TAKE YOUR EARTH ON MARS WITH PNN (Non-Newtonian Propulsion)

http://www.asps.it/aliena222.htm

CID (Centrifugal Impulse Drive)

Operating Principle:

• Uses classical electromagnetic and mechanical forces
• Complete mathematical framework with measurable forces
• No theoretical assumptions needed

Core Equations:

• Net Force: F_net = -∇(m·B) + mω²r
• Magnetic Field: B(r,t) = B₀(R/r)³[2cos(ωt)r̂ + sin(ωt)θ̂]
• Centrifugal Force: F_c = mω²r
• Efficiency: η = (F_net·v)/P

Demonstrated Performance:

• Thrust: 0.313-0.46875 N
• System Mass: 24.7 kg
• Operating Speed: 150 RPM
• Efficiency: 0.58%

Q Thruster

Operating Principle:

• Based on quantum vacuum fluctuations
• Relies on "quantum vacuum virtual plasma"
• Requires unproven quantum effects

Theoretical Framework:

• Incomplete mathematical model
• Relies on speculative quantum vacuum effects
• No peer-verified force generation mechanism

Claimed Performance:

• Specific Thrust: 0.4-4.0 N/kWe
• Thrust Range: 0.001-0.004 N (micro-Newtons)
• Efficiency: Not publicly verified

Key Differences

CID:

• Uses only known forces (magnetic and centrifugal)
• Forces are measurable and reproducible
• Works within established physics
• No violation of conservation laws
• Complete mathematical proof
• Peer-review ready documentation

Q Thruster:

• Requires unproven quantum vacuum interactions
• Forces are theoretical and disputed
• Needs new physics interpretations
• Relies on controversial quantum vacuum plasma concept
• Incomplete theoretical framework
• Limited experimental validation

Bottom Line

The fundamental difference is that CID operates entirely within known physics using measurable forces, while the Q Thruster requires theoretical quantum effects that haven't been proven to generate macroscopic forces. CID's thrust mechanism can be fully explained using classical electromagnetics and mechanics, whereas the Q Thruster relies on speculative quantum vacuum effects that would require new physics to explain the claimed thrust generation.

 EmDrive:

• Uses microwaves in a closed cavity
• No definitive mathematical proof
• NASA tests inconclusive
• Theory conflicts with physics laws

 Mach Effect Drive (MED):

• Claims to use Casimir effect
• No comprehensive mathematical validation
• Experimental results disputed
• Lacks peer review

 Exodus Tech System:

• Claims 1g of thrust
• No published mathematical framework
• Pending patent verification
• No peer-reviewed results
• Theory needs validation

 CID™:

• Measurable thrust: 0.313 N
• System efficiency: 0.58%
• Complete mathematical framework: F_net = -∇(m·B) + mω²r B(r,t) = B₀(R/r)³[2cos(ωt)r̂ + sin(ωt)θ̂]
• Conservation law compliant
• Reproducible results

 Key Differences: Only CID™ provides:

• Published mathematical framework
• Verified thrust measurements
• Conservation law compliance
• Reproducible experimental data
• Peer review ready results

 Future Development:

• Scaling up CID™
• Improving efficiency
• Publishing peer-reviewed papers
• Industrial applications

Arround 27 minute, he said it will be a video of plate levitating "in a couple of months".

Did I get that right how early test of the EmDrive was carried out on the ground level but the latest test rendering him unusable were carried out in space or in some other significant altitude?

https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/rockets/a60608517/overcome-earth-gravity/

https://academia.edu/resource/work/118293994

https://academia.edu/resource/work/117894839

The colonization of the Moon and Mars remains a dream if we rely on rocketry

https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/

A cathode ray tube can shoot electrons from cathode to negative electrode, which is similar to the process in an electrical generator. If we have two cathode ray tubes, the tube A shoot electrons to tube B and the tube B shoot electrons back to tube A. Then the electrons have a closed circuit. If the electrons don't hit the anodes, the input power is zero. The kinetic energy of electrons can be converted to output power.

For the first time after 7-8 years, I have released all my design, build and test vlogs to the public via a sorted Playlist here:

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXewH43ZGxxnpryaAXN-D1pRS27qNFQeq&si=biWtNlsbhd90paeI

I built a modest, crude but effective test lab and did detect about 18mN thrust with 1kW power on a horizontal beam deflector. False positives were certainly possible but I took my project as far as I could since vacuum chambers and magnetic shielding were far above my pay grade.

There are 39 videos in the play list, increasing chronologically. Binge watching might be a way to get through it all. :)

Regardless, I hope it inspires someone to build something new and exciting despite naysayers...

Does anybody have any idea what happens when EMDR is done but the present is not safe or stable? My therapist has started it with me but my home life is very y bad right now. I had a psychotic break around seven years ago and I’m pretty desperate as nothing is working. I had a lot of childhood trauma but had been extremely high functioning until age 44 when I submitted my PhD and descended into delusions. I have the original trauma and now terribek trauma from the psychosis and fall out from that.

I know patience is needed for real science to happen. I'm wondering if they have turned on the experimental thrusters yet. I don't expect to know if it works yet.