke and shouldn't have been taken seriously. A look at the book in question will confirm this 2) These examples are not rape: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals 3) You only assume he is gay due to question begging

With that in mind, it can be said that HIV is nature’s response of correcting an occurrence that goes against Natural Order. Faggotry is an evolutionary dead end, and nature is trying to kill it faster with diseases that are spread specifically through the central activity that defines faggots. Not only is science against faggotry but so is nature.

This implies nature has an order, which smacks of the is-ought fallacy, also ignoring massive rises in heterosexually transmitted diseases: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2018/11/29/russia-risks-hiv-epidemic-as-cases-rise-experts-warn-a63644&ved=2ahUKEwiQ1q7m76riAhWqnuAKHeOSCVcQFjABegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw1RmdOauUm4vji2Ag2lfhpv https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0055060

Explain the heterosexual aids epidemic in Russia good sir: https://www.reddit.com/r/askgaybros/comments/cc3gnv/how_do_you_prove_that_aids_is_not_a_gay_disease/?

“They told me I could be anything, so I became a demisexual preop MTF unicorn-kin and this is my life partner Rocky. He’s a horse but since I’m a unicorn-kin I can communicate with him and it’s totally mutual. Who are you to tell me otherwise, bigot? I put “it’s complicated” into my facebook relationship status because farmer John doesn’t approve of our relationship. We’re like a modern day Romeo and Juliet – love is love! We’ll get married one day too, zoosexual rights is the next chapter of social justice. Why? Because it’s the current year – check and mate, ignorant nazi bigots!“

Oh god transgenders are biological ninny: http://transascity.org/the-transgender-brain/

Who the fuck thought this scum can be our allies?

Debunking links, ho! http://homoresponse.blogspot.com/2011/06/mental-health-and-substance-abuse.html http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2012/06/10/45512 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4695779/ http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/polygamy-fuels-violence/ http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/Articles/000,009.htm https://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.centerforinquiry.net/uploads/attachments/Anti-gayActivismandtheMisuseofScience_1.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwia-7CM9KriAhWJd98KHaNdDOkQFjAAegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw1-e4VP0yTWqnBE2_e3QHGB http://homoresponse.blogspot.com/2011/04/response-to.html https://medium.com/@juliussky/gays-arent-more-likely-to-be-pedophiles-611a48469655

Tell me your attitude to pain and I will tell you what kind of person you are” as Ernst Junger wrote. A faggot will betray you if threatened with discomfort or promised carnal satisfaction in return for his treachery.

The Night of Long Knives disagrees with you. Remember when the nazis betrayed the Brownshirts because some were gay?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_R%C3%B6hm#Death

Ironically, some people ignore this to say all nazis were gay.

https://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/dx2m6n/some_christain_loonies_are_so_bad_they_think/

https://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/ex2p7v/the_brainwashed_are_scary_in_the_sense_they_dont/

“It is also indicative of the whole Modern World/Gynocractic pursuit of promiscuity and hedonism, well espoused in the liberal youth slogan of “YOLO – You Only Live Once”. Taking the concept of “burning bright and fast” to the most degenerate place imaginable. I am all but certain that Bug Chasers already partake in the other faggot endeavor of mixing semen into alcoholic beverages.”

You forgot the rest of the article.

“Now, it’s one thing to like the after product of sex, and another thing to like the thing that fuels the sex, but to mix both? You’ve gone too far internet. Go sit in the corner and think about what you’ve done.”

Yeah plenty of gays don't like that shit.

“Another aspect of this problem is that faggots have fantasies about not just acceptance but dominance in society. ”

It’s being equal to cisgenders admit and pointing out hey be what you want to be dude! That isn’t indoctrination.

Oh this: https://donotlink.it/RyZY

People have fetishes and kinks. Don't take it seriously. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29285655

Faggotry is either a biological disorder, in which case it must be treated; a psychological disorder, in which case it must be treated; the result of fag indoctrination, in which case it must be treated; a hedonistic vice, in which case it must be overcome.

How about none of the above?

Social faggot acceptance leads to complete degradation of society and all norms, resulting in a free-for-all sexual jungle where everything is permissible, including pedophilia, incest and zoophilia

Hahahaha! https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2011/09/matt-barber-has-pedophilia-on-the-brain/ https://daleyeagerdotcom.wordpress.com/2018/06/02/incest-and-the-lgbt-community-the-david-epstein-case/

Seriously though homosexuality used to be accepted until Western values came along: https://www.stonewall.org.uk/about-us/news/african-sexuality-and-legacy-imported-homophobia

https://theculturetrip.com/asia/china/articles/a-history-of-homosexuality-in-china/

https://qz.com/931438/in-premodern-japan-it-was-common-for-aristocrats-and-samurai-to-pursue-male-lovers/

https://donotlink.it/mk93

While there is no doubt that opinions are strong and cruelty does occur, this is a separate issue from approval of homosexuality. It is well known-or used to be-that one can disapprove of homosexuality and still be kind to homosexuals.

