/r/Capitalism
A place to discuss Capitalism and capitalist interests on Reddit.
Rules:
Content that would be seen as a bad faith attack on capitalism is not allowed. Content that challenges the underlying theories or critiques are allowed provided the discussion remains civil.
Memes and Macros are not allowed.
No personal attacks.
Keep profanity to a minimum.
No post spam or submit circlejerk content.
Screenshots from sites that include usernames, or any other form of identification, must have ALL names blacked out.
No NSFW Content, any content posted will be grounds for being banned from the subreddit.
Unoriginal Content, Reaction images, and blatant advertising without prior mod approval with be removed at moderator discretion.
-Unoriginal content
-Reaction images
-Blatant advertising without prior mod approval
Guidelines
/r/Capitalism is an accepting subreddit dedicated to the refinement and enhancement of the capitalist ideology. We welcome critical thought and we respect the free market of ideas.
-Anyone is welcome here, regardless of age, race, gender, nationality, sexuality, or economic status.
-We welcome those with every political ideology, but that does not mean that the people here will agree with you all the time.
-We welcome difference in opinion, and encourage everyone to be critical of their views and others’ views.
-While we are a capitalism subreddit, we encourage criticism towards everything posted here, regardless of its political bias.
-You can message the mods at any time if you need help, or if a user has broken reddit’s site-wide rules, or the sub-wide rules.
-Please use the appropriate tag when creating a post, such as Discussion, News, Meta, or ELI5. Description of the tags is included in the sidebar.
/r/Capitalism
Marriage used to have a libertarian purpose.
Preventing paternity fraud.
If I live thousands of years ago I would get married.
Now it makes it paternity fraud lucrative.
Why would any men make deals where they are responsible for someone else's children? Absurd.
So unfair. My children according to paternity tests,of course I pay for it. Someone else's children? Why would I?
I made this clear before we have children to ensure women don't even try.
But here is the thing.
Most of these absurd terms are not explicitly agreed before marriage
It's hidden deep inside marital laws. And somehow many people absurdly say that you are responsible if you take this absurd deals.
Also there seems to be one marital laws. Like marriag must be monogamous and for life bla bla bla.... Why not several different marriages people can choose from?
Contract mareiage with provision of money in case children show up treated like normal business contract seems fine.
Too many people do not think that being a responsible father means having great genes and money and being a responsible parent starts picking mates with great genes.
Of course, that's eugenic and voters don't like that.
https://x.com/GarbageHuman24/status/1862507871520661607?t=pJ2o5STb4wFt6w5iou41YQ&s=34
The numbers to reflect congressional control from 1947 to current (2023).
* Average annual GDP growth rate under Republican Congress: 3.97%
* Average annual GDP growth rate under Democratic Congress: 2.98%
* Average annual GDP growth rate under Split Congress: 2.54%
Even broader timeframe. From 1945 to current (2023),
* Average annual GDP growth rate under Republican Congress: 4.03%
* Average annual GDP growth rate under Democratic Congress: 3.04%
* Average annual GDP growth rate under Split Congress: 2.63%
And breaking down further:
* Republican Congress (including 1945-1947): 4.03%
* Democratic Congress: 3.04%
* Split Congress: 2.63%
Job market performance also varies by congressional control:
* Average monthly job growth under Republican Congress: +184,000 jobs
* Average monthly job growth under Democratic Congress: +157,000 jobs
* Average monthly job growth under Split Congress: +134,000 jobs
Data from Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), covering 1945-2023 period.
Total job growth in millions:
* Republican Congress (1945-2023): +74.6 million jobs
* Democratic Congress (1945-2023): +54.4 million jobs
* Split Congress (1945-2023): +23.5 million jobs
Data from Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS),
The sources include:
* Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) for GDP data
* Congressional Research Service reports on congressional control and economic data
* Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) for additional economic indicators
* Historical congressional control data from:
+ House of Representatives Clerk's website
+ Senate's official website
+ Congressional Quarterly (CQ) publications
Specifically, GDP data comes from BEA tables 1.1.1 and 1.1.6, while congressional control data is compiled from various sources listed above.
