Deepseek R1:

👽 ”Bro, imagine thinking every protest is a CIA Sims game. 💻🌍 The ‘color revolution’ conspiracy is like that one TikTokker who claims every viral trend is ~Illuminati~—zero rizz, all copium. Let’s unpack why this take is giving ”NPC energy”:

1️⃣ ”It’s All Foreign Psyops!!1!” 🤡

• When people protest corruption/oppression, the theory’s like: ”Nooo, they’re just CIA NPCs!!”
• Reality check: Grassroots movements ≠ Fortnite skins you can buy with V-Bucks. Local activists aren’t LARPing as revolutionaries for a Western side quest.

2️⃣ ”Same Vibes, Must Be Same Script!” 📜

• “Omg Ukraine’s orange, Georgia’s rose, Hong Kong’s umbrellas—SUS COLLAB ALERT!”
• Reality check: Oppressed people sharing protest aesthetics ≠ proof of a Marvel crossover event. Y’all ever heard of parallel struggles? It’s not a group project.

3️⃣ ”But… But… Regime Change Agenda!!” 🥴

• This theory malds over ”foreign interference” but ghosts the actual reasons people rebel: poverty, censorship, or their government being the ”ick” 24/7.
• Reality check: When your leader’s giving ”failed statecore” and the youth are DMs-deep in unemployment, maybe… it’s not just NATO’s fault?

4️⃣ ”Look at the Color Palette!!” 🎨

• Naming revolutions after colors/flowers is just branding, like Supreme for activism. But conspiracists act like it’s a Soros loyalty program.
• Reality check: If hashtags could overthrow governments, Gen Z would’ve #Yeeted every boomer regime by now.

TL;DR: Color revolution theory is the geopolitical version of ”my ex cheated because of TikTok horoscopes”—cheap lore to avoid admitting people hate their oppressors. Real activism’s a grassroots glow-up, not a CIA fanfic.

#NotAllRevolutionsAreCapCutTemplates #TouchGrassNotPropaganda 🍃🚫

Ahh, I see. So you think nothing other than nation states are significant. Such a narrow view of history and the world that you have. You also have a particularly ignorant view of state socialism being as Lenin gutted the decision making power of the actual worker's council's which eliminated all direct workers control of the means of production which also eliminated any possibility of calling it Socialism at all. Instead it was a nation participating in global Capitalism with State controlled Industry. Curious how you missed that part, since all of this is so significant to you. Also curious how you missed Stirner's influence on many, many political and philosophical authors, which indeed is quite significant globally. Yet apparently nothing other than convoluted authoritarian nation states which did nothing more than vast population purges, indigenous genocide and vast ecocide are valid to you. Funny how that works, isn't it? Another thing of interest is that you seem to think that authors are obligated to prescriptive political planning in order to be valid authors at all, which is so narrow minded as to be ignorantly and obliviously absurd. Honestly, your narrow mindedness makes it particularly difficult from my perspective to see anything significant about your opinions at all. But go ahead and be a cliché Marxist simp if you want to. 🤷‍♂️

I'm so sick of all these people who think they're marxists. No, you're not. I see these people saying "I've made a hundred tweets in a twitter argument and I clearly won" That's nothing, most of us can put 300+ tweets in all our arguments. I see people who only read the Gotha Programme and think they're marxists. Come talk to me when you pick up On Authority, then we'll be comrades.

Also DEAR TROSTKYISTS: DPRK is AES. Vietnam is AES. Cuba is AES. The Eastern Bloc was AES. The USSR was AES. China is A. E. S. Put down the baby theory and defend the national bourgeoisie that requires challenge and skill for once.

-sincerely, all of the ACTUAL marxists

Saw some shit about Minecraft Peter driving someone insane? Stfu liberal. Let the man agitate and inform the lumpen youth and we'll purge him in time.

Plzs guys

https://i.redd.it/yv442y6mw9ge1.gif

This isn't really a question just about the Ruhr Uprising, but it embodies the totally bizarre (to me) situation in Germany at the time. How come Germany seems to have frankly bursting at the seems with revolution for 15 odd years between 1917 and 1933? What about the Nazi takeover was so different to the Kapp Directorate, that it wasn't overthrown in the same way? Was it simply that the SDP had opposed the Putsch but not the Nazi's in the same way? How in hell did the SPD remain in such a position of consistent authority for so long?

Fundamentally, what would it have taken for the sporadic punctures in the structure of the bourgeois state to bring about it's dissolution?