She doesn't believe that talking about homosexuals won't encourage homosexuality. So why should I believe this?

Oh and replace homosexuality with race..https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-biblical-roots-of-racism_b_7649390

As a consequence, the "solutions" to the victimhood status boil down to one: all those prejudiced against homosexuality must be made to change their minds. The conclusion is clear, that the violence that does occur is being exaggerated to force such a change throughout our culture-starting in our schools.

Tell me how is it being exaggerated? Despite idiots saying otherwise there isn'tany reason to doubt it: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262682914_The_Unjustified_Doubt_of_Add_Health_Studies_on_the_Health_Disparities_of_Non-Heterosexual_Adolescents_Comment_on_Savin-Williams_and_Joyner_2014 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10508-014-0434-8

From here:

Here again we have the word “could” used to suggest a hypothetical, and the word “attraction” is extracted from any practical context. What is the teleological purpose of “attraction”? Riley J. Dennis is talking about genitals — “what’s between their legs” — and therefore we might ask, why do genitals matter in terms of “attraction”? Do you really need me to explain this? Didn’t your mother give you the where-do-babies-come-from talk when you were a child?

This is a fallacy: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argument_from_design

Sex is about reproductive biology. Human beings are mammals, and any eighth-grader can figure out what that means in terms of sex.

Once you understand this scientific definition of sex, everything else is just details. Young people have to figure out how to attract potential partners, how to choose a good partner from among the prospective candidates, and how to negotiate a relationship that will lead toward lifelong monogamous pair-bonding — i.e., a successful marriage — because this is the ideal situation in which to raise children.

Then explain other animals: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2015/08/03/animal-sex/ Or these studies on gay couples rasing kids: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/category/research/parenting/

This is very simple. Sex is about procreation, and therefore sexual success can be measured. There are winners — the ones who are blessed, in obedience to the divine commandment — and there are losers.

All of my ancestors were successful in this regard, or else I wouldn’t be here. As the descendant of a long line of sexual winners, therefore, I have inherited a legacy of winning

What about kin selection? Hell sex isn't that good for reproduction: https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/sexual-reproduction-and-the-evolution-of-sex-824

You also mentioned forming families and child rearing before. So now only reproduction matters?

Riley Dennis accuses those who disagree with him/“her” of “reducing people to their genitals” — you’re guilty of an ignorant prejudice if you don’t want to date a “woman” with XY chromosomes and a penis, you see. Perhaps the best reply to such an accusation is, “So what?”

Because you are wrong? https://medium.com/@tomo.albanese/debunking-ben-shapiros-transgender-denialism-c39b090116e1 http://overthebrainbow.com/blog/2017/1/7/wired-this-way-sexual-orientation-and-gender-in-the-brain

How is your “transphobic” prejudice different from, or worse than, Riley J. Dennis’s blatant prejudice against normal people? Riley J. Dennis is abnormal, and expects the rest of us to tolerate his/“her” preference for female clothing and effeminate mannerisms. Most of us do grant such tolerance, so long as these weirdos stay away from our children. If you want to live your life like an extra from the cast of The Rocky Horror Picture Show, you are free to move to San Francisco and let your freak flag fly. And I’ll keep my kids 2,500 miles away from San Francisco.

But what if your kids turn out to be trans? https://www.socialworktoday.com/news/dn_022916.shtml https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/01/young-trans-children-know-who-they-are/580366/

Oh and appealing to normality is a fallacy: https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2009/04/22/the-normative-fallacy/ https://www.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/24kqoe/is_the_appeal_to_normality_fallacious_in_ethics/

Not to mention you seem to confuse drag with being transgender: https://theconversation.com/amp/explainer-the-difference-between-being-transgender-and-doing-drag-100521

Under the First Amendment of the Constitution, I have the right to say that Riley J. Dennis is crazy, and I also have the right to tell you that Riley J. Dennis is a selfish liar, promoting a false concept of “discrimination” for his/“her” personal gain.

And I have the right to say you are a bigot that isn't right in the least.

Let me give you an example

https://donotlink.it/MRkA

My answer is "heteroes have a visceral hatred of homos" when read in context has only one possible meaning: that "heteroes have a visceral hatred of homos" is WHAT LEFTISTS ARE THINKING when they put female homos rather than males in stories."

Tell me, why do you think that? You gove no reason as to why you think lefitists have this opinion. In fact you provide no evidence that the left thinks so, and the way you write gives no indication that this isn't anything more than a generalization of people in general.

"I asked you what form of evidence, aside from my testamony, would convince you? You replied that my testamony would not convince you. We both know that. If you cannot answer the question, please admit that there is no answer, and please admit that your request for evidence was insincere."