Keep in mind too, that democrats have been in Congress FAR longer than Republicans have too.
I’m not successful by any means currently but I truly believe if you hate success and vilify all rich people you won’t be able to achieve that for yourself. More importantly 99% of the hatred towards wealthy people I see on Reddit and online in general cannot be warranted. Most people genuinely believe you cannot become wealthy without harming someone else. Thats a zero sum mentality and it breaks down the second you think about value adding. The basic idea I’ve always used to describe this is the furniture seller. If someone gets rich selling furniture who did they harm along the way. The lumberjack who cut the would got money that they deemed worth it for their service. The mill who refined the wood got money they deemed worth it. The distributor of that wood also did. The person who designed that furniture did. The person who cut and assembled that furniture did. Maybe another person who finished and painted the furniture also benefitted. And then the end purchaser obviously decided it was worth it or they wouldn’t buy. So who exactly was exploited along this line?
Anyway, I’ve made this argument 1,000x and most people who vilify success or think all ultra wealthy people are bad, are not the type of people who are willing to change their outlook. I’m tired of trying to make the argument.
I want to be in more communities with like minded people who know building wealth isn’t evil and exploitative, it’s actually a massive social good. Can anyone point me in the direction of some good places? I’m in some good subreddits but wouldn’t mind more suggestions, and also would just like to get off this site in general outside of entertainment. It’s always been a cesspool of super far left thinking but it’s gone too far. I think certain sites like Hackernews might be more economically logical and friendly to businesspeople, and I’m looking for more along those lines. Thanks!
If you were planning on hiring a financial advisor/planner, would you care about their philosophical/economic beliefs? Would it even matter?
Today, I started a new book. The Unfair Trade by Michael J. Casey. It enlightened me and helped open my eyes to the intricate relationship between the US and China. If we are truly committed to addressing economic inequality and the climate crisis, we must fundamentally reimagine our economies, consumption practices, and trade agreements.
We also need to look beyond the propaganda that pits us against China, even though the national security concerns surrounding China are valid to an extent.
Here’s what I learned: Americans consume cheap goods and services produced in China. In this exchange, US consumers transfer their wealth to China, receiving products in return, while business leaders pocket the profits. The Chinese government requires that all the US dollars flowing into the country be converted into its local currency, the yuan, through the People’s Bank of China. This enables China to manipulate its currency, intentionally devaluing it to maintain its monopoly in producing cheap goods and services.
The Chinese government then accumulates vast reserves of US dollars and invests them in US securities and treasury bonds. These safe investments solidify the feedback loop, further concentrating wealth among an elite few at the top of both countries. The flow of wealth back to major financial markets and corporations in the US amplifies inequality and entrenches the systemic nature of global capitalism.
Over time, this dynamic has lead US multinational corporations to offshore jobs to cheap labor markets like China while simultaneously raising prices of goods and services at home for Americans. In China, this system exploits workers with low wages and poor working conditions, all while the government continues devaluing its currency to maintain its dominance in global manufacturing.
Politicians in both countries, who will do anything to stay in power, have embraced this vicious cycle with open arms. In the US, they understand the demand for cheap, readily available goods and the relentless pursuit of profit by corporations and financial institutions. Policies, trade deals, and foreign relations have cemented this feedback loop.
But this cycle comes at a steep price. Environmental degradation, labor exploitation, and extreme economic inequality are just the externalities of this relentless pursuit of profit.
The US government has cemented this relationship through free trade agreements that have allowed corporations to offshore jobs and exploit cheap labor markets abroad. Both political parties in the US, have embraced neoliberalism and been captured by wealthy and corporate interests, have perpetuated this self sustaining feedback loop.
An important nuance to this analysis, would be the neoliberal or “establishment” perspective. This perspective highlights massive wealth creation, improved GDP numbers, increased consumer access to cheaper goods and services, and even lifting some groups of people out of extreme poverty. These are all real outcomes and not being disputed. However, they only represent part of the story. The other part included extreme wealth inequality, labor exploitation, the erosion of labor rights and democratic values, and the degradation of our environment. These outcomes are just as real, and cannot be ignored.
