/r/ShitTheAdminsSay

Photograph via snooOG

Welcome to Shit The Admins Say!

Take a peek at what the admins think and do, we stalk the admins so you don't have to!

Subscribe to learn little known facts about the site or just read the outlandish things the reddit admins say.

Attention: Shit does not necessarily mean bad in this case.

If the admins said something feel free to post, this sub is helps give insight on admin views and policy.


Stay updated on changes made to the site here

To Search A Specific Admin Click Here

Related subreddits

Contact the admins
Reason How to Contact
General Community Based Things Send message to /r/reddit.com
Press Inquiry Email press@reddit.com
Gold Support Email GoldSupport@reddit.com
RedditGifts Help Email redditgifts@reddit.com
Advertising Help Email selfservicesupport@reddit.com (or advertising@reddit.com)
AMA Help Email AMA@reddit.com
Security Concerns/Issues Email security@reddit.com
AMA Data Email amadata@reddit.com

Also see the help center

/r/ShitTheAdminsSay

2,076 Subscribers

0

reddit bans g-word in a bid to protect it's pedophile mods and admins

5 Comments
2022/07/16
04:26 UTC

23

Reddit’s 2021 Mod Summit was incredibly revealing. These aren't people I'd trust to tie my shoe laces, much less run one of the biggest and most important websites in the world. And their new "true block" announcement is a perfect example that they're either horribly corrupt or incompetent.

I was going to leave this alone simply because I didn't want to spend the time, but now after seeing they're planning to implement "true block" in the ModNews sub https://old.reddit.com/r/modnews/comments/rkyoeq/previewing_upcoming_changes_to_blocking/hpgfq0m/ I just can't stay silent. This true block thing is yet another extremely stupid or extremely corrupt change. The admins have either been bought out by special interests who want to spread propaganda without being confronted, or they're too stupid to realize that's what's going to happen. And beyond propaganda, it's going to make harassment even worse because the user won't even know that the other person is talking about them. It would also enable bad actors to completely privatize their actions/behavior in ways I don't even want to mention since I don't want to help them do it.

The mod summit was incredibly revealing regarding the people at the top behind the scenes. These top admins and powermods they brought on are some of the unhealthiest, stereotypical type of redditor that gets mocked. These aren't people I'd trust to tie my shoe laces, much less run one of the biggest and most important websites in the world.

I'm not going to name names or provide descriptions because I don't want to get in trouble for harassment.

They wasted the hell out of our time, and just spewed more of the same PR BS.

It's supposed to be live with a chat yet they're playing a pre-recorded video and there is no chat. Didn't even give us a recorded video that we can play on x4 and skip through...

They get a bunch of weirdos to sing songs very badly. This is what we're here for? To listen to this? Do what you want, but why are you making us sit through this?

Steve gets on and says he has a pathological pull towards hard questions, then they give him a bunch of extremely fluff questions, and not a single hard one, such as the one I asked about regarding Spez claiming they were not going to tolerate people manipulating reddit towards one viewpoint, yet one of the top admins specifically puts corrupt mods in places of power who do exactly that.

Previously I commended Spez for telling the massive amount of people who were demanding heavier, biased censorship to fuck off, but after the mod summit I think he was just playing good cop bad cop, and/or trying to end the mod rebellion by acquiescing to the power mods' demands while at the same time saying "we're in charge here". I don't believe for a second that he nor any other top admins have a shred of integrity.

The community manager person that came on first and last was just so fake, spewing more BS. The type of PR person that gets paid to spew fake useless BS.

Ugh. It's incredibly frustrating and disheartening to see something with the potential that Reddit had continually fall to new lows. RIP Aaron Swartz. You were a man of intelligence and integrity, fighting for a better world. You are sorely missed.

A main problem seems to be that their business model depends on people (mods) being willing to do free work. So you end up with people who are very passionate about a subject, or people who are power hungry/megalomaniacs, and/or people who have nothing going for them and thus have the time to sit around all day on reddit, and/or special interest groups who want to manipulate discussion/content towards their personal goals/ideologies.

I think you can largely deal with this by making the mod guidelines "rules", and enforcing and expanding them. But the admins seem to have zero intent to do so except in instances where it has some specific benefit for the admins.

This latest "true block" thing is just taking censorship and echo chambers to the next level. It enables power users who submit a lot of content to basically become mods of a ton of different subs themselves. They can/will now block anyone who says anything they don't like. Very soon there will be zero disagreement on reddit. Any time anyone says anything there will only be people agreeing with them.

