Background

President John Quincy Adams's second term has witnessed unprecedented political realignment and transformation of the American party system. The once-dominant Democratic-Republican Party has formally split into two distinct factions: the National Republicans, led by Adams and supporting a strong federal government, internal improvements, and protective tariffs; and the Democratic Party, led by Andrew Jackson, advocating for states' rights and limited federal power. Meanwhile, the Federalist Party, already in decline since the War of 1813, has completely dissolved, with its remaining members largely absorbed into the National Republican faction. Adams's ambitious domestic agenda, known as the "American System Plus," has achieved mixed results. His administration has overseen the completion of several major infrastructure projects, including expansions of the National Road and numerous canal systems. The controversial Tariff of 1828, dubbed the "Tariff of Abominations" by its southern opponents, has protected northern manufacturing but intensified sectional tensions. The President's push for federal support of scientific research and educational institutions has met with limited success, though it has established important precedents for future federal involvement in these areas. Following the tradition established by Washington and reinforced by Clinton, President Adams has announced he will not seek a third term, despite encouragement from his National Republican allies. His decision has sparked an intense nomination contest within the party. This decision has set the stage for a vigorous nomination contest within the Democratic Party. Former Tennessee Senator Andrew Jackson has emerged as the party's presidential nominee, prevailing over a distinguished field of candidates including former Secretary of War John C. Calhoun, former Secretary of State William H. Crawford, and Speaker of the House Andrew Stevenson. Jackson's populist message and military reputation have resonated strongly with party delegates and the general public. The Democratic vice-presidential nomination has drawn significant attention, with four prominent candidates vying for the position. Former Secretary of War John C. Calhoun brings his extensive executive experience and strong support from southern states. New York Senator Martin Van Buren offers his masterful political organization skills and influence in the crucial northern state. Former Speaker of the House Philip P. Barbour represents Virginia's political establishment and brings legislative expertise. Kentucky Senator Richard Mentor Johnson emphasizes his western appeal and military service in the War of 1813, where he gained fame for his battlefield accomplishments. The upcoming election represents a critical juncture in American political history. The Democratic Party, under Jackson's leadership, seeks to implement a new vision of popular democracy and limited federal government, while facing strong opposition from the National Republicans. The selection of a vice-presidential nominee will be crucial in building a coalition capable of securing victory and implementing the party's agenda for reform and populist governance.

Presidential Nominee

Former Senator Andrew Jackson of Tennessee

Former Tennessee Senator Andrew Jackson emerged as the populist champion of the common man, building on his military heroism and opposition to the established political elite. His platform centered on dismantling what he viewed as corrupt privileged institutions, particularly the Second Bank of the United States. Jackson advocated for strict constructionist interpretations of the Constitution, expanded suffrage for white males, and aggressive western expansion through Indian removal. He opposed protective tariffs and federal funding for internal improvements, believing such matters should be left to the states. Jackson's democratic vision emphasized direct popular sovereignty and reducing the influence of wealthy eastern establishments.

Former Senator Andrew Jackson of Tennessee

Candidates

Former Secretary of War John C. Calhoun of South Carolina

Former Secretary of War John C. Calhoun positioned himself as a defender of states' rights and southern interests. His platform emphasized strict limits on federal power, opposition to protective tariffs, and defense of slavery as a positive good. Calhoun advocated for concurrent majority principles, arguing that minority interests (particularly those of the South) deserved protection from majority rule. He supported limited federal involvement in internal improvements while emphasizing state sovereignty. On economic issues, Calhoun opposed the National Bank and favored free trade policies beneficial to southern agricultural interests.

Former Secretary of War John C. Calhoun of South Carolina

Senator Martin Van Buren of New York

New York Senator Martin Van Buren emerged as a master political strategist who championed states' rights while maintaining a careful balance on sectional issues. He advocated for limited federal power, opposing protective tariffs and federally-funded internal improvements as unconstitutional. Van Buren supported a strict construction of the Constitution and sought to dismantle the Bank of the United States. His economic policies emphasized hard money, state banking reform, and minimal federal intervention in commerce. On social issues, Van Buren carefully avoided antagonizing either Northern or Southern interests, supporting state sovereignty on slavery while maintaining a moderate public stance.

Senator Martin Van Buren of New York

Former Speaker of the House Philip P. Barbour of Virginia

Former Speaker Philip P. Barbour represented the traditional Jeffersonian philosophy of strict constructionism and states' rights. He vigorously opposed protective tariffs as unconstitutional and harmful to agricultural interests, particularly those of his native Virginia. Barbour consistently fought against federal funding for internal improvements and argued for a limited interpretation of federal power under the Constitution. He strongly opposed the National Bank as an unconstitutional expansion of federal authority and advocated for state-based banking systems. On territorial issues, Barbour defended states' rights regarding slavery and opposed any federal interference with the institution.

Former Speaker of the House Philip P. Barbour of Virginia

Senator Richard Mentor Johnson of Kentucky

Kentucky Senator Richard Mentor Johnson balanced Western populism with moderate nationalism. As a war hero from the Battle of the Thames, he emphasized military preparedness and territorial defense. Johnson supported selective internal improvements, particularly those benefiting western expansion and development. On economic issues, he favored a middle ground on tariffs and supported a regulated banking system that would serve both agricultural and commercial interests. Johnson advocated for debtor relief and opposed imprisonment for debt. He distinguished himself through his support for religious freedom and public education, while maintaining a moderate position on expansion that acknowledged both settler and Native American interests.

Senator Richard Mentor Johnson of Kentucky

View Poll

Background

President John Quincy Adams's second term has witnessed unprecedented political realignment and transformation of the American party system. The once-dominant Democratic-Republican Party has formally split into two distinct factions: the National Republicans, led by Adams and supporting a strong federal government, internal improvements, and protective tariffs; and the Democratic Party, led by Andrew Jackson, advocating for states' rights and limited federal power. Meanwhile, the Federalist Party, already in decline since the War of 1813, has completely dissolved, with its remaining members largely absorbed into the National Republican faction. Adams's ambitious domestic agenda, known as the "American System Plus," has achieved mixed results. His administration has overseen the completion of several major infrastructure projects, including expansions of the National Road and numerous canal systems. The controversial Tariff of 1828, dubbed the "Tariff of Abominations" by its southern opponents, has protected northern manufacturing but intensified sectional tensions. The President's push for federal support of scientific research and educational institutions has met with limited success, though it has established important precedents for future federal involvement in these areas. Following the tradition established by Washington and reinforced by Clinton, President Adams has announced he will not seek a third term, despite encouragement from his National Republican allies. His decision has sparked an intense nomination contest within the party. This decision has set the stage for a vigorous nomination contest within the National Republican Party. Secretary of the Treasury Richard Rush has emerged victorious in securing the party's presidential nomination, prevailing over a distinguished field of candidates including Attorney General and former Vice President William Wirt, former Speaker of the House John W. Taylor, Associate Justice Smith Thompson, and Pennsylvania Representative John Sergeant. The race for the National Republican vice-presidential nomination has drawn significant attention, with five prominent candidates vying for the position. Attorney General and former Vice President William Wirt brings his extensive legal expertise and executive experience to the contest. Massachusetts Representative Benjamin Williams Crowninshield offers strong ties to New England's maritime interests and commercial sector. Secretary of State James Barbour represents Virginia's political establishment and brings diplomatic experience. Secretary of War Samuel L. Southard emphasizes his military administrative capabilities and New Jersey connections, while Secretary of the Navy Peter Buell Porter highlights his experience in naval affairs and strong support base in New York. The upcoming election represents a critical juncture in American political history. The National Republicans, under Rush's leadership, seek to continue Adams's vision of active federal government and national development, while facing strong opposition from the Democratic Party. The selection of a vice-presidential nominee will be crucial in building a coalition capable of maintaining the party's hold on the presidency and implementing its ambitious agenda for national growth and development.

Presidential Nominee

Secretary of the Treasury Richard Rush of Pennsylvania

Secretary of the Treasury Richard Rush championed the American System, advocating for high protective tariffs to foster domestic manufacturing and industrial growth. Drawing from his experience in the Treasury, he supported a strong National Bank and emphasized the importance of internal improvements funded by federal revenues. Rush promoted educational initiatives and scientific advancement, while supporting a robust infrastructure development program to connect American markets. His economic policies aimed to reduce dependence on foreign goods while strengthening domestic production capabilities.

Secretary of the Treasury Richard Rush of Pennsylvania

Candidates

Attorney General William Wirt of Virginia

Attorney General William Wirt brought a moderate approach to national politics, supporting gradual modernization while maintaining traditional Republican values. He advocated for measured protective tariffs and selective federal funding for internal improvements. Wirt emphasized the importance of constitutional restraint while supporting necessary federal initiatives for national development. His platform included support for the National Bank, educational advancement, and balanced economic policies that considered both agricultural and industrial interests.

Attorney General William Wirt of Virginia

Representative Benjamin Williams Crowninshield of Massachusetts

Massachusetts Representative Benjamin Williams Crowninshield championed New England's commercial interests and embraced a nationalist economic vision. He strongly supported protective tariffs to foster domestic manufacturing and advocated for extensive federal funding of internal improvements, particularly ports and highways vital to commerce. Crowninshield favored a robust national banking system and opposed any measures that might weaken the Second Bank of the United States. On social issues, he supported gradual emancipation while emphasizing the need to maintain stability and opposed rapid westward expansion that might disturb the nation's economic balance.

