t3_1grquhb

Here we go - another try: Rogue Announces Full Manifest of Their Next Mission: OTP-2 - In-Space…

t3_1gg1a75

Roger Shawyer's book can be downloaded from Anna's Archive

t3_1e9vqna

Real propellantless propulsion. Not like the Emdrive.

t3_1e0ndfv

IVO ltd plans another try in space, in Q1 / 2025

t3_1dxs4r1

Arround 27 minute, he said it will be a video of plate levitating "in a couple of months".

<div class="md"><p>Arround 27 minute, he said it will be a video of plate levitating &quot;in a couple of months&quot;.</p>
</div>

Exodus propulsion technologies has a new video

ЭФИРОДИНАМИКА. Вся физика на 100 листах

t3_1du3rmb

Dmitry from r/Osenilo still pretty much believe in EmDrive. Recently, under a major publisher, he released his book on the ether

t3_1dkwcel

Did I get that right how early test of the EmDrive was carried out on the ground level but the latest test rendering him unusable were carried out in space or in some other significant altitude?

<div class="md"><p>Did I get that right how early test of the EmDrive was carried out on the ground level but the latest test rendering him unusable were carried out in space or in some other significant altitude?</p>
</div>

Where exactly was EmDrive tested?

t3_1cgy731

https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/rockets/a60608517/overcome-earth-gravity/

<div class="md"><p><a href="https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/rockets/a60608517/overcome-earth-gravity/">https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/rockets/a60608517/overcome-earth-gravity/</a></p>
</div>

t3_1cgh5b6

https://academia.edu/resource/work/118293994

<div class="md"><p><a href="https://academia.edu/resource/work/118293994">https://academia.edu/resource/work/118293994</a></p>
</div>

Continuation of the research from the physics paper looking into high voltage asymmetrical capacitors

t3_1cahxsf

https://academia.edu/resource/work/117894839

<div class="md"><p><a href="https://academia.edu/resource/work/117894839">https://academia.edu/resource/work/117894839</a></p>
</div>

Hypothesis on the nature of the thrust in Exodus’s design, and ideas for possible avenues for improvement: 

NASA Veteran’s Propellantless Propulsion Drive That Physics Says Shouldn’t Work Just Produced Enough Thrust to Overcome Earth’s Gravity

NASA Veteran’s Propellantless Propulsion Drive That Physics Says Shouldn’t Work Just Produced Enough Thrust to Overcome Earth’s Gravity - The Debrief

The colonization of the Moon and Mars remains a dream if we rely on rocketry

[https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/](https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/)

<div class="md"><p>The colonization of the Moon and Mars remains a dream if we rely on rocketry</p>

<p><a href="https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/">https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/</a></p>
</div>

Update PNN

A cathode ray tube can shoot electrons from cathode to negative electrode, which is similar to the process in an electrical generator. If we have two cathode ray tubes, the tube A shoot electrons to tube B and the tube B shoot electrons back to tube A. Then the electrons have a closed circuit. If the electrons don't hit the anodes, the input power is zero. The kinetic energy of electrons can be converted to output power. 

<div class="md"><p>A cathode ray tube can shoot electrons from cathode to negative electrode, which is similar to the process in an electrical generator. If we have two cathode ray tubes, the tube A shoot electrons to tube B and the tube B shoot electrons back to tube A. Then the electrons have a closed circuit. If the electrons don&#39;t hit the anodes, the input power is zero. The kinetic energy of electrons can be converted to output power. </p>
</div>

A new electrical generator based on Cathode ray tubes

The Controversial Quantum Drive was put to Test. It Didn't go as Planned.

Breaking: Satellite Failure Scuttles First-of-Its-Kind In-Space Test of Physics-Defying Quantum Drive - The Debrief

For the first time after 7-8 years, I have released all my design, build and test vlogs to the public via a sorted Playlist here:

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXewH43ZGxxnpryaAXN-D1pRS27qNFQeq&si=biWtNlsbhd90paeI

I built a modest, crude but effective test lab and did detect about 18mN thrust with 1kW power on a horizontal beam deflector. False positives were certainly possible but I took my project as far as I could since vacuum chambers and magnetic shielding were far above my pay grade.

There are 39 videos in the play list, increasing chronologically. Binge watching might be a way to get through it all.  :)

Regardless, I hope it inspires someone to build something new and exciting despite naysayers...

