/r/NonAustrianEconomics
Economics from Keynes to Chicago, from game theory to econometrics and everything in between, or outside of, EXCEPT the Austrian school (discuss that in /r/economics, please).
See the rules and guidelines for further clarification.
/r/NonAustrianEconomics
Hey, I wrote a paper on economics. I think it shows that monetary profit disrupts the economy, and it can be solved by the government printing new money.
Summary:
https://medium.com/@DoPromote/summary-of-the-problem-of-the-origin-of-the-profit-18b551fcce36
Full paper:
https://medium.com/@DoPromote/problem-of-the-origin-of-profit-37f94d33c67
Most completed and final form. 43 pages. Over 100 quotes. Exposition of Marx's inner working economic categories. Critique of Marx's Value Theory. Biographical overview of Marx's economic writing and changes over time. More insight into Marx's history in economics than Engels can provably give. Marx's dialectics and historical materialism. Correlation of ideas to social relations, correlation of characteristics to social relations. Written from defection.
https://www.academia.edu/34227320/Critique_of_Marxs_Value_Theory_patched_
A critique of bourgeois reformism growing out of the process of circulation necessary for surplus revenue, what Marx called the general formula: M-C-M'. Also, a bit of Marxology attempting to propose that chapter 7 of Capital volume one was intentionally left undeveloped by Marx to go along with the theme of production in the first volume of Capital. This is is newer and completely redone version, much better.
They act like the ABCT is some unknown universal truth that nobody has ever heard the or even heard of.
Everybody has heard of it, everyone has rejected it. We don't need it forced down our throats anymore.
I studied Econ in college, most of my profs were Austrian, with one Keynesian.
AE makes sense to me, honestly I don't see how anyone can argue against it.
I am totally open to other theories and just am wondering what is the rebuttal to AE? How would you go about "calling out" an Austrian on theories you believe are wrong?
If you were to debate an Austrian, what would be your major points? And what do you think he wouldn't be able to refute?
Sincerely here to learn,
Thanks!