Representative Benjamin Williams Crowninshield of Massachusetts

Secretary of State James Barbour of Virginia

Secretary of State James Barbour represented a moderate stance that sought to bridge sectional divisions. As a Virginian, he supported states' rights but believed in a constructive federal role in national development. Barbour advocated for moderate tariffs that would protect domestic industry without unduly burdening agricultural interests. He supported systematic internal improvements under clear constitutional authority and favored a regulated banking system. On territorial matters, Barbour promoted orderly western expansion while seeking to protect Native American rights through treaty obligations.

Secretary of State James Barbour of Virginia

Secretary of War Samuel L. Southard of New Jersey

Secretary of War Samuel L. Southard emphasized strong national defense and territorial integrity while supporting broad federal authority for internal development. He advocated for modernizing the military, expanding naval capabilities, and strengthening coastal fortifications. Southard favored protective tariffs and extensive federal funding for roads, canals, and harbors as vital to national security and economic growth. He supported the National Bank as essential to fiscal stability and promoted scientific surveys and exploration of western territories. On social issues, Southard advocated for educational initiatives and gradual, compensated emancipation.

Secretary of War Samuel L. Southard of New Jersey

Secretary of the Navy Peter Buell Porter of New York

Secretary of the Navy Peter Buell Porter combined support for federal development programs with sensitivity to local interests. Drawing on his experience in both military and commercial affairs, he advocated for expanding naval power while developing internal transportation networks. Porter supported moderate tariffs balanced between manufacturing and agricultural interests, and favored federal investment in infrastructure projects with clear interstate benefits. He promoted orderly western expansion through systematic land surveys and regulated settlement, while supporting fair treatment of Native American tribes through treaty negotiations.

Secretary of the Navy Peter Buell Porter of New York

View Poll

39th President of the United States George W. Romney

Administration:

Vice President: Howard Baker

Secretary of State: Charles Mathias

Secretary of the Treasury: C. Douglas Dillon

Secretary of Defense: Richard B. Ogilvie

Attorney General: Edward Brooke

Postmaster General: George Christopher

Secretary of the Interior: Rogers Morton

Secretary of Agriculture: Elizabeth Dole

Secretary of Commerce: Raymond P. Schafer

Secretary of Labor: Walter Reuther

Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare: Oveta Culp Hobby

Secretary of Housing & Urban Development: Charles Goodell

Secretary of Transportation: John Chafee

Ambassador to the United Nations: William Scranton

Chief of Staff: Leonard W. Hall

The Romney cabinet would be one of notable diversity, with the President making the historic decision to appoint Senator Edward Brooke of Massachusetts to serve as the first African-American Attorney General, while also appointed women to positions such as Elizabeth Dole, wife of Senator Bob Dole (R-Kansas) & Oveta Culp Hobby. Aside from Romney’s recycling of Hobby & Dillon from the Eisenhower administration, Romney would pay patronage to his coalition, appointing numerous Republicans of his branding. Along with that, Romney would bring back Secretary of Labor under the RFK administration, Walter Reuther, who had been a longtime personal ally of Romney despite being more associated with the Democrats.

The new administration would attempt to rework itself to be more open than the previous Kirk administration in hopes of refueling trust in the government, with the DoJ becoming especially hawkish upon its own departments to enforce regulations and standards.

Ed Brooke, America's first African-American Attorney General

Domestic Policy:

With withdrawal from Vietnam, Romney would give a second round of amnesty as the RFK administration had done, hoping to mend the wounds of the controversial draft.

With accusations of corruption coming out against many members of Kirk’s cabinet such as former Attorney General G. Harrold Carswell, former postmaster general James D. Martin & others who were instrumental in the administration for certain crimes such as intimidation and extortion via withholding funds to coerce policy, an area where congressional aid Hillary Rodham would make her debut in the political scene by aiding the investigation of Carswell, the scandals would trace back to the disgraced Claudius Rex, who was now being investigated by the DoJ for allegedly holding on to a money slush fund. While many would call for the former President’s trial to go on as to show that nobody was above the law, President Romney would pull the brakes on the whole thing, publicly pardoning President Kirk in an effort to get past the troublesome times.

Newspaper on President Claude Kirk following his pardon

George would begin to fold unions back into the belt of Republicans, having made use of an endorsement in the 1972 election from ally and Robert Kennedy’s Secretary of Labor, Walter Reuther, whom he has now called upon to be his Secretary of Labor, promoting pro-union policies such as the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act & upholding support for Unions in court. Romney would continue to support Great Society policies on top of that, successfully passing his own comprehensive healthcare reform plan nicknamed "RomneyCare" which some have called one of his most progressive pieces of legislation.

The appointment of Massachusetts Senator Edward Brooke to the major position of Attorney General would show the commitment from the Romney administration on supporting civil rights, as many had seen the Kirk administration’s policies as neglectful at best and segregationist at worst. Despite not supporting bussing, Romney’s admin has focused on upholding desegregation in the courts as well as housing availability for African-Americans, creating a Civil Rights Commission headed by James L. Farmer Jr., pledging action to eliminate discrimination at the state, local, and private levels. Romney’s actions would result in more hostility from the south that had once voted Goldwater in 1964 amid a shift in the parties on civil rights, with Lester Maddox getting elected Governor of Georgia in a race-baiting campaign.

The Equal Rights Amendment would continue to gain support as liberal lawmakers were able to make gains in the 1974 elections as Conservative Republicans squandered, even in spite of Phyllis Schlafley’s crusade & George W. Romney’s personal opposition towards it, however the President has remained neutral on the issue as it looks like it will pass in the near future, though his wife and U.S. Senator of Utah Lenore Romney has voiced concerns with the amendment on the senate floor in what has been described as a “weak & timid” speech.

First Lady & U.S. Senator of Utah, Lenore Romney

In order to enforce federal drug laws, President Romney would sign into law the creation of the Drug Enforcement Administration, or the DEA, to combat the growing availability of drugs.

On January 22nd, 1973, former President Lyndon B. Johnson would pass away his ranch in Texas, making Claude Kirk the last living former President.

On September 5, 1975, in Sacramento, California, Manson Family cult member Lynette “Squeaky” Fromme would unsuccessfully attempt to shoot President Romney at the State Capitol, though she would fail to chamber the round, with no shots firing. 17 days later, while in San Francisco to address the World Affairs Council, another Manson Family cult member Sara Jane Moore would fire two shots at President Romney, both missing.

Foreign Policy:

Though something many had called for, first seeing moderate success as a movement when Robert Kennedy was elected in 1968, Romney’s withdrawal from Vietnam would be described by many as lacking in steadiness, as South Vietnam fell quickly while the news broadcasted that many American soldiers were being left behind as the Romney administration attempted to work out relations with the North Vietnamese government on POW, though the images of helicopters fleeing would leave a scar on the Romney administration as people criticized the President for being weak on communism. Retired General William Westmoreland would harshly criticize the administration for abandoning South Vietnam, successfully becoming Governor of South Carolina in 1975 running on said criticisms.

War hero John McCain, known for the infamous case of being a tortured PoW in Vietnam, would be dismayed by the conduct of the war by George W. Romney, concluding that the conduct of withdrawal was a shortcoming and made the United States weaker in the world, and didn’t prioritize the troops, as it had been reported that many were left behind. Similar criticisms would come from figures such as businessman Henry Ross Perot, who has made the POW/MIA issue a focus of his.

A House Committee led by Charlie Wilson would investigate the problems with the withdrawal from Vietnam, finding that ~2,500 Americans were unaccounted for. ArchConservative Democrat Larry McDonald of Georgia, who sat on the committee, would call for Romney to resign, accusing him and the rest of the administration of having socialist sympathies.

https://preview.redd.it/a77aql6v2a8e1.jpg?width=278&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4d9354e414381940202cd048285042fa0d5af120

The policy of isolating of South Africa from American & western diplomacy would continue under Romney, believing it would be hypocritical to support an apartheid regime due to his domestic pro-civil rights focus, despite criticism from some war hawks who believed South Africa would be an imperative ally to have in the fight against communism, as President Romney and Secretary of State Charles Mathias promoted Majority rule.

While relations with China are imperfect, SoS Mathias would lead a charge to normalize relations with the People’s Republic, though refused to set any biases between the PRC & the ROC in Taiwan. In the midst of the Sino-Soviet, the Soviets have begun fearing that China may become a useful ally to the U.S. especially as India, an often Soviet aligned nation, has acquired nuclear weapons. Mathias would see only minor success in his mission before Mao Zedong died in 1976, with the Gang of Four successfully succeeding the premier in a power struggle, allowing for Mao’s wife Jiang Qing to take power over the reformers, executing figures such as Deng Xiaoping and ruining any chance of rapprochement between the PRC & the U.S. for now.

Jiang Qing, successor to Mao Zedong in the People's Republic of China

Pol Pot would be executed in Cambodia by King Norodom Sihanouk, putting an end to the major fighting in their civil war.

Though himself a strong supporter of Israel, Romney’s deference to Mathias on foreign policy would lead to putting the brakes on any blank checks to Israel, as Mathias was personally skeptical that supporting Israel would only further push the Arab world into the Soviet sphere. With the Yom Kippur war igniting, the U.S. would already put some blame onto Israel for not welcoming a compromise to their issues beforehand. Regardless, the U.S. would send aid to Israel, however, in a snub to the nation, Mathias would influence the U.S.’s vote in the United Nations to recognize Palestine.

Supreme Court:

Chief Justice: Arthur Goldberg

Associate Justice: Warren Burger

Associate Justice: William J. Brennan Jr.

Associate Justice: Potter Stewart

Associate Justice: Byron White

Associate Justice: Thurgood Marshall

Associate Justice: Frank Minis Johnson

Associate Justice: Shirley Hufstedler

Associate Justice: Archibald A. Cox

In a landmark decision, the court would rule in favor of protecting the right to having an abortion, striking down many abortion laws.

