Question about fbi upin/ nics check

Hello, basically long story short 10 years ago i went to a hosptial in NYS for a few days for observations.. ive read alot about people who have been misclassified by NYS as "involuntarily commited" so ive never wanted to go into a ffl and try and buy a gun to get denied and accused of purgery worst case scenario.

I had requested my documents from that hospital years ago but theres nothing about the holding code and all/most of my intake notes where blanked out. It was pretty sketchy .

I was trying to research if theres an easy way to contact the fbi and see if your in the nics or not.

From what ive read if i apply for a upin though the vaf this will essentially have them do both a background check and a nics check on me? Im not a felon and dont have any violent misdemeanors. Im not a convicted drug user or illegal drug user of anykind. I have no major mental health problems and am a very healthy person.

Those same doctors also denied my rights and denied me a court hearing when they refused to release me after 2 days and held me a few more days. I wish i had sued them then but i was busy with life and diddnt have money for that. A few friends that are lawyers told me i should just walk in a ffl and try and find out the quick and easy way that nobody is gonna try and arrest me that the atf only comes after like dangerous felons who try and buy one. But i would rather be safe than sorry

But if this upin thing works easy like that this could work for me; Is this applicable to my situation? Will i be able to apply for the vaf without committing purgery or disqualifying myself?

If anybody who was had similar concerns has any information that would be appreciated

I live in a bad neighborhood in Allentown PA and was trying to find out if I qualify for a concealed carry permit before I attempt to apply. I have a couple public drunkenness and a paraphernalia charge on my record, but I have been clean and sober since June 2012 (over 12 years) Would this disqualify me from obtaining a concealed carry permit?

I’m 33F, live in West Virginia USA.

When I was in my late teens/early 20s I was a drug addict. I’ve been clean for seven years now. During my addiction my parents had me 5150’d (involuntarily committed) twice. I was over 18 at the time, this was 12 years ago. One of the times they thought I was suicidal (I was not, just high).

Now as a “real adult” I want my gun rights back. I’m now a homeowner, in a committed relationship, planning a family, stable and sober. I’ve written a petition to my local judge, got a letter from my dad supporting me and expressing his reasoning for having me committed. I have disputed the denial I received when I tried to purchase a revolver. Got the NTN number and which exact issues prevent me from purchasing a firearm.

I plan to see a psychiatrist to be mentally cleared and am signed up for an upcoming firearm safety class this November. Once I see the psych and complete the class, I’m going to turn in my petition with all the added paperwork.

Thank you for reading all that. I thought it best to elaborate on my situation before asking my questions:

• any other West Virginians here who have been successful in restoring their gun rights? Is there anything helpful I’m missing in my quest? Even if you’re from another state, anyone with a similar background restored their rights successfully?

I have read that a law was recently passed in WV allowing those (non felons) who were involuntarily committed to restore their rights. I am hopeful of my situation.

It the good guy with a gun fantasy why do they kill the person, why don't they kill a mother or baby, why don't the cops think you're the bad guy.....you just a child that thinks you're a hero or you're an avenger and can't miss

In the late 1960s, anti-gun coalitions pushed to ban the Saturday Night Special, claiming it was responsible for high homicide rates. However, this specific firearm is rarely seen in crime reports today, despite never being banned. People naturally gravitate towards the most effective tools available to them.

The anti-gun lobby often oversimplifies the issue by blaming guns in general, and specific models in particular, for crime. There is also considerable debate over the lethality of different calibers. This article explores gun deaths by caliber and the often overlooked variables involved.

Ammo.com aims to provide accurate and reliable information from reputable sources, which can be found here.

Report Highlights:

• The 9mm caliber is used in more fatal and non-fatal shootings than any other caliber, according to recent studies.
• Handguns are involved in 46% of all homicides in the United States.
• Larger caliber bullets, though used less frequently, result in more fatalities per shot.
• Medium-caliber bullets are used in more crimes but have lower death rates compared to larger calibers.

Continue reading Gun Death Statistics by Caliber: A Review of Calibers and Crime in 2024 on Ammo.com

The debate over gun control is heavily influenced by various groups, including the anti-gun lobby and anti-Second Amendment (2A) politicians. These groups often dominate headlines and social media, advocating for more restrictive gun laws. Organizations like Moms Demand Action, Everytown, and Newtown have successfully garnered public support by using data, statistics, and emotional appeals to sway opinions.

