/r/neoliberal
Free trade, open borders, taco trucks on every corner. Please read the sidebar for more information.
Please send feedback to /r/metaNL. For off-topic chat, join the community in the pinned discussion thread.
We welcome people of all political persuasions as long as civility standards are observed.
With collectivism on the rise, a group of liberal philosophers, economists, and journalists met in Paris at the Walter Lippmann Colloquium in 1938 to discuss the future prospects of liberalism. While the participants could not agree on a comprehensive program, there was universal agreement that a new liberal (neoliberal) project, able to resist the tendency towards ever more state control without falling back into the dogma of complete laissez-faire, was necessary. This sub serves as a forum to continue that project against new threats posed by the populist left and right.
We do not all subscribe to a single comprehensive philosophy but instead find common ground in shared sentiments and approaches to public policy.
We reserve the right to remove comments and posts that do not explicitly break these rules in certain circumstances.
I: Civility
Refrain from name-calling, slapfights, hostility, or any uncivil behavior that derails the quality of the conversation. Do not engage in excessive partisanship.
II: Bigotry
Bigotry of any kind will be sanctioned harshly.
III: Unconstructive engagement
Do not post with the intent to provoke, mischaracterize, or troll other users rather than meaningfully contributing to the conversation. Don't disrupt serious discussions. Bad opinions are not automatically unconstructive.
IV: Off-topic Comments
Comments on submissions should substantively address the topic of submission.
V: Glorifying Violence
Do not advocate or encourage violence either seriously or jokingly. Do not glorify oppressive/autocratic regimes.
VI: Brigading
Refrain from brigading other subreddits, or coming from another subreddit and brigading this subreddit. Links within the subreddit are encouraged provided no other rules are broken
VII: Off-topic, Meta, or Duplicate post
Submissions should be relevant to public policy or political theory. Meta posts should be posted to /r/metaNL. Don't editorialize submissions titles.
VIII: Submission Quality
Low-quality or irrelevant submissions will be removed at mod discretion. This applies in particular to low-quality or repetitive memes and tweets or images of tweets.
IX: Use Pings Wisely
See the full set of guidelines in our wiki. In short, don't use pings to troll, spam, or brigade. The group members decide what is a good use of the ping system, so listen and respond to their feedback.
X: Bonk-Posting/Sexual Content
Posting inappropriate content of a sexual nature. Both SFW and NSFW content can qualify. Repeat infringements can lead to bans.
XI: Toxic Nationalism/Regionalism
Refrain from condemning countries and regions or their inhabitants at-large in response to political developments, mocking people for their nationality or region, or advocating for colonialism or imperialism.
/r/neoliberal
Would it just be a copycat of the US Constitution but with some additions or something else entirely?
The discussion thread is for casual and off-topic conversation that doesn't merit its own submission. If you've got a good meme, article, or question, please post it outside the DT. Meta discussion is allowed, but if you want to get the attention of the mods, make a post in /r/metaNL ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Ping Groups | Ping History | Mastodon | CNL Chapters | CNL Event Calendar
I am really trying to understand the legal status of the West Bank (or Palestine). In 1967, Israel captured the West Bank. Now, many will say that Israel occupied it, however wouldn’t that require that the occupied land being previously sovereign. There has never been a sovereign Palestinian state, the Arab Higher Committee turned it down in 1948. So when Israel captured the West Bank in 1967, did it automatically become incorporated into Israel? Or would that require a formal declaration of annexation or something?
Also, the Oslo Accords afforded the Palestinian Authority “full civil and security control” of “area A” in the West Bank. Now what does that even mean in terms of its legal status? The Accords also give Israel full control over “area C” - which is where the majority of their settlements are. If they have “full control” over the territory, then how can the settlements be illegal?