Former President Claude Kirk would express animosity towards the Supreme Court for their decision on Furman V. Georgia as the liberal court voted to rule the death penalty as a whole unconstitutional in a 7-2 decision, with only Warren Burger & Frank Minis Johnson voting in dissent.

View Poll

The 32nd quadrennial presidential election in American history took place on Tuesday, November 5, 1912. Amid a nation still reeling from the Revolutionary Uprising and the sweeping reforms brought by the Second Bill of Rights, the United States stood cold and alone. The election was more than a contest for power—it was a referendum on the soul of the United States. The struggle began from 1908, later expanding to the shadow of the assassination of George von Lengerke Meyer, and engulfed as the tumultuous political landscape of the Hamilton Fish II administration. The struggle had profoundly altered the political, social, and economic landscape, leaving scars visible in every corner of American life. With the passage of the Second Bill of Rights and its transformative reforms, the election became a battleground between competing visions of America’s future. The two dominant parties—The Homeland Party and the Visionary Party whom were sired by the old four core establishment parties after the outbreak of the war—offered starkly different platforms and worldviews to guide America through its musty waters, marking the first time in awhile where it was a straight two-party contest on the first round. Newspapers and pamphlets on both sides engaged in hyper-partisan rhetoric, fueled by a raging polarization of communities. In America’s burgeoning cities, change was palpable. Industrial hubs like Chicago, New York, and Pittsburgh were teeming with life ever after the chaos of the war, as factories bustled and immigrant populations exploded through the Meyerian "Flavor Wave". Alas, the memories of the "Winter of Harrows" and the devastating warfare that enflamed the former Revolutionary Authority remained in the minds of many, as many families were destroyed and homes turned to dust. Nativist sentiments continued to rise, fueled by economic insecurities and fears of cultural change. The election was less a contest of personalities than a referendum on the reforms’ successes and failures, the direction of post-Revolution America, and the lingering shadow of reform and restoration.

Servicemen on duty stationed in former Revolutionary-controlled Indiana to root out \"lingering revolutionary sentiment\"

The Homeland Party

The Homeland Party convention through all its candidates into hellfire, with the task of keeping their tongues in act. Alas, two made it out still able to babble. James R. Garfield, in his second time in a national ticket, positioned himself as a compromising reformer seeking to address the economic inequities that had fueled unrest, while steadfastly rejecting the revolutionary legacy. He framed his campaign as a battle to prevent the resurgence of "radical chaos," emphasizing his commitment to anti-trust laws to dismantle monopolies that he believed concentrated too much power in the hands of a few industrialists. He also championed the nationalization of essential industries, such as railroads and utilities, as a means of ensuring fair access and public control, aiming to curb the unchecked power of monopolies and restore competitive markets. At the same time, Garfield opposed any rollback of measures designed to safeguard the nation from future uprisings. He firmly supported keeping federal troops in former revolutionary territories, arguing that their presence was necessary to enforce order and ensure the protection of loyal citizens. However, he would support the weakening of the Hancockian Corps and other paramilitary groups and also sought to repeal Article 5, the controversial clause allowing temporary executive powers. He rejected calls to lift the ban on former revolutionary collaborators holding public office, warning that doing so would invite a return to instability. Garfield’s campaign struck a delicate balance between addressing the economic grievances that had fueled the revolution and maintaining a conservative stance on governance. He appealed to voters who sought reform but feared the disarray of recent years, presenting himself as a steady hand capable of guiding the nation toward progress without upheaval.

Meanwhile, the ever-fiery James K. Vardaman railed against what he called the "radical decadence" of the revolutionary period and positioned himself as the champion of traditional American values. Running his own basically disconnected campaign to entice his own base, a central pillar of Vardaman’s platform was his call for the reintroduction of strict and exclusive immigration laws. He argued that the influx of immigrants during the Meyer and Fish eras had diluted American culture and exacerbated social tensions. He proposed stringent restrictions designed to prioritize "native-born" Americans and align immigration policy with the ideals of an "American Exceptionalist" policy. In addition, Vardaman took aim at what he described as the "elitist stranglehold" of wealthy industrialists and financiers. While aligning himself with Garfield’s anti-trust stance, he framed his critique of the wealthy in terms of class betrayal, accusing the nation's elite of abandoning American workers in favor of self-enrichment. He called for significant wealth redistribution policies to empower small farmers, laborers, and the middle class, combining left-wing economic populism with right-wing nationalism. Vardaman’s speeches were marked by impassioned appeals to restore "the rightful order" of society. He sought to fuse the economic struggles of ordinary Americans with a vision of a morally Christian upright and culturally cohesive nation. Due to the separation of the Garfield and Vardaman campaigns to lure in their own respective bases, many question the cohesion of their tandem.

James R. Garfield surrounding with his family during the 5th death anniversary of his father on August 1912.

The Visionary Party

The Visionary Party’s presidential ticket for the 1912 election—headed by New York Representative Bainbridge Colby and his running mate, New Jersey Governor Louis F. Post—presented itself as the so-called torchbearer of modern progressivism. Their platform was a clarion call for the United States to embrace reform, reason, and reconciliation in the aftermath of one of the most turbulent periods in the nation’s history. Colby’s campaign was deeply rooted in the ideals of the Second Bill of Rights, which had redefined American governance in the wake of the revolution. As a fierce advocate of civil liberties, labor rights, and equitable governance, Colby positioned himself as a unifying figure in a fractured nation. He described the Visionary Party as the “party of progress and peace,” contrasting it with the Homeland Party’s campaign, which he argued represented “reactionary fears and narrow nationalism.” Central to Colby’s platform was his proposed "Good Neighbor Policy," a sweeping doctrine of domestic and international cooperation. Domestically, this policy called for the federal government to step back from heavy-handed interventions in state and local affairs, emphasizing respect for state sovereignty and community governance. Colby argued that the federal government should serve as a guiding force rather than an authoritarian overseer, stating, “We must lead with a light hand, building consensus and trust among all Americans.” He promised to end the lingering military occupation of former revolutionary territories, which he described as “a stain on our nation’s conscience,” and to reorient the military away from aggressive posturing toward defensive readiness. He warned that the Hancockian Corps and other military-affiliated groups represented a dangerous overreach of power, undermining civilian governance and constitutional norms. Colby pledged to disband such organizations and reduce the military’s influence in domestic and political affairs.

One of the most contentious issues of the campaign was the future of the Land Value Tax, a policy tied to one of the largest group of his backers. His campaign promised to “seek a cohesive and logical solution for the question of the Land Value Tax,” advocating for a nationwide commission to study its effects and propose reforms that balanced equity with practicality, yet of course purposely remaining vague to hold no certain promises. Being a member of the Georgist coalition, Post was a tireless advocate for the LVT, labor rights, supporting measures to strengthen unions and protect workers from exploitation. He shared Colby’s commitment to upholding the Second Bill of Rights, particularly its provisions related to labor organization and fair wages. Despite his self-proclaimed progressive platform, Colby faced significant scrutiny over his connections to New York’s wealthy elite. Critics, including his opponents, pointed out that his career had been shaped in the circles of industrialists and financiers who had often opposed the very reforms he now championed. These ties became a focal point of James K. Vardaman’s attacks. Vardaman accused Colby of being a “wolf in the poorman's clothing,” suggesting that his promises were hollow and that he would ultimately side with the interests of the elite. In fiery campaign speeches, Vardaman painted Colby as a hypocrite who sought to dismantle the military complex while benefiting from the support of those who profited from it.

Newspaper headlining Colby's declaration of the 19th amendment, with gave suffrage to men and women aged 18 and over.

(Write-In Votes Only)

​

"^(1)Behold! I am an anointed servant of the Lord, called forth by the voice of the Almighty, yea, even by the messenger of the heavens, who descended in glory to declare unto me His holy will.

**^(2)**Thus saith the Lord of Hosts, I have looked upon the nations and seen their strife; the proud wax fat with their riches, and the lowly are trodden underfoot.

**^(3)**Therefore, I send thee, William, son of Basil, as a prophet unto this people, to proclaim the justice of the Almighty and to prepare the way for His kingdom.

**^(4)**Cry aloud and spare not! Lift up thy voice like a trumpet, and show the nations their transgressions, and the people their sins.

**^(5)**Thus saith the Lord of Hosts, I have chosen thee, O America, land of the spirit of Kittim, as a people of covenant, a nation set apart to fulfill My divine purpose upon the earth.

**^(6)**I have established thee as a beacon of hope, and thy foundation is built upon the rock of liberty and justice, that the world may know My power and My glory.

**^(7)**For thou art My new Israel, a light unto the nations and the revival of Abraham's covenant, called to walk in righteousness and to proclaim the statutes of the Most High.

**^(8)**And it shall come to pass, if thou hearken diligently unto My voice, thou shalt be as a tree planted by the rivers of water, thy branches shall reach unto the heavens, and thy fruit shall be for the healing of the nations, repent, therefore, and return unto Me, for the time is at hand."

Divine Revelations of the Archangel 11:1-8

Declaring himself the "anointed servant of the Lord" and a prophet chosen to guide America, William Saunders Crowdy, ran as an independent candidate, leveraging his position as the leader of the Church of the Revelations. His platform blended fiery religious rhetoric with a vision of America as "God's new people of covenant," destined to lead the world spiritually and morally. Crowdy advocated for policies rooted in his belief in divine American Exceptionalism. He called for strict moral governance, the establishment of religious education nationwide, the enshrinement of America’s covenantal mission in law, and proclamation of himself as "Grand Superior of the Republic In God's Name". His campaign also emphasized economic justice, denouncing monopolies as sins against God and demanding land value taxation to redistribute wealth equitably. Crowdy would have no running mate chosen.