However, the perspective supporting the Second Amendment, which views it as a vital measure for self-defense, is often underrepresented. This viewpoint is frequently criticized as prioritizing firearms over children’s safety or merely offering “thoughts and prayers.” Despite these criticisms, proponents of the 2A argue that compromising on these rights poses greater dangers.

Key Points:

• Implementing mandatory gun buybacks or registrations in the U.S. would cost billions of taxpayer dollars, and many firearms would still remain in civilian hands.
• The firearm industry contributes billions annually to the U.S. economy, providing jobs and tax revenue.
• Despite existing gun control laws, homicide rates in countries like the U.S., Canada, Australia, and the U.K. continue to fluctuate, suggesting that criminality is not directly impacted by these laws.
• The Second Amendment and Supreme Court rulings support an individual’s right to keep and bear arms in the U.S.
• Gun control has historically been used to oppress minorities in the U.S. and worldwide.
• There is no positive correlation between gun lobby efforts, anti-gun lobby actions, and gun deaths.

You can check our sources out here.

The pro-gun community has put a lot of time and effort into preventing accidental shootings in America. Unlike other firearm-related incidents, accidental shootings are a category that the pro-gun community has notably influenced over the years.

Despite sensationalized headlines and ongoing advocacy for new legislation, it’s crucial to recognize that accidental shootings are exceedingly rare occurrences. Even in households with unsecured firearms and children, such tragedies are infrequent.

However, it’s essential to acknowledge that these accidents are entirely preventable. The following sections delve into various aspects of accidental shootings in the United States.

Key Points:

• In 2022, less than 1% (461) of the 48,222 firearm deaths in the U.S. were attributed to accidental shootings.
• 2.3% of the 30,303 unintentional firearm-related injuries were fatal in 2021.
• Of the 231,878 firearm-related offenses reported to the FBI in 2022, only 721 were accidental shootings (0.3%).
• There is no correlation between permitless carry and accidental shootings; only four of the five top states for accidental shootings and all five of the bottom states have permitless carry.
• Only 0.2% of all accidental injury-related deaths in the U.S. can be attributed to firearms.

Continue reading Accidental Shooting Statistics: A Review of Unintentional Firearm Deaths From 1979-2024 on Ammo.com

https://preview.redd.it/ero23x97t17d1.png?width=1159&format=png&auto=webp&s=4fceab1632e1c8535a6da20595330e73819d6409

https://preview.redd.it/v23lj0a7t17d1.png?width=977&format=png&auto=webp&s=1922cc2a853e79519cf80aff645f32fce56655ea

https://preview.redd.it/2b2ddx97t17d1.png?width=803&format=png&auto=webp&s=2018de8949572c8df8a52c64e903e640de31fafe

https://preview.redd.it/eu2t8lgz014d1.png?width=601&format=png&auto=webp&s=af7910d3f0378ce3ad1816883dc2ae8fa8e95231

I am a superintendent for elections in a very gun-liberal state, open carry is totally normal here and many carry openly. I understand that Heller and Bruen ban guns in sensitive places, such as "schools and government buildings", to me it's not clear if that refers to the school as a physical building, or only when a school actually *functions* as a school, i. e. has plenty of kids swirling around. When elections are held in schools, they don't *function* as schools, but they are still school *buildings*. I want to know if I have to turn a voter who carries openly away on election day, thus enforcing Heller and/or Bruen. I'm all for guns, we can't have enough guns in the hands of intelligent citizens, and a voting site would in my opinion actually make for a particularly important place to defend, but I don't know if I as superintendent for elections have to enforce Heller and/or Bruen. If I allow open carry in a school because it doesn't *function* as a school, am I violating anything?

My husband has some charges from back in 2000 that were filed as felonies, but pled down to misdemeanors. He has bought both long guns and hand guns in the past after a "delay". A few years ago, he purchased a 9mm after a "delay" and a month later he received a letter from the Wisconsin DOJ stating he needed to return the gun, he wasn't supposed to have been green lighted to purchase it. He tried to contact them, but wasn't able to. Last year he went to a gun shop and was able to purchase a AR, no "delay" and didn't hear anything from the DOJ. Today he stopped at a pawn shop and wanted to buy a .22 long rifle and was denied, no reason given by the pawn shop for the denial. What is going on? Why would he have been allowed to buy guns for the longest time (including when he was on probation in 2000) to having an issue with the 9mm, being able to buy the AR, and now being flat out denied for the .22?