Hey, let me preface by saying I am absolutely the sort of person I'm talking about in the post title.
I'm simply not a career oriented person, and I don't think I really have it in me to become one. I think doing what makes you happy outside of your career is what makes life truly worth living.
I work a typical full time factory job, and simply having a space to call my own seems like a pipe dream.
The past decade I've felt myself becoming increasingly disillusioned with capitalism, and the absurd price hikes of pretty much everything under the sun the past few years has increased those feelings.
I'm a firm believer in the idea that anyone working 40 hours a week should be able to live somewhat comfortably, but with cost of living how it is, especially housing costs, it isn't really possible for most.
It blows my mind when you bring up how insane cost of living is right now you get droves of people acting like there isn't a problem. How prices skyrocketing faster than wages are is simply an issue of people not working hard enough. These observations always get met with something along the lines of "have you tried working 3 jobs and a side hustle and splitting a 1 room shack in the swamp with some roommates." I just don't understand how so many people defend this cycle of having to work harder and harder for less and less we seemed to have found ourselves in.
Now I fully understand why work is important. At the end of the day your job is your contribution to society, the part you play in keeping the world running. Even in a completely moneyless society, food needs to be grown, houses need to be built, car parts need to be made. I get it. But I also think even the most "low skill" jobs are providing services that are essential to our current ways of life and deserve to have comfortable lives outside of their jobs (I won't get into my opinions on how the unemployed should be allowed to live, because many would disagree and it'll just derail the conversation I'm looking to have here).
I've always hated the idea "low skilled workers" don't deserve a living wage. Its rhetoric that always struck me as the people at the top trying to turn the people in the middle against the people at the bottom to get away with paying EVERYONE what they're actually works to line their pockets more.
I remember back when $15/h minimum wage was one of the big American talking points. I remember a woman commenting on that something along the lines of "I'm and EMT and I make $15/h, some burger flipper shouldn't be getting the paid as someone in my field," and all I could think of "you worked your ass off to get into such a demanding and 'high skilled' career just to make a wage that would barely get you by in your average city, and you don't see anything wrong with that? You don't see how you're getting screwed? Why are you turning your anger towards workers who are just looking for enough to survive instead of to the powers that be paying you nowhere near what your labour is worth?"
Now one thing my parents always told me was "don't expect to have a lot of money in your 20s, that comes with time." I do get that, however I also feel like for a lot of people just starting out don't really have the same hope as "finances getting better over time" is just... gone largely due to a lot of today's companies largely undervalue their employees.
My parents weren't "grinders", didn't go to college, they just settled into some job and stayed their all they're lives. When I was young I don't think we were "dirt poor" but disposable income was definitely extremely limited. Over time finances gradually got better just from the virtue of the fact they've been working at the same place longer and longer. In a lot of today's working world employer loyalty does almost next to nothing for you and 100% benefits the employer because today's worker is more undervalued than workers have been in decades.
I'm not quite sure what my exact goal with this post is. While I don't think anyone here's gonna be able to sell me on "capitalism is great actually", I find that these things are a heavy burden on me and discussing it with likeminded peers getting met with "yeah it does suck doesn't it" isn't getting me anywhere. I guess I'm hoping I'll innevitably run into some insight that at least helps me manage better in this world.
DW Documentary published this. What do you think about this idea? I would like to get some opinion about this topic.
India is the world's fastest growing major economy.
Global investors are lining up to invest in the next big economic miracle as billions pour into the country.
But not all one billion Indians themselves feel like they're a part of this story.
What is happening in India today has happened before. The video explores the numbers as well as vibes behind India's tale of inequality and how lessons from India's past and even across the world teach us about its future trajectory.
Capitalism and 9-5 very bad👎 You guys give tips and advices how to avoid it = very gud!👍
Thanks for playing a role for motivating those moderate, independent voters, and reluctant voters who got off their asses two weeks ago and had enough of “too far left”.
Thanks a lot!
A special thanks to bloodfart. Bloodfart, you alone probably created a hundred trump supporters - well done!