/r/shittylinguistics
This is a place where you can come to pronounce things properly and to correct others' ungrammatical use of apostrophes and split infinitives; to share and discuss interesting etymologies; to count the number of words that Inuits have for 'snow'. We also hold important discussions on the general decay of language in today's youth and share theories on how best to remedy this imminent decline of communication. Personally I think it's the advent of texting that has caused young people today to speak wrongly.
Please refrain from using any of the following 'words' (these 'words' do not actually exist):
who (of course this should be 'whom')
less (this should be 'fewer')
me (this should be 'I')
hopefully (this is just made up)
like (this is lazy)
/r/shittylinguistics
var: watachi ga bu sprechën good = faux;
Universal Grammar posits that we all have an innate capacity for syntax.
Premise 1: All humans have an innate capacity for Phrygian, as Psammetichus 664 proves.
Premise 2: Phrygian has syntax.
Conclusion: All humans have an innate capacity for syntax.
QED
This might be slightly anachronistic but PIE phonology seems...remarkably well-suited to the stereotypical "caveman in a children's cartoon" voice.
gʰrem. gʰrendʰ. gʰegʰuǵʰ. bʰruHg. These are noises made by someone who rides a dinosaur to work.
“Woh” could be pronounced "wawh" or “wuh”... (There are no English words starting with “woh-” for an appropriate phonetic reference.)
“How” sounds effective for thoughtful questioning, while “woh” seems cheerful. Try saying the following:
“Woh was school today?”
“Woh high can your balloon fly?”
"Woh am I supposed to live without you?" (in Michael Bolton's voice)
Reconstructions based on French, Spanish, and Italian localisations.
Nominative | Nominatives | Vocative | Vocatives | Accusative | Accusatives | Genitive | Genitives | Dative | Datives | Ablative | Ablatives |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
*ABRA | *ABRAE | *ABRA | *ABRAE | *ABRAM | *ABRÁS | *ABRAE | *ABRÁRVM | *ABRAE | *ABRꟾS | *ABRÁ | *ABRꟾS |
*NꟾDÓRꟾNA | *NꟾDÓRꟾNAE | *NꟾDÓRꟾNA | *NꟾDÓRꟾNAE | *NꟾDÓRꟾNAM | *NꟾDÓRꟾNÁS | *NꟾDÓRꟾNAE | NꟾDÓRꟾNÁRVM | NꟾDÓRꟾNAE | NꟾDÓRꟾNꟾS | NꟾDÓRꟾNÁ | NꟾDÓRꟾNꟾS |
*NꟾDÓRꟾNVS | *NꟾDÓRꟾNꟾ | *NꟾDÓRꟾNE | *NꟾDÓRꟾNꟾ | *NꟾDÓRꟾNVM | *NꟾDÓRꟾNÓS | *NꟾDÓRꟾNꟾ | NꟾDÓRꟾNÓRVM | NꟾDÓRꟾNÓ | NꟾDÓRꟾNꟾS | NꟾDÓRꟾNÓ | NꟾDÓRꟾNꟾS |
*VV́LPꟾXSIS | *VV́LPꟾXSĒS | *VV́LPꟾXSIS | *VV́LPꟾXSĒS | *VV́LPꟾXSEM | *VV́LPꟾXSÉS | *VV́LPꟾXSIS | *VV́LPꟾXSIVM | *VV́LPꟾXSꟾ | *VV́LPꟾXSIBVS | *VV́LPꟾXSE | *VV́LPꟾXSIBVS |
English loaned the word from Mbabaram before 1000 AD. Obviously.
Edit: to clarify, this would explain so much, the origin of "dog" is quite mysterious. Yet, we found it in an Aboriginie language, complete with cognates in a local family. I am proposing that english "dog" derives from *gudaga.
I'm seriously worried English is going to default on its debts and revert to Anglo-Saxon
I spent years thinking haute couture literally meant "high culture" with the French snobbishly using the word for "culture" to refer to all fashion.
But no. Totally unrelated. Pure coincidence. I hate it.
long live the empire of banat
-ference > -fefe
hju: > ju:
Standard English: a huge inference
Trumpian English: a yuge infefe
ch- > j- (eg. china > jina)
ai realised more as /ai/
-verage > -vfefe That's not yuge, that's avfefe...