t3_1gmdrkf

Does anyone have any articles or personal insight on how far detectable vibrations can travel from active well sites?

Asking because I live in a neighborhood adjacent to active wells (on private properties with leases), and I can hear vibrations throughout my house. 

A map shows there are some reported active and non active wells located between 0.3 and 0.8 miles away. The vibration noise seems loud. Plus we can hear trucks and other noises. Is it really that easy to hear this much noise from 0.3 miles away or are they drilling new wells that are not on the map yet? 

Another question I wondered about is how close does a well pad need to be to a property for these active vibrations to cause structural damage to adjacent homes? 

If you have an articles or direct knowledge, I'd appreciate the info, thanks

<div class="md"><p>Does anyone have any articles or personal insight on how far detectable vibrations can travel from active well sites?</p>

<p>Asking because I live in a neighborhood adjacent to active wells (on private properties with leases), and I can hear vibrations throughout my house. </p>

<p>A map shows there are some reported active and non active wells located between 0.3 and 0.8 miles away. The vibration noise seems loud. Plus we can hear trucks and other noises. Is it really that easy to hear this much noise from 0.3 miles away or are they drilling new wells that are not on the map yet? </p>

<p>Another question I wondered about is how close does a well pad need to be to a property for these active vibrations to cause structural damage to adjacent homes? </p>

<p>If you have an articles or direct knowledge, I&#39;d appreciate the info, thanks</p>
</div>

Distances for fracking vibration

t3_1giczxo

Research paper of fracking professional needed please!!!

Hello!!
I am doing a research paper for school about the environmental effects of fracking. If possible is there a professional that would be able to give me some insight? I would like to hear from all sides of the argument the good the bad and the ugly about fracking. Please and thank you!!!

<div class="md"><p>Research paper of fracking professional needed please!!!</p>

<p>Hello!!
I am doing a research paper for school about the environmental effects of fracking. If possible is there a professional that would be able to give me some insight? I would like to hear from all sides of the argument the good the bad and the ugly about fracking. Please and thank you!!!</p>
</div>

Professional help needed for research paper!

t3_1ffz26j

It’s official: the LNG fuel cycle (natural gas / fracking) is 33% worse than coal for climate change. 

It’s official: LNG fuel cycle is 33% more destructive than coal. This should be being screamed from the rooftops of every nuclear advocate. 

This is a Cornell University study used to determine the GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS impact “ONLY.” This doesn’t research the acute health effects caused by millions of people in the United States and globally who breathe in, drink, or are topically exposed to ozone, benzine, methane, mercury, dioxins, NORM, and other known carcinogens, neuro-toxins and poisons that are EXEMPT from the the clean-air act, the clean-water act, the SuperFund act, and a dozen other keystone environmental health regulations. 

I personally believe the morality of killing children and elderly the respiratory disease and the increasing rates of cancer found in correlation with the “shale fracking revolution” is a much more serious matter.. and I say that knowing that the existential threat posed by climate disruption to could end organized civilization in less than a century.

A lot of the utilities here in the U.S. that have PWRs and BWRs in their portfolio also have a lot of fracking and LNG.. but it’s time to be vocal.. to educate.. to organize.. to act.. until the public-pressure builds to the point where they are proud to announce the planned closure of their natural-gas cycle peaker plants and infrastructure, while embracing the public demand for safe and reliable modern nuclear technology.. but if that reality is to come to fruition, if preventing asthma and neuro-myopathy, lymphoma and leukemia in children and people in the Pennsylvania forests, Colorado plateau, East-Texas tall-grass and every other state (pollution knows no borders) and around the world is surely enough.. if the existential threat to human civilization from green-house gas emissions is surely enough.. 

…but what is not enough - is those of us with the heads and hearts to understand the context and solution ☢️ to this problem is we need to educate, organize, act a HELL of A LOT more than we are already doing in order to force the conversation and public consciousness. Almost every positive change in history takes place, not because of the benevolence of power but because of the reluctant acceptance by power of the public pressure to do the right thing. Solar and wind technology are crucial, but only the reliability, acute safety and chronic long-term climate safety of energy reliability, which will be needed to end most of the synthesized petro-chemical revolution and current agriculture-hydrocarbon intersections NEED an abundance of non-intermittent electricity to make easy. There is simply nothing more misunderstood than the economic, safety and record of nuclear technology.. but it’s all being replaced with gas under the fossil fuel corporation lie that “it’s greener” 

We need to stop it and embrace the correct energy portfolio..or our neighbors will get sicker and our great grand children will inherit a biosphere destroyed in totality for human life and organized civilization. 