The National Labor and Order Party emerged as a small third-way movement, representing a peculiar fusion of labor advocacy, tax reform, military nationalism, and Christian moralism. The party was formed by a coalition of dissatisfied voters disillusioned with the two major parties' perceived failure to address critical economic and social issues. They sought a platform that combined progressive labor and tax reform with a strong emphasis on military empowerment and the preservation of traditional Christian values. Despite their ambitious goals, the party struggled to secure a high-profile candidate and, almost ironically, settled on nominating Florida Governor Sidney Johnston Catts—a staunch proponent of Christian moral reform and anti-elitist economic policies. However, Catts refused to acknowledge the nomination, leaving the party with a symbolic but unengaged figurehead. They nominated George Edwin Taylor, the Governor of Arkansas, for Vice President, whom also refused to acknowledge the nomination.

View Poll

View Poll

Previous post in the series

Ernst Thälmann of the Communist Party of Germany won the April presidential election, beating candidates such as the erstwhile Paul von Hindenburg and the ambitious Adolf Hitler. With the KPD holding a minority of seats in the Reichstag, Thälmann dissolved the Assembly and called new federal elections.

The Social Democratic Party - the largest in the Reichstag prior to the dissolution - backed Paul von Hindenburg in the presidential election, and this has caused a split in the party. Arthur Crispien has formed the Social Democratic Party of Germany-Left, which supports the KPD, albeit quietly, and opposes the centrist and right wing parties. The SPD-Left is democratic socialist and has been campaigning on a platform primarily of workers' rights.

The SPD itself has continued to associate with Brüning and the centre/right, focusing on keeping the far-right and far-left out of power. It opposes the numerous strikes encouraged by the SPD-Left and KPD and carried out by German workers, but still calls for a strengthening of workers' rights and reducing unemployment.

The National Socialist German Workers' Party was the second largest in the Reichstag, and it hopes to avoid a repeat of Hitler's disastrous performance in the presidential election. The National Socialists vow to crack down on Jews and communists, strengthen the German military, end the economic crisis, and ensure that every German can get food and work, if they are granted a mandate to form a government.

The Communist Party of Germany is attempting to continue with the surprising victory in the presidential election. It campaigns on granting power to workers (rather than the existing liberal democratic system) and increasing their pay. A Marxist-Leninist party, it supports the USSR and opposes imperialism and colonialism, but also calls for peace and wishes to avoid war in Europe.

The German Centre Party has been at the heart of Brüning's disastrous government. It is a Catholic, Christian democratic party, that believes Germany must be a Christian nation. Due to its centrist position it has been open to supporting almost any party in the Reichstag. In recent times it has been leaning towards authoritarian democracy in opposition to existing liberal democracy.

The German National People's Party is in many ways a more moderate version of the National Socialist Party. It is conservative, nationalist, anti-communist and anti-semitic, and supports either authoritarian democracy or monarchism.

Which party will you vote to get the most seats in the Reichstag?

View Poll

Hello everyone. I have not yet posted the super tuesday results of the Predict the 2028 Democratic Primaries series due to me not having the time to do so. I will resume posting tomorrow, which will be Hawaii's primary.

If you think Taylor, write it in the comments

View Poll

View Poll

View Poll

View Poll

Incumbents

President of the Senate:

John Howard, 6th Vice President of the United States (Federalist; Dixie Moderate)

Speaker:

https://preview.redd.it/udnm4pt3t18e1.png?width=898&format=png&auto=webp&s=6a67298f9f2ba56f64d73b9a127a14948c6d3d3f

Timothy Pickering, Speaker from Massachusetts since 1811(Federalist; Yankee Quid)

Pro Tempore:

12 Seats are up for election: 5 Yankee Federalists, 1 Dixie Federalist, 2 Moderate DRs, 1 Clay Republican, 3 Populist Democrats

Rufus King, Pro Tempore from New York since 1805 (Federalist; Yankee Quid)

Major Laws

• Treaty of Halifax (Improved Trade relations with Great Britain, compensation paid for damages to American shipping, and establishing a proper border out west).
• The Wolcott-Perry Edict (Established an economic zone of security along American shipping lines in the Caribbean, targeting Spanish trade ships with “checks for piracy or barbarism”).

Major Events

• Hartford Convention causing fractures in the Federalists.
• War Secretary and former President Thomas Pinckney resigns out of anger with President Burr.
• Democratic-Republicans fracturing in response to the loss of James Madison's bid for a second term.
• Steady economic improvement.
• Death of Tecumseh due to a raid coordinated by Captain (now, Major) Zachary Taylor.
• Defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte in April and May, Bourbon Monarchy restored, impressment ends.

Important Figures

Daniel Webster

https://preview.redd.it/w6pxipqat18e1.jpg?width=1303&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c80ccd84f046b5248ddb27927a87b68b46b477ff

Already a rising star in the Federalist Party, the freshman congressman from Massachusetts has been taken under the wing of fellow Massachusetts Congressman and Speaker Timothy Pickering. Webster made a name for himself during the first day of the Hartford Convention, where he spoke of limiting the embargo power of Congress, arguing against the on-and-off embargoes toward Great Britain and France during the Jay and Madison years. He has proven an economic moderate, favoring a middle-ground on tariffs and a continuance of tax policy on whiskey and landowners. In 1814, his attempts for the Federal Government to assert control over industrial development in major cities (Buffalo, Cleveland, and Boston were meant to be a new tri-city expansion akin to the Hamiltonian days), or the development of a canal going through New York were turned down by fiscal conservatives in his party, as the debt remains too high. Should Federalists retain control of the House, Daniel Webster is a hopeful replacement for the old Speaker Pickering. However, Webster would only further divide the party, as it battles within over slavery.

Henry Clay

https://preview.redd.it/f4q0sjcct18e1.jpg?width=340&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=38d11997cf0a766cce5f70a81d66bb61df6ea302

Since the election loss of James Madison in 1812, the young Henry Clay has become the trophy boy among many moderates. However, as the Democratic-Republicans began to fracture, Clay has led a small, if loud, movement of moderates that only largely differ on that of tariffs. Clay and his allies have found the current issue of tariffs, established with the Trade Act of 1809, to be a good balance of helping keep the national debt low while still keeping interstate trade prices low and economic development high. The “Clay Republicans”, also sometimes referred to as the “Madison Republicans”, are in danger of joining the “Dixie” Federalists as that fraction of their rival party begins to seriously consider states rights as a major issue; something many Democratic-Republicans take to heart anyway.

Andrew Jackson

https://preview.redd.it/856002met18e1.jpg?width=208&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=60a42556073cde223b28757edcacbfbd22d88ed6

The Senator from Tennessee and leader of the populist movement, war hero Andrew Jackson has helped lead his coalition of supporters since the loss of President James Madison in the 1812 election. His faction, with aid from Governor of Virginia Thomas Jefferson, and former State Secretary James Monroe, has already become de facto leaders of the Democratic-Republicans. His movement's support for universal white-male suffrage (not dependent on land ownership) has gained traction, even among some Federalists. So far, 5/18 States have passed suffrage laws to this degree, including: New Hampshire, Vermont, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Tennessee.

View Poll

​

The 22 star Flag, adopted March 16th 1820

John Quincy Adams first term as President has been highlighted by the National crisis following the harsh winters in the "Bitter Winter" of 1817-1818 and the famine that followed. President Adams would not take the crisis seriously at first believing the situation would repair on its on, but at the urging of his Vice President and Speaker Clinton he would give some half hearted attempts to fix the situation. The acts the President used to try and help the Western States only favored wealthy farmers as the poor ones would be left behind and continue their struggles. As a show of goodwill Adams would travel to Lexington in 1819 to give a rallying speech and announced a series of executive orders which promised to benefit the masses. The President would speak on duty, loyalty, and hard work as he would proclaim that relief is coming, but that the work will need to be a group effort and that they would emerge victorious United. The speech, however, would come off as dull and uninspiring as Adams floated too much on policy, and legalistic issues and never once position himself as the central figure to lead the way. The speech showed Adams deficiencies with public speaking as he came off as distant and overly academic.

Past the farming crisis however the President so far seen the most efficient administration so far in the nations history. The President would help craft and sign off on laws that would help to weaken the President and give more power to congress as part of his larger reform program to curb the future possibility of the tyranny that Liberals claim was exercised in the Federal Regency and Alexander Hamilton's Presidency. Highlighting this was the war powers act of 1818, The Anti-Tyranny Act of 1817, and the Federal Appointments Act of 1819(this act was sponsored by Federalists as well).

The Presidents tenure has also seen the addition of 3 new states: Illinois(admitted December 3rd, 1818), Mississippi(admitted December 10th, 1819), and Franklin(admitted March 16th, 1820) as well as it has seen the restoration of Kentucky, Tennessee and North Carolina to the Union. The scars of the civil war have begun to heal, however down in the deep south it seems almost as if it never ended with the onset of the White Terror caused by the Second Sons of Liberty which has vexed the Capital City.

The Federalist Ticket:

After the Federalist Party’s crushing defeat in the 1816 election, it seemed as though its days were numbered. However, the devastating farming crisis that gripped the nation would unexpectedly breathe new life into the party. Under the expert leadership of Timothy Pitkin and Daniel Webster, the Federalists managed a modest rebound in the 1818 elections, gaining a small but significant number of seats. This resurgence marked the beginning of a determined effort to oppose John Quincy Adams’ administration, particularly its efforts to limit executive power. The Federalists also championed economic reforms aimed at revitalizing the struggling economies of the western states, whose agricultural sectors had been decimated.

