Hi everyone,

I’m reaching out to this amazing community for help in making a real difference for dogs around the world. I’ve started a petition advocating for a mandate to prioritize rescue dogs in adoption and rehoming efforts globally. The goal is to reduce the suffering of countless dogs in shelters and on the streets by ensuring that rescue dogs are given the chance to find loving homes before breeding or sales are prioritized. If you have a kind heart, please just sign this petition and share it with other kindhearted people that care about innocent pure souls that are suffering all over the globe.

Here's the link: https://www.change.org/p/mandate-rescue-measures-for-all-dogs-worldwide

Thank you so much. PS: you'll have to confirm with the email address.

How do I confirm my age? Can it even be done without jeopardizing privacy?

I think this matters especially with the burned ballot boxes,Threats so people didnt go vote, Polls closing even though people were still in line. Its all very valid points on why there should be some sort on investigation on this.

https://www.change.org/DemandIt2024

To: The Home Secretary, Members of Parliament, and Relevant UK Authorities

We, the undersigned, call upon the UK Government to take immediate action to proscribe the activist group known as Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act 2000. This group, operating under the guise of activism, has repeatedly engaged in unlawful, disruptive, and violent actions that pose serious risks to public safety, target private businesses, institutions and Jewish charities, and undermine the rule of law. It is essential that the UK Government address these unlawful activities decisively to protect the rights and safety of individuals and businesses, uphold the rule of law, and maintain national security.

Background and Grounds for Proscription

Palestine Action has a history of carrying out direct action tactics, often involving property destruction, breaking and entering, theft and occupation of private and commercial premises. Palestine Action has resorted to actions that include:

Vandalism and Destruction of Property: Damaging and defacing private property, resulting in considerable financial losses to businesses and taxpayers.

Endangering Public Safety: Using harmful substances, causing fires, and engaging in actions that put employees, law enforcement officers, and the general public at risk.

Disregard for Legal Accountability: Regularly promoting actions that are in clear violation of UK laws, showing blatant disregard for lawful channels of protest and civil discourse.

Events of the weekend 2nd November 2024: The defacement of buildings housing British Jewish charities and vandalism and theft at the University of Manchester is intended to harass and intimidate communities and the staff who work in them.

These actions are designed not only to cause economic disruption but also to instil fear and intimidate those connected, directly or indirectly, with their target organisations and institutions. The group’s methods and objectives mirror tactics employed by extremist organizations worldwide and set a dangerous precedent for similar groups to flout the law and resort to violence.

Why Proscription is Necessary

The Terrorism Act 2000 allows the UK Government to proscribe an organisation if it meets the criteria of:

Engaging in terrorism: Palestine Action’s activities fit the definition of terrorism by attempting to influence government policy and intimidate the public through unlawful violence.

Posing a threat to public safety: Their actions have repeatedly endangered public safety, leading to escalating confrontations and disruption of lawful businesses.

Palestine Action has publicly stated it will not cease its activities until it meets its goal, irrespective of legal consequences or public safety. The UK cannot allow this to continue. Proscribing Palestine Action as a terrorist organization will give law enforcement the tools needed to act effectively, dismantle the group, and deter similar future actions.

Call to Action

We urge the Home Secretary, MPs, and relevant authorities to:

· Proscribe Palestine Action under the Terrorism Act 2000, making it a criminal offense to be a member, support, or promote the organization.

· Take immediate steps to halt any ongoing or future actions that could pose risks to public order and safety.

· Protect UK businesses and employees from intimidation, vandalism, and unlawful acts by enforcing stricter laws around direct action protests that cause harm to public safety.

Conclusion

While the right to protest is fundamental in a democratic society, Palestine Action’s tactics fall well outside the bounds of lawful activism. Allowing these actions to continue unchallenged undermines the rule of law, jeopardises public safety, and sets a dangerous precedent for other groups. We urge you to protect the rights of law-abiding citizens and businesses by proscribing Palestine Action as a terrorist organization.

Please sign this petition to show your support for proscription and to stand up for public safety, the rule of law, and peace.

