I was never in the camp of people who said we had concrete evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 election. But I was absolutely in the camp of "there were a lot of discrepancies that warranted an explanation and we never thoroughly looked." It is in my opinion more rediculous for people to imply that the lack of a thorough investigation supports no voter fraud than it is to suggest it supports voter fraud, but that's just me.

One of the greatest political misteps in history, in my opinion, was allowing the conversation to shift from "we see discrepancies" to "there was or was not voter fraud." As it immediately allowed the left to demonize people for "being election deniers" as opposed to forcing them to finish out any investigations. We on the right forced the issue because we foolishly hoped that if evudence existed and we found it fast enough we could perhaps get a new election, when in hindsight, that was unrealistic and sacrificed our opportunity to finalize the investigations in the first place.

So, as long as there is true representation from both sides in any investigations into election interference/fraud. I PRAY THAT THEY PULL THIS THREAD. I know that people on both sides of the aisle are likely "playing the game" and would be caught up in these investigations. Based off everything I have seen, my speculation is that specifically for federal elections (house, senate, presidency) you would see results that imply tampering goes one way a lot more often than the other. Doing these investigations is best for the country, even if some people I like are caught up in it. It is paramount to restore the public's faith in elections. IF these investigations happen, it is critical that our people supervise the process to ensure the results are accurate.

Additionally it blows my mind that the left's rallying cry is that 10 million less people voted in this election for the left, and that there are a lot of split tickets where Trump won the presidency but a Democrat won the senate seat. I acknowledge, we don't really known what is going on, we just have some ideas of what it looks like or what it could be, there's somenplausible explanations and some that don't really make sense. This is telling because it shows they have given no thought to the fact that perhaps the 2020 popular vote total was suspect, or that perhaps the 2024 elections of Democratic senators are suspect. Whether a compelling argument for this can be made or not, this hasn't even entered into their mental calculus. I really don't think they know what they are asking for.

Thoughts?

I may have laughed too hard at this