When the party convened in the summer to nominate their presidential candidate, several names were floated, but it was the youthful Daniel Webster who quickly garnered the support of most delegates. However, Webster’s momentum faltered short of a majority, and in a surprising turn, the venerable John Jay, with his long-standing reputation and stature, managed to secure enough delegates to push the convention forward. Webster, hungry for the nomination and presidency, attempted to convince Jay’s supporters to flip, but the delegates remained loyal to the elder statesman. Soon after, Timothy Pickering threw his support behind Jay, giving him a narrow majority and sealing his nomination.

Despite Jay’s experience and reputation, the delegates were acutely aware of his age—at 75, he would be unlikely to serve more than one term, perhaps two if his health allowed. Both Webster and Pitkin knew this, and they also knew the American people would soon realize it. Jay reached out to Webster with a proposal: not just the vice presidency, but a unique mentorship opportunity. The aging founding father understood his years were numbered, and he saw Webster as the future of the party—someone who could serve as vice president for eight years and, with the precedent of Nathanael Greene, potentially lead for up to twelve more as President himself. Webster, seeing the value of such an arrangement, accepted the offer.

The Jay-Webster ticket emerged as a symbol of national pride and unity, promoting the idea that America was the greatest political experiment in history and destined to lead the world. They advocated for a strong executive while taking a constructionist approach to the Constitution, interpreting laws within their original framework while resisting unnecessary changes. Even the liberal James Madison had praised their commitment to constitutional integrity. Above all, Jay and Webster saw the farming crisis as the nation’s greatest challenge and vowed to deploy all available resources to address it. They also prioritized national unity, aiming to restore South Carolina, Georgia, and Virginia to the Union by the 1824 election.

To bolster their campaign, they enlisted political heavyweights like John C. Calhoun, who returned to South Carolina to rally support in the Deep South, framing Jay as a champion of Southern interests. Meanwhile, Governor Nathanael Ray Greene, son of the legendary Nathanael Greene, toured New England, promoting John Jay as a “traditionalist” candidate committed to preserving the nation’s founding principles. The Jay-Webster ticket thus positioned itself as a formidable force, ready to confront the challenges of the time and lead America toward a brighter future.

​

Official Senatorial Portrait of John Jay

The People’s Party Ticket

Jackson’s dramatic withdrawal from the Anti-Hamiltonian faction sent a clear message to Adams and the nation: he was no longer standing by. Within days of the convention, he began setting up his campaign, leveraging his connections in Congress through Representative Davy Crockett—his protégé and right-hand man in the Civil War—and Senator Jonathan Jennings. Together, they would form the People’s Party.

Jackson’s campaign promised a war on central banking, the abuse of office to control states' rights, and a pledge to end the elite class of bankers who had run the country since its inception. But with the formation of his campaign came the critical need for a running mate. Jackson, along with Crockett and Amos Kendall, reviewed a shortlist of potential candidates: Jennings, Ohio’s Thomas Worthington, New York’s Edward Livingston, and Vice President Harrison. None fit. Jennings and Worthington were moderates, Livingston was too new to the Senate, and Harrison’s ego and profile were a poor match for Jackson’s own pride. The solution for Jackson came in the form of Governor Henry Clay of Kentucky.

Clay’s political journey had been anything but conventional. Initially a lowly attorney in Lexington after earning his JD in 1797, he gained prominence in 1802 during the case of Breckenridge vs. Platt. Where he successfully defended Sam Platt, a freed slave accused of smuggling slaves off the Breckenridge plantation from Senator John Breckenridge. Clay got the case dismissed due to insufficient evidence and earned him a reputation as a fierce lawyer. Clay would gain little personal glory however as the case would aid the abolitionist movement and later influenced Lafayette vs Virginia(which declared free states and territories had the right to seize any slaves within their borders and free them)

When war broke out, Clay remained in the Confederacy, indifferent to its cause, but became active in local politics, eventually serving on the Lexington City Council before leaving the position after just 2 years. He later supported Union occupation and emerged as a leading voice in reconstruction. Elected Governor after Kentucky's restoration, Clay aligned himself with Andrew Jackson. The war had shaped Clay’s views, leading him to see the Federal Regency, which had controlled the nation for nearly 20 years, as the primary issue behind the Civil War. He shared Jackson's belief that states’ rights should trump federal power, and his animosity toward central banking made him the perfect running mate.

Jackson and Clay have led an aggressive and fiery campaign, touring across the west and south promising to "break the elites" and restore to the people their power and liberties. Jackson believes the best way to fix the farming crisis is through the removal of tariffs and blames central banking for its causes. He also expresses support for both sharecropping and tenant farming as a means to allow the south to recover and despises the attempts to uproot the plantation economy(which also may have led to the crisis becoming region wide).

​

Official Governor Portrait of Andrew Jackson

​

The Liberal Republican Ticket:

The western caucus's attempt to oust President Adams in favor of Vice President Harrison failed. Adams narrowly carried the New York delegation, securing his re-nomination. The coup attempt seemed to spell the end for the Anti-Hamiltonian coalition. In response, Adams moved to remove Harrison from the ticket, replacing him with Secretary of State Daniel D. Tompkins.

This decision proved to be the breaking point. The western delegation erupted in fury, with physical altercations, including one between Representative Davy Crockett and Senator William Wirt. The Speaker slammed his gavel, demanding order, but his efforts went ignored. Governor Andrew Jackson, present to support Harrison's challenge to Adams, watched as the violence unfolded. It was clear his plan had failed.

In a dramatic moment, Jackson fired his pistol—unlawfully brought into the hall—forcing the room into silence. He scorned Adams, accusing him of betraying the Union by pandering to Northeastern elites and failing to resolve the Great Panic. After his tirade, Jackson turned to the Western Delegation and motioned for them to follow. With a mix of bravado and determination, he led them out, his defiance ringing louder than his pistol. The message was clear: Jackson would challenge Adams in the upcoming election.

President Adams would move to set up his campaign as one of continuation. The nation objectively has largely recovered from the civil war and the President has been hard at work to create guardrails which would hopefully prevent the actions that led to the war never be repeated again. Within just four years the New Englander has seen the most efficient administration, but Adams personally seeks no glory and has stayed away from giving himself credit on everything, often leaving it to congress or others. Unlike the Jackson and Jay campaigns, Adams has taken a much quieter approach to the election, believing it best to let others do the speaking.

​

https://preview.redd.it/k1r31cmr718e1.png?width=800&format=png&auto=webp&s=e5a6ccc7cfab8f17354ffe1a311496f512796b75

​

View Poll

How would our presidnetial primaries be different if the DNC and the RNC both had a hat with 50 slips of paper in it and each slip of paper had the name of a different state in it, and the blindfolded the person, and the blindfolded person picked 3 states at random each week, and those three states were the states for next week's primary?

More context: https://www.reddit.com/r/Presidentialpoll/comments/1hi60z1/reconstructed_america_preview_of_the_1982/

The 1982 Midterms are here and here is the Senate Election!

Current State of the Senate

It was a long road for Raúl Castro. From former Liberal to now the Senate Majority Leader and the Leader of the Republican Party in the Senate. After the retirement of Roman Hruska, Castro came out to become the Leader of the Republican Party in the Senate with the support of the Progressives and Moderates. It wasn't done with some changes to his opinions. He started as one of the most Economically Progressive Senators as the whole. The shift seems to start after he Voted Against the Civil Rights Act of 1976, which gained him praise from the Conservatives. Castro is seen as Socially Moderate, but now he seems to be more Economically Moderate than he used to be (although still towards more Progressive side). Nobody knows for sure if it's the sincere change in policy or political maneuvering, but it seem to work. Castro also supports Biden's Foreign Policy and didn't cause any trouble in this aspect. He holds large majority and his position as the Senate Majority Leader isn't in doubt, but Castro needs to not lose very much as most don't expect the Republicans to actually gain seats here.

After many years of William Proxmire as the Leader of the Liberal Party in the Senate, Thomas Eagleton, former House Minority Whip, became the Leader. Eagleton was known as the proponent of Mental Health Awareness, which wasn't that noticeable in the past, but seem to gain some steam recently. Eagleton himself had mental health problems, which nearly cost him his career in the past. On other issues he doesn't differ from other Liberals for the most part. He is Protectionist, Economically Progressive and the Dove. He may be more Moderate than Conyers in the House, but not by much. Eagleton opposed Biden's Deregulations and argues that the Peace in the war with UAR needs to come faster. However, he is quite a Moderate on Social Issues and although he Voted for the CRA of 1976 there are rumors that he did so reluctantly. Eagleton since said that he is fighting for the Progressive cause. Right now the Liberals are expected to make gains in the Senate as they don't have much to lose in this elections, but Eagleton wants substantial gains so he could pressure the President's policy.

And what could be said about Barry Goldwater Sr. that wasn't said before? He is the Leader of the Libertarian Party in the Senate since it had the seat. He was the first seat. Goldwater is a legend of the Libertarian Party and he will probably remain the Default Leader of Libertarians until he retires. Right now the goal of the Libertarian Party is simple - retain seats that you have and make some gains, if you can. It's impossible for them to gain the majority right now, but they can apply pressure on the Republicans, so they don't waste spending and make sure that the interests of the people are kept. Also, unlike Libertarians in the House, in the Senate they seem to be more Hawkish, which could be another issue they can apply pressure on.

View Poll

More context: https://www.reddit.com/r/Presidentialpoll/comments/1hi60z1/reconstructed_america_preview_of_the_1982/

The 1982 Midterms are here and here is the House Election!

