/r/WelfareEconomics

Photograph via snooOG

/r/WelfareEconomics

86 Subscribers

1

Welfare

How does the welfare office know that welfare applicants don’t have family members to support them?

0 Comments
2023/12/13
08:44 UTC

1

Why are the feds so reluctant to step in, give grants to states and their public housing authorities, and make them build public housing again?

It is noticeable what the filthy-rich Boomer NIMBY-triggered national housing shortage is producing (Homeless population increase, decent neighboorhoods falling apart, complete demise events of municipalities, etc.).

1 Comment
2023/10/08
21:54 UTC

1

How to end homelessness

0 Comments
2023/03/14
18:11 UTC

1

Food Stamps vs The Military | My only options?

0 Comments
2023/02/03
14:29 UTC

2

Capitalism, Sugar Relationship, and/or Polygamy can replace welfare

Capitalism, the way it currently is, is awesome, in helping productive people create wealth.

However, many still complaints that capitalism leave many people poor.

I think I have a way to solve this and this can be done by capitalists irrelevant of governments' help. We can end poverty through capitalism.

That is.

Being still reasonably selfish

No donation. Donation and altruism sucks anyway.

Being reasonably capitalistic

May actually be legal (it's legal in my country) though may requires some loopholes.

How?

Why are people poor? Many reasons. But the big reason is daddy is poor. Why is daddy poor? Because mom choose poor man as father of their children. And why is that?

There are many complex factors. However, the way I see it, there are too many land mines when it comes to choosing a rich man as daddy. So many rich men do not want to have children with too many women.

Alimony is expensive for the rich. Child support is expensive for the rich. Prostitution is illegal. Sugar relationship is border line illegal. Polygamy is illegal. Government regulate marriage.

Simple. Use capitalism on sex and reproductive market.

Currently western civilization is awesome when it comes to capitalism on most stuffs.

However, when it comes to sex, suddenly people are communists. Sex for consideration is illegal. Women shouldn't consider money in offering sex but can consider government infested marriage.

Instead of marrying, rich men can just pay women to give children. Have more children.

Can this be done?

The main problem is transaction complexity.

For example, a billionaire can agree to pay a woman 1 million dollar to give him an heir and raise the child. However, what would stop the woman from suing for more money after the baby is made?

In my country a woman cannot sue for child support and there is no link between wealth of father and amount of child support. This lead to another problem. How does the woman know that the rich man will provide after she get knocked up?

Sure we often have deals where the man agree to support a woman for life and their children together. In exchange the women give sex and the children to the man. This deal is what marriage is or used to be or should have been.

However, marriage is heavily regulated by the state. The state is obsessed with ensuring there is one woman for every man than ensuring the child is rich. The state acts as if all women want to be the only one instead of having more money or better genes. Monogamy seems to be the goal of anything state sanctioned.

There are many solutions.

Split deals into smaller pieces. Instead of paying women to give children, pay her for sex first. However, this maybe illegal due to anti prostitution law. However, in many country prostitution is legal and even in US sugar relationship is legal.

Build reputation. A rich man can knock a woman up and be a responsible dad for his biological children. That way other women will know that he's not dead beat.

Libertarian court. Both agree to make marriage and stipulate that if they have disputes the dispute is resolved in libertarian court. The man can be a multimillionaire or billionaire that has no problem ensuring the child is well supported and put some collateral.

Move to more sensible state. In most countries child support is not linked to the man's wealth. In Texas USA, there is a max amount of child support.

How will this eliminate poverty?

Simple. Rich men tend to have richer children. Also most men want more than one women. The children will simply have more resources to make it. Also rich men often have talents that make them rich in the first place. So a high IQ rich men, for example, can hire high IQ women to produce smart children that will, given resources, more likely build empire.

Rich men bequeath talents, connections, IQ, and even businesses to his children. This gets leveraged.

If Bill Gates spend 10 million on a ghetto child, that child will still unlikely make another Microsoft. But if Bill Gates spend 10 million on his own child, and say he has 100 children, each are quite likely to make another Microsoft.

The more women end up with rich men, less women will end up with poor men. So less poverty.

What about women that don't want money? What about women that don't prefer the rich? What about women that want government infested marriage for "legitimacy" or whatever? What about women that want to make money like men.

Who cares. Let them choose. However, now it's obvious that if a child is poor it's mainly because of mom's choice. This will greatly undermine justification for welfare.

We can say, look, your twin sister choose to give a sugar daddy a child. So her child is rich. You choose to get a job till you're old and marry without considering money. So your child is poor. Why should women that pick better decisions for her children be taxed to pay for welfare of women that pick good decisions?

So rich capitalists can eliminate poverty by first being a great capitalist and make more money. Then they can use capitalism to acquire more women and produce more children. Then they take care THEIR own children. No need to care about others' children. Just take care of our own children and make sure our children build business empire too.

Then more children will have rich dad and better genes. Poverty will be gone by itself.

This can even eliminate all poverties in the world.

Just import sugar babies from poor countries. Any country that fail to embrace capitalism will be poor anyway and of course their women want richer guys and higher standard of living. Look at women in Afganistan, for example. Rather than being sex slaves by Taliban, they will be better off looking for a rich sugar daddy in say Europe or Asia.

Capitalism is the solution for prosperity. It will also be the solution for eliminating poverty. Let the greatest among us be the one providing the greatest service and values to the largest number of customers.

