/r/Freethought
Freethought is an open forum dedicated to rational, logical and scientific examination of culture, politics, religion, science, business and more!
We are now private in protest of Reddit's unfair exploitation of the community that made it what it is today. Here's our Discord: https://discord.gg/25puhg6d
More than atheism: dedicated to rational, logical and scientific examination of culture, politics, religion, science, business and more!
See the definition of Freethought and Freethinker.
This subreddit is not about:
Please note these rules:
*The term "freethought" (one word) has a specific meaning and does not imply whatever you feel you should talk about. *
/r/Freethought is an open forum dedicated to rational, logical and scientific examination of culture, politics, religion, science, business and more!
Freethinkers reject claims and beliefs which are not testable and verifiable using established scientific methods, and encourage a society that espouses the priority of rationality and reason over dogma, emotion and pop doctrine.
Reddit Hivemind not welcome here! Just because you personally disagree with something doesn't mean it should be marginalized. All arguments require evidence.
This forum is focused on examining issues to, as best we can, identify truth from a pure science perspective, with an acknowledgement that we as humans are inherently biased and must celebrate and respect skepticism and be aware of emotion and peer pressure and how it affects our ability to identify and recognize that which is objectively true.
The scientific method always leaves room for re-adjustment if evidence indicates such. As a result, dogmatic behavior (subscribing to passionate viewpoints in lieu of evidence) is antithetical to our ideals.
Remember, downvote stories based on the quality of the content, not whether you agree or disagree with the statement. For more info on Reddiquitte, see voting guidelines.
Rules regarding debate and discussion
/r/Freethought endeavors to be a Logical Fallacy Free Zone - What this means is that we encourage debate on the merits of an issue, without resorting to personal attacks or dismissing the messenger by applying some kind of politically-incorrect label, or using dishonest debate tactics that distract from, rather than address the cogent parts of an issue. If you cannot successfully argue your point without using personal indictments, sweeping generalizations or false-dichotomies/equivalences, we will encourage (if not facilitate) your non-participation.
We also strongly condemn the over-simplification of complex issues, or the deviation from an argument by drilling down into semantics or the "two wrongs make a right" fallacy (pointing out hypocrisy needs to be relevant to the debate beyond simply an attempt to discredit someone or something) . As we debate issues, be aware of staying on point, arguing the position raised, not the position you've assumed that isn't clearly specified -- so if you're unsure, ask what the other person means before you go off on a tirade attacking an argument they did not make.
And last but not least: Not all references are of equal weight. Citations should be individually-assessed based on: 1. The depth of their details and how this specifically relates to the issue at hand, 2. The objectivity of the source and the degree to which there is not a conflict-of-interest.
Notice: There will be a zero-tolerance policy for muck-raking, trolling and trying to create drama. If you participate in any threads trying to attack mods or the subreddit you will be banned. /r/Freethought is the subreddit, NOT the topic of threads. If you don't want to participate, feel free to unsubscribe. In the meantime, bear with us while we "cleanse" the forum of disruptive influences.
NOTE: This is not a "philosophy forum" unless it specifically relates to science and skepticism. Do not confuse "free thought" with "freethought".
Subreddits worthy of checking out:
/r/Freethought
##TLDR If we consider that the body and the mind are inherently unified and not separate entities, how can we justify the notion of having full autonomy or ‘ownership’ over the body? Does the body truly belong to the self if, without the mind, it becomes mere flesh, and yet the mind is fundamentally bound to the body’s mortality? Furthermore, in cases like plastic surgery, where the mind enacts a change upon the body: 1. Does the individual possess the right to alter their body in this way? 2. After such an alteration, does the individual remain the same ‘self’?
(and i must say that this is highly irrelevant to modern political issues about abortion and etc. in abortion baby is simply another object in the body which occupies space and doesnt belong to body)
#-
Hello, I’ve been pondering a question that initially seemed simple but has grown increasingly complex for me. At first, I couldn’t understand why the idea that the body shouldn’t “possess” the mind was problematic. However, after reflecting more deeply, I’ve started to see the tension, and it has stayed on my mind ever since.
Recently, I came across Aristotle’s perspective on the body and mind, where he describes their relationship as one of master and servant. This only added to my confusion. On one hand, the body and mind are united—they are not separate entities. But on the other hand, without the mind, the body is reduced to mere flesh. This seems to reintroduce a kind of division between the two.
It’s also undeniable that the body influences the mind, sometimes persistently so—for instance, through the inevitable reality of death. This suggests that the mind doesn’t have full domination over the body, as emotions, instincts, and mortality all play a role in shaping our thoughts and actions.
And John Locke says it was a white table if we werent had any experience. So basically the mind is strictly dependent to the body. Locke was telling that memories were defining our identity, yet for that one i don't agree because our body has a part in the identity too.
Now, this tension becomes even more striking in specific scenarios like plastic surgery. Imagine undergoing a facial surgery. Here, the mind exerts its will over the body in a direct and tangible way. This raises two deeply philosophical questions: 1. Do we truly have the right to alter our bodies in such a way, especially when considering the interconnectedness of body and mind? 2. After making such a change, do we remain the same self?
These questions challenge our understanding of autonomy, identity, and what it means to be “whole.”
I have worked with governments across the world for several years and have developed a straightforward framework for evaluating countries. I would appreciate your feedback and critique on the same.