Hi all,

I’ve been putting off grad school applications for a few years, but I finally have the energy and motivation/reason to start working on my application for the next cycle. Does anyone have UCSB’s personal statement prompts from this year’s application? I’d love to get started on them during the holiday break while I have some downtime.

As part of an assignment for my environmental studies class, I’m reaching out to professionals in the environmental field to conduct informational interviews. I’m looking to learn more about different career paths, industry challenges, and gain valuable advice for newcomers.

If you work in any environmental sector (such as conservation, sustainability, renewable energy, environmental science, etc.), I would love the opportunity to ask you about your career and experiences.

I have a bachelor and masters of science degree. I am currently job searching and am trying to figure out what jobs I am actually qualified for. My research for my masters mainly focused on Acarology and vector borne diseases but I have experience with field ecology, laboratory techniques, beekeeping, and statistical analysis. What I want to do is either be a biology instructor (doesn't have a route for moving up with pay/position) or some type of field ecologist like a park naturalist or helping with someone else's research doing outside field work. I really want to teach as I have a lot of teaching experience from the Army and during my M.S. I do not want to do lab work or a lot of statistical analysis. Industry jobs would be cool.

Hello all! I am currently obtaining my Bachelor's degree in Environmental Science. I also am pursuing a Master's Degree in Environmental Science, with a focus in ecology. I am wondering what the job outlook is like in this field? Are there careers to get into where there will be no field work and possible work from home opportunities? If not, are there full time positions in a laboratory setting M-F with weekends off? I'm almost done with my studies and I'm worried about getting into a career and the schedule not being consistent, having low pay and working very long hours. By this time, I plan on having a family. What careers do you suggest getting into first with my bachelor's, and what degrees do you suggest after obtaining my Master's degree? Thank you all for your time! This has been a lingering cloud over my head and any advice would be deeply appreciated! I've watched "day in the life" videos as well and I will say anything water related is fascinating and studying living organisms in general is very intriguing to me. I have always worked in laboratory settings and believe that is my strong suit. The video linked is also very interesting to me. Any advice is appreciated!

SOLAR ENERGY IS NOT CLEAN ENERGY

The current politically correct strategy for addressing global warming is not only ineffective but is also creating a massively worse situation that threatens to doom mankind and most life on the planet.Almost all of the efforts to alleviate global warming to date have been focused on carbon dioxide (CO2), the most benign of the greenhouse gases.

 The principal strategy has been to replace coal and gas electrical production with "clean energy," especially wind and solar photovoltaics (solar panels). Nitrogen TriFluoride (NF3), a gas used in the manufacture of computers, flat screen televisions and SOLAR PANELS is 17,200 times more powerful a greenhouse gas than CO2. 

While CO2 levels in the atmosphere have barely inched upward, NF3 use has increased by 10-11% a year, and recent studies have shown that NF3 levels in the atmosphere are eight times greater than originally predicted.Proponents of terraforming Mars have advocated using NF3 and other super greenhouse gases to warm the Martian atmosphere to Earthlike levels.  More likely, however, is that NF3, etc., will turn the Earth's climate Venus-like, a planet where lead is molten on the surface. 

https://www.amazon.com/NF3-Apocalyptic-Super-Greenhouse-Gases/dp/B0DQD8QDRK/ref=sr_1_3?crid=ZY5G2Y6YH3NE&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.YE1t4IsDXloDXPozu9_hA9_ILEz9QTjwMMtISM-6M5_GjHj071QN20LucGBJIEps.nieiC6POdeki42FXztoo0peDtWOVNqjHK9YX5W9BvGY&dib_tag=se&keywords=nf3%2C+sf6+and+the+apocalyptic+super+greenhouse+gases&qid=1734297880&sprefix=nf3%2C+sf6+and+the+apocalyptic+super+greenhouse+gases%2Caps%2C189&sr=8-3

Hello fellow Redditors! We've been keeping an eye on air pollution and how it directly impacts public health and the environment. Bhumi recently dived into some of the latest innovations in air pollution control technologies, and I think it's a topic that needs more visibility.

Air pollution, as many of us know, is a silent killer. It's not just about the haze over cities or the smog that hangs thick; it's also about tiny particles that can infiltrate our lungs and bloodstreams, causing heart disease, respiratory problems, and even affecting mental health. But as daunting as it sounds, there are promising advancements that are paving the way to tackle this global issue more effectively.

For instance, the introduction of more sophisticated filtration systems that target the finest particulates, and innovative methods for monitoring emissions via satellite technology, are changing the way we approach air quality management. Moreover, the rise of biofilters in industrial applications is notable, which utilise natural processes to capture and degrade pollutants.

Taking a deeper dive on Bhumi’s blog, the post addresses how these technologies not just help in reducing pollution but also, in a broader sense, contribute to our fight against climate change by monitoring and reducing CO2 emissions. It’s an interconnected battle, where gains in one area can significantly impact another.

While this paints a hopeful picture, it's also essential to discuss the accessibility of these technologies. Are they accessible across the globe, including in developing economies where air pollution is rampant due to industrial progress? Or are they still a distant dream for some areas?

This moves us to ponder — how do we make these technologies more universally accessible? Should governments invest more into researching and subsidising such technologies? Or is it up to private sectors to lead the charge with policy support?

