/r/netneutrality
We believe in a free, fair and open internet for everyone!
This subreddit is for discussions and links related to Net Neutrality globally.
Join our Discord here!
All constructive viewpoints of net neutrality are welcomed. Please keep conversations civil and remain respectful toward everyone at all times.
Content that reveals personal information, incites violence, threatens users, or encourages any kind of criminal activity is strictly prohibited.
All-caps titles, low-effort memes, asking for upvotes, clickbait, spam, self promotion and trolling is highly discouraged.
No misleading or editorialized titles. Do not add your own opinion/commentary to the article's title; use the article's exact title.
The moderators reserve the right to remove content or restrict a user's posting privileges at their discretion.
/r/netneutrality
Net Neutrality is about letting corporations control/throttle internet traffic. Whether you are a Democrat or republican you should want net Neutrality laws. Raise awareness of this issue before a republican FCC kills Net Neutrality because they think no one is paying attention
We've been enjoying music video from Digital Concert (Berlin Phil) last several years, but it recently became very choppy. We have 100MBP broadband service from Comcast in Seattle WA, and it has no problem receiving HD video from Amazon, Netflix, Hulu and Apple. Only Digital Concert has this issue.
Recently, I connected to the same Digital Concert account from Hawaii via Spectrum, and it has no issue at all. It means Digital Concert itself has enough infrastructure to serve. Comcast is throttling down it.
I heard that net neutrality is coming back into play. Any idea how that will affect ISPs when it comes to throttling? Like I have Hughesnets elite package. 200gigs a month of priority date then once that is reached they slow my speed down to like 1MBPS with this going back into play won’t they have to at least give me 25mbps?
The Unseen Cost of Data Throttling: The Impact of 2G Speeds on Consumers and the Case for Net Neutrality
Introduction
In an era where high-speed internet is integral to daily life, data throttling practices by carriers—particularly the practice of reducing speeds to 2G levels after a customer exhausts their data allotment—are raising significant concerns. This practice, while ostensibly a network management tool, has far-reaching implications for consumer experience, fairness, and the broader debate on net neutrality.
The Practice of Throttling to 2G Speeds
Throttling to 2G Speeds: An Overview
Data throttling refers to the intentional slowing down of internet speeds by carriers once a user reaches their data limit. For many consumers, this slowdown can mean a reduction from 4G or 5G speeds to outdated 2G levels. This practice, though not universal, is increasingly common among carriers that advertise "unlimited" data plans.
Impact on Usability
2G speeds, which range from 50 kbps to 100 kbps, are significantly slower than even the most basic 3G speeds. At these levels, internet activities such as browsing, streaming, and using applications become almost impractical. This throttling effectively turns a so-called "unlimited" plan into one with severe limitations, undermining the promise of uninterrupted data access.
Consumer Frustration
Consumers often find themselves facing excessive buffering, delayed page loads, and difficulties in using essential applications once their data allotment is used up. This reduction to 2G speeds can be particularly troublesome in emergency situations, where timely access to information and communication can be critical.
How Carriers Use Throttling as a Profit Mechanism
Profit Motive Behind Throttling
Carriers use throttling as a strategic measure to manage network congestion and encourage customers to purchase additional data packs. Once customers exceed their monthly data limits, they are often offered the option to buy additional data, such as 1GB for $5. This approach not only generates additional revenue but also subtly pressures customers into spending more.
Add-On Data Packs
By throttling speeds to 2G after the data limit is reached, carriers create a compelling incentive for users to purchase add-on data packs. This practice can be seen as a method of generating extra income from customers who are left with unusable service unless they pay more.
Regulatory and Consumer Protection Issues
Need for Regulatory Action
The practice of throttling to 2G speeds raises questions about fairness and transparency. Regulatory bodies like the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) are critical in ensuring that data throttling practices do not compromise the quality of service that consumers expect from "unlimited" plans.
The FCC could implement regulations that mandate minimum speed thresholds to prevent excessive throttling. Such regulations would ensure that even after data limits are exceeded, consumers retain a basic level of connectivity necessary for practical internet use, including emergency situations.
Consumer Protection and Transparency
Greater transparency in marketing and clearer disclosures about throttling practices are essential. Consumers should be informed about the potential speeds they might experience after exhausting their data allotments, allowing them to make better-informed decisions about their plans.
The Case for Net Neutrality
Net Neutrality Explained
Net neutrality is the principle that all internet traffic should be treated equally by internet service providers (ISPs), without discriminating against or charging differentially by user, content, website, platform, or application. It ensures that ISPs cannot prioritize certain types of traffic or charge extra fees for faster access.
Benefits of Net Neutrality
Unrestricted Access: Net neutrality guarantees that users can access any website or service without interference from their ISP. This promotes a free and open internet where content is not unfairly throttled or prioritized based on profitability.
Innovation and Competition: By preventing ISPs from creating fast lanes or charging for better service, net neutrality fosters a level playing field for new and small businesses. It encourages innovation and competition by ensuring that all services and websites have equal access to users.
Consumer Protection: With net neutrality, consumers are protected from practices such as throttling and prioritization based on financial incentives. It ensures that all users receive the quality of service they are promised without additional costs or unfair limitations.
Opposition from Carriers
Carriers often oppose net neutrality because it restricts their ability to generate additional revenue through practices like throttling and prioritizing paid content. Without net neutrality, carriers can charge for premium services, create fast lanes for content providers who pay extra, and manage traffic based on their business models, potentially at the expense of consumer choice and access.
