I have been using HumeAI, I am trying to understand if we can create voices using HumeAI?

I am only able to select via from base voices?

I ask it over and over to show me the temperature in the Australian standard units (Celsius) and specifically not Fahrenheit and no matter what I try it just won't stop giving me freedom units. Does anyone have a fix as I haven't been able to find one.

I know it's a bit of a generic question but I'm genuinely interested, and maybe we can use this post to shine the light on products that deserve it.

Does ChatGPT already use the images in the PDF or does it only use text extracted from the PDF?

I've been using ChatGPT on the devices and quite addicted to using the app to make my life easier with knowledge, answers, questions and even data. So, safe to say that I launch the app like 40-100 times within a day.

Just like the Mac shortcut with the Opt+Space, even the iPhone should have a Widget to quick launch ChatGPT. Maybe either the voice mode, or the chat bar - like a quick tap on the Homescreen?

If you want to set SearchGPT as your default, you can download the extension.

I wanted to keep Google as my default though but still have easy access to ChatGPT, which is what a custom search engine can do.

1. Go to chrome://settings/
2. Click "Search engine" on the left
3. Under "Site Search" click Add
4. Add ChatGPT/SearchGPT as a site search
   1. Name: "ChatGPT"
   2. Shortcut: "@chatgpt"
   3. URL: https://chatgpt.com/?q=%s
   4. Note: you can customize the name and shortcut to be whatever you like
5. Now, in your search bar you can do "@chatgpt" and enter your query there

I can see that option on the web version but not on my macOS desktop app? Is it available only on the web mode and not on apps?

Anybody have any idea when us normies might get access to it?

I’ve been using ChatGPT a lot on my desktop to look things up or get quick, AI-generated answers (especially when it comes to niche stuff or more nuanced responses than a standard Google search). I know there’s a ChatGPT app, but is there any way to do a SearchGPT-style search on my phone specifically?

Would love to hear about any tips, shortcuts, or specific apps you’re using to get SearchGPT when you’re on mobile.

If we interpret what came out of the AMA with Sam Altman, Kevin Weil, Narayanan and Chen, we can conclude that OpenAI will really put GPT-5 and even GPT-4o aside, and the company's focus will now be on o1 and preparing its successors. I may be wrong, but the impression I got is that the company will start betting heavily and focusing now on o1 and its next updates and versions. This will be OpenAI's new direction for the next few months.

OpenAI DevDay London 2024: Sam Altman Ask Me Anything – Liam Patience's Blog

It was hyped as Skynet, then it comes out and it can’t sing, it can’t do voices, it is slightly more fluid than the last one and it also consistently has problems with chats being interrupted or reaching some kind of limits…

The bubble is blue-ish now, wow!

Well worth 240$+ a year!

May 2024, OpenAI introduced Vision Feature with AVM but i think they've forgot it. Does anyone have idea about that vision future?

I have a large manuscript that I wrote in a few different structures. I can go back and make everything line up to how a manuscript or novel should look but it's a pain (a lot of add space before paragraph, delete space after paragraph etc.)

Does anyone know a tool that can easily do this? Simple stuff, making the paragraphs align correctly where there's not a space between each one except for the times I double spaced which would be one space.

There's probably a way to do this in excel but since it's in so many mishmashed formatting styles, I thought I'd test the AI waters first.

I'm developing a Python application using the OpenAI Assistants API, and I've noticed a significant discrepancy in the assistant's responses. When I use the same custom assistant in the OpenAI web interface, it provides more precise and contextually accurate responses compared to when I run the same query through my Python application.

Specific concerns:
- The system prompt and user message are identical in both environments
- The response quality and adherence to instructions vary noticeably
- I've verified the API key, assistant configuration, and basic implementation

Questions:

1. Could there be subtle differences in how the context or instructions are interpreted between the web interface and the Python API?
2. Are there any known issues with context passing or instruction handling in the current version of the OpenAI API?
3. What debugging steps can I take to identify the root cause of these inconsistent responses?

Code snippet for reference:

def generate_response(user_prompt, system_prompt):
    thread = client_openai.beta.threads.create()

    message = client_openai.beta.threads.messages.create(
        thread_id=thread.id,
        role="user",
        content=user_prompt
    )

    run = client_openai.beta.threads.runs.create(
        thread_id=thread.id,
        assistant_id=wsp_assistant,
        instructions=system_prompt
    )

    while True:
        run_status = client_openai.beta.threads.runs.retrieve(thread_id=thread.id, run_id=run.id)
        if run_status.status == "completed":
            break
        elif run_status.status == "failed":
            print("Run failed:", run_status.last_error)
            break
        time.sleep(2)  # wait for 2 seconds before checking again

    messages = client_openai.beta.threads.messages.list(thread_id=thread.id)

    response = ""

    for message in reversed(messages.data):
        role = message.role  
        for content in message.content:
            if content.type == 'text':
                partial_response = content.text.value 
                print(f'\n{role}: {partial_response}')
                if(role == "assistant"):
                    # print(json.loads(partial_response))
                    response = json.loads(partial_response)
                    print(">> Object response!!")
                    print(response)
                    # response = response + " " + object_response["message"]
    return response

You don’t sound anywhere near as sophisticated as you think you do! More like the stereotypical college freshman whose response to every geopolitical question is “just, like… follow the money, man.” Somehow this is invariably one of the top comments on every thread around an OpenAI statement and I genuinely don’t get it.

