https://youtu.be/BN4IjHN9o5w?si=cun9H4OYvNTvrHvm

https://youtu.be/V7a7wWMc7lw?si=FjgZ4_Xb6z_k4jR5

Watching the City-Brentford match today, Savinho was deployed as the right winger. Every time he got ahold of the ball, I became more and more convinced that he is a poor fit for what City have become under Guardiola. City are a selfless, pass-first, possession based team that relies on moving the ball quickly. Savinho seems determined to make a name for himself, looks to take on defenders and will only look for the pass when he runs into an alley. I noticed several times that he ran out of time to pass up the ball and got the ball picked off his feet. I can't see Pep being too pleased with his performance although I'm not watching every City match that he plays.

The title pretty much says it all, but to be more specific — is there a website or a provider where I can get the data regarding, for example, pressures applied by team/player, average distances between the lines, etc.?

I’ve been playing football for a few years now and I’ve always struggled with awareness. Today was my first practice back from summer, and I was just lost and didn’t know where to go to make a play and get open, and I felt fucking sped just standing there watching the play. Anyone have any tips for getting more aware of where to go to draw this guy, and receive this pass, and etc?

This may be a hot take, but I personally think many of us overemphasize the importance of tactics in football. Unlike American football or basketball or other sports where the players run set plays and set defensive schemes, I feel like football is much more of a player’s game than it is a manager’s. That’s certainly not to say that managers can influence the style of play. I think could players can recognize weaknesses in a game and correct for them. For example, say the team is playing a 4–3-3, but the forward wingers recognize that there is more space toward the center. Then the players could just effectively play a 4-3-2-1. Football is a fluid game and smart players will recognize how to adapt to best help their team, because often times they can see on the field that their managers can’t. Just my opinion but curious to hear your thoughts.

player 1 - gk player 2 - their best defender, brave player who uses head a lot. player 3 - the weak point of their team. worst player in their team football wise player 4 - a defender who often comes to help in midfield and attack. player 5 - their best player. has very good touch and passing ability. player 6 - winger, has good dribbling but a bad shooter player 7 - a striker who doesn’t use his head very much player 8 - second best player in their team. good dribbler and shooter

The advantage my team is, we’re physically stronger than them but overall mu team is worse in football abilities. So what can you guys suggest to beat them?

So, i played football for 7/8 years with friends, it's more like street football because we play in a playground but anyways, the 27 of august I'll have my first training and i need some tips, I'm well suited for the wingback/attacking fullback position but I lack of stamina, I'm very fast, good in dribbling(both in 1v1 and 1vsmany), good in defending 1v1 and man-marking, i even have a good shooting and passing, I can use the outside of the foot and I'm right footed, I have a good tactical intelligence even if i only played with friends till now but i must improve more. can you give me some tips? not only on how ti improve and what ti improve but even on the position(being almost all-rounder I think I can play almost everywhere but I want opinions fron people who have more experience)

What do you guys think about 3-4-2-1/3-4-1-2? I was asking because im seeing a lot of teams in Serie A approching this formation, I even like it so i was thinking of i am the only one or no. personally, I like it because I find it a lot useful both in offense and defense, having 3 defenders+two outer midfielders who come back to defend forming a defensive 5 can be useful, i even like the second striker position because second strikers are a lot completed(especially if there are two because they can cover one the weaknesses of the other) the striker isn't even isolated and the box-to-box midfielders can be a real problem for the opposition. Anyways if you want tell me what you think about the 3-4-2-1/3-4-1-2 and why

P.S. sorry if i wrote some word wrong or eventually mistakes in the writing, I'm italian and use english only online sometimes so sorry