<div class="md"><p>For the first time after 7-8 years, I have released all my design, build and test vlogs to the public via a sorted Playlist here:</p>

<p><a href="https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXewH43ZGxxnpryaAXN-D1pRS27qNFQeq&amp;si=biWtNlsbhd90paeI">https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXewH43ZGxxnpryaAXN-D1pRS27qNFQeq&amp;si=biWtNlsbhd90paeI</a></p>

<p>I built a modest, crude but effective test lab and did detect about 18mN thrust with 1kW power on a horizontal beam deflector. False positives were certainly possible but I took my project as far as I could since vacuum chambers and magnetic shielding were far above my pay grade.</p>

<p>There are 39 videos in the play list, increasing chronologically. Binge watching might be a way to get through it all.  :)</p>

<p>Regardless, I hope it inspires someone to build something new and exciting despite naysayers...</p>
</div>

1701A design, build and test vlogs just released

<blockquote class="twitter-video"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Sadly, Barry-1 had ongoing power-system issues on the bus through LEOP, and after two months of operations, towards the end of LEOP, <a href="https://twitter.com/RogueSpaceCorp?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@RogueSpaceCorp</a> lost communication with the satellite. <a href="https://twitter.com/ivo_ltd?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ivo_ltd</a> never had the opportunity to test the <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/QI?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#QI</a> Quantum Drive.</p>&mdash; Richard Mansell (@RaMansell) <a href="https://twitter.com/RaMansell/status/1755963063629484047?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 9, 2024</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



Ivo Ltd: "Sadly, Barry-1 had ongoing power-system issues on the bus through LEOP, and after two months of operations, towards the end of LEOP, @RogueSpaceCorp lost communication with the satellite. @ivo_ltd never had the opportunity to test the #QI Quantum Drive."

Such Different Ethers

Does anybody have any idea what happens when EMDR is done but the present is not safe or stable? My therapist has started it with me but my home life is very y bad right now. I had a psychotic break around seven years ago and I’m pretty desperate as nothing is working. I had a lot of childhood trauma but had been extremely high functioning until age 44 when I submitted my PhD and descended into delusions. I have the original trauma and now terribek trauma from the psychosis and fall out from that.

<div class="md"><p>Does anybody have any idea what happens when EMDR is done but the present is not safe or stable? My therapist has started it with me but my home life is very y bad right now. I had a psychotic break around seven years ago and I’m pretty desperate as nothing is working. I had a lot of childhood trauma but had been extremely high functioning until age 44 when I submitted my PhD and descended into delusions. I have the original trauma and now terribek trauma from the psychosis and fall out from that.</p>
</div>

EMDR

Nice graph of Barry-1 satellite data is on Celestrack web site - check link below. Motors not switched on yet (black curve is average orbital height).

I know patience is needed for real science to happen. I'm wondering if they have turned on the experimental thrusters yet. I don't expect to know if it works yet.

<div class="md"><p>I know patience is needed for real science to happen. I&#39;m wondering if they have turned on the experimental thrusters yet. I don&#39;t expect to know if it works yet.</p>
</div>

Have Their Been Any Updates On Barry-1?

I decided to compare the reported speed of Barry-1 against the calculated orbital velocity of Barry-1 and found a problem. My graphs are only as good as my data, and my data could be bad.

When using this [source for velocity and altitude](https://orbit.ing-now.com/satellite/58338/2023-174cl/barry-1/), a comparison of the reported orbital velocity and the calculated orbital velocity are inconsistent, with a 1.6 km/s difference in velocity at the current altitude. A comparison of the calculated orbital speed from mean altitude using [a different source](https://in-the-sky.org/spacecraft.php?id=58338) disagreed with both the original source's reported orbital speed and the calculated orbital speed from altitude. 

&#x200B;

[The red dots are the reported orbital velocity. The blue dots are orbital velocity calculated from altitude. Both red and blue use data from the same source. Black dot is calculated orbital velocity from altitude using the mean orbital altitude from a difference source.](https://preview.redd.it/2m5kh5dp7zfc1.jpg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=18199b29b559352e35982229a154d83a993564fe)

* Inorder for the reported velocity to be valid, the satelite must be orbiting at 530.5 km.
* Inorder for the calculated velocity in blue to be valid, the satelite must be orbiting at 503 km altitude.

I think we need to look for better sources of data if we are going to track Barry-1's progress.

&#x200B;

<div class="md"><p>I decided to compare the reported speed of Barry-1 against the calculated orbital velocity of Barry-1 and found a problem. My graphs are only as good as my data, and my data could be bad.</p>

<p>When using this <a href="https://orbit.ing-now.com/satellite/58338/2023-174cl/barry-1/">source for velocity and altitude</a>, a comparison of the reported orbital velocity and the calculated orbital velocity are inconsistent, with a 1.6 km/s difference in velocity at the current altitude. A comparison of the calculated orbital speed from mean altitude using <a href="https://in-the-sky.org/spacecraft.php?id=58338">a different source</a> disagreed with both the original source&#39;s reported orbital speed and the calculated orbital speed from altitude. </p>

<p>&#x200B;</p>

<p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/2m5kh5dp7zfc1.jpg?width=1200&amp;format=pjpg&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=18199b29b559352e35982229a154d83a993564fe">The red dots are the reported orbital velocity. The blue dots are orbital velocity calculated from altitude. Both red and blue use data from the same source. Black dot is calculated orbital velocity from altitude using the mean orbital altitude from a difference source.</a></p>