Of course there is a general incentive to overstate (or overestimate) the magnitude of what is coming and understate (underestimate) the timeframe required, but the way some people act like everything out of the OpenAI team’s mouth is snake oil salesmanship you’d think we were talking about Theranos or something.

As someone whose evaluation of p(doom) is definitely closer to Yudkowsky’s than LeCun’s I wish I could convince myself that progress is slower than they’re suggesting but it doesn’t really read that way to me.

I have not been using OpenAI API for quite some time since Anthropic's Opus/Sonnet have been very good for my usage.

Today, I was trying out something and it needed OpenAI's text embedding models (mandatory), so I decided to credit some amount into my OpenAI account. The first surprise was that the previous credit amount that I had in my OpenAI account had just vanished into thin air (seems like Sama went and bought some Strawberries with my $?) and the billing was disabled, the second surprise came when I added my card details and immediately after adding the details, they charged $5 (Without asking x/y amount to be added into my account). When I went to activate my billing, it asked me to add credits again along with card details. I was like WTH?!

The worst is that, except the transaction details on my card, there are no emails from OpenAI/Stripe on this transaction and no invoice generated as well. Seems like more $ for Sama and Co. to get more Strawberries?

Is this normal? Never had these issues with Anthropic. Not response from the support yet, and I had to delete my card details, as I could not believe an org, like OpenAI could do this?

[Note: Since the time they introduced prepaid credits (after the inital days of billing for the usage), I have always used prepaid credits and not the billing option.]

Have you guys experienced anything like this?

I'm a little confused with the demos in London demo day. Was the Wanderlust demo UI running inside the ChatGPT interface itself? Or is Wanderlust a 3rd party app using o1 in the background to drive all the interactivity within its UI? Was the app developed using o1?

In the past I have had problems getting dalle to avoid over-decorating plain objects.

For example, "show a picture of a plain steel girder" would create an ornately engraved Victorian steel bar.

However using the new / submenu to start dalle I can now create plain undecorated images of objects much more easily.

Has dalle been modified, or maybe my prompting has improved?

It’s become hard to keep up with all of the recent news! I’m enjoying the new search functionality through the iOS app, but I’d like to know if there has been mentions of any plans to bring web search to advanced voice mode?

Currently advanced voice mode continues to tell me that it can’t provide real time data.

I know I'm going to get downvoted into oblivion for even asking but knowledge is more important than karma.

Isn't SearchGPT just sending the question verbatim to Google, parses the first page and combines the sources into a response? I don't want to believe that, because there are more complex AI jam projects, this (if true) is literally a single request and a few regex passes. I'd love to be proven wrong, because it would be a bummer to know that a multibillion (if only at valuation) dollar company has spent months on something teenagers do in an afternoon.

Help me understand, I really like to know.

Also how good is gpt-4o in general for sql queries

Since yesterday, ChatGPT has become a powerful search engine.
Curious? Discover how this innovation can change the way we find information, and share your thoughts in the comments!

https://youtu.be/XYW8cVcivbQ

I installed the chrome extension from this link: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/9237897-chatgpt-search (bottom)

It seems to aggressively set the default search engine to SearchGPT, making it impossible to adjust the search settings. I find this problematic, as I would prefer for SearchGPT to simply be added as a new search engine option.

Ideally, I’d like to keep Google as my default engine and use a shortcut like !sg to trigger a SearchGPT search.

How can I set this up?

Edit: Seems they offer the !g keyword internally. So if you want to search via google you can use !g <keyword>, but this still triggers the SearchGPT plugin. So they basically know everything you are searching for.

You also have bad luck if you are using alternative search engines like duckduckgo, as the shortcuts configured in chrome are overwritten?

I really hope there is way of changing this.

Edit2: SOLUTION
Just uninstall this aggressive extension and configure SearchGPT as an alternative engine in chrome:

https://preview.redd.it/0mluygp7y8yd1.png?width=519&format=png&auto=webp&s=1cd30b8d96927ac1f3ba989ecbbb9c73ded3098f

what is it , if ai does , you will believe "yes, this is real and not just hype"