Current state of the House

The Speaker of the House George H. W. Bush stayed in this position ever since becoming the Republican Leader in the House after the 1974 midterms. He oversaw the Party's success in this time. From the coalition with the Libertarians and States' Rights Party to a clear majority right now. Even with the controversial passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1976 he stays in his Leadership role. He wants to maintain his majority, so that he won't have to rely on the Libertarians for support. George Bush maintains the loyalty of his Party, which has so many different wings. From Progressives to Conservatives, Moderates and even some Prohibitionist, Bush is the man who holds them together. Although he is Moderately Conservative, he is gathered the reputation of the Dealmaker and fully supports President Biden's agenda. Now they just need to maintain the majority with the promise of continuing the Economic growth and the path towards Peace With Honor.

John Conyers is a very Progressive member of the Liberal Party and after Mo Udall stepped down, he became the Leader of the Liberal Party in the House. Not only Conyers' ascension to this position signals the shift of the Liberals in the House to much more Progressive side, Conyers also makes history as he is the first African-American House Leader of either Major Party (Libertarians not included). Conyers is an opponent of Biden's Economic Policy, arguing that he has too much of rich people's interests. He opposed the Tax Cuts, Deregulations, Healthcare Reform and the Tariff Cuts. It started some time ago, since Frank Church's Administration, but now it's apparent that the Liberal Party is the Party of Protectionism and the Republican Party is the Party of Free Market/Moderate Approach. Conyers now leads this Protectionist Party in House. With that being said, he didn't oppose the creation of National Accounting Service or the rapid building of public housing, but those were passed with bipartisan support. Conyers is Socially Progressive, which isn't surprising. He is also a Dove in Foreign Policy, not really attacking President Biden's Foreign Policy actions, but focusing that Peace needs to be achieved quicker. In the House Doves have the upper hand on the Hawks, but with Biden's Foreign Policy maybe Doves could lose influence. Overall, Conyers at least wants the Republicans to not have full on majority. However, his biggest goal is the majority for Liberals themselves.

And then there is Thomas Sowell, former Vice Presidential Nominee, now the Leader of the Libertarian Party in the House. Even though he is, like Conyers, African-American Leader of the Party in the House, in terms of policy, they are the opposites. Sowell is much more Conservative and probably more than Bush. He supports Deregulations done by Biden, but opposes policies he deems cause "too much federal interference in the Economy. And his Party mostly supports him in that. Sowell is also much more Socially Conservative than his predecessor John Hospers and this could effect the Party going forward, but for now it's not an issue. In terms of the Foreign Policy, the Libertarians as a whole remained mostly silent as there are also Hawks and Doves in the Party. Overall, the focus of the Party remains on the Economy and push for more Deregulations. Thomas Sowell knows that his Party isn't likely to win the majority, but he wants to make more gains to influence President Biden's policies.

There are other Third Parties, but the only notable one is People’s Commonwealth Party, which right now has 5 seats. In these elections though, both former Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates run for House seats. Donald Trump runs for the House seat in New York and Angela Davis runs to win the seat in California. There are others who try to win seats for this Party, but financial sutuation of the Party limits their posibilities. There is also the Prohibition Party, which has one seat in the House, but it adopts the strategy of running a fusion tciket with the Republicans to have some success, so the most success for them will likely come from there.

View Poll

View Poll

3rd round

In a massive upset, the Communist Party of Germany's Ernst Thälmann has won the presidential election by a tiny margin, gaining 50.9% of the vote to incumbent president Paul von Hindenburg's 49.1%.

Despite narrowly trailing Hindenburg in the first two rounds, higher turnout in the third round propelled Thälmann forward and onto victory in the presidential election. Originally expected to gain only around 10-15% of the vote, Thälmann quickly replaced Adolf Hitler as the primary opponent to Paul von Hindenburg before ultimately beating the old president.

Celebrations have broken out among supporters of Thälmann across Germany, although violence has also erupted, in most cases instigated by supporters of Hitler and Hindenburg. Clashed have taken place in the streets of Berlin, and demonstrations both in favor and in opposition to a full socialist revolution are being seen across the Republic.

Thälmann's KPD holds just 77 out of 577 seats in the Reichstag, and will not be able to govern except by decree. Rather than attempting to form a ruling coalition with the Social Democrats, Thälmann has condemned them as fascists and, hoping that his popularity will hold for his party in a federal election, has dissolved the Reichstag, declaring that "a clear path for Germany must be charted in the coming days."

Federal elections are expected to be held soon.

Background

President John Quincy Adams's second term has witnessed unprecedented political realignment and transformation of the American party system. The once-dominant Democratic-Republican Party has formally split into two distinct factions: the National Republicans, led by Adams and supporting a strong federal government, internal improvements, and protective tariffs; and the Democratic Party, led by Andrew Jackson, advocating for states' rights and limited federal power. Meanwhile, the Federalist Party, already in decline since the War of 1813, has completely dissolved, with its remaining members largely absorbed into the National Republican faction. Adams's ambitious domestic agenda, known as the "American System Plus," has achieved mixed results. His administration has overseen the completion of several major infrastructure projects, including expansions of the National Road and numerous canal systems. The controversial Tariff of 1828, dubbed the "Tariff of Abominations" by its southern opponents, has protected northern manufacturing but intensified sectional tensions. The President's push for federal support of scientific research and educational institutions has met with limited success, though it has established important precedents for future federal involvement in these areas. Following the tradition established by Washington and reinforced by Clinton, President Adams has announced he will not seek a third term, despite encouragement from his National Republican allies. This decision comes amid growing political tensions and sets the stage for what promises to be a transformative election. The newly formed Democratic Party's nomination contest has attracted four prominent candidates, each representing different facets of the party's emerging identity. Former Tennessee Senator Andrew Jackson, who maintains significant popular support, particularly among western and rural voters, has emerged as the frontrunner. His campaign emphasizes democratic reform, opposition to privilege, and a more limited federal government. Former Secretary of War John C. Calhoun, championing southern interests and states' rights, has built a strong base in the South, particularly among those opposed to protective tariffs. Speaker of the House Andrew Stevenson has positioned himself as a moderate capable of bridging the growing sectional divide, while former Secretary of State William H. Crawford, returning to national politics after his 1824 campaign, represents the traditional Democratic-Republican heritage with his advocacy for strict construction of the Constitution. The upcoming election represents more than a mere transfer of power; it marks the beginning of a new era in American politics. The collapse of the First Party System and the emergence of new political alignments reflect deeper changes in American society, as the nation grapples with questions of democracy, federalism, and economic development. The successor to Adams will inherit not only these political challenges but also the responsibility of governing an increasingly divided nation.

Candidates

Former Senator Andrew Jackson of Tennessee

Former Tennessee Senator Andrew Jackson emerged as the populist champion of the common man, building on his military heroism and opposition to the established political elite. His platform centered on dismantling what he viewed as corrupt privileged institutions, particularly the Second Bank of the United States. Jackson advocated for strict constructionist interpretations of the Constitution, expanded suffrage for white males, and aggressive western expansion through Indian removal. He opposed protective tariffs and federal funding for internal improvements, believing such matters should be left to the states. Jackson's democratic vision emphasized direct popular sovereignty and reducing the influence of wealthy eastern establishments.

Former Senator Andrew Jackson of Tennessee

Former Secretary of War John C. Calhoun of South Carolina

Former Secretary of War John C. Calhoun positioned himself as a defender of states' rights and southern interests. His platform emphasized strict limits on federal power, opposition to protective tariffs, and defense of slavery as a positive good. Calhoun advocated for concurrent majority principles, arguing that minority interests (particularly those of the South) deserved protection from majority rule. He supported limited federal involvement in internal improvements while emphasizing state sovereignty. On economic issues, Calhoun opposed the National Bank and favored free trade policies beneficial to southern agricultural interests.

Former Secretary of War John C. Calhoun of South Carolina

Speaker of the House Andrew Stevenson of Virginia

Speaker of the House Andrew Stevenson represented a moderate Democratic position, balancing states' rights principles with practical governance. He supported modest tariffs for revenue rather than protection, and favored limited federal funding for internal improvements where clearly constitutional. Stevenson advocated for careful reform of the banking system without complete dismantling, and supported gradual western expansion with consideration for existing treaties. His platform emphasized party unity and practical compromise between competing sectional interests.

Speaker of the House Andrew Stevenson of Virginia

Former Secretary of State William H. Crawford of Georgia

Former Secretary of State William H. Crawford maintained his traditional Democratic-Republican principles, advocating for strict construction of the Constitution and limited federal power. He opposed high protective tariffs and extensive federal internal improvements, believing such matters should be left to state discretion. Crawford supported sound banking practices while opposing both the National Bank and unregulated state banks. His platform emphasized fiscal conservatism, states' rights, and maintaining the traditional balance of federal and state authority.