<ul>
<li>Inorder for the reported velocity to be valid, the satelite must be orbiting at 530.5 km.</li>
<li>Inorder for the calculated velocity in blue to be valid, the satelite must be orbiting at 503 km altitude.</li>
</ul>

<p>I think we need to look for better sources of data if we are going to track Barry-1&#39;s progress.</p>

<p>&#x200B;</p>
</div>

Bad data for Barry-1

Conference "Ether dynamics as the basis of breakthrough technologies"

Screwed up the last one. Lesson learned. Don't do maths when you haven't slept in the past two days; you might post your work.

But I went back to it and redid the graphs.

They show the last 90 days of velocity and altitude data. I think it is interesting the data shows Barry-1 stopped accelerating and the altitude is holding.

I used a rolling average because the data I have is truncate or rounded. I also use the standard deviation to show changes in the rate of change, and their scale. E.g., if the rate of acceleration changes, you will see that in the error bars, which show the standard deviation of the rolling average.

[This is the source of my data.](https://orbit.ing-now.com/satellite/58338/2023-174cl/barry-1/)

[Altitude changes for the past 90 days. Note the day 66 Std D error bars.](https://preview.redd.it/9dyxr17dvnfc1.jpg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ffa2ce675fc354fae33420a525617377218b9c5b)

[Velocity changes for the past 90 days.](https://preview.redd.it/7fnvr17dvnfc1.jpg?width=1200&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=592949e0d30478336646f26880da75c89c515cc5)

The graphs and calculations were done in Mathematica.

<div class="md"><p>Screwed up the last one. Lesson learned. Don&#39;t do maths when you haven&#39;t slept in the past two days; you might post your work.</p>

<p>But I went back to it and redid the graphs.</p>

<p>They show the last 90 days of velocity and altitude data. I think it is interesting the data shows Barry-1 stopped accelerating and the altitude is holding.</p>

<p>I used a rolling average because the data I have is truncate or rounded. I also use the standard deviation to show changes in the rate of change, and their scale. E.g., if the rate of acceleration changes, you will see that in the error bars, which show the standard deviation of the rolling average.</p>

<p><a href="https://orbit.ing-now.com/satellite/58338/2023-174cl/barry-1/">This is the source of my data.</a></p>

<p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/9dyxr17dvnfc1.jpg?width=1200&amp;format=pjpg&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=ffa2ce675fc354fae33420a525617377218b9c5b">Altitude changes for the past 90 days. Note the day 66 Std D error bars.</a></p>

<p><a href="https://preview.redd.it/7fnvr17dvnfc1.jpg?width=1200&amp;format=pjpg&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=592949e0d30478336646f26880da75c89c515cc5">Velocity changes for the past 90 days.</a></p>

<p>The graphs and calculations were done in Mathematica.</p>
</div>

Last 90 days of BARRY-1 altitude and velocity (corrected)

It's actually quite difficult to find a useful graph showing current orbital data for BARRY-1, carrying the experimental QI drives. This is the best I've found so far. As I understand it, we want to be paying particular attention to SMA, which is the size of the orbit. If the drives work, we should see that value start to level out.  
[https://celestrak.org/NORAD/elements/graph-orbit-data.php?CATNR=58338](https://celestrak.org/NORAD/elements/graph-orbit-data.php?CATNR=58338)

<div class="md"><p>It&#39;s actually quite difficult to find a useful graph showing current orbital data for BARRY-1, carrying the experimental QI drives. This is the best I&#39;ve found so far. As I understand it, we want to be paying particular attention to SMA, which is the size of the orbit. If the drives work, we should see that value start to level out.<br/>
<a href="https://celestrak.org/NORAD/elements/graph-orbit-data.php?CATNR=58338">https://celestrak.org/NORAD/elements/graph-orbit-data.php?CATNR=58338</a></p>
</div>

Direct link to BARRY-1 graph

BARRY-1 Altitude Trending update (2023-11-28 to 2024-01-28)

Smallest Hall Effect Thrusters Can Fit Into Cubesats | NextBigFuture.com

Real time satellite tracking for: BARRY-1

This is a very good article containing several links to relevant background information about the QI drive. I hadn't realised it had some DARPA funding.

https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2024/01/darpa-partially-funded-quantum-space-drive-orbital-test.html

<div class="md"><p>This is a very good article containing several links to relevant background information about the QI drive. I hadn&#39;t realised it had some DARPA funding.</p>

<p><a href="https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2024/01/darpa-partially-funded-quantum-space-drive-orbital-test.html">https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2024/01/darpa-partially-funded-quantum-space-drive-orbital-test.html</a></p>
</div>