/r/yimby
YIMBY: content and discussion related to the "Yes in My Back Yard" cause. What do we want? Affordable housing near where people want to live and work! When do we want it? As soon as we can safely construct it!
What is YIMBY?
YIMBY is short for "Yes in My Back Yard". The goal of YIMBY policies and activism is to ensure that our country is an affordable place to live, work, and raise a family. Focus points for the YIMBY movement include,
Addressing and correcting systemic inequities in housing policies and related regulations.
Ensure that housing laws and local regulations are evidence-based, equitable and inclusive, and not unduly obstructionist of development.
Support urbanist land use policies and protect the environment.
Related subreddits:
Rules:
1) Don't be rude or hostile to other redditors.
Rudeness, hostility and personal attacks towards other redditors are forbidden on this subreddit. Respectful discussion, from diverse points of view, makes for a thriving community. We have zero tolerance for insults or attacks on other redditors' character or identity instead of the soundness of their ideas.
2) Respect those across the political spectrums.
YIMBY is a big-tent issue and attracts people of various political persuasions. We guarantee that you will not share 100% of the views espoused by other YIMBYs. No ideology has a monopoly on YIMBYism. This also applies to NIMBYs; disagreement does not require disrespect.
YIMBY around the web:
Find us on tumblr at https://www.tumblr.com/blog/yesinmybackyard
/r/yimby
Note: my question is about property values and not rent
I’ve been watching a lot of Japan and Thailand apartment reviews and these small apartments look so amazing that you don’t even notice how small they are.
What’s In their law books for real estate. Wish nyc had more of this or SF.
The dems got played trying to play “protect the rich” and “protect the single family home”…
Caribbean Progress Studies Institute leader Rasheed Griffith has a good podcast episode with a guy named Diego who has written a book about market liberal governance in Madrid. Diego also alludes to some market liberal reforms in Andalucia related to urban planning, but doesn't describe them in detail
https://www.cnu.org/publicsquare/2024/12/04/pre-fab-home-future-descended-log-cabin
A piece of actual encouraging news, perhaps? We all know that despite being legalized in a lot of places, ADUs are not being built at scale. This design could change that...the key thing being that untrained people can (allegedly) put these together. If true, that is a complete gamechanger, and may very well convince homeowners to add more housing to their property. Let's hope they can commercialize this at a reasonable cost.
I was digging into The Hague municipality's housing vision for a university essay and found something I didn't see coming: an explicit endorsement of YIMBYism, and a desire to create a YIMBY movement in the city (see the last sentence of the image) on page 99. They mention that people in the region are forming an action group to represent home-seekers' interests. The municipality intends to let them participate in planning procedures, instead of just the existing local inhabitants as is usually the case.
What I take from this is that either;
a specific civil servant in Den Haag is in the online YIMBY bubble, or
this is becoming a proper movement internationally.
Either way, pretty cool to see. The vision itself is pretty based in general, focussing fully on densification across the board (tbf there literally is no physical space to expand outwards) and combatting segregation (it's the most segregated city in the Netherlands), mostly by adding more affordable units in the rich areas.
Link to the housing vision (in Dutch): https://www.companen.nl/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/RIS318961-Bijlage-2-Ontwerp-Woonvisie-Den-Haag-2040-Wonen-in-een-stad-in-balans.pdf
The more I look into this, the more I agree with an expert on the UCLA housing podcast who likened mandatory affordable units to mandatory parking minimums: a fundamentally destructive policy that sounds good in a neighborhood meeting, but will ultimately result in fewer units of housing being built.
I get that inclusionary zoning increases the political support among progressives for increasing supply. But because mandating affordable units in reality limits supply by disincentivizing construction/development, I wonder if it’s showing the seeds for a larger political problem, which is much-heralded supply increases such as City of Yes failing to deliver.
I’m thinking a bit out loud here but anyone else concerned about this?