So l, about 7 years ago, made a few really terrible decisions that resulted in a burglary 2nd class B felony and serious jail time (County time at that). I stopped into the washington state patrol home base near my house and talked to a state trooper. He stated, I quote: "I don't know of anybody with a class B felony that has restored their gun rights. Once they are convicted they've lost them for good"

I wanted to say that I really don't think that is the case if I understand it right. But considering their office is literally 5 minutes from my house I kept my thoughts to myself. All I need is some state trooper with his pride huet with nothing better to do but to keep an eye out for me in my sports car.

What's the general consensus about gun rights being restored after completing my court obligations and the proper amount of time? I'm a bit confused bc there are dif. Sites that claim 7 years for my felony and others 10 years

Hi I've got a question. My brother in law stepped in and helped a chick who was being choked by the boyfriend. He ended up pepper spraying the boyfriend. By the time the police showed up the boyfriend and chick got into the shower and concocted a story that they were having sex and that's why they were undressed. The truth is the boyfriend was trying to wash off the spray. The police initially arrested my brother in law but released him later dropping all charges but they confiscated his gun. I would like to know if this is legal for them to do that and how long can they keep it? No charges are being filed he should have gotten his property returned but they have not. It happened here in the city of Glendale az.

I responded to a “well-regulated means the state can control your guns” post with a correction. Naturally there have been replies but I get the old “Sorry, please try again later” message whenever I attempt to respond to one. I don’t have a message telling me that I’m banned but I can’t post in any thread there now.

Just a heads-up.

Hii, I’m doing my speech about gun rights (I’m all for guns) I’m just curious if any of y’all know a good attention getter to use for my speech introduction! Any ideas!? I can’t think of any.

It is a truth universally acknowledged that the British colonies in America had widespread gun ownership prior to 1776, and the American War for Independence was fought by colonists who were accustomed to owning their own guns.

There were clearly a few laws or local ordinances restricting some aspects of firearms ownership in the Old West. For example, Dodge City apparently restricted the bearing of firearms. (Whether such restrictions were ever challenged as un-Constitutional would be an interesting question for historians.) Some non-scholarly sources have claimed that America had extensive restrictions on gun rights all the way from 1791 to 1934, but I have seen very little evidence for that claim.

https://buffleheadcabin.com/post/2778934233/front-street-dodge-city-kansas-1878-the-sign

Prior to 1934 I do not know of any federal infringements on gun rights. Vin Suprynowicz has written that the widespread ownership of smoothbore pistols such as the Ithaca Auto and Burglar proves that the 1934 restrictions on gun rights were perverse and contrary to American culture.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ithaca_Auto_&_Burglar

Recently some pseudo-historians have been skirting around the edges of outright fraud by claiming that American gun culture is a recent innovation. For example, Megan Kang is a propagandist who dances around the facts to insinuate that gun culture is a Cold War invention:

https://aeon.co/essays/america-fell-for-guns-recently-and-for-reasons-you-will-not-guess

Kang cites writers of questionable honesty, including Richard Hofstadter, Andrew McKevitt, and Brian DeLay, to argue that America was a gun-free pacifist utopia until 1945. I am currently seeking actual history books that can be used to refute Kang's propaganda. I am aware that Patrick J. Charles has written Armed in America but I have not yet obtained a copy and I do not know whether he is a real scholar or a propagandist I have begun reading his work and I fear that he is biased against individual rights. I would greatly appreciate title and author recommendations. Thanks in advance.

Edit: Patrick J. Charles advances very unconvincing arguments against American gun culture, but he cites Volokh and Halbrook as his opponents. Thus Stephen P. Halbrook's book That Every Man Be Armed may be a starting point for this research.

I was Involuntary committed to a mental health facility 8yrs ago when I lived in NYC. I have since moved and have been living in VA for past 6yrs. I'm trying to get my gun rights back, however not sure exactly where to file petition. Here in VA or do I have to travel all the way back to NY? Any info would be greatly appreciated.