Thank you for your attention to this urgent matter. Together, we can ensure a safer, law-abiding United Kingdom.

https://www.change.org/p/proscribe-palestine-action-as-a-domestic-terrorist-organization

Please sign this when you can. She’s racist.

https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/tell-susan-wittrup-to-step-down-as-fusd-board

Uncrustables are great, but there's just one tiny flaw. They don't have crust! This is why we need a version that does have crust. I know that the seam on it technically is a tiny bit of crust, but we need more crust than that! Sign the petition here: change.org/CreateCrustables

Hey,

Across Europe, more than 20 million women do not have access to abortion.

It is unacceptable that women are still dying in Poland today because of this. That women suffer financially because abortion is not free. That women are forced to travel long distances or seek unsafe alternatives because of a lack of providers.

Together we can change this. (More info: https://www.myvoice-mychoice.org/)

We need to collect 1 million signatures to change the lives of over 20 million women in the EU.

Do you live in the EU and want to help? Sign here: https://eci.ec.europa.eu/044/public/#/screen/home

Want to volunteer? We would love it if you would join us between the 16. and 28. September to collect the rest of 1 million signature to make abortion safe and accessible: https://community.myvoice-mychoice.org/

We are the team behind My Voice, My Choice - a movement of friends, activists, and organizations who joined forces to make Europe a better place for all. And we’re truly grateful for every person who takes the time to sign. <3 

Together, we can make a difference.

Current UCMJ regulations in the US military ban consensual relationships on an arbitrary rank basis which can result in separation from service of service members who are in loving, consenting relationships even outside the chain of command and across service branches. It does happen, commanders have immense latitude, anything from verbally counseling to 2 years of jail. It shouldn't be this way, this reg needs reform, and military leadership has admitted as much internally for years (details below).
Petition: https://www.change.org/liberty2love

A working group from the Army Sergeant Major’s Academy dated 18 March 2005 fully supported any measure that would allow relationships to exist between officers and enlisted personnel in today's Army. The Sergeants Major further held that the Army's interdiction of one's personal preference of intimacy is a clear violation of their human rights. Leaders must be counted on to use good judgment, experience, and discretion to draw the line between relationships that are "destructive" and those that are "constructive" (DA PAM 600-35, p. 1). This is what the Quid-pro-Quo parts of the SHARP regulation are for. There is absolutely NO reason to punish consenting couples.

The Army Lawyer periodical, Issue 2, 2020 firmly established that the current regulation as bad policy that needlessly destroyed lives and careers. Across the military, we're looking at thousands of personnel lost every year to an administrative SNAFU, increased suicide rates, decreased retention, and untold numbers of hours lost by chains of command investigating nonsense. The DOD itself has also described the policy as unethical in a paper written by Georgetown law school.

The Air Force Institute of Technology also extensively and definitively demonstrated that the current regulations are the most intrusive and draconian they’ve ever been and were implemented relatively recently to combat coercive crimes (which are covered as Quid pro Quo under SHARP regulations). They further established the tradition emerged from class distinction in feudal societies – the United States is NOT a feudal society, we are a nation based on equality and freedom. This regulation as presently written is a violation of that freedom. Lawrence vs. Texas firmly established that consensual relations are constitutionally protected.

Please sign the petition (for free) here: https://www.change.org/liberty2love

Pennsylvania is making strides in combating domestic violence with Act 55 of 2022, which mandates domestic violence education in higher education institutions. While this is a crucial step forward, it falls short by not extending these protections and educational requirements to high schools, leaving a significant gap in early intervention. We must ensure that school policies are designed to comprehensively address abuse and foster a safe environment for our younger peers.

Your voice can help change this. No matter where you live, you can make a difference by signing this petition urging state education officials to require all Pennsylvanian high schools to include domestic violence education in their curricula. Together, we can protect our next generation from the cycles of violence and inspire other US states to follow Pennsylvania's lead in making domestic violence education a priority.

Sign the petition below: https://chng.it/P8kVJnJZ7Y

on August 28, 2014, President Obama wore a tan suit (pictured) and it caused a "controversy" by his political opponents who questioned his style. it was dubbed Tanghazi. it was a slow news day that day in August 2014 and his perceived sartorial faux pas was made into a 'issue'

frankly, i thought he looked amazing in tan and wished he'd use this opportunity at this weeks DNC (democratic national convention) in Chicago (his home town) to revisit the suit.

below is a good clinic on how this 'blunder' was covered:

https://youtu.be/WrTf6CaTTc0?si=xarbGnuAF5ew8G7I