Conclusion
The practice of throttling data speeds to 2G levels once a customer exhausts their data allotment highlights a broader issue of fairness and transparency in the telecommunications industry. This practice not only compromises the usability of data services but also serves as a revenue-generating tactic for carriers.
Regulatory intervention, such as setting minimum speed thresholds and enforcing transparency, is necessary to protect consumers. Moreover, reinstating net neutrality would ensure a fair and open internet, preventing discriminatory practices by carriers and fostering a competitive and innovative digital landscape. For the sake of consumer rights and a balanced internet ecosystem, net neutrality remains a crucial component of digital policy that should be upheld and reinforced.
Just curious and can’t find any solid answer online…Will the restored net neutrality mean that my cell provider can no longer reduce my speed on my “unlimited” data plan when a certain amount of data has been used?
If any one of you could answer these questions for my school project which will be included in my paper about net neutrality. I appreciate your time for reading and answering my questions. If you would like to be anonymous please say so and I will not mention your name.
Awareness and Understanding:
Importance and Impact:
Regulatory Perspectives:
Internet Service Provider Practices:
Economic Considerations:
Innovation and Content Diversity:
Global Perspectives:
Future Technologies:
If any one of you could answer these questions for my school project which will be included in my paper about net neutrality. I appreciate your time for reading and answering my questions. If you would like to be anonymous please say so and I will not mention your name.
Awareness and Understanding:
Importance and Impact:
Regulatory Perspectives:
Internet Service Provider Practices:
Economic Considerations:
Innovation and Content Diversity:
Global Perspectives:
Future Technologies:
The Crucial Role of Net Neutrality in Ensuring an Open Internet
The internet has become an integral part of our daily lives, revolutionizing the way we communicate, access information, and conduct business. However, the question of how it should be regulated to ensure fairness, freedom, and accessibility for all users remains a hotly debated topic. Net neutrality, the principle that all internet traffic should be treated equally without discrimination, has emerged as a fundamental concept in this ongoing discussion. In this article, we will explore the many benefits of net neutrality and why it is considered a necessary practice for maintaining an open and inclusive internet.
1. Equal Access for All
One of the core tenets of net neutrality is the idea that all online content and services should be treated equally. This means that whether you are a small startup, a non-profit organization, or a large corporation, you have the same chance to reach your audience on the internet. Net neutrality levels the playing field, promoting competition, innovation, and economic growth. It prevents ISPs from playing favorites and ensures that users can access the content and services of their choice without artificial barriers.
2. Protection for Consumers
Net neutrality safeguards consumers from unfair practices that can negatively impact their online experience. Without net neutrality, ISPs could engage in practices like throttling, where they intentionally slow down or restrict access to certain websites or services. This can lead to frustratingly slow internet speeds and a poor user experience. Net neutrality ensures that consumers get the internet service they pay for without interference or limitations.
3. Preserving Freedom of Speech
The internet has become a powerful platform for free speech and expression. Net neutrality plays a vital role in preserving this freedom by preventing ISPs from censoring or blocking content they disagree with. It ensures that the internet remains a space where diverse voices and opinions can thrive. Without net neutrality, there is a risk that ISPs could exert control over what content is accessible, stifling open discourse and the exchange of ideas.
4. Public Interest and Infrastructure
Advocates argue that the internet has evolved into critical infrastructure, similar to electricity or water. Net neutrality regulations help ensure that it serves the public's best interest, rather than purely being driven by profit motives. These regulations also encourage ISPs to invest in the expansion and improvement of broadband infrastructure to meet the growing demands of users. A well-maintained and accessible internet benefits society as a whole by facilitating education, healthcare, and economic development.
5. Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Net neutrality fosters an environment where startups and small businesses can compete on a level playing field with established corporations. Without discrimination or preferential treatment, entrepreneurs have the opportunity to create and launch innovative online services and products. This fosters a culture of entrepreneurship, driving economic growth and job creation.
Conclusion
In conclusion, net neutrality is a critical principle for ensuring that the internet remains open, accessible, and fair for everyone. It promotes competition, protects consumers, preserves freedom of speech, and serves the public interest. While there are arguments against net neutrality, including concerns about stifling ISP innovation, the benefits of a free and open internet far outweigh these potential drawbacks. Net neutrality is a practice that empowers individuals and businesses, fosters innovation, and upholds the principles of a democratic and inclusive online world.
As the internet continues to evolve, the importance of preserving net neutrality cannot be overstated. It is not just a matter of convenience but a fundamental aspect of modern society and democracy, where the flow of information and ideas should remain unrestricted and equally accessible to all. Net neutrality is, therefore, a cornerstone in the ongoing effort to create a digital world that truly serves the needs and aspirations of its users.
I recall reading somewhere that telecommunications companies will have more power later down the road. When net neutrality was trending on the internet around 2017 i read that they wouldn’t be able to immediately introduce slow lanes but the deal said that they could about 8 years or so later down the road.
Does anyone remember what im referring to and how long exactly the telecommunications companies have to wait?
I found this to be a sneaky move. It was as if they didnt want to create slow lanes while “net neutrality” was trending but were given permission to do it later.
Capitalism fails here because no other startup can catch up to companies that have such a large infrastructure. That means theres no balance and will result in price gouging. Normally when companies price gouge, people move to the next best company. but how can it balance out if no one can match the telecommunications infrastructure?
Why did Trump allow net neutrality to die? The middle class need money too! Not only the CEO’s.
Hello everyone, I am from China. In 2019, I was sentenced to three and a half years in prison for providing VPN services (to access foreign websites). The charge was "providing hacker tools". I have just been released from jail, and I want to tell you that many people in China are currently being sentenced for this. There is no freedom in China.