https://preview.redd.it/xoche27jynsb1.png?width=2590&format=png&auto=webp&s=2c4df6d53670a8dfc9f9c278306c207c44b02bb3

Hey everyone!

Founder and creator of a site called Politarian.com. A free website for people who like to make political predictions; letting people post who they think will win in a future election.

Complete Anonymity: Make predictions with full anonymity – your account details stay private.
Predict the Future: Dive into predicting federal and state elections for 2023-2024. Decode the paths to victory.
Public or Private: Share your predictions publicly or keep them all to yourself – it's your call.
Candidate Insights: Access comprehensive candidate info – news, endorsements, bios – everything to make sharp predictions.

Politarian is nonpartisan regarding any political party; rather focusing on transparency, holistic information, accountability, and a simple-to-use interface as to navigate the complex political landscape.

I would appreciate any feedback and look forward to seeing your predictions on Politarian.com!

Update: 1.1: Hey y’all! We just made an update to Politarian.com!! We added Social Media to the candidate profiles. Hope you guys can join us in making a primary prediction for the 2024 election :)

Update: 1.2: We have become more enlightened! I've made changes to the Map and added a counter along with a progression bar so you know the total votes. Let me know what you think!

Any other people in this sub from NYS like me? I'm looking for likeninded people to maybe talk or even hang without and potentially go plinking at some point with maybe? unfortunately most of the people i talk to about firearms around me are VERY conservative and always try to take me down a crazy rabbit hole.

I saw this hoping it wouldn't be the same as liberal gunowners.

It's definitely better, but I already see people upvoting organizations that are clearly politically biased in one direction in an extreme way.

Why in the fuck is it so hard for people to just enjoy firearms and avoid calling police "criminals" or every protester "rioter"?

Anyways, I literally just joined and hope to find more likeminded, rational, non-extremist gun owners.

Anyone have any recommendations on the best way to find non-politic handgun instruction? I’ll likely end up teaching a family member myself, but resources without the right wing political bend are hard to come by. Any thoughts or ideas are much appreciated.

Not a liberal, more of a democratic socialist really, but I decided to post whatever the fuck these guns were supposed to be.

This is a literal abomination from hell.

Looking to join an active club/group that shoots outside. Based in Seattle but happy to drive a couple hours. Drop a comment please!

Hello all!

Are there any folks in Pennsylvania know of any trans friendly gun shops in Central PA?

Thanks so much!

Several anti-drag groups including avowed Neo-Nazis, "White Lives Matter," Proud Boys, Patriot Front, and non-affiliated conservative activists protested outside a drag show today at a public park in Wadsworth, Ohio. More info at

​

https://www.yahoo.com/news/neo-nazis-chanting-sieg-heil-113410499.html

"A Portland man admitted his guilt in a mass shooting that left one protester dead and four others wounded as part of a plea deal Wednesday in Multnomah County Circuit Court.

Benjamin J. Smith entered a guilty pleas to all charges including second degree murder and, acknowledging he killed Brandy L. Knightly, who used the name June, and injured the other four demonstrators, including one who was paralyzed from the neck down, according to a court affidavit...."

More info at

https://www.wweek.com/news/courts/2023/03/08/normandale-park-killer-pleads-guilty-to-all-charges/

First off, In minnesota its a one party consent state: https://www.rcfp.org/reporters-recording-guide/minnesota/

Minn. Stat. § 626A.02(2)(d). Recordings made with at least one party’s consent and exclusively for the purpose of news reporting therefore do not violate Minnesota’s recording law. Copeland v. Hubbard Broad., Inc., 526 N.W.2d 402, 406 (Minn. Ct. App. 1995).

However, a person does not need consent to record conversations in places in which the parties do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy. See definition of “oral communication,” Minn. Stat. § 626A.01.

Half the jobs I have had in the last 3 years involved some very intense and repeated demands for sexual favors in and outside of work. So I record to protect myself.

https://www.dewittllp.com/news/2019/02/19/secretly-recording-conversations-in-the-workplace-can-you-do-that

Can an employer implement a “no-recording” policy?
In one-party consent states such as Wisconsin, employers may consider creating a company policy prohibiting secret audio or video recordings. Even though state law allows surreptitious recordings, an employer may prefer to turn its workplace into an all-party consent space by including a “no-recording policy” in its employee handbook. In recent years, courts and administrative agencies have begun deciding when “no-recording” policies are permissible—and when they might not be.

Some courts have found that no-recording policies infringe employees’ ability to engage in “protected concerted activity” under the National Labor Relations Act.2 Recent decisions on the issue include the following:

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the NLRB’s prior decision that Whole Foods’ no-recording policy was too broad, because it prohibited all recordings unless store management gave prior approval. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 691 F. App’x 49, 51 (2d Cir. 2017).
The Fifth Circuit agreed with the NLRB’s finding that that T-Mobile’s no-recording policy3 was similarly over-broad because it, “encompasse[d] any and all photography or recording on corporate premises at any time without permission from a supervisor.” T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 865 F.3d 265, 274 (5th Cir. 2017). The Court stated that, “a reasonable T-Mobile employee, aware of his legal rights, would read the language of the recording policy as plainly forbidding a means of engaging in protected activity.” Id.

​

Therefore I know I can and I do because the immense amount of lying. Plus being gaslighted by bosses or coworkers who demand attention or sexual favors at work is prolific. The state statute definition for a civil proceedings is weaker than the criminal definition for sexual harassment. In otherwords unless law enforcement or a government agency is willing to pursue charges for sexual harassment the legal definition for sexual harassment for civil litigation is very high bar. Most attorneys won't take a civil litigation for sexual harassment. My intent is to document with audio recordings how flagrant sexual harassment is in the workplace that is male dominated.

​

I am not anti-gun ownership but this guy openly brags about doing things that I know are illegal like driving a class A semi-truck without a class A CDL, and driving hazmat 55 gallon barrels about 14 pallets of this stuff in one truck with a class D license.

​

This person was training me in for a job.

He told me when he worked at fleet farm he got to buy a fire arm in his name for a relative in order to get the fleet farm discount and I asked him if he had a fire arm permit. He told me he never obtained a fire arm permit yet was allowed to purchase a fire arm at fleet farm as an employee then gave the fire arm to his brother.

Now this guy has done some grand lying, and he assumes I am an idiot. I audio record everything at work, I mean everything. I record phone conversations with the boss, I audio record job interviews.