Hey there r/archviz

I do commercial architectural photography and video. I have some background with AutoCAD and Lumion and wanted to see about adding some compositing and rendering into my services.

I think I have an idea of what the workflow will look like, and I think I have a handle on some self study work.

I asked a client from a project for a BIM file so I could work up some proof of concept stuff (for lack of a better term) and they obliged. I want to get a sense of what kind of standards I should be aware of with regard to how the BIM files are given to me. And this kind of leads into a bigger question about the general standards of practice when you are doing third party viz work for a client.

I would like to have a video meeting with someone and get a little bit of insight on this, particularly with the state of my current BIM file.

I think I am looking for maybe 2-3 one hour consults. I am in Italy and there is a local guy who would do it, but seems booked out till January.

Anyone interested?

Hi all, I've been out of the archviz game for a few years due to practicing architecture in a firm where this process is mostly outsourced. Before that I was using 3DSMax and VRay, with Lumion for quick outdoors stuff.

Recently I've been following Arch competitions online and seeing generally a very high level of render, and I was curious if anybody could let me know what sort of workflows they think are being used here so I can try them out?

You can see the images below here: https://www.terravivacompetitions.com/lighthouse-hotel-competition-results-2024/

https://preview.redd.it/hfrekm2ef87e1.jpg?width=4000&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=44f89471b7d6732185716fa29366d7be229f0463

Hello, everyone,

I'm tasked with running a research on AI in architecture & Interior design. I'm asking you guys to test a web app which uses generative ai to render models, sketches.

Use cases might be for quick styling iterations or showing concepts to clients before rendering. If you want to test it, please go to https://neolocus.ai, and please do report your honest thoughts back here.

This would really be helpful for me, thank you so much!

I have been working with models and rendering in architecture for 1 year. What do you think of the render I designed using d5 render and Archicad?

that’s the one i posted on he

Wondering if this is an appealing image overall...?
How do you get good quality renders with night scenes? Materials look different in general and the stone material from the wallpanel behind the bed doesn't look good. How to get this right and how do you get less noise with a lot of artificial light? Any tips? thanks

https://preview.redd.it/0d9lo4aniu6e1.jpg?width=3000&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5bf6c4b867ad2991f3b862e478e37f6870a5ed75

I know i am new to the game and that the competition is relentless out there. Then AI crap has infiltrated the industry and the situation has gone down the drain, according to people who have been in the field for years. I started experimenting as an archviz artist (among other things), mostly by following tutorials and and doing simple stuff. How long you think would it take for someone with skills like that to land a job? I sure tried sending mails and promote my work but i got no luck so far. Here is my portfolio, roast it and lets be done with it!

https://martinhoward.artstation.com/

Hello everyone,

I am an architect and professional architectural visualizer, I have been working in visualization professionally for about 2-3 years now most of it remote work for multiple offices (Europe/US/middle east). I have been also working specifically in unreal engine for large scale masterplans.

My main exposure was from upwork and some connections. My main issue was that these jobs were mainly project based and weren’t always there during the year. Which takes effort from me to look for more jobs etc..

So i wanted to come to you guys to ask you where do you think I should start looking for a more stable remote archviz job that is decently paid (ex. 2000usd/month). Remote is the keyword here. Is there a certain place to look or do i start to individually send emails to certain offices. And if so do you guys recommend certain offices to check out?

Thank you guys!

Hi everyone,

I’m considering this laptop for architectural visualization, mainly for using 3ds Max, Corona Renderer, and D5 Render. I’d appreciate your feedback on both the Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-72-908D model and the Predator Helios series in general.

Here are the specifications for this specific model:

• Processor: Intel Core i9-14900HX, 24 cores, 32 threads
• RAM: 32GB DDR5 5600MHz
• Storage: 1TB SSD NVMe M.2 Gen 4.0
• GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, 12GB GDDR6
  • Boost Clock: Up to 1585 MHz
  • Max Graphics Power: Up to 165W
• Display: 16.0” WQXGA (2560 x 1600) IPS, 240Hz, 100% DCI-P3 Color Gamut, 16:10 aspect ratio

Do you think this is a good choice for archviz workflows? How does this model—and the Predator Helios series as a whole—perform in terms of build quality, thermals, and overall reliability?

Thanks in advance for your insights!

https://preview.redd.it/m23bs1ipmn6e1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=6772b8e4d7ffe15e1d64181c2612a57170973cb6

So Im pretty decent with rhino/grasshopper/twinmotion, but I've noticed a pretty big limit to my skillset-

I can only model things that look nice, clean and new.

But this year for uni I'm doing a project about repurposing shipwrecks, which are obviously not nice, clean or new. What's the strategy for making things look worn down, rusted, barnacled, etc?

I get that I could do some stuff with simple textures (like rust) but I still get this problem that everything looks uniform. It doesn't feel random or natural.

Any recommendations? Software that's good for this stuff or like, tips and tricks?

Thanks in advance for any help 🙏

According to the AI overview on google, it's FBX. But i'm curious what you all would recommend.

I started messing around with D5 last night using a skp. file which went fine.

But if there is a recommended format to use I will begin using that.

Thanks

As a photographer, I've always been fascinated by how pros use manual camera controls vs auto modes. Sure, auto settings work, but real magic happens with precise control over aperture, shutter speed, and ISO. This same principle led me to build something different in architectural visualization.

Here's the problem with current AI visualization tools: they're essentially 'auto mode' - upload and pray. But architectural design needs nuance. Just like how a photographer might:

• Drop the shutter speed slightly for that perfect motion blur
• Tweak the aperture decimal by decimal for exact depth of field
• Fine-tune ISO to balance noise and brightness

I built an AI platform that brings this level of control to architectural visualization:

• Custom prompt engineering for specific architectural elements and materials
• Style intensity slider for subtle to dramatic changes
• Layout preservation controls to maintain structural integrity (crucial for accurate architectural representation)
• Real-time adjustments for instant iterations

The result? Instead of hoping the AI gets it right, you can dial in exactly what you want, just like a pro photographer with their camera settings. Perfect for quick design iterations and client presentations.

Please check out demo at https://propulix.com/

As I'm focusing on new projects, I'm looking to pass this on to someone who is interested.