Former Secretary of State William H. Crawford of Georgia

View Poll

Background

President John Quincy Adams's second term has witnessed unprecedented political realignment and transformation of the American party system. The once-dominant Democratic-Republican Party has formally split into two distinct factions: the National Republicans, led by Adams and supporting a strong federal government, internal improvements, and protective tariffs; and the Democratic Party, led by Andrew Jackson, advocating for states' rights and limited federal power. Meanwhile, the Federalist Party, already in decline since the War of 1813, has completely dissolved, with its remaining members largely absorbed into the National Republican faction. Adams's ambitious domestic agenda, known as the "American System Plus," has achieved mixed results. His administration has overseen the completion of several major infrastructure projects, including expansions of the National Road and numerous canal systems. The controversial Tariff of 1828, dubbed the "Tariff of Abominations" by its southern opponents, has protected northern manufacturing but intensified sectional tensions. The President's push for federal support of scientific research and educational institutions has met with limited success, though it has established important precedents for future federal involvement in these areas. Following the tradition established by Washington and reinforced by Clinton, President Adams has announced he will not seek a third term, despite encouragement from his National Republican allies. His decision has sparked an intense nomination contest within the party. Secretary of the Treasury Richard Rush has emerged as a leading candidate, championing the continuation of Adams's economic policies and infrastructure development programs. Former Speaker of the House John W. Taylor has positioned himself as a strong advocate for internal improvements and anti-slavery policies, particularly appealing to northern voters. Pennsylvania Representative John Sergeant has built his campaign on support for protective tariffs and banking reform, while emphasizing his ability to bridge sectional divisions. Attorney General and former Vice President William Wirt has garnered support through his advocacy for Native American rights and judicial reform, though his previous association with the Democratic-Republicans has raised some concerns among party stalwarts. Associate Justice Smith Thompson has presented himself as a moderate choice, emphasizing his judicial experience and commitment to constitutional principles while seeking to appeal to both northern and southern wings of the party. The upcoming election represents a critical moment in American political development, as the new party system takes shape amidst growing sectional tensions. The National Republican nominee will face the Democratic Party's candidate in what promises to be a heated contest over the future direction of the nation. The winner will need to address not only the ongoing debates over tariffs, internal improvements, and states' rights, but also the increasingly contentious issue of slavery's expansion into the western territories.

Candidates

Secretary of the Treasury Richard Rush of Pennsylvania

Secretary of the Treasury Richard Rush championed the American System, advocating for high protective tariffs to foster domestic manufacturing and industrial growth. Drawing from his experience in the Treasury, he supported a strong National Bank and emphasized the importance of internal improvements funded by federal revenues. Rush promoted educational initiatives and scientific advancement, while supporting a robust infrastructure development program to connect American markets. His economic policies aimed to reduce dependence on foreign goods while strengthening domestic production capabilities.

Secretary of the Treasury Richard Rush of Pennsylvania

Former Speaker of the House John W. Taylor of New York

Former Speaker John W. Taylor established himself as a strong advocate for northern interests, particularly regarding the restriction of slavery's expansion. He supported protective tariffs and internal improvements, while emphasizing the need for balanced regional development. Taylor promoted educational reform and advocated for federal support of state-level initiatives. His platform included strengthening the National Bank's oversight role and promoting industrial development while maintaining agricultural interests.

Former Speaker of the House John W. Taylor of Virginia

Representative John Sergeant of Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Representative John Sergeant, a prominent constitutional lawyer, advocated for a strong federal role in economic development while respecting state sovereignty. He strongly supported protective tariffs to benefit Pennsylvania's growing industrial sector and backed extensive internal improvements. Sergeant favored a powerful National Bank and sound monetary policies. His platform emphasized the need for balanced economic growth between agricultural and manufacturing interests, while supporting educational initiatives and infrastructure development.

Representative John Sergeant of Pennsylvania

Attorney General William Wirt of Virginia

Attorney General William Wirt brought a moderate approach to national politics, supporting gradual modernization while maintaining traditional Republican values. He advocated for measured protective tariffs and selective federal funding for internal improvements. Wirt emphasized the importance of constitutional restraint while supporting necessary federal initiatives for national development. His platform included support for the National Bank, educational advancement, and balanced economic policies that considered both agricultural and industrial interests.

Attorney General William Wirt of Virginia

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Smith Thompson of New York

Associate Justice Smith Thompson presented himself as a moderate voice, supporting careful expansion of federal power while maintaining strong state rights. He favored selective tariffs that would protect American industry without overly burdening commerce. Thompson advocated for a balanced approach to internal improvements, supporting federal projects of national importance while respecting state authority. His judicial background influenced his platform, which emphasized constitutional balance and careful consideration of federal initiatives.

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Smith Thompson of New York

View Poll

​

John Quincy Adams, 6th President of the United States

Henry Clay, 9th Vice President of the United States

Cabinet

President: John Quincy Adams (1821-1825)

Vice President: William Wirt (1821-1825)

Henry Clay (1825-1829)

Secretary of State: William H. Crawford (1821-1825)

James Barbour (1825-1829)

Secretary of the Treasury: Albert Gallatin (1821-1825)

Richard Rush (1825-1829)

Secretary of War: John C. Calhoun (1821-1825)

Samuel L. Southard (1825-1829)

Attorney General: John McLean (1821-1825)

William Wirt (1825-1829)

Secretary of the Navy: Benjamin Williams Crowninshield (1821-1823)

Samuel L. Southard (1823-1825)

Peter Buell Porter (1825-1829)

Key Events of Presidency

• November 1824: 1824 Congressional Election Results
  • National Republicans gain Senate Majority (26-22)
  • National Republicans gain House Majority (118-95)
• March 4, 1825: John Quincy Adams is inaugurated as President with Henry Clay as Vice President, marking the beginning of his second term.
• April 1825: The National Republican Party is formally established, composed of Adams supporters, Clay allies, and former Federalists.
• July 1825: President Adams negotiates a crucial trade agreement with Prussia, expanding American commerce in Europe.
• July 1825: President Adams nominates Albert Gallatin to replace Associate Justice Daniel D. Tompkins who died on June 11, 1825. Richard Rush is appointed as Secretary of the Treasury, replacing Gallatin.
• October 1825: The Erie Canal is completed, marking a significant infrastructure achievement under Adams's administration.
• January 1826: Adams proposes the creation of a national university and naval academy, though Congress rejects both proposals.
• January 1826: Congress passes the expanded American System bill, increasing tariffs and funding for internal improvements.
• March 1826: The Democratic Party forms under Andrew Jackson's leadership, splitting from the Democratic-Republicans.
• November 1826: 1826 Congressional Election Results
  • National Republicans retain Senate Majority (24-24)
  • National Republicans retain House Majority (109-104)
• February 1827: Adams signs the Scientific Progress Act, allocating federal funding for scientific research and exploration.
• April 29, 1827: Former President Rufus King, America's 4th President, dies in New York City.
• July 1827: Adams signs the Woolens Bill, increasing tariffs on imported textiles to protect domestic manufacturers.
• September 1827: The Interstate Commerce Enhancement Act passes, promoting improved transportation networks between states.
• September 1827: Construction begins on the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad with Adams's federal support.
• February 11, 1828: Former President DeWitt Clinton, America's 5th President, dies in Albany.
• May 1828: The Tariff of 1828 ("Tariff of Abominations") is passed, causing significant Southern opposition.
• May 1828: The National Education Initiative is launched, promoting public education across states.
• July 1828: Adams signs the first major immigration law regulating passenger ships and immigration quotas.
• October 1828: Adams establishes diplomatic relations with the newly independent nations of Latin America.
• October 1828: Adams completes negotiations for expanded trade treaties with European nations.
• December 1828: Adams delivers his final annual message to Congress, advocating for internal improvements.

Domestic Policy

• Implementation of comprehensive internal improvements program
• Expansion of federal support for education and scientific research
• Protective tariffs to support American industry
• National banking system enhancement
• Infrastructure development including roads, canals, and harbors
• Support for Native American rights and peaceful relations

Foreign Policy

• Strengthening diplomatic ties with European nations
• Expansion of international trade agreements
• Maintaining neutral stance in Latin American conflicts
• Promoting peaceful resolution of border disputes
• Supporting commercial maritime rights
• Developing formal diplomatic relations with new nations

View Poll

1982 Midterms are a couple of months away. Right now the Republican Party has the Government Trifecta with the Presidency, House and Senate in their control. The Liberal Party has the potential to make some gains, although the Republicans are expected to retain the majority in the Senate and at least coalition control in the House as the Liberals remain somewhat divided.

But before the midterms, let's look at Joseph R. Biden's Presidency heading into the midterms.

https://preview.redd.it/xay5zpnxhv7e1.png?width=612&format=png&auto=webp&s=233de0be533844c79483ac18ed2f8adab84b7e59

The President got a lot of stuff done in his first year in office and beyond (more on it here: https://www.reddit.com/r/Presidentialpoll/comments/1hb0f5w/bidens_presidency_year_1_reconstructed_america/). However, other actions took place in that time.

When it comes to domestic policy, he continued the policies that he pursued before, like increased investment into Nuclear Energy. He also made true on his other campaign promises like the Tax Code Reform, closing the loopholes in it, and creation of National Accounting Service as a sub department of the IRS. The Tax Reform was highly praised by Moderates and Progressives in both Republican and Liberal Party, although the most Progressive members of the Liberal Party argued that for the loopholes to be fully closed taxes should be raised. Most Conservatives and especially Libertarians felt uneasy with the Reform an dthought that it was "Too much of Federal Government interference". National Accounting Service was met with the same amount of praise and criticism, although the Liberals were more happy this time and Conservatives with Libertarians less happy.

After a lot of negotiations for the rapid building of public housing to fight rapidly growing cost living President Biden put his foot down and the Republicans passed it with some private housing options accepted. This was probably the most bipartisan policy of this administration with only Libertarians not been very supportive of it.

Overall, the Economy has recovered from the Recession and it starts to show the signs of rapid growth. Even if you couldn't say that the Economy is already booming, it sure looks much better than less than 4 years ago.

He also passed the mild Increased Investment in Police (including community policing and getting tougher on the drug trade), but he plans on going even further.

On the Foreign Policy the biggest changes is Treaty of Baghdad where the war in Syria ended and it became Independent (More on it here: https://www.reddit.com/r/Presidentialpoll/comments/1hddahm/reconstructed_america_treaty_of_baghdad/). The other big change is the start of the negotiations with the Rebels in UAR as a whole. After the front was stabilized the country became divided with the Rebels controlling West and the Government controlling East. As of now there is no major fighting going on and both sides try to come out of the negotiation with the better deal. This was huge for Biden administration as the country sees that Peace With Honor is one step closer.

Right now the Approval ratings of Biden sit at amazing 71% and it sure thing gives the Republicans great advantage.