Would love to hear your thoughts or any additional insights you might have on this matter! What do you think are the best ways forward in technologies for air pollution control?

https://preview.redd.it/ay3w35hhss6e1.png?width=1089&format=png&auto=webp&s=c28de16899af5a1c735b0c0b0b761e8f4ba28810

I have finally been offered an entry level job as an environmental scientist, it's been 2 years since I graduated college and I have been working in a different field since. Needless to say plant etymology was not used a ton in my old field, and it has been ages since I took that course in college. Are there any youtube videos, or online resources particularly good at refreshing me on that? Particularly south TX plants if possible. TIA

Hi all! I work at a tech startup and I'm trying to get more insight into the geospatial space and how it's applied to various aspects of environmental science. I put together a brief survey to get some feedback on pain points/challenges around geospatial data specifically. Also would love to chat with anyone working with geospatial data in their day to day to learn more about your work :)

Hello, Reddit community!

I’ve been pondering over the effectiveness of international agreements in addressing air pollution—a topic that we at Bhumi care deeply about, given our work with farmers in Southeast Asia to manage crop waste, which is a significant contributor to regional air pollution.

Today, I revisited our recent blog post on global efforts to combat this issue (you can check it out at Bhumi's website). It got me thinking about the multifaceted approach needed to tackle such a pervasive environmental problem. While international agreements aim to set unified standards for air quality and emissions, the actual outcomes often vary greatly between countries. This discrepancy usually stems from differences in economic capabilities, technological advancement, and political will.

What strikes me is the balance—or often, the imbalance—between developing economies, where industrial growth is sometimes prioritized over environmental concerns, and developed nations, which may have more resources to implement cleaner technologies. This global disparity poses a significant challenge in genuinely curbing air pollution on a worldwide scale.

I'm curious about your thoughts on this matter. How effective do you think international efforts like the Paris Agreement have been in aligning global actions against air pollution? Are there other local or regional initiatives that you feel have been successful or promising in your area? What role can individuals and communities play in complementing these larger agreements?

Looking forward to reading your insights and discussions!

https://preview.redd.it/tkll9aiyvl6e1.png?width=569&format=png&auto=webp&s=71abc65ca8b2aeaadec9fd22e435dd05ca1c661e

For some context I have a degree in software engineering and want to get into environmental science. I have heard the positives, but what are some cons I may have not considered or many people overlook.

Any advice or infor is greatly appreciated 👍

I was going to delete some data off of my YSI and when I confirmed the time range and hit "yes" to delete it it just froze up on me. I'm not sure if the time range was too large, but now none of the buttons are working for me. The time is still counting but other than that I'm locked out. I'm curious if anyone has run into this before or has any fixes. Thanks!

Hi all! I have recently gotten a masters degree in environmental science and have been looking for employment in environmental science. I’ve been applying to EHS, consulting, permitting, and wetland delineation jobs but have yet to get anything besides the generalized blanket rejection emails. I’ve done fieldwork and assisted with graduate student work for a few years and have taught soil science as well, but it feels like the asks for entry level jobs are extravagant and for extremely low wages. Anybody have some useful advice or tips on getting my foot into any door?

Title: Turning the Tide on Soil Degradation: Can Sustainable Farming Really Save Us?

Hi Reddit! Let’s dive into a pressing issue that doesn’t get as much limelight as it should — soil degradation. Our soil, the very ground beneath our feet, is deteriorating faster than it can naturally regenerate, and this has massive implications for food security, biodiversity, and climate change.

Here's a rundown from a recent article on Bhumi's blog: Combatting Soil Degradation with Sustainable Practices. Essentially, the piece highlights how crucial our management of soil resources is. Unsustainable agricultural practices, coupled with deforestation and industrial activity, have stripped significant portions of the Earth's soil of its fertility and ability to store carbon. This not only impacts agricultural productivity but also amplifies climate change effects.

For example, conventional farming techniques often involve heavy use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, which, although boost yield in the short term, can severely damage the soil’s microbial ecosystem in the long run. The blog also discusses how innovative practices such as crop rotation, organic farming, and the use of biochar are proving effective in restoring soil health and reducing the need for chemical inputs.

Yet, there are critics who argue that transitioning to fully sustainable agricultural practices poses significant challenges, especially without consistent policy support and financial aid for farmers transitioning from conventional to sustainable practices. They suggest that while organic farming and similar methods are a step in the right direction, they might not be sufficient to address the scale of degradation we're facing globally.

Moreover, there's a real tension between the immediate demands of food production for growing populations and the long-term need for sustainable soil management. Some argue this balance is not currently feasible without a drastic change in global food distribution and consumption patterns.

With such a complex issue at hand, it’s critical to foster discussions around these themes. What are your thoughts? Can sustainable farming alone turn the tide against soil degradation, or do we need a broader systemic change to truly make a difference? And how feasible are these changes in the near future? Let’s discuss!

So I am working on a project for my school. It is a restoration project and i am really passionate about it. I have conducted lots of research and tomorrow I have a presentation in front of environmental scientists and professors. They will deem if it’s worth pursuing or not. What is a way I can sell it to them? I am emphasizing the increase in biodiversity from before and after the implementation of the plan, explaining how it is a site many people see and will benefit the community. I don’t know if I’m selling it right, any advice?

Feel free to ask questions, since I didn’t explain barely anything.

My employer wants a few of us to get trained to do ESA's but due to our grant, they want us to pay for ut. The only one I've seen online is $1600. Is there anything cheaper out there?

I'm a master student currently studying Hydrology in the Netherlands. However, I would love to do an internship in the US. Are there any hydrologists here that can share their experiences with me about their job and what they do on a daily base. And what are the best places/companies to work at?

Hey y’all! I’m not sure what’s going on with me lately but I’ve been inspired to make a change. Big or small but I want to solve environmental problems. With that being said I’m actually quite unaware of what problems we are facing. Can anyone kind of give me a run down on some pressing issues that I can look into? It would be greatly appreciated thanks!

I’m investigating datametrics and toxins in the water and abuse of electricity leads. Anyone in the know?