I think before we add hush and court of owls we need to build up some of Batman’s basic more known first so that when we add the more complex villains they can piggy back and mix well with each other it doesn’t seem like the right time to add court of owls because we don’t even have a bat family yet I don’t think it’s right to add hush in either because we don’t have many villains introduced in that world just penguin joker and riddler I’m not against these ideas it’s just too early this is only year two Batman so maybe taking some ideas from his year two stories would be better and make more sense.

I know people tune out whenever someone brings up Hush as a potential villain but also I think it's because (most) people have only read the old Loeb comic. Paul Dini's story here is one of my favourite Batman stories ever (just like most things Paul Dini is). I personally think it would be better suited to be a Part III story, Part II in my opinion should be story that is purely about Bruce getting over the guilt he feels over the death of his parents, coming out his shadow and realizing that being Bruce Wayne is just as important as being Batman. Heart of Hush is more or so a story that works well with the themes of Greg Rucka's run in the early 2000's, since it's a story about Bruce getting over the death of his parents and having a life outside of just his mission but still realizing that he was born to be Batman and help people, but also I do think that there is an interesting version of the story that could be done in Part II.

I consider this version of Batman to be the definitive version of the character in live-action films so far (imo), but I find it a bit odd (yet understandable) that him as Bruce Wayne is more "doomer".

I know that he didn't overcome his trauma at that point, views himself as vengeance and it's his second year as Batman but still. The reason why I like the character as Bruce (in other films and comics) it's because, while Batman is beloved by Gotham citizens for putting criminals in their place during the night, Bruce is beloved because he uses his wealth to contribute to society during the day and he has that playboy persona as his second disguise to gain more positive public preception and to make more people believe that he's not Batman.

In fact, in the funeral scene, Bella Real criticize Bruce for not contributing his wealth to society. I imagine in the next film, Bruce is trying to fix his public preception, trying to prove to Gotham that he cares about social issues, the poor and the orphan and that he's not a corrupt billionaire. Just like how people of Gotham started to love Batman by the end of the movie and no longer view him as "freak" or vengeance.

Also, I want to see Bruce and Alfred making fun at each other

I admit, I am still little mad too about having to wait 5 years for The sequel but have people forgot that Across The Spider-Verse literally released 5 years as well after the first instalment? Atleast with The Batman, we got a masterpiece of a comic book show, but with Spider-Verse we got nothing other than some marketing stuff. Not to mention, The Batman could possibly actually complete it's trilogy before Spider-Verse does. With the indefinite delay, problems with Phil and Chris (Directors of the Spider-Verse films) and Sony, and the controversy with the Miles Morales voice actor, it'll probably be a while before we get Beyond The Spider-Verse.

Just be thankful Robert didn't try rizz up Zoe and fail at it 😂

My apologies for posting this it's kind of topic but i want to know y'all perspective on this.

first lets understand what is charm?Charming people make anyone like them persuade them into doing what they rather don't own their own.

Jack Nicholson,Charles Dances,Anthony Hopkins are not conventionally attractive people like Pattinson,Cavill,Hemsworth are yet have 10x more charm than them but why.

So Oz Cobb is a pieace of trash but we still like him and finds him fascinating to watch much like Joker,Tony Soprano,Hannibal but do you ever thought why do we find so much charismatic likable even though he's a bad person.And another thing before Oz Cobb i never find Farrell charming fascinating to watch.

3 particular things i thought that could be one of the reason.

1)Expressiveness:-All the actors above are highly expressive they emote to almost everything but its never overboard expressions RDJ,Dinklage does that and that also makes them a great actor instead of being stiff with same expression like Keanu,Segall.

2)Words:-What they say how humourus they are. How much silver tongued smooth talker they are as characters but they also seem the same way in interviews especially Nicholson,Hopkins.

3)Look:-How people look plays a big part example replace Cillian's Shelby with Michael Cera and all of sudden there's no intimidation anymore even though both are same height 1.75 m.why do you think Richard Ramirez had so many female fans but not John Wayne Gracy.Some actors just have that IT factor that is hard to pin point but its not being good looking otherwise every model would have been a charmer instead they came across as lifeless walking hangers.

So in the deepfake vid i replace Farrell Cobb's face with that extra from MyHusband'sRightOutside and he still has same mannerisms expressions as Farrell's Cobb so that could not be the reason then he has same monologue word for word as well so not that either the only thing that's changed is his face and he lost all his charm.hat do you think do you feel the same as me.

Do you find Cobb less charming as well?Let me know thoughts.

https://reddit.com/link/1i9ipsv/video/c5y0ojnoq3fe1/player

So I’ve been rewatching some Batman movies. The Batman (2022) is my favourite. But I came across this scene and it bugs me a little bit.

You know, Oz was at a shootout, he causes GREAT damage on a car chase, but ultimatly both Gordon and Batman decide to leave him handcuffed and free. Why?

Now, here’s what I always thought happened: first, there was no concrete proof Oz did anything, so they might not be able to prosecute him. Second, Oz is a known guy on the GCPD, so he would probably just me set free instantly with a pat on the back by the corrupt cops and the blame would be tossed to Batman. So it would have been a waste of time. Because of that, both Gordon and Batman decided to make him pay a little bit in the way they could make him pay.

Am I wrong? Am I right? Do any of you have any other explanation? Just to make sure. Still love the movie, I’m just bugged over this simple detail and the fact that it isn’t really brought up ever again in the film. Though there were more serious situations going on, like the Serial Killer, Wayne Tower exploding, the constant uncertainty over Batman and of he’s a good guy ir a bad guy. Could have just been shown offscreen. And maybe Oz made his way to hide the situation. What do you guys think?

After the way the penguin ended two face would be a good character to introduce the D.A from the Batman got killed by riddler so Gotham has no D.A as of now one thing about Harvey dent is he always targeted organized crime especially the top kingpin at the moment which is penguin I can see Harvey going to war against penguins organization as D.A then when he turns to two face down the line then it will be a brutal war between two face and penguin then Batman will really have to step in and stop this gang war.🪙🐧

Reeves has said in Part 2 it will be harder for Batman to tell if he should defeat the bad guy. To me that sounds like we will have more gray/heroic villain this time around.

My mind goes to Anarky. Like Riddler he hates the status quo, but instead of serial killing and domestic terrorism his crimes will be motivated towards creating a self-sufficient community of Gothamites, severing ties from the often corrupt powers that be. His actions might still be violent, but more defensive and geared around getting people needed supplies and taking out specific threats, possibly like Cobb and the people aiding him.

First, I just wanna say I’m fully aware that the Wayne murders were meant to be ambiguous and that they have no intention of revealing who did it but just for fun I wanna see everyone’s speculation.

For me, after seeing how he was in the Penguin show, I really think it was Falcone. Considering he admitted his own daughter to Arkham to save his own ass, it makes perfect sense that he would have Thomas killed to prevent him from turning him over to the police. Also I rewatched the scene from the movie where he and Bruce talked and I feel like there were hints there too. Like I thought it was odd how Falcone seemed to know and remember everything about that time period but conveniently had no idea who murdered his own friend who he has “history” with. Plus when he mentioned how the reporter was on Maroni’s payroll, the way he said that sounded like he just came up with it on the spot to me.

What do you guys think?