A video conference and documentation they are who you claim they are.

"As for the rest, I have answered you before, and will answer you again. The answer is in two parts."

I know, but this context ignores how you make your conclisions.

Again your response to the question What do you think the Leftists are thinking when they put female rather than male homosexuals in a story (like Last Airbender)? Why do they do it?"

"It is because the two sexes differ.

Lesbians in fiction look like Asami Sato, young and pretty. Even guys who have no fetish for seeing pretty lesbians make out understand their attraction to each other, because we also are attracted to pretty girls. It does not trigger a puke response. Woman also can look at female beauty and see it, that is, see the beauty.

The reverse is not true. Men abhor homosexuals on a visceral level. While girls sometimes are attracted to them, they tend to be ‘bishounen’ rather handsome, if effete, men."

You give no indication that this unique to lefists nor any way a reader could make such a distinction.

So I will ask you again: even if it were true that I thought heteros have an instictive loathing of homos, how is this one iota different from your Lefty friends at all times and at all places thinking that heteros have an instictive hatred of homos, so much so that you coined a fake term for it, "homophobia"?"

That isnt even how homophobia works. It is defined as a dislike of or prejudice against homosexual people. Nothing about it being instinctive or ingolving heteros as a whole.

If you doubt that my family exists, I cannot help you with that. You've lost your mind.

You don't name the family member so I can't check the story, but insist it happened either way?

https://donotlink.it/Qa4Y

For a debunking of this, see here: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QtuS3wsHOKo&t=960s

https://donotlink.it/Eb5l

From the source: https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2018/10/adolf-hitler-bisexual-according-declassified-1942-cia-profile/

Much of the information in the profile was obtained second- and third-hand, and few sources are cited. One name that is brought up several times is “Dr. Sedgwick,” which may refer to Ernst Franz Sedgwick Hanfstaengl, a personal friend of Hitler who fell out with him in the mid-1930’s and defected to the U.S.

So a biased source...his response

OSS declassified profile is an extremely reliable primary source. It is not proof but it is credible evidence that American intelligence sources believed Hitler was, in fact, bisexual.

& Mine

From your link again: "Sedgwick concluded that Hitler most likely did not engage in same-sex sexuality or in an intimate relationship with another man during his youth."

A footnote explains that Sedgwick actually didn’t have any personal knowledge about the men’s hostel, but that he heard from someone else that it was a gay cruising spot.

https://donotlink.it/MRkA

My answer is "heteroes have a visceral hatred of homos" when read in context has only one possible meaning: that "heteroes have a visceral hatred of homos" is WHAT LEFTISTS ARE THINKING when they put female homos rather than males in stories."

Tell me, why do you think that? You gove no reason as to why you think lefitists have this opinion. In fact you provide no evidence that the left thinks so, and the way you write gives no indication that this isn't anything more than a generalization of people in general.

"I asked you what form of evidence, aside from my testamony, would convince you? You replied that my testamony would not convince you. We both know that. If you cannot answer the question, please admit that there is no answer, and please admit that your request for evidence was insincere."

A video conference and documentation they are who you claim they are.

"As for the rest, I have answered you before, and will answer you again. The answer is in two parts."

I know, but this context ignores how you make your conclisions.

Again your response to the question What do you think the Leftists are thinking when they put female rather than male homosexuals in a story (like Last Airbender)? Why do they do it?"

"It is because the two sexes differ.

Lesbians in fiction look like Asami Sato, young and pretty. Even guys who have no fetish for seeing pretty lesbians make out understand their attraction to each other, because we also are attracted to pretty girls. It does not trigger a puke response. Woman also can look at female beauty and see it, that is, see the beauty.

The reverse is not true. Men abhor homosexuals on a visceral level. While girls sometimes are attracted to them, they tend to be ‘bishounen’ rather handsome, if effete, men."

You give no indication that this unique to lefists nor any way a reader could make such a distinction.

https://i.redd.it/v3uj1i8wwup21.png

This is a melting pot of terrible historical analysis, bad sociology, bad human geography, and racist pseudo-patriotic nationalist tripe.

https://donotlink.it/Vr9n

This link relies on the research of the idiot debunked here to make the following claim:

The whole plot of the film revolves around an angelic Lincoln using his political skills – lying, dissembling, and bribery – to personally engineer the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment before the Confederacy can surrender and the ex-Confederates return to Congress and block the abolition of slavery.

In order to do this, Lincoln must convince conservative Republicans led by Francis Blair that he seeks peace with the Confederacy, temper the rhetoric of the Radical Republican wing led by Thaddeus Stevens, and win the support of twenty racist lame duck Democrats while keeping the Confederate peace commissioners at bay.

None of it is true:

Says you. This is ver badhistory.

https://donotlink.it/v0j6