<div class="md"><p>It’s official: the LNG fuel cycle (natural gas / fracking) is 33% worse than coal for climate change. </p>

<p>It’s official: LNG fuel cycle is 33% more destructive than coal. This should be being screamed from the rooftops of every nuclear advocate. </p>

<p>This is a Cornell University study used to determine the GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS impact “ONLY.” This doesn’t research the acute health effects caused by millions of people in the United States and globally who breathe in, drink, or are topically exposed to ozone, benzine, methane, mercury, dioxins, NORM, and other known carcinogens, neuro-toxins and poisons that are EXEMPT from the the clean-air act, the clean-water act, the SuperFund act, and a dozen other keystone environmental health regulations. </p>

<p>I personally believe the morality of killing children and elderly the respiratory disease and the increasing rates of cancer found in correlation with the “shale fracking revolution” is a much more serious matter.. and I say that knowing that the existential threat posed by climate disruption to could end organized civilization in less than a century.</p>

<p>A lot of the utilities here in the U.S. that have PWRs and BWRs in their portfolio also have a lot of fracking and LNG.. but it’s time to be vocal.. to educate.. to organize.. to act.. until the public-pressure builds to the point where they are proud to announce the planned closure of their natural-gas cycle peaker plants and infrastructure, while embracing the public demand for safe and reliable modern nuclear technology.. but if that reality is to come to fruition, if preventing asthma and neuro-myopathy, lymphoma and leukemia in children and people in the Pennsylvania forests, Colorado plateau, East-Texas tall-grass and every other state (pollution knows no borders) and around the world is surely enough.. if the existential threat to human civilization from green-house gas emissions is surely enough.. </p>

<p>…but what is not enough - is those of us with the heads and hearts to understand the context and solution ☢️ to this problem is we need to educate, organize, act a HELL of A LOT more than we are already doing in order to force the conversation and public consciousness. Almost every positive change in history takes place, not because of the benevolence of power but because of the reluctant acceptance by power of the public pressure to do the right thing. Solar and wind technology are crucial, but only the reliability, acute safety and chronic long-term climate safety of energy reliability, which will be needed to end most of the synthesized petro-chemical revolution and current agriculture-hydrocarbon intersections NEED an abundance of non-intermittent electricity to make easy. There is simply nothing more misunderstood than the economic, safety and record of nuclear technology.. but it’s all being replaced with gas under the fossil fuel corporation lie that “it’s greener” </p>

<p>We need to stop it and embrace the correct energy portfolio..or our neighbors will get sicker and our great grand children will inherit a biosphere destroyed in totality for human life and organized civilization. </p>
</div>

Cornell Study confirms: Fracking & Natural Gas fuel cycle is 33% worse than coal 

t3_1f5cxmy

The Township is trying to show this down the residents throats. Saying there is nothing we can do to stop it. The permits with the DEP have not been filed yet. Most of the housing communities here have been built on abandoned coal mines. 
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to stop this, or any legal resources we can call. TIA. 

<div class="md"><p>The Township is trying to show this down the residents throats. Saying there is nothing we can do to stop it. The permits with the DEP have not been filed yet. Most of the housing communities here have been built on abandoned coal mines. 
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to stop this, or any legal resources we can call. TIA. </p>
</div>

Range Resources has signed a lease to put in 13 unconventional fracking wells in North Fayette

t3_1dw9ib7

New to fracking and e-frac applications: wondering if there was a list for some of the terminology that is used in the field, specifically what they are referring to. Examples:
ASF (all shots fired)
Pulsed
Equalizing
1000’ surface
1000’ to MJ
On Flush
Shut in Wells

Etc, etc.

<div class="md"><p>New to fracking and e-frac applications: wondering if there was a list for some of the terminology that is used in the field, specifically what they are referring to. Examples:
ASF (all shots fired)
Pulsed
Equalizing
1000’ surface
1000’ to MJ
On Flush
Shut in Wells</p>

<p>Etc, etc.</p>
</div>

Lingo

t3_1d8q8kg

New portmanteau: Fracne - the pockmarks left on the face of the Earth as a result of fracking

t3_1cdnj7q

Victory for ODNR, environmental activists in local injection well case

t3_1cdjo1d

I am thinking of moving to a house 3/4 a mile away from a small scale LGN storage plant.it is not downwind.  I cannot find online if there are similar long term health risk as fracking operations. If anyone has insight on this matter I’d really appreciate it.  

<div class="md"><p>I am thinking of moving to a house 3/4 a mile away from a small scale LGN storage plant.it is not downwind.  I cannot find online if there are similar long term health risk as fracking operations. If anyone has insight on this matter I’d really appreciate it.  </p>
</div>

Small-scale liquefaction plants

t3_16s1di6

‘Monster Fracks’ Are Getting Far Bigger. And Far Thirstier. (Gift Article)

t3_16f2hjc

Morrocco just recently started fracking, and they don’t have a history of big earthquakes.

