/r/megafaunarewilding
This subreddit is a hub for any news, information, artwork, and discussion focused on rewilding, mainly restoring populations of megafauna species and the ecosystems they are a part of, as well as overall wildlife conservation. Welcome!
lol
/r/megafaunarewilding
Hey guys, out of curiosity, was interested in what ecosystems today (and in recent history, past 1,000 years or so) support the greatest densities of megafauna on the planet. And how would this have compared to megafauna densities in the past?
I know that the mammoth steppe would have topped out at around 10,000 kg/km2, and interglacial Europe at around 13-15,000 maybe. But wouldn’t the ecosystems of modern day sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia still be able to support far more than that, just due to the all round abundance that plentiful heat, water and fertile soil creates? Potentially up to 20-30T per km2?
Modern ecosystems that come to mind is the seringetti ofc, but also the okovango delta (due to the huge numbers of elephants, hippos, buffalo and more), parts of Mozambique, Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania that are currently still protected, and the gangetic pain of India, Nepal, and Pakistan back when there were far less people.
Thanks for ur guys times, would appreciate any input.
So this week, there has been reported that there are more than 2 lynxes that were illegally introduced in winter nontheless. So how many were released?
As for my opinion on illegal rewilding, it can only be done if researched properly and done properly to the point that it is an actual legal rewilding but without the gov looking into it. For predators, illegal rewilding is complicated and has threats against ranchers. It is better for legal rewilding of predators to occur like for example Australia finally decided to reintroduce dragons, they would be put into a testing area to see the ecological effects on different ecosystems that have different biomass/fauna like what would be the ecological effects on Komodo dragons in where wallabies/wallaroos are more dominant in the environment.
However, illegal rewilding if done properly can work such as asiatic lions being illegal introduced to nature reserves near Gir national park by Indian conservationists because Gir/Modi is a bitch.
Hello! I wanted to ask opinions on "safari style" parks and reserves, so places that overall make profit off wildlife and allow for human-animal exposure. I personall y do not see in the best of lights and ideally i would go against them, however in a democratic society where compromises are sought and need to be reached they could be a good way to slowly get humans to get used to wild animals again, especilly predators. And here fits the specific case i want to discuss: https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?mid=1BR6h-xVBtjy8Ej7UHMjcozdBcAB7Iidk&usp=sharing
This is a somewhat interactive map of all the environmental (some more, some less) practices i want to implement in my region, Sicily, in Italy through my political activity and organisation.
Today the island is quite devoid of megafauna (and fauna in general), with only fallow deer, roe deer and boar recently reintroduced, while wolves, red deer, wild ass, monk seals being locally extinct (the wild donkey could be completely extinct since it isn't unclear if equus hydruntinus was a subspecies of the asiatic wild ass or a separate species), together with other animals like the eurasian eagle owl, or the otter. However the reintroduced herbivores will need (and probably already do) a predator and even if they didn't need it for the sake of conservation and habitat restoration wolves should, in my opinion, be reintroduced one day. But if already there is quite the opposition with resepect to herbivores, carnivores will face an even harsher one and a colony reintroduced with the purpose of repupulating may not come for other 50 years or more.
However here's the question, what if it was inside a park that had more a safari like vocation? Do you think that could help? That could be an easier maneuver? At least wolves could start adapting back to the local environment and with generational interchange more local consensus could be reached, meanwhile there is the "economical profit" excuse that could even help in promoting this kind of park, maybe opening two, three... five all over the island. Of course in such parks one could already reintroduce other species as well, an ecosystem with foxes, porcupines, rails, rock patridges, boars, fallow, roe and red deer and finally wild donkey and wolves could truly be something. Possibly one day bearing also smaller sized aurochs and bisons (as they were present on the island, in a smaller morphotype or subspecies).. There were also cave hyenas, lions and i am not sure about bears, but that one is really another story. Also such parks could help vultures adapting to a more wild feeding style. Today to favour their reintroduction and sustain the few remaining populations carcasses are brought to specific sites with a certain regularity where they can feed, but this is obviously different from what they would do in the wild.