What a fucking shithole this place has become. Appalling. Stunning. Revolting.

We desperately need a valid /r/RedditAlternatives.

8 Comments
2021/12/27
18:21 UTC

19

Debate, dissent, and protest on Reddit

6 Comments
2021/08/25
23:49 UTC

14

"While in general, individuals (whether they are mods, admins, or regular people using Reddit) are not above reproach when it comes to criticism. Respectful discussion is allowed and will not be removed."

5 Comments
2020/05/16
07:16 UTC

15

Redtaboo clarifies that not all unmoderated subs are banned "Not special treatment at all, we try to err on the side of leaving content viewable when we can. We noted that in this post:"

1 Comment
2019/05/01
05:55 UTC

18

We don't shut these banbots down because we know that some vulnerable subreddits depend on them. So, right now we're working on figuring out how we can help protect subreddits in a less kludgy way before we get anywhere near addressing banbots

3 Comments
2019/04/30
14:43 UTC

32

"It's all true: Everything is fake. Also mobile user counts are fake. No one has figured out how to count logged-out mobile users, as I learned at reddit."

3 Comments
2018/12/28
16:14 UTC

28

Q: "Are there any benefits to the recipient of reddit silver?" A: "Just the disappointment of not getting Gold"

1 Comment
2018/10/16
09:55 UTC

12

"it makes me happy that our business goals are aligning with what makes Reddit great: the comments."

2 Comments
2018/10/15
00:53 UTC

11

If someone gets suspended but comes back and their behavior is within the site rules, then that is more or less fine to do.

6 Comments
2018/10/05
03:32 UTC

16

"About 0.29% of logged-in redditors opt-out of the redesign on a given day."

6 Comments
2018/09/25
20:23 UTC

13

"there were a lot of things that conspired together to kill digg (product re-launch, backend rebuild, and a general "not listening to the community" vibe)...we strive to only ever break two of those at the same time."

3 Comments
2018/08/31
20:39 UTC

7

"Howdy everyone. I just wanted to pop by this thread and provide a little more information. We haven’t seen evidence that any of this information has been made public, but Typeform told us it was taken."

0 Comments
2018/07/27
20:01 UTC

13

"Old" shitty reddit begs to differ

2 Comments
2018/06/19
22:37 UTC

21

r/science used to promote AMAs by removing other more popular posts so that the AMA could be top of r/science without the votes

4 Comments
2018/05/19
21:46 UTC

11

If anyone's interested, I found a hard drive in my garage with the original Reddit Lisp code from 2005. Been looking for it for years. Enjoy.

0 Comments
2018/03/29
19:48 UTC

11

"We pushed out a bad deploy which showed the opt-in banner for joining redesign to all reddit users instead of a small number of logged out users."

2 Comments
2018/03/08
00:27 UTC

8

"Hello, We're experiencing higher than usual support volume"

Hello,

We're experiencing higher than usual support volume, but want to let you know that we have received your message. If we need to follow up with you, we'll message you here.

Meanwhile, please check out our updated Help Center here for answers to frequently asked questions.

Sincerely,

Your Reddit Trust & Safety Team

1 Comment
2018/02/20
18:09 UTC

7

"Yes, we're still working on the redesign but we're taking our time to make sure we're doing it right. That said, Q1 2018 is still our goal [for the full switchover to the redesign]. We should have more information to update everyone with some time in the next few weeks."

6 Comments
2018/01/19
06:19 UTC

11

Regarding the possibility of subreddit-wide group chats: "I think subreddit chatrooms would always be opt in. A good number of subs probably won't want to have chatrooms, and a good number of may not have the desire or time/resources to moderate chatrooms."

1 Comment
2017/12/11
22:31 UTC

12

"mod me pls" -spez

3 Comments
2017/12/07
04:04 UTC

9

Two-factor authentication beta for moderators: "We’re starting to roll it out beginning with a beta phase. We’ll release it soon to all moderators and to users afterwards." [from r/modnews]

1 Comment
2017/08/31
00:10 UTC

7

[from /r/modnews] Reddit Redesign: Styling Alpha - "We’re inviting moderators to an alpha version of the Redesign to get feedback on customization tools. [...] Alpha is a run side-by-side with the existing site, meaning opting in will not effect your existing subreddit."

3 Comments
2017/08/22
04:42 UTC

20

Reddit blocks ads on problematic subs

4 Comments
2017/06/30
20:30 UTC

13

Goodbye AchievementUnlockd

3 Comments
2017/04/27
23:09 UTC

Back To Top