Let's now look at the House Elections.

Current state of the House

The Speaker of the House George H. W. Bush stayed in this position ever since becoming the Republican Leader in the House after the 1974 midterms. He oversaw the Party's success in this time. From the coalition with the Libertarians and States' Rights Party to a clear majority right now. Even with the controversial passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1976 he stays in his Leadership role. He wants to maintain his majority, so that he won't have to rely on the Libertarians for support. George Bush maintains the loyalty of his Party, which has so many different wings. From Progressives to Conservatives, Moderates and even some Prohibitionist, Bush is the man who holds them together. Although he is Moderately Conservative, he is gathered the reputation of the Dealmaker and fully supports President Biden's agenda. Now they just need to maintain the majority with the promise of continuing the Economic growth and the path towards Peace With Honor.

John Conyers is a very Progressive member of the Liberal Party and after Mo Udall stepped down, he became the Leader of the Liberal Party in the House. Not only Conyers' ascension to this position signals the shift of the Liberals in the House to much more Progressive side, Conyers also makes history as he is the first African-American House Leader of either Major Party (Libertarians not included). Conyers is an opponent of Biden's Economic Policy, arguing that he has too much of rich people's interests. He opposed the Tax Cuts, Deregulations, Healthcare Reform and the Tariff Cuts. It started some time ago, since Frank Church's Administration, but now it's apparent that the Liberal Party is the Party of Protectionism and the Republican Party is the Party of Free Market/Moderate Approach. Conyers now leads this Protectionist Party in House. With that being said, he didn't oppose the creation of National Accounting Service or the rapid building of public housing, but those were passed with bipartisan support. Conyers is Socially Progressive, which isn't surprising. He is also a Dove in Foreign Policy, not really attacking President Biden's Foreign Policy actions, but focusing that Peace needs to be achieved quicker. In the House Doves have the upper hand on the Hawks, but with Biden's Foreign Policy maybe Doves could lose influence. Overall, Conyers at least wants the Republicans to not have full on majority. However, his biggest goal is the majority for Liberals themselves.

And then there is Thomas Sowell, former Vice Presidential Nominee, now the Leader of the Libertarian Party in the House. Even though he is, like Conyers, African-American Leader of the Party in the House, in terms of policy, they are the opposites. Sowell is much more Conservative and probably more than Bush. He supports Deregulations done by Biden, but opposes policies he deems cause "too much federal interference in the Economy. And his Party mostly supports him in that. Sowell is also much more Socially Conservative than his predecessor John Hospers and this could effect the Party going forward, but for now it's not an issue. In terms of the Foreign Policy, the Libertarians as a whole remained mostly silent as there are also Hawks and Doves in the Party. Overall, the focus of the Party remains on the Economy and push for more Deregulations. Thomas Sowell knows that his Party isn't likely to win the majority, but he wants to make more gains to influence President Biden's policies.

Now let's look at the Senate.

https://preview.redd.it/m4y7w4hvuv7e1.png?width=560&format=png&auto=webp&s=857835178568097f27635cbcc13307a506fe22bf

It was a long road for Raúl Castro. From former Liberal to now the Senate Majority Leader and the Leader of the Republican Party in the Senate. After the retirement of Roman Hruska, Castro came out to become the Leader of the Republican Party in the Senate with the support of the Progressives and Moderates. It wasn't done with some changes to his opinions. He started as one of the most Economically Progressive Senators as the whole. The shift seems to start after he Voted Against the Civil Rights Act of 1976, which gained him praise from the Conservatives. Castro is seen as Socially Moderate, but now he seems to be more Economically Moderate than he used to be (although still towards more Progressive side). Nobody knows for sure if it's the sincere change in policy or political maneuvering, but it seem to work. Castro also supports Biden's Foreign Policy and didn't cause any trouble in this aspect. He holds large majority and his position as the Senate Majority Leader isn't in doubt, but Castro needs to not lose very much as most don't expect the Republicans to actually gain seats here.

After many years of William Proxmire as the Leader of the Liberal Party in the Senate, Thomas Eagleton, former House Minority Whip, became the Leader. Eagleton was known as the proponent of Mental Health Awareness, which wasn't that noticeable in the past, but seem to gain some steam recently. Eagleton himself had mental health problems, which nearly cost him his career in the past. On other issues he doesn't differ from other Liberals for the most part. He is Protectionist, Economically Progressive and the Dove. He may be more Moderate than Conyers in the House, but not by much. Eagleton opposed Biden's Deregulations and argues that the Peace in the war with UAR needs to come faster. However, he is quite a Moderate on Social Issues and although he Voted for the CRA of 1976 there are rumors that he did so reluctantly. Eagleton since said that he is fighting for the Progressive cause. Right now the Liberals are expected to make gains in the Senate as they don't have much to lose in this elections, but Eagleton wants substantial gains so he could pressure the President's policy.

And what could be said about Barry Goldwater Sr. that wasn't said before? He is the Leader of the Libertarian Party in the Senate since it had the seat. He was the first seat. Goldwater is a legend of the Libertarian Party and he will probably remain the Default Leader of Libertarians until he retires. Right now the goal of the Libertarian Party is simple - retain seats that you have and make some gains, if you can. It's impossible for them to gain the majority right now, but they can apply pressure on the Republicans, so they don't waste spending and make sure that the interests of the people are kept. Also, unlike Libertarians in the House, in the Senate they seem to be more Hawkish, which could be another issue they can apply pressure on.

There are other Third Parties, but the only notable one is People’s Commonwealth Party, which right now has 5 seats. In these elections though, both former Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates run for House seats. Donald Trump runs for the House seat in New York and Angela Davis runs to win the seat in California. There are others who try to win seats for this Party, but financial sutuation of the Party limits their posibilities. There is also the Prohibition Party, which has one seat in the House, but it adopts the strategy of running a fusion tciket with the Republicans to have some success, so the most success for them will likely come from there.

Midterms Elections will come really soon (probably tomorrow), so don't miss them!

1st Round

2nd Round

After a long, tumultuous, and at times violent campaign, the third and final round of the German presidential election has arrived.

The National Socialist candidate, Adolf Hitler, was eliminated in the last round after gaining just 15% of the vote, a huge and unexpected setback.

Incumbent Paul von Hindenburg won 43% of the vote and, as in the first round, narrowly beat all the other candidates and will proceed to the final round.

Ernst Thälmann from the Communist Party gained 42%, continuing with his unexpectedly high support and coming just behind Hindenburg. Thälmann will also contest the last round.

With Adolf Hitler refusing to endorse either candidate and calling on his supporters to boycott the election, the campaign for the final round has been bitter, often dissolving into personal attacks against both candidates, with Hindenburg criticizing Thälmann's "love affair with Stalin" and Thälmann condemning Hindenburg's "incompetent social fascism."

Hindenburg comes into the election with the backing of centrist, leftist and right wing candidates, though being generally right wing himself. He hopes that his reputation will be enough to win him the election, but the aging politician faces criticism for the economic crisis he presides over and his support of Brüning's authoritarian rule by decree.

Thälmann, with the support of the far-left KPD has been campaigning on worker's rights, as well as jobs, pay, and food. He also faces criticism for the political violence and strikes carried out by the KPD and his opposition to liberal democracy.

Hindenburg vows stability, Thälmann promises change. Both have been criticized as anti-democratic. Hindenburg is perceived by some incompetent and authoritarian, while others consider Thälmann radical and too supportive of the USSR.

Who will you vote for to take the office of president of Germany in this third and final round of the 1932 election?

View Poll

After the 2016 Clinton victory, winning the Rusbelt + FL, The 2018 Midterms were interesting to say the least, it was a Red Wripple due to Republican Obstruction, and After the Massive Landslide for Clinton in 2020 due to the rally around the flag effect COVID-19 Had, and a Red Tsunami for Republicans in 2022, The Democratic Party starts off with a disadvantage. Madam President Clinton got so much done, she balanced the budget, ushered in D.C statehood, reduced child poverty by half, raised the Minimum Wage to $12 an hour in her Second Term. But Americans are unhappy, due to the Wars in the Middle East, Ukraine Conflict, Record High Inflation, They are currently 15 points behind in the National Polls and a clear underdog, but which candidate shall take their place as 24 Nominee? It seems clear that it will be a massive landslide for Republicans (like the Tories defeat in UK), but will Democrats be able to turn it around?

VOTE: https://strawpoll.com/2ayLQR2kBn4

The next contests in the 2028 Democratic Primary will be Super Tuesday, with over 500 delegates at stake.

If a candidate fails to receive over 5% of the vote in a primary, they will be eliminated. 1,975 delegates are needed to win. If a candidate fails to reach this, then the superdelegates will need to vote and the nominee will be decided by that.

Tomorrow will be Hawaii, where 22 delegates are at stake

PLEASE REMEMBER: - WHEN VOTING, BASE IT OFF OF YOUR PREDICTION, NOT YOUR PERSONAL PREFERENCE

SOUTH CAROLINA PRIMARY RESULTS

ANDY BESHEAR (49.15%) - 27 delegates

GRETCHEN WHITMER (18.64%) - 10 delegates

GAVIN NEWSOM (11.86%) - 7 delegates

JOSH SHAPIRO (11.02%) - 6 delegates

PETE BUTTIGIEG (9.32%) - 5 delegates

https://preview.redd.it/izpn84glrp7e1.png?width=1430&format=png&auto=webp&s=630591ecf0ac8192e3f0267a25a8d638e54c3410

Since super tuesday is such a large contest, I have decided to put it in one google form so as to not flood the subreddit with useless stuff.

https://forms.gle/MHV73vfJZQuUt9CWA

View Poll