0 Comments
2022/01/15
16:55 UTC

8

questions for ‘poor’ people

Serious question... why do poor people so often have so many children they can not afford? For me, I would have loved to have a child a few years back but decided my boyfriend and I couldn’t afford it at the time so we didn’t. Why do some cultures not think this way? Also, Defoe anyone on long term or lifelong welfare, do you feel like you’re wasting your life? Do you ever think of making a better life for yourself and your children? Since they are likely to be on welfare for life if their parents are. Also, why do poor people have money for tattoos and cigarettes? I know this sounds bad but I really am wondering and instead of assuming, i thought I would ask. So please take this into consideration when answering. Also, tho I myself am not poor, I have been poor and have been around extreme poverty and people abusing the system , while living in the projects. I was a heroin addict for years and spent a lot of my time in the worst part of Philadelphia and knew a lot of people from the area well. I’m Kensington . To anyone not from this area, that is the worst open air drug scene in the country, and many say the world. And also lived in a bad part of Florida for a year, and a bad part outside of philly for a few years/ when I was younger. So I’m not some person that has never been around the people I’m talking about. Thanks in advance.

7 Comments
2020/08/10
20:11 UTC

1

Thomas Sowell - Welfare

0 Comments
2020/07/13
07:42 UTC

1

I found my optimal environmental equilibrium home: It's The Siberian Sun and The Hawaiian Hell

.........

To everyone smart enough to be -- enrolled in a food procurement program with cash benefits which disseminates cards brandishing the acronym EBT -- that have their needs met or buried by a societal monetary, "American" luxury freebie -- and you gainfully hate and satiably truly berate, as a whole, the asshole aggregate idiot community:

                                              .........

Just before you are presented with the clichéd, deliriously self-righteous, "communally conscience", corrosive, contributory stare from a retard /////welfare\\\ resenting clerk that says 'I'm challenging you so I can try to praise my self.........get a life.'

Whip out your cash referencing, cash social stipend, cash benefit, cash problem solution opportunity reception plastic, and then militantly manifest ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ an engaging big, hearty, yawning, exasperation-relinquishing, unwaveringly visible public stretch that seriously states 'I'm a superior, resourceful, perfect state optioning -- minimalist -- satisfaction savant by choice you fickle fuck drone structured simpleton so bring it on right now so we can see who is legit and better', then smile at your neighbor who is your <<<<kind>>>> cashier, and, with finality, present the point-of-sale counter with a big ass solid, sturdy, serrated, abrasive 14 inch soon-to-subordinately-yours butcher's knife.

.........

I hate every lurker bee.

.........

(spare me commentary regarding your magical validation of your sorrow over a labored lifestyle you have no justified grasp of on a level illuminating enough of an understanding that prompts you to not blindly bitch about other individuals -- by bitching about other individuals when our affectively appealing, effectively complete intrapersonal dynamic gives us that natural innate progressive happiness-continuity feeling from a lifestyle that in fact really -=works=-....

Do not /embrace/ and /force upon me/ criticism from a disposition where you feel correct in dictating what anything does and demand accommodations -- that is silly and perfectly stupid... so... never sell redirection here at any time ...at all ...ever -- when I embrace and force upon you criticism from a disposition where I feel correct in dictating what anything does and demand accommodations -- so I am the winner; therefore, go make more potential and possibility when it comes to your convenient manipulated utilized tool ultimately self-sabotaging autonomously useless self-defeating existence bolstering the provisioning of resources you don't make true use of in a survival sense -- and then while really, in real, actual, unflinching, contemporary life, watch me go get a Slim Jim and a frigid fucking sweet sugar sauce soda).

Don't ignore everything and never embrace anything by fucking with the homeless human / self-saluting independent honest real lives who don't ignore anything and embrace everything).

nigga.................

I'm accomplished and, while being an ultimate, abstract thinker, I realized my trajectory was stupid catshit worthless retardation.... then realized where I should be... so to establish some harmonious narration ambience for my "fuck you!" foul freak consumer crystallizing conclusion..........

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ao-Sahfy7Hg

Here's looking at you trying to feign our lifestyle because you are trying to 180°...

Social Security Mastermind Manipulation Insightful Ingenuity Sourced Serenity:

[^[this is you if you try to be like me...]^]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGmQAF84tww

...yeah brothers and bimbos... deny that she doesn't also sport something like human emulating big tits to boot and also that entire dummy daisy dreamy day to appreciate them... you fucking rejects... ...you stupid shit bitching bitch toxins... ==- You shoot for the bottom or the top, but, get real, you can utilize everything else with poignant efficiency when you are just always fucking bottom busy for eternity.............................. That video was my point being channeled through an idiot...even if you do nothing we still will get you as you still have to look to us for guidance...which means...... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbxUSsFXYo4 ......Humans -- you know who you are along the production spectrum no matter what you secured at home at 11:59:59 PM each night..... the REST OF YOU SOUND SO FUCKING STUPID ARGUING THE UTILITY IN MISERY AND ARGUING... this bitch is toast........................................................-==

Hurt me by giving me work to destroy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7OvPTmhtiY

Point being...

Fuck off with a smile at your owners.....

To the worker sleaze:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTBjUJuTua4

It doesn't matter what you do, you're going to your fucking job later or just being a fucking prey part of the ecosystem... a thing that has no perspective no matter what we do with you all............idiots...............

That youtube 'wacko' is a cognitively capitulated, bullshit believer 'psyched'-to-suck toy for all of us...male or female..................

0 Comments
2019/12/13
05:39 UTC

1

Resources for Welfare Economics?

Hey. I am looking for books/ articles that could serve as a resource for undergraduate kids. The only one I am aware of is Intermediate Microeconomics by Varian.

0 Comments
2016/05/24
14:17 UTC

1

Indicator for the acceptance of inequality (xpost)

1 Comment
2016/01/23
13:49 UTC

Back To Top