What is current cost of a barrel of water for well fracking going for?

<div class="md"><p>What is current cost of a barrel of water for well fracking going for?</p>
</div>

Selling water for fracking

 as representative for the Salt Fork BF Clan. As of yet no one from ODNR or any of it's subsidiary councils have done not  anything..even suggested an environmental impact study.  They are getting anxious, and that don't look good on a squatch.

<div class="md"><p>as representative for the Salt Fork BF Clan. As of yet no one from ODNR or any of it&#39;s subsidiary councils have done not  anything..even suggested an environmental impact study.  They are getting anxious, and that don&#39;t look good on a squatch.</p>
</div>

I'm officially going on the record

What is better for the environment between EVs and hydrogen fuel cells?

I know I'm lazy and I apologise but I ptomise I have reasons. TL:DR the forum first but would really appreciate someone with some knowledge of fracking to tell me if this post in the image is accurate, somewhat accurate, or completely misinformed please?

<div class="md"><p>I know I&#39;m lazy and I apologise but I ptomise I have reasons. TL:DR the forum first but would really appreciate someone with some knowledge of fracking to tell me if this post in the image is accurate, somewhat accurate, or completely misinformed please?</p>
</div>

Fact checking

More Reason to Take Fracking Quakes Seriously

Significant back-to-back earthquakes in northern B.C. 'very likely' caused by fracking: federal expert

Parliamentary fracking vote is won by the UK government

[Britain] Fracking moratorium to be lifted – reaction

Anti-fracking group threatens direct action against Vancouver's highways and tourist spots unless demands met

Why a planned frac sand mine spells trouble for Manitoba First Nations and the environment

Sharp cut in methane now could help avoid worst of climate crisis: Focussing on carbon dioxide alone will not keep world within 1.5C limit of global heating, warn scientists

To Counter Global Warming, Focus Far More on Methane, a New Study Recommends: Scientists at Stanford have concluded that the EPA has radically undervalued the climate impact of methane

There are millions of orphaned gas and oil wells leaking methane in the U.S. — plugging them will cost billions

New Study Says World Must Cut Short-Lived Climate Pollutants as Well as Carbon Dioxide to Meet Paris Agreement Goals: Cutting only CO2 emissions, but failing to rein in methane, HFCs and soot, will speed global warming in the coming decades and only slow it later this century.

Calgary researchers say there may be a link between fracking and premature births

Climate Expert Debunks Big Oil's Lies About Carbon Capture, Nature-Based Solutions: Michael Mann also told a House panel that "investing in natural gas is crowding out investment in true clean, renewable energy that can help us decarbonize our economy and address the climate crisis."

A New Generation of Satellites Is Helping Authorities Track Methane Emissions: Efforts to identify fracking leaks of the harmful greenhouse gas are improving with advances in technology

2018 Scientists struggle to explain a worrying rise in atmospheric methane, a potent greenhouse gas releaded by fracking

For the First Time, a Harvard Study Links Air Pollution From Fracking to Early Deaths Among Nearby Residents

Interior: US has twice as many abandoned oil and gas wells as previously thought

----
### For all your fracking natural gas needs, unless you shill.  Post national and local news stories, scientific articles, comics, cartoons, animations, information on protests, and other events or actions related to hydraulic fracturing of "natural" gas or other fracked fossil fuels.

#### Reddit Resources

* /r/environment 
* /r/sustainable
* /r/water 
* /r/renewable 
* /r/energy

<div class="md"><hr/>

<h3>For all your fracking natural gas needs, unless you shill.  Post national and local news stories, scientific articles, comics, cartoons, animations, information on protests, and other events or actions related to hydraulic fracturing of &quot;natural&quot; gas or other fracked fossil fuels.</h3>

<h4>Reddit Resources</h4>

<ul>
<li><a href="/r/environment">/r/environment</a> </li>
<li><a href="/r/sustainable">/r/sustainable</a></li>
<li><a href="/r/water">/r/water</a> </li>
<li><a href="/r/renewable">/r/renewable</a> </li>
<li><a href="/r/energy">/r/energy</a></li>
</ul>
</div>

<div class="md"><p>A horizontal news sharing network for those who want to be fully informed rather than fracked about fracking (hydraulic fracturing) and natural gas.</p>
</div>

For all your fracking natural gas needs, unless you shill. Post national and local news stories, scientific articles, comics, cartoons, animations, information on protests, and other events or actions related to hydraulic fracturing of "natural" gas or other fracked fossil fuels.

Reddit Resources

990 Subscribers