So yeah i would like to hear your opinion on the matter as i have conflicting thoughts about the topic.
Also in case probably safari is not the right term? Do you have a better one?
Thankyou in advance
Winter in northern Norway is a quiet time. Most animals have either migrated away, gone into hibernation or are hiding under the ground/snow/ice, which is why there isn't a lot variety in animals.
I'm going to talk about the animals and what when and where each species can be spotted. This video was taken during November, which is the darkest and coldest time of the year and with the least variety in different species, which is why there aren't any birds in the video. I will mostly talk about the period of November-February, since that's when there is the least amount of species variation through the whole year.
Animals such as frogs, insects, spiders, snails and lizards are all hibernating, which means they are never seen during the winter. However if you were to warm up a cabin or a house, houseflies will start getting active again, but will dissapear once the it cools down again.
Fish are all alive, however they are stuck under the ice. However on rare occasions you can find leftovers of fish on the ground, as some predators do hunt fish and bring them to the surface to feed on them.
Birds are an interesting group, as most of them have migrated away once the snow started falling. However there are some that stay here during the winter.
Rock and willow ptarmigans are a common species found all over the place, with the rock ptarmigan living in open habitat and the willow ptarmigan in forested habitats. The black grouse can also be sometimes seen, however they are also a really rare sight.
Ravens, magpies and hooded crows are often found near people, but they also follow the reindeer herds looking for scavenging oppurtunities or in case they flush small mammals out of the snow.
Most golden eagles and snowy owls have migrated away, however there are some that stay behind. The eagles also follow the herds looking for scavenging oppurtunities or hunt the small animals that follow the herds. Owls on the other hand will only stay if there is little snow, as large amounts make it harder to hunt.
However if we go into towns and cities, the variety of species increases a lot. With better access to food, either by people actively feeding them or throwing food outside and the large amount of available shelters because of houses, a lot of species choose to stay through the winter instead of migrating away.
The corvids, as mentioned before use their inteligence to find food, and have no problem venturing back into the wilderness if they can't find anything.
While most sea birds leave the coast, there are some individual that choose to stay behind and live near humans, but these are mostly gulls.
A lot of different species of passerine birds also stay near humans through the winter, relying on people either feeding them or by eating anything they can find. The house sparrow is the most common sight, but great and blue tits can also be seen flying from house to house.
However the most varied group are actualy the mammals, as they don't have the same options as the other groups when it comes to hibernation or migration.
Reindeer are probably the most common sight, and can be seen everywhere, from tundras, to forests and even near people, and are the most abundant large animal living here. Moose on the other hand usualy live in the wilderness or the outskirts of humans settlements, with some individuals venturing into towns or cities to find food. Roe deer on the other hand can't survive in the wilderness and are reliant on humans for safety, and because of this are often seen near people.
Aside from reindeer, red foxes and mountain hares are the most common mammal species to see. They can also be found everywhere, however many individuals like to live near humans for safety, shelter and food, however they can do just fine in the wilderness. They are rarely seen, however their tracks can be spotted everywhere.
Many rodents and shrews are usualy hiding under the snow or inside buildings, and are rarely seen. If there is little amounts of snow, they can be seen scurrying above ground, however they will quickly hide if they sence danger. It isn't uncommon to find them dead inside cabins or in other buildings.
Stoats and least weasels are also rare to see, as they also live under the snow. Sometimes they do come above ground, meaning they leave behind tracks. They also like to live near humans because of the rodents, and are really fond of cabins or other wooden buildings that people don't use that much.
Wolverines and lynxes are also animals you will rarely see, as they have big territories and move in the darkness. They usualy avoid people, however in cases of food shortages they might come near people to hunt livestock or pets, but most of the time they try to avoid people.
Brown bears and red squirrels are usualy hibernating, however they can on rare occasions come out to eat. Squirrels usualy have food stored in various places that they go to eat, however they might also come to bird feeders to eat some food. Bears on the other hand might stay in their den through the whole winter. However on warm days they might come out, and it's usualy only if they are able to smell a carcass nearby.
Then are the last 2 species, and these ones are incredibly rare to see, those being the otter and the arctic fox. The arctic fox is criticaly endangered so seeing one is almost impossible in the winter, as they usualy only live on the tundra. The otters are also bound to a specific habitat, being rivers and lakes that have holes in them. They are rarely seen, however they do leave a unique trackway because they like to slide around.
Those were all of the species that can be seen in northern Norway (not including marine animals) in the winter, and suprising there are a decent amount. However the period of November-February is really dark and cold, so a lot of animals are usualy hard to spot. However once March comes around, northern Norway starts seeing more activety again, as the first migratory birds arrive (snow bunting), and more and more will arrive in spring, and by summer, northern Norway is filled with life again with hundreds of different species living here, only for them to all dissapear in the winter, leaving behind less than 40 species that endure the cold winter
Where are the remaining specimen of Ursus arctos syriacus mostly located ? Where is the biggest chunk of them ? Where do researchers go to study it ?
Some safe countries where it is found in are Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia, but is it actually in safe areas of Georgia ? Because Abhkasia and South Ossetia are not safe at all.
And does it actually live also in Turkey any longer ? I thought it only lived in Caucasus and Central Asia, and it was no longer in Middle East or even in Turkey.
The Imam Turki bin Abdullah Royal Nature Reserve Development Authority, in collaboration with the National Center for Wildlife, has reintroduced several endangered species into their natural habitats. The release includes 30 Arabian oryx, 10 Arabian gazelles, 50 sand gazelles and five red-necked ostriches.
The initiative is designed to restore the ecological balance within the reserve and reinforce the role of wildlife in sustaining healthy ecosystems. It also aims to increase public awareness about the importance of protecting endangered species and fostering environmental sustainability.
Link to the full article:- https://madhyamamonline.com/middle-east/uae/endangered-species-find-home-at-saudi-arabias-imam-turki-reserve-1368030
Two lynx that were illegally released in the Highlands have been captured by wildlife authorities.
The big cats were spotted on Wednesday night and wildlife conservation charities worked alongside Police Scotland to safely trap the cats and take them back into captivity.
"We plan to move them from the park to Edinburgh Zoo in the near future where our expert veterinary team will assess their health and welfare. We condemn the illegal release of these lynx in the strongest possible terms. It is very unlikely they would have survived in the wild." officials at Highland wildlife Park.
As the high severity wildfires are happening in southern Cal (Im there unfortunately), I decided to study more about wildfires and learned about High severity wildfires and low intensity wildfires. I also learned more ecology about how fauna impacts foliage. Unfortunately three things exist that would forever have high severity wildfires be the norm. One, lack of fauna existing in S Cal as well as beavers, california decided to not do prefires back in October 2024 because money even though we had to prely of pre fires because of lack of megafauna, and climate change. Looking into this I think this is the best/great time for some megafauna rewilding of species. Tule elk comes to mind as the largest herbivore native to California and would be vital to limiting wildfire. Beavers are an obvious one as them creating natural wetlands that prevent high severity wildfires. With elk being introduced into S Cal, this would promote wolves to spread further south as well.
https://www.fws.gov/story/2022-10/how-does-wildfire-impact-wildlife-and-forests
Jaguars are always on the discussion of reintroducing once extirpated wildlife into US but two small cat species that used to be in the US are no longer there. The ocelot and the jaguarundi. We should reintroduce them first to essentially test the waters back to their former range to see what will happen ecologically, but also a way to see the perception and if this action will be denied or accepted.
I know meta posts will probably be removed but c'mon that's kinda funny
We know that historically the Great Bear roamed across the Great Basin, so suitable habitat is not an issue. With about 50-60million acres (85,000 sqmi) of public land, we know that space is not an issue.
Why don’t we see anyone carrying the torch to bring Grizzly Bears back into Nevada? I hear about the North Cascades project regularly, but what about Nevada?